* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download PROPAGANDA: HISTORY, TECHNIQUES AND
Racial stereotyping in advertising wikipedia , lookup
German Corpse Factory wikipedia , lookup
Propaganda in the Mexican Drug War wikipedia , lookup
RT (TV network) wikipedia , lookup
Political warfare wikipedia , lookup
Eastern Bloc media and propaganda wikipedia , lookup
Propaganda of Fascist Italy wikipedia , lookup
Propaganda in Japan during the Second Sino-Japanese War and World War II wikipedia , lookup
Cartographic propaganda wikipedia , lookup
Airborne leaflet propaganda wikipedia , lookup
Role of music in World War II wikipedia , lookup
Radio propaganda wikipedia , lookup
Architectural propaganda wikipedia , lookup
Randal Marlin wikipedia , lookup
Propaganda in Nazi Germany wikipedia , lookup
Psychological warfare wikipedia , lookup
! ! PROPAGANDA: HISTORY, TECHNIQUES AND EFFECTS Antoinette N. Lopez The University of the Incarnate Word ABSTRACT In a democratic society, the right to an opinion is invaluable. It is public opinion that shapes our nation through popular culture, politics, and morals. Propaganda is a force used to sway popular opinion in a direction beneficial to its source. It is through propaganda that selective facts are presented to spark a highly emotional, rather than rational response, the desired outcome being to change the present attitudes of a target group to support or further a specific agenda. Propaganda is usually biased and presents itself in many forms. First, this paper will explore the history of propaganda and its roots, researching the birth of opinion changing techniques and the major influence of World War II. Second, the paper will review the seven main techniques of propaganda and thirdly, the case studies used to exemplify their effects on society’s mass opinion. Keywords: public opinion, history of propaganda, seven main techniques, effects on society’s mass opinion "#$%&!'! ! !! ! ! Antoinette N. Lopez Dr. Perry Research and Writing Techniques 6300 27 February 2012 Propaganda: History, Techniques and Effects In a democratic society, the right to an opinion proves invaluable. Public opinion shapes our nation through popular culture, politics, and morals. Propaganda defines a force used to sway popular opinion in a direction beneficial to its source. In propaganda selective facts are presented to spark a highly emotional, rather than rational response, the desired outcome being to change the present attitudes of a target group to support or further a specific agenda. Propaganda presents itself in many forms and usually exhibits a biased message. First, this paper will explore the history of propaganda and its roots, researching the birth of opinion-changing philosophies and the major influences of World War II. Second, the paper will review the seven main techniques of propaganda and last, examine the case studies used to exemplify their effects on society’s mass opinion. The Journal of Advertising Research estimates that the average American perceives over 2,000 propagandistic ads everyday (3-9). This demonstrates the necessity for society to fully understand mass media’s propagandist agendas penetrating everyday life. Although the use has existed since the beginning of history, the actual term propaganda originated during the Reformation period. The Catholic Church’s, Pope Gregory XV coined the term with the establishment of his Sacred "#$%&!(! ! !! ! ! Congregation for Propagating the Faith in 1622 (Severin and Tankard 108). The congregation commissioned cardinals to spread the word and regulations of their faith, in hopes of winning back the recent followers of the Protestant faith movement. The congregation took major advantage of the recent boom in printing presses. The new invention of presses made new ideas and information easier to access than ever before. In these times, the term propaganda was considered honorable and respected by society. It was not until 1933 that Nazi Germany’s Joseph Goebbels took the term into a whole new light. Goebbels took the position as Minister of Public *+&,!$-#$+.+/0+!$#12%-! %3$4+1,&,/.!24%!4#/#-!#5!60#75! 8,27%-! Enlightenment of Propaganda. The Nazi’s pervasive use of the term secured the negative connotations that exist today (Shah 41). Germany obtained the most advanced forms of propaganda at the time, implementing regulations, policies, a goal of a Total War, and support of the extermination of millions in the Holocaust. Germany pumped its message into the veins of society using every channel of media, utilizing newspapers, posters, films, books, educational textbooks, comics, magazines, radio, and even fine art. Adolf Hitler provided two chapters of his work of Mein Kampf to the study and practice of propaganda. Hitler claimed to have experienced the importance of propaganda as a World War I infantryman "#$%&!)! ! !! ! ! exposed to the successful British propaganda (Welch 23). An argument took place stating that Germany lost the war mainly because of British propaganda efforts. This started Hitler’s obsession with the power of manipulation through propaganda in World War II. Hitler and Goebbels took over the propaganda field of study, pushing forward extensive research. These actions began the war on Nazi propaganda, causing the opposing nations to fight back with their own forms of propaganda in hopes to reduce the Nazi’s effect on society’s mass opinion. America and other opposing nations used propaganda as a soft power. Soft power in contrast to hard power, describes the use of a second option to violence or intense action in warfare. During World War II, American utilized propaganda to increase support for the war and loyalty to an Allied victory. With a vast selection of media, propagandists built hatred for the enemy and support for America's allies. American World War II propaganda urged greater public effort for war production and persuaded people to limit their rations of products in order to provide more material for the war effort. Most propaganda channels pitched and sold war bonds used as debt securities for the purpose of financing military operations in times of war. “The War Finance Committee was in charge of supervising the sale of all bonds, and the War Advertising ::;;!$-#$+.+/0+!$#12%-! 24-%+2%/,/.!8,27%-<1!-%,./!2#! $%-1=+0%!$=->4+1%!#5!?+-!@#/01! "#$%&!9! ! !! ! ! Council promoted voluntary compliance with bond buying. The work of those two organizations produced the greatest volume of advertising in U.S. history. In the name of defense of American liberty and democracy, and as safe havens for investment, the public was continually urged to buy bonds” (US War Bonds 1). In 1936, America established the Institute for Propaganda Analysis (IPA) to help educate Americans to study and recognize the techniques of propaganda. Although the institute did not last very long, its list of seven propaganda methods became a national standard and continues to carry on throughout history. The first and most commonly used technique described in the IPA list titles as name calling. This technique, used to give an idea or individual a bad reputation, hopes to sway society towards rejecting and condemning one or one’s idea without considering the evidence. In America, the label “Communist” is a very common example of the name calling technique. In the early 1950s, a !"#$%&"'$(")*#)+$#&$),-")..$#/)$ 01*#)2*3*4$.#"1553)$%6#/$#/)$ !2)"6(*4$7"16#$8&9$$*4+$#/)6"$ .1:;(&2-*4<$8/6=16#*$>*4*4*.9$ major fruit company was faced with the expulsion of their large amount of land holdings in Guatemala, in order to make room for land-less natives. The major fruit company started a chain of rumors labeling the expulsion as “Communist-related,” targeting the newly elected government that ordered the expulsion. The company went so far as to stage Communist demonstrations at the site of the press coverage. Due to the "#$%&!A! ! !! ! ! coverage of the “Communist-related” issues, the US State Department and the CIA got involved. The US government was convinced that the expulsion was a “Communist threat.” This resulted in the overthrow of the justifiably elected Guatemalan government. As said by Severin and Tankard in their book Communication Theories, “Sometimes name calling can affect the destinies of nations and millions of people”(14). The extraordinary power of labeling can bring about extraordinary outcomes, whether they are justified or not. The next technique often referred to as glittering generality, compares an idea or object with a virtuous word to gain society’s approval without studying the evidence. Glittering generality is mostly seen on food and products. Items like the cereal Lucky Charms or Wonder Bread are titled to persuade you to buy them for how “lucky” or “wonderful” they are. Some foods titled as “natural” or “light” are also considered glittering generality because of the dependence on the title to sell itself. Politics takes advantage of this technique as well, using words like trust or freedom to title a new law or campaign. Even wars are titled to gain approval. George W. Bush’s, “War on Terrorism” was attached to a powerful emotion. The simple use of words can affect a lasting impression on the public, causing predetermined judgment without rational thinking. The American nation still mourning from September 11 was vulnerable. A nation full of anger and mourning was faced with a decision too soon to rationally comprehend it. Who could possibly disagree with a battle against “terrorism?” The way something is titled can subconsciously penetrate your first impression, creating immediate judgment without consideration of its true reality. "#$%&!B! ! !! ! ! When one watches television commercials one will notice theme music backing the advertisement. This theme music is known as a technique called transfer. Music often associates a product or idea with a feeling, like a rock band playing in the background of a truck commercial. Transfer propaganda, in contrast to glittering generality, does not usually use words to associate its products with the positive. Transfer usually utilizes scenes or situations along with music to persuade an audience. The goal is to link an idea or product with an idea or situation that people admire. Sometimes manufactured personalities ?/)$2*4<$@*"6*#6&4.$&A$>)##<$8"&(')"$ #/"&15/&1#$#/)$<)*".$ are used as well. For example, General Mill’s has a line of products that have been represented by a manufactured woman who takes the title of Betty Crocker herself. In 1936, a face was given to Betty Crocker products. Originally a grandmotherly figure, Betty Crocker’s face changes drastically as she gets surprisingly younger and more attractive every few years. Betty Crocker’s products are associated with family, motherhood, home, beauty and youth to gain the targeted audience appeal. Transfer associates not only words, but lifestyles. Similar to transfer techniques the testimonial technique associates ideas or products with the admirable. In this case the admirable is a spokesperson. Magazine ads are fully adorned with the famous faces of actors, singers, models, "#$%&!C! ! !! ! ! and athletes. Testimonials are usually represented by a respected or hated person to give something a good or bad association. One should consider the “Got Milk” ads as an example, all represented by a different celebrity showcasing their famous milk mustache. The association with celebrities, leading figures, and any other being of the admired elite has proved to boost success in sales and marketing. One of the most interesting of techniques describes the method by which a source attempts to convince its target that its ideas are good because they are a part of the average society. This technique is called the plain folks approach. Often used in ads and politics, the plain folks technique steers the audience to feel associated with a person or thing. One could consider Blue Bell E-%1,0%/2!F@+3+!,/!24%! +>2!#5!GH+@I!J,11,/.K! “Homemade” Ice Cream as an example. The word homemade proves a usual word used in the plain folks approach attempting to associate itself with the idea of home. In politics one might be familiar with the term “baby kissing,” used to describe propaganda utilized by politicians through publicity. A politician can walk through a middle class neighborhood, talk to normal people, hold and kiss babies, often dressing casually. Often creating a feeling of closeness between the politician and the voters, baby kissing is a very resourceful plain folks technique in politics. The association between an authority figure and the honest acts of a humble being "#$%&!D! ! !! ! ! can have major effects on the public. It is a strong personal feeling that embodies that plain folks approach. Mostly used in movie trailers and product advertisements, card stacking is “the selection and use of facts or falsehoods, illustrations or distractions, and logical or illogical statements in order to give the best or worst possible case for an idea, program, person, or product” (Lee 95). Card stacking infamously stamps DVD covers with complementing quotes of movie critics. These quotes are often chopped to say exactly what the source wishes. One nationally respected movie critic accused a movie production company of chopping his statements in reference to Francis Ford Coppola’s new film The Rainmaker. “She went on to stress how print-media movie ads take phrases from reviews out of context. “Sometimes ad designers will even seek out a critic willing to say a certain word that they want to include in a [movie ad]” (Severin and Tankard 120). Card Stacking proves useful to politicians, usually when it comes to ads bashing the opponent. It is resourceful to a politician to showcase all the negative facts of their opponent, leaving out all possible good or positive views. Viewers must usually disregard these bashing ads, as most of them are manufactured to persuade society based on irrational impulse. When it comes to group or peer pressure, advertisers hold the expertise. The bandwagon technique pushes the “everyone is doing it” pressure upon the audience. Often used in cigarette and alcohol ads, the bandwagon technique displays a group of appealing people doing appealing things showcasing a product the advertiser wants to sell. Showing a group of beautiful women holding "#$%&!L! ! !! ! ! Virginia Slim cigarettes, a campfire barbeque with a group of attractive middle aged men drinking Miller Lite, or even a group of diverse children riding the new edition Razor scooters are all examples of bandwagon ads. Bandwagon ads create the illusion that one can connect personally with others through the represented product, convincing one to buy in order to join the crowd. In the book Age of Propaganda, Pratkanis and Aronson note, “Every time we turn on the radio or television, every time we open a book, magazine, or newspaper, someone is trying to educate us, to convince us to buy a product, to persuade us to vote for a candidate or to subscribe to some version of what is right, true, or beautiful” (5). It is up to one as a member of society to educate one’s self, not only on the techniques propagandists force upon society but on what one personally agrees with. What makes one an individual? Individuality brings a freedom to express a new idea. New ideas award society with knowledge, making society less vulnerable to persuasion. Whether in culture, politics, or morals, knowledge is power. Words: 2,607 "#$%&!'M! ! !! ! ! Works Cited "A Breif History on Propaganda." Changing Minds and Persuasion. Web. 28 Jan. 2012. <http://changingminds.org/techniques/propaganda/propaganda_history.htm>. Britt, Steuart Henderson, Stephen C. Adams and Allan S. Miller, “How Many Advertising Exposures per Day?” Journal of Advertising Research, Dec. 1972, pp.3-9. Edelstein, Alex S. Total Propaganda: From Mass Culture to Popular Culture. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997. Print. Frohardt, Mark, and Jonathan Temin. Use and Abuse of Media in Vulnerable Societies. Washington, DC: USIP, 2003. Print. Goldstein, Patrick. "Propaganda Is Hard to Prove." Los Angeles Times 13 June 2011. 31 June 2011. Web. <http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jun/13/news/sns-lat-propaganda-hard-toprove-20110613>. Lee, Alfred McClung. "The Analysis of Propaganda: A Clinical Summary." American Journal of Sociology 51.2 (1945): 126. Print. Pratkanis, Anthony, and Elliot Aronson. Age of Propaganda: The Everyday Use and Abuse of Persuasion. New York: W.H. Freeman and, 1991. Print. Rampton, Sheldon, and John C. Stauber. Trust Us, We're Experts!: How Industry Manipulates Science and Gambles with Your Future. New York: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Putnam, 2002. Print. Scott, Cord. "Written in Red, White, and Blue: A Comparison of Comic Book Propaganda from World War II and September 11." The Journal of Popular Culture 40.2 (2007): 325-43. Print. "#$%&!''! ! !! ! ! Severin, Werner J., and James W. Tankard. Communication Theories: Origins, Methods, and Uses in the Mass Media. 5th ed. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, 2000. Print. Shah, Anup. "War, Propaganda and the Media — Global Issues." Global Issues : Social, Political, Economic and Environmental Issues That Affect Us All — Global Issues. 31 Mar. 2005. Web. 29 Jan. 2012. <http://www.globalissues.org/article/157/warpropaganda-and-the-media>. Smith, Ted J., ed. Propaganda: A Pluralistic Perspective. New York: Praeger, 1989. Print. "U.S. War Bonds." United States American History. Web. 28 Feb. 2012. <http://www.u-shistory.com/pages/h1682.html> Welch, David. The Third Reich: Politics and Propaganda. London: Routledge, 1993. Print. ! "#$%&!'(! ! !!