Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Part 2 - Simplified Strategy The IWCM Process The IWCM process consists of two main parts: Part 1: An Evaluation Study ( recently completed); and Part 2: A Strategy ( this study). The IWCM Evaluation Study The study listed all utility and urban water service targets and then identified the issues relating to planning and delivery for water supply, sewerage and stormwater over the next 30 years. The IWCM Evaluation Study The study listed all utility and urban water service targets and then identified the issues relating to planning and delivery for water supply, sewerage and stormwater over the next 30 years. Determined which issues can be addressed by existing actions and capital works and whether any issues remain to be addressed. The IWCM Evaluation Study The study listed all utility and urban water service targets and then identified the issues relating to planning and delivery for water supply, sewerage and stormwater over the next 30 years. Determined which issues can be addressed by existing actions and capital works and whether any issues remain to be addressed. Recommended that a Simplified Strategy be prepared. Process Outline The Simplified Strategy The Evaluation Study has found that there are IWCM issues needing actions which are not part of the Council’s adopted “business as usual” plans and actions. A Simplified Strategy is undertaken where these outstanding issues can be addressed without the need for significant capital works within the next 10 years. Identified Issues for Council Identified Issues for Council Identified Issue Action Required Algal Blooms occurring in Kentucky Creek onstream storage leading to failure to meet the desired LOS for water quality i.e. taste and odour. Council adopted recommendations of the Uralla Water Treatment Plant (WTP) Organic Removal Strategy 2006 by Hunter Water Aust. and upgraded the dosing system at the plant as a first step to remove taste and odour compounds and toxins. Estimated Cost Timing Identified Issues for Council Identified Issue Action Required Estimated Cost Timing Algal Blooms occurring in Kentucky Creek onstream storage leading to failure to meet the desired LOS for water quality i.e. taste and odour. Council adopted recommendations of the Uralla Water Treatment Plant (WTP) Organic Removal Strategy 2006 by Hunter Water Aust. and upgraded the dosing system at the plant as a first step to remove taste and odour compounds and toxins. $2,000 2010/11 One other recommendation of the strategy to implement a detailed monitoring programme was partly implemented. Council should use the outcomes of the programme to date to assess plant performance and then review the benefits of continuing with the programme. Identified Issues for Council Identified Issue Action Required Estimated Cost Timing Inadequate information on Security of Supply for both Uralla and Bundarra. Undertake a Secure Yield Study for both water supply catchments including climate correction of demand (use demand trend tracking model). Note: A Water Sharing Plan is likely to be enacted by June 2011 and may impact on extraction rates. $29,000 2010/11 Council to adopt a watching brief on developments with the implementation of a Water Sharing Plan and respond accordingly. Identified Issues for Council Identified Issue Action Required Estimated Cost Timing No Demand Management Plan in place. Implement all six Best Practice criteria. •Prepare a Demand Management Plan. $28,000 2011/12 No Drought Management Plan in place. •Prepare a Drought Management Plan •Update Developer Charges & Pricing Identified Issues for Council Identified Issue Action Required Non-compliance with ADWG chemical and microbiological standards for water quality. Develop a risk-based Water Quality Management Plan in accordance with the ‘ADWG Framework for the Management of Drinking Water Quality’. Review current management practices for plant operation at Uralla and Bundarra for compliance with NSW Health Drinking Water Monitoring Plan. Estimated Cost Timing Identified Issues for Council Identified Issue Action Required Estimated Cost Timing Non-compliance with ADWG chemical and microbiological standards for water quality. Develop a risk-based Water Quality Management Plan in accordance with the ‘ADWG Framework for the Management of Drinking Water Quality’. Review current management practices for plant operation at Uralla and Bundarra for compliance with NSW Health Drinking Water Monitoring Plan. $17,000 2011/12 Non-compliance with NSW Health water quality sampling frequency requirements. Improve sampling techniques and reliability of transport to laboratory. Sample in accordance with the updated Guide for Submitting Water Samples to the Division of Analytical Laboratories for Analysis 2nd Edition June 2010. Identified Issues for Council Identified Issue Action Required No Asset Management Plans for Water Supply and Sewerage infrastructure. Prepare and implement robust, up-to-date Asset Management Plans for both Uralla and Bundarra Water Supply and Uralla Sewerage infrastructure. Estimated Cost Timing Identified Issues for Council Identified Issue Action Required No Asset Management Plans for Water Supply and Sewerage infrastructure. Prepare and implement robust, up-to-date Asset Management Plans for both Uralla and Bundarra Water Supply and Uralla Sewerage infrastructure. Inadequate information on condition of sewerage gravity mains. Undertake audit of asset condition for data input into Asset Management Plan. Estimated Cost Timing Identified Issues for Council Identified Issue Action Required No Asset Management Plans for Water Supply and Sewerage infrastructure. Prepare and implement robust, up-to-date Asset Management Plans for both Uralla and Bundarra Water Supply and Uralla Sewerage infrastructure. Inadequate information on condition of sewerage gravity mains. Undertake audit of asset condition for data input into Asset Management Plan. Effluent quality from STP does not fully comply with licence conditions. Undertake an audit of performance of Uralla STP and determine if stormwater infiltration is affecting effluent quality. Estimated Cost $28,000 Timing 2012/13 Identified Issues for Council Identified Issue Action Required Estimated Cost Timing High operating costs of sewerage system. Carry out an extensive investigation (including dye testing) to determine the source of stormwater infiltration into sewer age system. Carry out an energy usage audit. $8,000 2012/13 Note: additional budget provision for corrective work may be required. Identified Issues for Council Identified Issue Action Required Estimated Cost Timing Levels of unaccounted for water losses in the system appear to be high. Adopt the recommendations of the preliminary Leakage Investigation Report (June 2010) prepared under the Water Loss Management Program for Regional NSW Water Utilities. $5,000 2012/13 Identified Issues for Council Identified Issue Action Required Estimated Cost Timing Poor performance of Bundarra on-site waste treatment systems poses an ongoing potential risk to public health. Investigate options for the provision of a financially and environmentally sustainable sewerage system for Bundarra and consult with the local community. $45,000 2013/14 Identified Issues for Council Identified Issue Action Required Risks to the water service which are related to Climate Change have been identified as either high or extreme. Implement the recommended actions of the NESAC Climate Change Adaptation Action Plan 2009 for the following risks: •Reduced water supply (to be addressed by Secure Yield Study) Estimated Cost Timing Identified Issues for Council Identified Issue Action Required Risks to the water service which are related to Climate Change have been identified as either high or extreme. Implement the recommended actions of the NESAC Climate Change Adaptation Action Plan 2009 for the following risks: •Reduced water supply (to be addressed by Secure Yield Study) •Increased cracking of water supply pipes (capital mains replacement program required). Estimated Cost Timing Identified Issues for Council Identified Issue Action Required Risks to the water service which are related to Climate Change have been identified as either high or extreme. Implement the recommended actions of the NESAC Climate Change Adaptation Action Plan 2009 for the following risks: •Reduced water supply (to be addressed by Secure Yield Study) •Increased cracking of water supply pipes (capital mains replacement program required). •Increased stormwater infiltration into sewerage system (addressed above) Estimated Cost Timing Identified Issues for Council Identified Issue Action Required Estimated Cost Timing Risks to the water service which are related to Climate Change have been identified as either high or extreme. Implement the recommended actions of the NESAC Climate Change Adaptation Action Plan 2009 for the following risks: $10,000 2014/15 •Reduced water supply (to be addressed by Secure Yield Study) •Increased cracking of water supply pipes (capital mains replacement program required). •Increased stormwater infiltration into sewerage system (addressed above) •Increased risk of dam failure (regular audits by the Dams Safety Committee). Proposed staging of expenditure to implement actions Year Proposed Expenditure 2010/11 $31,000 2011/12 $45,000 2012/13 $41,000 2013/14 $45,000 2014/15 $10,000 Total $172,000