Download Pulse Intravenous Methylprednisolone as Adjunctive Treatment for

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Epidemiology wikipedia , lookup

Gene therapy of the human retina wikipedia , lookup

Infection control wikipedia , lookup

Adherence (medicine) wikipedia , lookup

Multiple sclerosis research wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Pulsed Intravenous
Methylprednisolone For Mucous
Membrane Pemphigoid (MMP): A
Pilot Randomised Clinical Trial
VPJ Saw1, JKG Dart1, C Bunce1, S
Hau1, S Rauz2, D Tole3,T Peto1
1Moorfields
Eye Hospital, 2Birmingham & Midlands Eye Unit,
3Bristol Eye Hospital
A newly developed upper
conjunctival fornix measure
used in this clinical trial
The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster
VPJ Saw was supported by an Action Medical Research Fellowship
INTRODUCTION
In actively inflamed ocular mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP), current
conventional treatment is to commence cyclophosphamide in combination with a 6 to
12 week course of tapering oral corticosteroids (1,2). Steroids act more rapidly than
cyclophosphamide.
However, with this conventional treatment ,corneal perforation and progressive
cicatrisation still occur in 10.5% and 21% of eyes respectively, and disease
control is achieved in only 26% by 6 weeks (3).
More rapid control of inflammation with the use of adjunctive pulsed IVMP could more
effectively suppress aggressive inflammation, and perhaps also delay cicatrisation.
Pulsed IVMP is used anecdotally by physicians managing ocular MMP. It is clearly
beneficial in treating optic neuritis, but its use in ocular MMP has not formally been
evaluated. The majority of treatment studies in ocular MMP are case series or cohort
studies. This is the 3rd only prospective randomised treatment trial in ocular MMP (4).
As part of this study, in 2004 we (VPJS, SH, D Carpenter ocular prosthetist at
Moorfields Eye Hospital) also designed a hand-made modified fornix depth instrument
to objectively assess progression of upper and lower conjunctival fornix cicatrisation.
Almost all previous reports on cicatrisation in MMP have been limited to assessing the
lower fornix, overlooking the upper fornix (5). In parallel with the clinical trial we
conducted a repeatability and reliability study using this instrument, and a preliminary
study establishing the normal range of upper conjunctival fornix depth; these results
are also presented here.
PURPOSE
Primary purpose: To establish the feasibility of conducting a randomised clinical trial to
evaluate the additive effect of pulsed intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) on rapidity of
control of inflammation, and control of scarring, in patients with active ocular MMP
commencing oral cyclophosphamide and oral corticosteroids.
Secondary purpose: To evaluate the use of a newly designed fornix depth instrument to
measure upper conjunctival fornix depth
METHODS
CLINICAL TRIAL: Research Ethics Committee approval was obtained and all participants had informed consent. Patients
were recruited from July 2005 through April 2008. The trial is registered on the International Standard Randomised
Controlled Trial Number Register (ISRCTN51714283). Inclusion criteria: patients with progressive conjunctival
cicatrisation, with positive direct immunofluorescence (DIF) and/or a positive indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) result.
Presence of a clinical indication to commence cyclophosphamide because of grade 3 or grade 4 ocular inflammation and/or
active inflammation uncontrolled by non-cyclophosphamide immunosuppression was a criterion for inclusion. The study
eye was the eye with the greatest conjunctival inflammation at enrolment. Where both eyes had similar inflammation, the
right eye was chosen. Recruitment: consecutive cases from Moorfields Eye Hospital (n=16), Birmingham Eye Centre (n=3)
and Bristol Eye Hospital (n=1). Intervention: adjunctive intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) 1 gram daily for 3
consecutive days. Oral cyclophosphamide 1.5-2 mg/kg/day was commenced simultaneously, and a 12 week tapering
course of oral prednisolone was commenced after the 3rd dose of IVMP. At the week 4 visit, if the conjunctival inflammation
was still grade 2 or above in each of the 4 bulbar quadrants (see Outcome Measures below), a second pulse of 3 grams
IVMP was given. Control: conventional therapy with oral cyclophosphamide 1.5 - 2mg/kg/day and a 12 week tapering
course of oral prednisolone 1mg/kg/day. In all patients, cyclophosphamide was continued for up to 1 year unless there were
adverse events. All patients were commenced on alendronic acid 70mg weekly with oral calcium and vitamin D3, and
omeprazole until the oral corticosteroid doses had reduced to <7.5mg/day. Randomisation: A randomisation list was
generated by Moorfields statisticians, using random permuted blocks of varying sizes. A masked observer graded
conjunctival inflammation at each visit and the cicatrizing conjunctivitis severity score (see below) at enrolment and the final
visit, and masked photographic grading of conjunctival inflammation at each visit was carried out in parallel (Moorfields Eye
Hospital Reading Centre:TP). Study investigators and patients were not masked.
METHODS continued
The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients achieving control of conjunctival inflammation in the study
eye at 6 weeks. Control of conjunctival inflammation was defined as bulbar conjunctival inflammation grade 1.5 or less in
all 4 quadrants, giving a total bulbar inflammation score of 6 or less. Conjunctival inflammation was graded 0 (nil), grade 1
(minimal), grade 2 (moderate), grade 3 (marked), or grade 4 (severe). Conjunctival inflammation was assessed at 2weekly intervals for months 1-3, 4-weekly for months 4 -6, then 8-weekly for months 6-12. Secondary outcome
measures included progression of cicatrisation, change in cicatrizing conjunctivitis severity score, visual acuity, and
adverse side effects. Progression of cicatrisation between the enrolment and 12 month visit was evaluated by using a
custom-made fornix depth instrument, the design of which was modified by us to enable measurement of the upper
conjunctival fornix (see below) A cicatrizing conjunctivitis severity score out of 63 was devised based on previous grading
schemes (Bernauer, Francis). This evaluated visual acuity, conjunctival inflammation, lid pathology and cicatrization as
well as keratopathy, to give an indication of the severity of disease affecting all aspects of the ocular surface. The
cicatrizing conjunctivitis severity score was assessed by the masked observers at enrolment and at the final visit, for each
patient. Blood pressure, blood sugar, dipstick urinalysis, full blood count, renal function and electrolytes, liver function tests
were monitored in all patients. Bone densitometry was performed at enrolment and at the final visit. Statistical Analysis:
Baseline characteristics of the treatment groups were compared to assess the adequacy of randomization. Given that it
was a pilot study, descriptive statistics are presented. The number of patients required for a definitive study was computed
based on success rates. Agreement between photographic and observer grading of bulbar inflammation was assessed
using Bland Altman methods. Analysis was by intention to treat.
UPPER FORNIX DEPTH MEASUREMENT: In 2004, in preparation for the clinical trial, a modification of the Schwab fornix
depth instrument (5) was designed by us (VPJS, SH, D Carpenter ocular prosthetist Moorfields Eye Hospital). It was used
at Moorfields and distributed to trial investigators in Birmingham and Bristol. The biconcave handmade instrument is made
of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), designed to fit between the globe and upper lid or lower lid, and measures 30mm x
8mm with a 17mm x 4mm handle. Ethics committee approval was obtained for a prospective study investigating the
repeatability and reproducibility of our newly designed fornix depth measure, and aiming to establish the normal range of
upper central conjunctival fornix measurements in healthy subjects aged 50 onwards. The mean difference in intra- and
inter-observer variation and 95% limits of agreement were calculated using SPSS (SPSS v11.5 for Windows). Preliminary
upper conjunctival fornix measurements for 127 healthy patients were taken. For a definitive study, it is planned that 120
healthy patients per decade of age will be measured, to establish the range of upper central fornix depth in healthy eyes.
A newly developed upper
conjunctival fornix measure
used in this clinical trial
RESULTS
CLINICAL TRIAL
• The primary outcome measure was analysed at 6 weeks for all 20 patients. Two patients in the IVMP
group died of unrelated causes (pulmonary embolism, lung carcinoma), as did two in the control group
(pneumonia in both) before the 12 month final visit. (see Figure 1)
• The 2 study groups were comparable regarding disease duration, prior immunosuppressive therapy, lid
surgery, and use of topical steroids (Table 1). Prognostic variables in the IVMP group appeared to be
slightly worse than in the control group, suggesting that any definitive trial would need to stratify for such
factors in the randomisation. The study eye in the IVMP group had a higher initial bulbar inflammation
score (median 12.5) compared with the control group (median 11), more advanced cicatrisation (10/10
Tauber stage IIb or above and 10/10 Tauber stage IIIa or above) as well as shorter upper and lower
fornix depths and a higher initial cicatrising conjunctivitis severity score (Table 2).
• Inflammation was controlled in 20% (2/10) of IVMP patients and 20% (2/10) of control patients at 6
weeks (Table 3). A rapid response to IVMP was observed at 2 weeks, but the effect was not maintained
at 4 weeks. At 6 months, inflammation was controlled in 37.5% (3/8) patients in the IVMP and 33.3 %
(3/9) patients in the control groups. Median time (range) to control of inflammation in the IVMP group
was 8 (2, 32) weeks, and in the control group 14 (2, 52) weeks. Factors associated with control of
inflammation at 6 months are described in Table 4.
• Fibrosis: Of the 16 patients with 12 month follow-up data, there was a decrease in fornix depth of at
least 2mm in 25% (2/8) of both the IVMP and control groups (Table 5). Characteristics of patients in
whom progression of fibrosis was detected are described in Table 6.
• Adverse effects: IVMP was associated with transient increased blood sugar levels in 40% (4/10),
increased intraocular pressure, and bone loss in one patient who had other osteoporosis risk factors.
Major adverse effects occurred in 2 patients in the IVMP group: haemorrhagic cystitis when
cyclophosphamide was withdrawn because of leucopenia and hepatotoxicity in 1 patient, another
developed bacterial pneumonia. And in 2 patients in the control group: pneumocystis pneumonia with
disseminated cytomegalovirus infection in 1 patient, and another patient developed bacterial
pneumonia.
RESULTS continued
Table 1. Patient characteristics at baseline
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS
Table 2. Clinical Features of Study Eye
Age (median, range)
IVMP
(n=10)
Control
(n=10)
All
(n=20)
76 (53 - 82)
58 (51 - 82)
61 (51 - 82)
Gender
Male
Female
8
2
6
4
14
6
Eye
Right
Left
6
4
8
2
14
6
Immunopathology positive
Extraocular Disease
Autoimmune Disease
8
5
1
9
6
0
17
11
1
Disease Duration in Years (median, range)
Lid surgery pre treatment
Topical Steroids used during Trial
Prior non-cyclophosphamide immunosuppressive therapy
2 (0 - 10)
3
6
4
1.5 (0.25 - 18)
3
9
5
2 (0 - 18)
6
15
9
Table 3. Control of Inflammation at Different Time Points
IVMP
(n=10)
Control
(n=10)
All
(n=20)
% controlled at 6 weeks
20% (2/10)
20% (2/10)
20% (4/20)
% controlled at 16 weeks
% of these controlled at 6 mths
% of these controlled at 12 mths
25% (2/8)
100% (3/3)
66.7% (2/3)
44.4% (4/9)
75% (3/4)
75% (3/4)
35.3% (6/17)
71% (5/7)
71% (5/7)
% controlled at 6 months
37.5% (3/8)
33.3% (3/9)
35.3% (6/17)
% controlled at 12 months
75% (6/8)
50% (4/8)
62.5% (10/16)
Median time to control (weeks)
(range)
8 (2 - 32)
14 (2 - 52)
10 (2 - 52)
Additional therapy required after week 12 due to
poor inflammatory control
33% (3/9)
30% (3/10)
31.5 (6/19)
Inflammation rebound after initial control
IVMP
(n=10)
12.5 (9 - 16)
Control
(n=10)
11 (8.5 - 12.5)
All
(n=20)
11 (8.5 - 16)
Initial Tauber Stage (lower lid)
II a
II b
II c
II d
Tauber stage IIb or greater
0
4
2
4
100% (10/10)
3
0
5
2
70% (7/10)
3
4
7
6
III a
III b
III c
III d
Tauber stage IIIa or greater
1
4
0
5
100% (10/10)
2
1
3
2
80% (8/10)
5
5
3
7
Fornix Depth (mm)
Upper (median, range)
Lower (median, range)
10.5 (4 - 20)
3.5 (0 - 6)
12 ( 4 - 21)
4 (0 - 10)
11.5 (4 - 21)
4 (0 - 10)
Visual Acuity (LogMAR)
(median, range)
0.76 (0.00 - 3.00)
0.66 (0.00 to >3.00)
0.18 (0.00 to >3.00)
Initial MMP Severity Score ( / 63)
(median, range)
32.5 (19 - 43)
27.5 (15 - 39)
29 (15 - 43)
Initial Bulbar Inflammation Score ( / 16)
(median, range)
Table 4. Factors associated with Control of Inflammation at 6 months
Controlled at 6 months Not controlled at 6 months
(n=6)
(n=11)*
Received IVMP
50% (3/6)
45 % (5/11)
Age (median, range)
Immunopathology positive
Extraocular Disease
Autoimmune Disease
Disease Duration (years) (median, range)
Lid surgery pre treatment
Topical Steroids used during Trial
Initial Bulbar Inflammation (median, range)
Initial Cic Conj Severity Score (median, range)
Fornix Depth- upper (mm) (median, range)
Fornix Depth- lower (mm) (median, range)
Median time to control (weeks) (Range)
* 3 patients deceased before 6 month visit
40% (4/10)
25% (2/8)
55.6% (10/18)
69 (51 - 82)
67% (4/6)
33% (2/6)
0%
1 (0.25 - 7)
20% (1/5)
71% (5/7)
58 (53 - 76)
90% (10/11)
64% (7/11)
9% (1/11)
2 (0 - 18)
36% (4/11)
90% (9/10)
11 (9 - 14)
22.3 (15 - 27)
12 (10 - 16)
3 (1 - 10)
11 (8.5 - 16)
30.3 (17.5 - 43)
8.5 (3.5 - 21)
4 (0 - 10)
12 (6 - 20)
20 (2 - 52)
RESULTS continued
Table 5. Progression of Disease at 12 months or last visit
Decrease in fornix depth
Time to control in patients with decrease in fornix depth
Time to control in patients with no change in fornix depth (median, range)
IVMP
(n=10)
30% (3/10)
Wk 20, wk 32, wk 52
Week 16 (week 6 to week 32)
Control
(n=10)
20% (2/10)
Week 12, week 8
Week 18 (week 2 to week 48)
Increase in corneal pannus
Time to control in patients with increase in pannus (median, range)
Time to control in patients with no change in pannus (median, range)
70% (7/10)
Week 32 (week 6 to week 52)
Week16 (week 8 to week 24)
40% (4/10)
Week 20 (week 8 to week 48)
Week 10 (week 2 to week 20)
Reduction in Cicatrising Conjunctivitis Severity Score (median, range) 7.75 ( increase 3.5 to reduction 26.5) 8.75 (reduction 0.5 to reduction 19)
Change in visual acuity (median, range)
Nil (loss 8 lines to gain 1 line)
Nil (no change to gain 2 lines)
Table 6. Progression of fibrosis
Decrease in fornix depth No progression
(n=5)
(n=15)
Received IVMP
Age (median, range)
Immunopathology positive
Extraocular Disease
Autoimmune Disease
Disease Duration (years) (median, range)
Any Lid surgery
Topical Steroids used during Trial
Initial Bulbar Inflammation (median, range)
Initial Cic Conj Severity Score (median, range)
Fornix Depth- upper (mm) (median, range)
Fornix Depth- lower (mm) (median, range)
Median time to control (weeks) and range
60% (3/5)
47% (7/15)
62 (53 - 83)
100% (5/5)
60% (3/5)
20% (1/5)
0.5 (0 - 5)
40% (2/5)
100% (5/5)
62 (51 - 82)
80% (12/15)
47% (7/15)
7% (1/15)
2 (0.1 - 18)
67% (10/15)
67% (10/15)
12 (11 - 16)
39 (25.5 - 43)
8 (3.5 - 12)
4 (1 - 5)
11 (8.5 - 15.5)
28.5 (15 - 37)
12 (4 - 21)
4 (0 - 10)
20 (8 - 52)
18 (2 - 48)
Figure 1 Flowchart of the trial
RESULTS continued
UPPER FORNIX DEPTH MEASUREMENT
• Used with topical anaesthesia, the fornix depth measure permitted rapid measurement and was well
tolerated. No patients reported prolonged discomfort or pain.
• Intra-observer variation: Duplicate measurements taken by a single observer were identical in 92%
(23/25) of measurements. Inter-observer variation: The mean difference in fornix depth measurement
between 2 observers was 0.55 mm with 95% agreement (± 2SD) of -2 and +2mm.
• Based on preliminary results from 127 patients aged 50 years and older, the mean upper conjunctival
fornix depth was 15.2 ± 1.6mm, range 12 – 20mm (see Table 7). These results will be refined in a
current ongoing larger study of 840 eyes (120 eyes per decade of age from 20 years old, up to 80years+).
Table 7. Upper central conjunctival fornix depth
50-59
n = 28
Mean upper conjunctival fornix depth (mm)
Range (mm)
15.5 ± 1.9
12 to 20
Age (years)
60-69
70-79
n = 36
n = 41
15.2 ± 1.3
12 to 18
15.4 ± 1.7
12 to 20
80+
n = 23
All
n=127
14.6 ± 1.6
12 to 18
15.2 ± 1.6
12 to 20
CONCLUSIONS
1.This pilot randomised trial has shown that adjunctive pulse IVMP is unlikely to provide
any additional effect in controlling either inflammation or fibrosis, although to make a
definitive statement about this would require a trial that we believe is too large to be justified
by these pilot data.
2. Our study suggests that if a difference between IVMP and no IVMP does exist, it is small
and very large numbers of patients would be required for a definitive
study. For example, if we assume a success rate of 20 % at 6 weeks and believe that
the smallest clinically relevant treatment difference to detect at the 5 % level is
20 %, to have a study of power 85 % we would need 93 patients per treatment
group. We would then need to inflate these figures to allow for loss to follow-up
which our pilot study suggests might be considerable. We did employ randomisation
so that differences at baseline between study groups are known to have occurred
by chance but this does emphasise the need to consider whether or not to stratify
randomisation for a definitive trial.
3. Our newly designed fornix depth measure is well tolerated and has low intra- and
inter-observer variation. A preliminary study of average upper central conjunctival fornix
depth using our measure is 15.2 ± 1.6mm, range 12 – 20mm.
REFERENCES
1. Thorne JE, et al 2008. Treatment of ocular mucous membrane pemphigoid with
immunosuppressive drug therapy. Ophthalmology 115: 2146-2152.
2. Letko E, et al 2004. A nonrandomized comparison of the clinical outcome of ocular
involvement in patients with mucous membrane (cicatricial) pemphigoid between conventional
immunosuppressive and intravenous immunoglobulin therapies. Clin Immunol;
111: 303-310
3. Elder MJ, Lightman S, and Dart JK: Role of cyclophosphamide and high dose steroid in
ocular cicatricial pemphigoid. Br J Ophthalmol 1995, 79: 264-2664.
4. Foster CS: Cicatricial pemphigoid. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1986, 84: 527-663
5. Schwab IR,et al. Foreshortening of the inferior conjunctival fornix associated with chronic
glaucoma medications. Ophthalmology 1992;99:197-202.
6. Kawakita T, et al. Measurement of fornix depth and area: a novel method of determining
the severity of fornix shortening. Eye 2009;23:1115-9.
The fornix depth measure can be purchased from Moorfields Eye Hospital. For details email [email protected]