Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Supplementary Methods Lynch syndrome genetic profiling and molecular characterization of defects in the DNA mismatch repair genes and miR-155 expression levels in resected specimens by means of qPCR assay. Lynch syndrome genetic profiling and molecular characterization of defects in the DNA mismatch repair genes Molecular pathology testing for microsatellite instability (MIN) alterations typical of Lynch syndrome was performed on tissue samples from the index patient with PVAC, her brother with colorectal cancer and her nephew with rectal polyps. In details, MIN was determined by the mobility shift of PCR products using Bethesda panel microsatellite (BAT25, BAT26, D5S346, D17S250 and D2S123) in formalin-fixed-paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue blocks, containing either tumour or non-neoplastic epithelial areas which were sectioned at 10 μm, harvested by manual dissection and placed in 50 μL DNA digestion buffer. Tumours showing instability in four or more markers were classified as high microsatellite instability (MSI-H), those showing it in two marker as low MSI (MSI-L), and those showing no instability as microsatellite-stable (MSS), (1). MSI-H was revealed in tumours from all the 3 patients by using 5 mononucleotide markers. Mismatch repair proteins were evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) on tissue specimens from the PVAC of the index case and from colorectal cancer of her brother. IHC evaluation of MSH2, MLH1, MSH6, MSH3 and PMS2 proteins was performed by using FFPE tissue blocks containing tumour and adjacent normal epithelial areas, as previously reported (2). The antibodies used for these studies were anti-hMSH2 NA26 (Oncogene Research, Darmstadt, Germany); anti-hMSH6 G70220 (Transduction Laboratories, Basel, Switzerland); anti-hMLH1 13271A (PharMingen, Basel, Switzerland); anti-hPMS2 65861A (PharMingen, Basel, Switzerland). MLH1/PMS2 proteins deficiency was observed in both tumour tissues. Since there was a DNA repair defect, mutational analysis of mismatch repair genes was recommended. Thus, in all the 3 subjects with MSI-H tumours, the entire coding regions of MLH1 gene, including all splice junctions and adjacent intronic regions, were sequenced. Mutational analysis was performed on genomic DNA extracted from the peripheral blood using a standard procedure, and amplified by PCR using primers located in the flanking introns approximately 50 base pairs from the respective intron/exon borders (3). Forward and reverse PCR amplified products were sequenced using the automated ABI 310 DNA Sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). To exclude deletion or insertion in MLH1 and/or PMS2 gene, we performed the Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) assay , by using using three different SALSA MLPA KIT (P003, P008 and P248 kits, MCR-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands), according to the protocol supplied with the kit. PCR products were analyzed by using an ABI 310 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). However, neither mutations in MLH1 gene nor large deletions or amplifications in the MLH1/PMS2 genes was found in these subjects. miR-155 expression levels in biopsies specimens by using qPCR assay The miRNA fraction was extracted from fresh biopsie of PVAC for index case, of colon for her brother and of rectal polyps for her nephew by using Qiazol Lysis Reagent (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), according to manufacturer’s instructions. Then, cDNA was synthesized by using genespecific primer according to the TaqMan MicroRNA Assay protocol (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), as previously reported (4). Quantitative PCR was performed using an Applied Biosystems 7700 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The Ct data was determinate using default threshold settings. In each tissue sample, miRNA relative expression level of miR-155 in tumour compared to normal tissue was obtained using the 2-Ct method of relative quantification, after normalizing for the expression of the endogenous RNU6B (5). References 1 Piepoli A, Cotugno R, Merla G, Gentile A, Augello B, Quitadamo M, Merla A, Panza A, Carella M, Maglietta R, D'Addabbo A, Ancona N, Fusilli S, Perri F, Andriulli A. Promoter methylation correlates with reduced NDRG2 expression in advanced colon tumour. BMC Med Genomics. 2009; 2:11 2 Truninger K, Menigatti M, Luz J, Russell A, Haider R, Gebbers JO, Bannwart F, Yurtsever H, Neuweiler J, Riehle HM, Cattaruzza MS, Heinimann K, Schär P, Jiricny J, Marra G. Immunohistochemical analysis reveals high frequency of PMS2 defects in colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2005;128(5):1160-71 3 Lastella P, Patruno M, Forte G, Montanaro A, Di Gregorio C, Sabbà C, Soppressa P, Piepoli A, Panza A, Andriulli A, Resta N, Stella A. Identification and surveillance of 19 Lynch syndrome families in southern Italy: report of six novel germline mutations and a common founder mutation. Fam Cancer. 2011;10(2):285-95 4 Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001; 25:402–408 5 Tavano F, di Mola FF, Piepoli A, et al. Changes in miR-143 and miR-21 Expressions and Clinicopathological Correlations in Pancreatic Cancers. Pancreas. 2012; 41(8):1280-4