Download formato Word

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Kannada grammar wikipedia , lookup

Yiddish grammar wikipedia , lookup

Word-sense disambiguation wikipedia , lookup

Modern Hebrew grammar wikipedia , lookup

Macedonian grammar wikipedia , lookup

Interpretation (logic) wikipedia , lookup

Context-free grammar wikipedia , lookup

American Sign Language grammar wikipedia , lookup

Georgian grammar wikipedia , lookup

Serbo-Croatian grammar wikipedia , lookup

Preposition and postposition wikipedia , lookup

Ambiguity wikipedia , lookup

Junction Grammar wikipedia , lookup

Ancient Greek grammar wikipedia , lookup

Construction grammar wikipedia , lookup

Transformational grammar wikipedia , lookup

Pipil grammar wikipedia , lookup

Chinese grammar wikipedia , lookup

Polish grammar wikipedia , lookup

Spanish grammar wikipedia , lookup

Malay grammar wikipedia , lookup

Semantic holism wikipedia , lookup

Pleonasm wikipedia , lookup

Parsing wikipedia , lookup

Latin syntax wikipedia , lookup

Focus (linguistics) wikipedia , lookup

Untranslatability wikipedia , lookup

Meaning (philosophy of language) wikipedia , lookup

Symbol grounding problem wikipedia , lookup

Lexical semantics wikipedia , lookup

General semantics wikipedia , lookup

Cognitive semantics wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
4 - Semantics
What does this mean?
Even with the most sophisticated grammar, we will always find sentences
that will not be representable, either because they are too complex or
simply because they are wrong. We should provide some methods to catch
those cases.
For this task, we need to take another dimension of texts into account, the
semantics.
Of course, the texts generated are not stand-alone, but rather want to
express something, a meaning. This meaning in connection with the text is
called semantics. So we need a powerful formalism to help us extracting a
meaning. This can be achieved by augmenting the grammar, passing
arguments to nonterminal symbols: you can use the additional information in
the parameters to associate meanings with strings and to achieve contextsensitivity.
The context-sensitive grammars are grammars that take the word's context
into account (not the sentence's context - this would lead to discourse
understanding problems which we will discuss later). This context-sensitivity
is needed when you have to make NPs and VPs agree in case and number, for
example in "I am taking it for me" instead of "I are taking it for I", which
would be agrammatical in natural English.
Now we want to have symbols that are more expressive.
Take
NP(semantics),
for example. This should express its meaning (its semantics) already in this
early stage of processing.
NP(semantics)
could, grammatically, be expanded to
NP(semantics, string),
a string representing certain semantics.
Then, you also have to see that some verbs differ in their syntactic
structure from others. Some accept objects, some don't, so you have to
represent this distinction in your system, too. This is called verb
subcategorization.
verb
subcategorization list
example
graze
[]
The horse grazes.
sign
[PP]
I sign at you.
translate [NP], [NP PREP NP]
I translate English to Chinese.
Many sentences can be very ambiguous, but usually one can extract the
intended meaning by looking at the context of the phrase in question.
All this plays a crucial role in the area of discourse understanding.
Almost any text can be interpreted in different ways, and these can only be
differentiated by knowing what the context is. This means that not only
mere disambiguation on word and phrase level is important for text
understanding, but incorporation that embraces world knowledge is
significant, too.
Natural Language Processing | Project of Multimedia Systems | EECS 579 | update: 22/12/2000
Daniele Quercia