Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
TER-2: Trophic Transfer, Bioaccumulation and Biomagnification of Engineered Nanomaterials in Basal Levels of Environmental Food Webs John Priester, Rebecca Werlin, Randy Mielke, Patricia Holden A fundamental concern in nanotoxicology is the possible propagation of intact nanoparticles and their associated ecological effects through food chains. Bioaccumulation of nanoparticles involves the concentration of nanoparticles from aqueous media into organisms. Trophic transfer of nanoparticles involves the exchange of bioaccumulated materials from one organism in a food web to another via predation. When the exchange during trophic transfer results in a concentration increase, biomagnification has occurred. Bioaccumulation, trophic transfer and biomagnification each enhance the toxicological threats of nanoparticles. The fundamental conditions of these processes should be understood, so that nanoparticles can be designed to avoid these outcomes. Previously, we studied the trophic transfer of CdSe quantum dots from bacteria into their protozoan predators and published (Werlin et al., 2011, Nat. Nanotech.) that biomagnification occurred, providing the first evidence for this pinnacle concern in ecological outcomes of nanomaterials in the environment. Besides being an inaugural report of biomagnification in nanoecotoxicology, the work was important because of the organisms involved: they are ubiquitous and at the base of all food webs. Further, during the research it became apparent how little is known regarding trophic transfer and the potential for biomagnification that is initiated with bacterial prey. We therefore extended the work to other nanoparticle and bacterial configurations. During this period, we built upon our initial work with two discrete studies: 1) trophic transfer of bacterially-synthesized Se(0) nanoparticles, and 2) protozoan uptake and bioprocessing of nano-TiO2 sorbed to its bacterial prey. Together, the three scenarios form a complete trilogy of nanoparticle presentations into basal food webs: bacterially-formed NPs, bacterially-biosorbed NPs, and bacterially-internalized NPs. Leveraging our prior discovery that Pseudomonas aeruginosa PG201 intracellularly reduces selenite to elemental selenium and thereby forms uniform intracellular Se(0) nanoparticles, we fed endpoint bacteria to Tetrahymena. Compared to controls, we observed protozoan growth inhibition; we also observed Se(0) accumulation in protozoan and apparent bioprocessing. Final conclusions await full analysis of microscopy data. With nano-TiO2, we observed that protozoa do not avoid bacteria that are circumscribed with biosorbed NPs. Rather, protozoa voraciously consume TiO2-decorated bacteria and accumulate nano-TiO2 into food vacuoles. The accumulation of nano-TiO2 in protozoan food vacuoles is strikingly visible in electron micrographs and exceeds accumulations from a treatment where TiO2, but not bacterial cells, were presented in rich media. Bacterial delivery of TiO2 in Tetrahymena appeared to increase toxicity, possibly through alterations in prey digestion, and thus creating nutrient acquisition differences as compared to the treatment with dissolved nutrients amended with nano-TiO2. The implication is that biomagnification can initiate in basal food webs without bacterial intracellularization of NPs. Overall, this project has the potential to have great impact in the following ways: 1) further understand the conditions under which biomagnification occurs, 2) quantify biomagnification from microbial prey into predators, 3) elaborate on the currently-sparse knowledge base regarding biomagnification of contaminants as initiated in bacteria.