Download merchant defined - IHateLawSchool.com

MERCHANT DEFINED
Ferragamo v. MBTA***
Sieman v. Alden
2-104
2-314, 2-104
2-314, 2-104, 2-315
STATUTE OF FRAUDS
Bazak v. Mast Industries***
2-201, 2-201(2)
2-201(2)
PAROL EVIDENCE
Columbia Nitrogen v. Royster
Nanakuli v. Shell Oil
2-202, UOT 1-205(2), COD 1-205(1), COP 2-208(1)
CONTRACT FORMATION
Dickinson v. Dodd
2-204, 2-207, 1-103
rstmt §24, §36
2-205
Drennan v. Starr Paving
Lambert v. Kyser
Dale R. Horning v. Falconer
rstmt §87
2-206
2-207
ADDT’L TERMS IN ACCEPTANCE
Diamond Fruit v. Krack***
2-207(1)
2-207(2)
2-207(3)
2-316
GETTING RID OF IMPLIED WARRANTIES
Cate v. Dover
2-316
Bowdoin v. Showell
2-314
2-315
2-316
Hunt v. Perkins
Theos & Sons v. Mack
2-313
2-316(3)
2-314
Exception to writing requirement
2-104(1) merchant’s exception does
not have to be signed
Offer & accept
Termination
Firm Offers, lapse of time =
termination
Bargained For Consideration
Unilateral
Additional Terms
Counter offer = ACCEPTANCE
Add’l terms on responding forms=k
b/t merchants
unless objected to or materially
limits, Terms Fall Out if Parties
Don’t Agree, once perf. begins,
Sufficient to establish a contract
Fitness For Purpose
2-314 Fitness for Purpose
2-315 Merchantability
2-316 Conspicuous Disclaimer
Conspicuous / Merchantability
Must reasonably call BR’s attention
Part of bargain
Must be on face of P.O. or say “see
other side”
Subsequent Owners
IMPLIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTIBILTY
Shaffer v. Victoria Station
Back v. Wickes
Daniell v. Ford Motors
2-314
Food & Drink Container
Vasillo
Webster v. Blue Ship Tea Room
Phillips v. Town of Springfield
No Duty To Warn Against
Unforeseeable
Breast Implants
Food & Drink
Food – Reasonableness Standard
FIT FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE
Milau Assoc v. North Ave Dev.
2-102
Anthony Pools
2-102
2-315
Predominant Factor Test
Gravaman of the Action Test
LIMITATION OF REMEDIES
Wilson Trading v. David Fergusson 2-719
2-316
Goddard v. GMC
2-719(1)
2-719
Disclaimers
Disclaimer Failed its Purpose
DEFENSES
2-607(3)(a)
Castro v. Stanley Works
2-607(3), §318 in MA
P&F Construction v. Friend Lumber
Notice
Baystate Steamship v. Caterpillar
2-725
Contract based 4 yrs from delivery
date
2-318
Tort based 3 yrs from injury date
Jacobs v. Yamaha
2-314
No privity, Minority view – remote
BR can sue remote seller under 2314 for economic loss alone
MAGNUSSON-MOSS ACT (FED’L)
Ventura v. Ford Motors
Troutman v. Pierce
Can revoke against a party in privity
Revoke acceptance & got atty’s fees
-2-
ARTICLE 2A: WARRANTIES: title 2A-211, express 2A-210, merch 2A-212, fitness 2A-213,
disclaim 2A-214
Colonial Pacific Leasing v. McNatt 2A-103
finance leasing and immunity
Draleau
MA 2-318
finance leasing
GAP FLLING: K FORMATION & LAW OF UNCONSCIENABILITY
Formation in gen’l 2-204, open price terms 2-305, output-anything produced 2-306
Landrum v. Davenport
2-202
PER fills gaps
2-305
open price terms
1-207
reservation of rights
UNCONSCIENABILITY
Waters v. Minnesota Ltd
2-302
RISK OF LOSS: tender 2-503, shipment by SR 2-504, risk of loss 2-509, FOB 2-319, CIF 2320, delivery ex ship 2-322


NO BREACH
Jason’s Foods v. Peter Eckrick 2-509(2)(b)
risk of loss turns on acknowledgment
BREACH
Jakoski v. Carole Chevrolet 2-510(1)
DELIVERY TERMS
Cook Specialty v. Schrlock
Rheinberg v. Vineyard Wine
2-509(1)(a)
2-504
2-509(1)(a)
2-319(a)
risk of loss
shipment by seller
risk of loss
DOCUMENTS OF TITLE: B/L 1-201(1) & WHSE REC’T 1-201(45)
Article 7  intra state commerce
Proctor Gamble v. Lawrence American Whse 7-204(1)
Dunfee v. Blue Rock Storage
7-204(1)
7-309
carrier
LETTERS OF CREDIT: issuer’s rights and obligations 5-102, stand-by letters of credit, strict
compliance rule 5-108(a)
U.S. Industries v. 2nd New Haven Bank
issuer’s duties and rights
Steijn v. Henry Schroder
5-109
PERFORMANCE OBLIGATIONS: INSTALLMENT K & SINGLE DELIVERY
Jacob & Young v. Kent
2-612(1)
installment sales
-3-
Cherwell Ralli v. Rytman Grain
2-612
2-609
PERFECT TENDER RULE, 2-601, manner & effect of rightful rejection 2-602
Moulton v. LynFlex
2-605
written objection
CURE
Wilson v. Scampoli
Ramirez v. AutoSport
Plateq Corp. v. Machlett
2-508(2)
2-606
2-106(4)
2-711(1)
what constitutes acceptance
cancel K
BR right to refund
1-205
2-508
2-719
multiple sources to right to cure
right to cure
REVOCATION OF ACCEPTANCE, 2-608
Rester v. Morrow
Fortin v. Oxbow Marina
POST FORMATION EXCUSES FOR NON-PERFORMANCE
IMPOSSIBILITY
2-613
IMPRACTIBILITY
Mishara v. Transit-Mixed Concrete 2-615
Louisiana Power v. Allegheny
2-609
2-712
FRUSTRATION OF PURPOSE
Chase v. Paonessa
impractible
cover
1-103
frustration of purpose
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES, 2-718, restitution 2-718, specific performance, SR remedies, 2703 through 2-709
RECLAMATION
Specific Performance
2-702
2-716(1)
credit SR or 2-507(2) case
-4-
SR REMEDY UNACCEPTED GOODS
Teradyne v. Teledyne
BR REMEDY
Tongish v. Thomas
2-713
Incidental
Consequential
Direct losses
2-715(1)
2-715(2)
2-714
STATUTE OF LIMITATION
Jandreau
Sheesley
2-725
BR damage for non-delivery
-5-