Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
The Natural Resource Curse and How to Avoid It Part I: Channels of the commodity curse Part II: Policies & institutions to avoid the pitfalls Jeffrey Frankel MPA/ID extra lecture, October 14, 2014 The Natural Resource Curse Part I: Channels Some seminal references: Auty (1990, 2001, 2007) Sachs & Warner (1995, 2001), By now there is a large body of research, which I have surveyed (2011, 2012a, b). 2 Many countries that are richly endowed with oil, minerals, or fertile land have failed to grow more rapidly than those without. Example: Some studies find a negative effect of oil in particular, on economic performance: including Kaldor, Karl & Said (2007); Ross (2001); Sala-i-Martin & Subramanian (2003); and Smith (2004). Some oil producers in Africa & the Middle East have relatively little to show for their resources. Meanwhile, East Asian economies achieved western-level standards of living despite having virtually no exportable natural resources: Japan, Singapore, Hong Kong, Korea & Taiwan, rocky islands or peninsulas; followed by China. Growth falls with fuel & mineral exports 5 Human Development Index is also worse for resource-rich countries, even for given income level. Chris Geiregat & Susan Yang “Too Much of a Good Thing?” FINANCE & DEVELOPMENT, September 2013. 6 Are natural resources necessarily bad? No, of course not. Commodity wealth need not necessarily lead to inferior economic or political development. Rather, it is a double-edged sword, with both benefits and dangers. It can be used for ill as easily as for good. The priority should be on identifying ways to sidestep the pitfalls that have afflicted commodity producers in the past, to find the path of success. 7 Some developing countries have avoided the pitfalls of commodity wealth. E.g., Chile (copper) Botswana (diamonds) Some of their innovations are worth emulating. The 2nd half of the lecture will offer some policies & institutional innovations to avoid the curse: especially ways of managing price volatility. Including lessons of policies to avoid. Some lessons apply to commodity importers too. 8 But, first: How could abundance of commodity wealth be a curse? What is the mechanism for this counter-intuitive relationship? At least 5 categories of explanations. 9 5 Possible Natural Resource Curse Channels 1. Volatility 2. Crowding-out of manufacturing 3. Autocratic Institutions 4. Anarchic Institutions 5. Procyclicality 10 (1) Volatility in global commodity prices arises because supply & demand are inelastic in the short run. 11 Commodity prices have been especially volatile over the last decade Data source: IMF, Nov. 2013. Graphic: Deloitte University Press Effects of Volatility Volatility per se can be bad for economic growth. Hausmann & Rigobon (2003), Blattman, Hwang & Williamson (2007), and Poelhekke & van der Ploeg (2007). Risk inhibits private investment. Cyclical shifts of labor, land & capital back & forth across sectors may incur needless costs. => role for government intervention? On the one hand, the private sector dislikes risk as much as government does & takes steps to mitigate it. On the other hand the government cannot entirely ignore the issue of volatility; e.g., exchange rate policy. 13 2. Natural resources may crowd out manufacturing, and manufacturing could be the sector that experiences learning-by-doing or dynamic productivity gains from spillover. Matsuyama (1992), van Wijnbergen (1984) and Sachs & Warner (1995). So commodities could in theory be a dead-end sector. My own view: a country need not repress the commodity sector to develop the manufacturing sector. It can foster growth in both . E.g. Canada, Australia, Norway… Now Malaysia, Chile, Brazil… Econometric findings that oil and other “point-source resources” lead to poor institutions Isham, Woolcock, Pritchett, & Busby Sala-I-Martin & Subramanian (2003) Bulte, Damania & Deacon (2005) Mehlum, Moene & Torvik (2006) Arezki & Brückner (2009). (2005) The theory is thought to fit Mideastern oil exporters well. What are poor institutions? A typical list: inequality, corruption, rent-seeking, intermittent dictatorship, ineffective judiciary branch, and lack of constraints to prevent elites & politicians from plundering the country. An example, from economic historians Engerman & Sokoloff Why did industrialization take place in North America, (1997, 2000, 2002) not the South? Lands endowed with extractive industries & plantation crops developed slavery, inequality, dictatorship, and state control, whereas those climates suited to small farms & fishing developed institutions of individualism, democracy, egalitarianism & capitalism. When the Industrial Revolution came, the latter areas were suited to make the most of it. Those that had specialized in extractive industries were not, because society had come to depend on class structure & authoritarianism, rather than on individual incentive & decentralized decision-making. 4. Anarchic institutions 1. 2. 3. Unsustainably rapid depletion of resources Unenforceable property rights Civil war See Appendix 2 for elaboration on each. 18 (5) Procyclicality The Dutch Disease describes unwanted side-effects of a commodity boom. Developing countries are historically prone to procyclicality, especially commodity producers. Procyclicality in: Capital inflows; Monetary policy; Real exchange rate; Nontraded Goods Fiscal Policy 19 The Dutch Disease: 5 side-effects of a commodity boom 1) A real appreciation in the currency 2) A rise in government spending 3) A rise in nontraded goods prices 4) A resultant shift of production out of manufactured goods 5) Sometimes a current account deficit 20 The Dutch Disease: The 5 effects elaborated 1) taking the form of nominal currency appreciation if the exchange rate floats or the form of money inflows, credit & inflation if the exchange rate is fixed; 2) Real appreciation in the currency A rise in government spending in response to availability of tax receipts or royalties. 21 The Dutch Disease: 5 side-effects of a commodity boom 3) An increase in nontraded goods prices relative to internationally traded goods 4) A resultant shift out of non-commodity traded goods, esp. manufactures, pulled by the more attractive returns in the export commodity and in non-traded goods. 22 The Dutch Disease: 5 side-effects of a commodity boom 5) A current account deficit, as booming countries attract capital flows, thereby incurring international debt that is hard to service when the boom ends. Manzano & Rigobon (2008): the negative Sachs-Warner effect of resources on growth rates during 1970-1990 was mediated through international debt incurred when commodity prices were high. Arezki & Brückner (2010a, b): commodity price booms lead to higher government spending, external debt & default risk in autocracies, but do not have those effects in democracies. 23 Procyclical capital flows According to intertemporal optimization theory, capital flows should be countercyclical: In practice, it does not always work this way. Capital flows are more procyclical than countercyclical. net capital inflows when exports are doing badly and net capital outflows when exports do well. Gavin, Hausmann, Perotti & Talvi (1996); Kaminsky, Reinhart & Vegh (2005); Reinhart & Reinhart (2009); and Mendoza & Terrones (2008). Invalidates much of existing theory, though certainly not all. Theories to explain this involve capital market imperfections, e.g., asymmetric information or the need for collateral “pecuniary externalities” to borrowing. Procyclical monetary policy If the exchange rate is fixed, surpluses during commodity booms lead to rising reserves and money supply. possibly delayed by sterilization attempts. Floating can help, accommodating trade shock. But, under pure floating: appreciation can be excessive. under IT: CPI rule says to tighten money & appreciate when import commodity price goes up (or other adverse supply shock). That’s backwards. (E.g., oil importers in 2008.) Should appreciate when export commodity price goes up. Procyclical real exchange rate Countries undergoing a commodity boom experience real appreciation of their currency taking the form of nominal currency appreciation for floating-rate commodity exporters, Colombia, Kazakhstan, Russia, S.Africa, Chile, Brazil…. or the form of money inflows & inflation for fixed-rate commodity exporters, Saudi Arabia & UAE…. OK. But real appreciation => NTGs crowd out other TGs. Procyclical fiscal policy Fiscal policy has historically tended to be procyclical in developing countries especially among commodity exporters: Cuddington (1989), Tornell & Lane (1999), Kaminsky, Reinhart & Vegh (2004), Talvi & Végh (2005), Alesina, Campante & Tabellini (2008), Mendoza & Oviedo (2006), Ilzetski & Vegh (2008), Medas & Zakharova (2009), Gavin & Perotti (1997), Medina (2010), Cespedes & Velasco (2013). Correlation of income & spending mostly positive – particularly in comparison with industrialized countries. The procyclicality of fiscal policy A reason for procyclical public spending: receipts from taxes & royalties rise in booms. The government cannot resist the temptation to increase spending proportionately, or more. Then it is forced to contract in recessions, thereby exacerbating the swings. 28 Two budget items account for much of the spending from oil booms: (i) Investment projects. Investment in practice may be “white elephant” projects, which are stranded without funds for completion or maintenance when the oil price goes back down. Gelb (1986). Rumbi Sithole took this photo in “Bayelsa State in the Niger Delta,in Nigeria. The state government received a windfall of money and didn't have the capacity to have it all absorbed in social services so they decided to build a Hilton Hotel. The construction company did a shoddy job, so the tower is leaning to its right and it’s unsalvageable..” (ii) The government wage bill. Oil windfalls are often spent on public sector wages. Medas & Zakharova (2009) Arezki & Ismail (2010): government spending rises in booms, but is downward-sticky. 29 Correlations between Gov.t Spending & GDP 1960-1999 procyclical Adapted from Kaminsky, Reinhart & Vegh (2004) countercyclical G always used to be pro-cyclical for most developing countries. The procyclicality of fiscal policy, cont. An important development -some developing countries, including commodity producers, were able to break the historic pattern in the most recent decade: taking advantage of the boom of 2002-2008 to run budget surpluses & build reserves, thereby earning the ability to expand fiscally in the 2008-09 crisis. Chile is the outstanding model. Also Botswana, China, Indonesia, Korea… 31 Correlations between Governmt. spending & GDP 2000-2009 procyclical Frankel, Vegh & Vuletin (2012) countercyclical Last decade, about 1/3 developing countries switched to countercyclical fiscal policy: Negative correlation of G & GDP. Summary of Part I Five categories of hypothesized channels whereby resources can lead to poor economic performance: commodity price volatility, crowding out of manufacturing, autocratic institutions, anarchic institutions, and procyclical macroeconomic policy, including But the important question is how to avoid the pitfalls, capital flows, monetary policy & fiscal policy. to achieve resource blessing instead of resource curse. Appendices: 1. Prebisch; 2. Anarchic institutions; 3. NRC skeptics 34 Appendix 1: I exclude a 6th channel, The Prebisch-Singer (1950) Hypothesis that commodities supposedly suffer a long-run downward relative price trend. Theoretical reasoning: world demand for primary products is inelastic with respect to income. Vs. persuasive theoretical arguments that we should expect commodity prices to show upward trends in the long run Malthus (esp. for food) Hotelling (for depletable resources). The up-trend idea goes back to Malthus (1798) and early fears of environmental scarcity: Demand grows with population (geometrically). Supply does not. Implication: the price will steadily rise. Hotelling Firms choose how fast to extract oil or minerals (1931) King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, with 2008 interest rates ≈ 0, apparently believed that the rate of return on oil reserves was higher if he didn't pump than if he did: "Let them remain in the ground for our children and grandchildren..." Arbitrage => expected rate of price increase = interest rate. The empirical evidence With strong theoretical arguments on both sides, either for an upward trend or for a downward trend, it is an empirical question. Terms of trade for commodity producers had a slight up trend from 1870 to World War I, a down trend in the inter-war period, up in the 1970s, down in the 1980s and 1990s, and up in the first decade of the 21st century. What is the overall statistical trend in commodity prices in the long run? Some authors find a slight upward trend, some a slight downward trend. [1] The answer depends on the date of the end of the sample. [1] Cuddington (1992), Cuddington, Ludema & Jayasuriya (2007), Cuddington & Urzua (1989), Grilli & Yang (1988), Pindyck (1999), Reinhart & Wickham (1994), Hadass & Williamson (2003), Kellard & Wohar (2005), Balagtas & Holt (2009) Hol, Cuddington & Jerrett (2008), and Harvey, Kellard, Madsen & Wohar (2010). Appendix 2: Elaboration on Anarchy: insufficient protection of property rights 4.1 Unsustainably rapid depletion When exhaustible resources are in fact exhausted, the country may be left with nothing. Three concerns: Protection of environmental quality. A motivation for a strategy of economic diversification. The need to save for the day of depletion Invest rents from exhaustible resources in other assets. Hartwick (1977) and Solow (1986). 40 The example of Nauru (phosphate mining) 4.2 Unenforceable property rights Depletion would be much less of a problem if full property rights could be enforced, thereby giving the owners incentive to conserve the resource in question. But often this is not possible especially under frontier conditions. Overfishing, overgrazing, & over-logging are classic examples of the “tragedy of the commons.” Individual fisherman, ranchers, loggers, or miners, have no incentive to restrain themselves, while the fisheries, pastureland or forests are collectively depleted. 42 Madre de Dios region of the Amazon rainforest in Peru, the left-hand side stripped by illegal gold mining. http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2011/02/27/amazon-gold-rush-laying-waste-to-peruvian-rainforest%E2%80%99s-madre-de-dios-20021 4.3 War Where a valuable resource such as oil or diamonds is there for the taking, factions will likely fight over it. Oil & minerals are correlated with civil war. Fearon & Laitin (2003), Collier & Hoeffler (2004), Humphreys (2005) and Collier (2007). Chronic conflict in places such as Sudan comes to mind. Civil war is, in turn, very bad for economic development. 44 Appendix 3: The NRC Skeptics Which comes first, oil or institutions? Some question the assumption that oil discoveries are exogenous and institutions endogenous. Oil wealth is not necessarily the cause and institutions the effect, rather than the other way around. Norman (2009): the discovery & development of oil is not purely exogenous, but rather is endogenous with respect to the efficiency of the economy. The important determinant is whether the country already has good institutions at the time that oil is discovered, in which case it is put to use for the national welfare, instead of the welfare of an elite. Mehlum, Moene & Torvik (2006), Robinson, Torvik & Verdier (2006), McSherry (2006), Smith (2007) and Collier & Goderis (2007). Skeptics argue that commodity exports are endogenous. On the one hand, basic trade theory says: A country may show a high mineral share in exports, not necessarily because it has a higher endowment of minerals than others (absolute advantage) but because it does not have the ability to export manufactures (comparative advantage). This could explain negative statistical correlations between mineral exports and economic development, invalidating the common inference that minerals are bad for growth. Maloney (2002) and Wright & Czelusta (2003, 04, 06). Commodity exports are endogenous, continued. On the other hand, skeptics also have plenty of examples where successful institutions and industrialization went hand in hand with rapid development of mineral resources. Countries that were able to develop efficiently their resource endowments as part of strong economy-wide growth include: the USA during its pre-war industrialization period David & Wright (1997). Venezuela from the 1920s to the 1970s, Australia since the 1960s, Norway since 1969 oil discoveries, Chile since adoption of a new mining code in 1983, Peru since a privatization program in 1992, and Brazil since lifting restrictions on foreign mining participation in 1995. Wright & Czelusta (2003, pp. 4-7, 12-13, 18-22). Commodity exports are endogenous, continued. Examples of countries that were equally wellendowed geologically but that failed to develop their natural resources efficiently include: Chile & Australia before World War I, and Venezuela since the 1980s. Hausmann (2003, p.246): “Venezuela’s growth collapse took place after 60 years of expansion, fueled by oil. If oil explains slow growth, what explains the previous fast growth?” Addendum: Countries with high resource rents (as % of GDP) tend to have lower student math performance (statistically significant at the .003 level) Source: OECD education data featured in Knowledge and skills are infinite – oil is not by Andreas Schleicher. 50 Part II Policies & institutions to avoid pitfalls of the Natural Resource Curse Some that are not recommended: Institutions that try to suppress price volatility. Recommended: Devices to hedge risk. Ideas to reduce macroeconomic procyclicality. Institutions for better governance. The Natural Resource Curse should not be interpreted as a rule that commodityrich countries are doomed to fail. The question is what policies to adopt to avoid the pitfalls and improve the chances of prosperity. A wide variety of measures have been tried by commodity-exporters cope with volatility. Some work better than others. 52 Many of the policies that have been intended to suppress commodity volatility do not work out so well Producer subsidies Stockpiles Marketing boards Price controls Export controls Blaming derivatives Resource nationalism Nationalization Banning foreign participation 7 recommendations for commodity-exporting countries Devices to share risks 1. Index contracts with foreign companies (royalties…) to the world commodity price. 2. Hedge commodity revenues in options markets 3. Link debt to the commodity price 7 recommendations for commodity producers continued Countercyclical macroeconomic policy 4. Allow some currency appreciation in response to a commodity boom, but not a free float. - Accumulate some forex reserves first. - Raise banks’ reserve requirements, esp. on $ liabilities. 5. If in need of a nominal target as monetary anchor, consider using nominal GDP or a price index PPT that puts weight on the export product. 6. Emulate Chile: to avoid over-spending in boom times, allow deviations from a target surplus only in response to permanent commodity price rises. 7 recommendations for commodity producers, concluded Good governance institutions 7. Manage commodity funds professionally. Invest them abroad like Norway’s Pension Fund, Reasons: (1) for diversification, (2) to avoid cronyism in investments. but insulated from politics like Botswana’s Pula Fund. Professionally managed, to optimize financially. Elaboration on two proposals to reduce the procyclicality of macroeconomic policy for commodity exporters I) To make monetary policy less procyclical: Product Price Targeting or Nominal II) GDP Targeting To make fiscal policy less procyclical: emulate Chile. PPT I) The challenge of designing a currency regime for countries where terms of trade shocks dominate the cycle Fixing the exchange rate leads to procyclical monetary policy: credit expands in commodity booms. Floating accommodates terms of trade shocks. Inflation Targeting, in terms of the CPI, But volatility can be excessive; also floating does not provide a nominal anchor. provides a nominal anchor; but can react perversely to terms of trade shocks. Needed: an anchor that accommodates trade shocks Product Price Targeting: PPT Target an index of domestic production prices [1] such as the GDP deflator • Include export commodities in the index and exclude import commodities, • so money tightens & the currency appreciates when world prices of export commodities rise • accommodating the terms of trade -• not when world prices of import commodities rise. • The CPI does it backwards: • It calls for appreciation when import prices rise, • not when export prices rise ! [1] Frankel (2011, 2012). Appendix II: Who achieves counter-cyclical fiscal policy? Countries with “good institutions” ”On Graduation from Fiscal Procyclicality” 2013, Frankel with C.Végh & G.Vuletin; J.Dev.Economics. What, specifically, are good institutions? The example of Chile since 2000 1st rule – Governments must set a budget target, 2nd rule – The target is structural: Deficits allowed only to the extent that set = 0 in 2008 under Pres. Bachelet. (1) output falls short of trend, in a recession, or (2) the price of copper is below its trend. 3rd rule – The trends are projected by 2 panels of independent experts, outside the political process. Result: Chile avoids the pattern of 32 other governments, where forecasts in booms are biased toward over-optimism. Chile ran surpluses in the 2003-07 boom, while the U.S. & Europe failed to do so. Appendices on recommendations for dealing with the natural resource curse Appendix 4: Policies not recommended Appendix 5: Elaboration on proposal to make monetary policy less procyclical – PPT, using GDP deflator to set annual inflation target. Appendix 6: Elaboration on proposal to make fiscal policy less procyclical – emulate Chile, setting structural targets with independent fiscal forecasts Appendix 4: Policies that have been tried but that are not recommended Producer subsidies Stockpiles Marketing boards Price controls Export controls Blaming derivatives Resource nationalism Nationalization Banning foreign participation Unsuccessful policies to reduce commodity price volatility: 1) Producer subsidies to “stabilize” prices at high levels, often via wasteful stockpiles & protectionist import barriers. Examples: The EU’s Common Agricultural Policy Or fossil fuel subsidies Bad for EU budgets, economic efficiency, international trade & consumer pocketbooks. which are equally distortionary & budget-busting, and disastrous for the environment as well. Or US corn-based ethanol subsidies, with tariffs on Brazilian sugar-based ethanol. Unsuccessful policies, continued 2) Price controls to “stabilize” prices at low levels Discourage investment & production. Example: African countries adopted commodity boards for coffee & cocoa at the time of independence. The original rationale: to buy the crop in years of excess supply and sell in years of excess demand. In practice the price paid to cocoa & coffee farmers was always below the world price. As a result, production fell. Microeconomic policies, continued Often the goal of price controls is to shield consumers of staple foods & fuel from increases. But the artificially suppressed price discourages domestic supply, and requires rationing to domestic households. Shortages & long lines can fuel political rage as well as higher prices can. Not to mention when the government is forced by huge gaps to raise prices. Price controls can also require imports, to satisfy excess demand. Then they raise the world price even more. Microeconomic policies, continued 3) In producing countries, prices are artificially suppressed by means of export controls to insulate domestic consumers from a price rise. In 2008, India capped rice exports. Argentina did it for wheat exports. And Russia in 2010. India banned cotton exports in 2012. Results: Domestic supply is discouraged. World prices go even higher. An initiative at the G20 meetings in France in 2011 deserved to succeed: Producers and consuming countries in grain markets should cooperatively agree to refrain from export controls and price controls. The result would be lower world price volatility. One hopes for steps in this direction, perhaps working through the WTO. An initiative that has less merit: 4) Attempts to blame speculation for volatility and so to ban derivatives markets. Yes, speculative bubbles sometimes hit prices. But in commodity markets, prices are more often the signal for fundamentals. Don’t shoot the messenger. Also, derivatives are useful for hedgers. An example of commodity speculation In the 1955 movie version of East of Eden, the legendary James Dean plays Cal. Like Cain in Genesis, he competes with his brother for the love of his father. Cal “goes long” in the market for beans, in anticipation of a rise in demand if the US enters WWI. An example of commodity speculation, cont. Sure enough, the price of beans goes sky high, Cal makes a bundle, and offers it to his father, a moralizing patriarch. But the father is morally offended by Cal’s speculation, not wanting to profit from others’ misfortunes, and tells him he will have to “give the money back.” An example of commodity speculation, cont. Cal has been the agent of Adam Smith’s famous invisible hand: By betting on his hunch about the future, he has contributed to upward pressure on the price of beans in the present, thereby increasing the supply so that more is available precisely when needed (by the Army). The movie even treats us to a scene where Cal watches the beans grow in a farmer’s field, something real-life speculators seldom get to see. The overall lesson for microeconomic policy Attempts to prevent commodity prices from fluctuating generally fail. Even though enacted in the name of reducing volatility & income inequality, their effect is often different. Better to accept volatility and cope with it. “Resource nationalism” Another motive for commodity export controls: 5) To subsidize downstream industries. E.g., “beneficiation” in South African diamonds But it didn’t make diamond-cutting competitive, and it hurt mining exports. Or Indonesian bauxite export ban in 2014. 6) Nationalization of foreign companies. Like price controls, it discourages investment. “Resource nationalism” 7) Keeping out foreign companies altogether. continued But often they have the needed technical expertise. Examples: declining oil production in Mexico & Venezuela. 8) Going around “locking up” resource supplies. China must think that this strategy will protect it in case of a commodity price shock. But global commodity markets are increasingly integrated. If conflict in the Persian Gulf doubles world oil prices, the effect will be pretty much the same for those who buy on the spot market and those who have bilateral arrangements. The overall lesson for microeconomic policy Attempts to prevent commodity prices from fluctuating generally fail. Even though enacted in the name of reducing volatility & income inequality, their effect is often different. Better to accept volatility and cope with it. For the poor: well-designed transfers, along the lines of Oportunidades or Bolsa Familia. Appendix 5: Product Price & NGDP Targeting Each of the traditional candidates for nominal anchor has an Achilles heel. The CPI anchor does not accommodate terms of trade changes: IT tightens M & appreciates when import prices rise not when export prices rise, which is backwards. Targeting core CPI does not much help. 6 proposed nominal targets & the Achilles heel of each: Vulnerability Targeted variable Gold standard Commodity standard Price of gold Price of agric. & mineral basket Vulnerability Example Vagaries of world 1849 boom; gold market 1873-96 bust Shocks in Oil shocks of imported 1973-80, 2000-11 commodity Monetarist rule M1 Velocity shocks US 1982 Nominal income targeting Fixed exchange rate Nominal GDP $ Measurement problems Appreciation of $ Less developed countries (or €) (or € ) CPI Terms of trade shocks Inflation targeting EM currency crises 1995-2001 Oil shocks of 1973-80, 2000-11 Professor Jeffrey Frankel Why is PPT better than a fixed exchange rate for countries with volatile export prices? PPT Better response to trade shocks (countercyclical): If the $ price of the export commodity goes up, the currency automatically appreciates, moderating the boom. If the $ price of the export commodity goes down, the currency automatically depreciates, moderating the downturn & improving the balance of payments. Why is PPT better than CPI-targeting for countries with volatile terms of trade? PPT Better response to trade shocks (accommodating): If the $ price of imported commodity goes up, CPI target says to tighten monetary policy enough to appreciate the currency. Wrong response. (E.g., oil-importers in 2007-08.) PPT does not have this flaw . If the $ price of the export commodity goes up, PPT says to tighten money enough to appreciate. Right response. (E.g., Gulf currencies in 2007-08.) CPI targeting does not have this advantage. A less radical alternative to CPI targeting: Nominal GDP Targeting NGDPT is more robust with respect to supply shocks & terms of trade shocks, compared to the alternative of IT . The logic holds whether the immediate aim is: Disinflation (as in 1980s, and today among some EMs); monetary stimulus (as among big ACs recently); or just staying the course. Figure: When a Nominal GDP Target Delivers a Better Outcome than IT Supply shock is split between output & inflation objectives rather than falling exclusively on output as under IT (at B). NGDPT for EMs The proponents of Nominal GDP Targets have focused on the biggest countries. But middle-size, middle-income countries are better candidates. Why? They suffer bigger supply shocks & trade shocks. Some evidence suggests the AS curve is indeed steep enough so that NGDPT minimizes quadratic loss function: “Nominal GDP Targeting for Middle-Income Countries,” Central Bank Review (CBRT), Sept. 2014. Conclusion: EMs should consider NGDPT as a serious alternative to IT & exchange rate targeting. Appendix 6: Chilean fiscal policy In 2000 Chile instituted its structural budget rule. The institution was formalized in law in 2006. The structural budget deficit must be zero, originally BS > 1% of GDP, then cut to ½ %, then 0 -where structural is defined by output & copper price equal to their long-run trend values. I.e., in a boom the government can only spend increased revenues that are deemed permanent; any temporary copper bonanzas must be saved. The crucial institutional innovation in Chile How has Chile avoided over-optimistic official forecasts? especially the historic pattern of over-exuberance in commodity booms? The estimation of the long-term path for GDP & the copper price is made by two panels of independent experts, & thus is insulated from political pressure & wishful thinking. Other countries might usefully emulate Chile’s innovation or in other ways delegate to independent agencies estimation of structural budget deficit paths. The Pay-off Chile’s fiscal position strengthened immediately: Public saving rose from 2.5 % of GDP in 2000 to 7.9 % in 2005 allowing national saving to rise from 21 % to 24 %. Government debt fell sharply as a share of GDP and the sovereign spread gradually declined. By 2006, Chile achieved a sovereign debt rating of A, several notches ahead of Latin American peers. By 2007 it had become a net creditor. By 2010, Chile’s sovereign rating had climbed to A+, ahead of some advanced countries. => It was able to respond to the 2008-09 recession via fiscal expansion. In 2008, with copper prices spiking up, the government of President Bachelet had been under intense pressure to spend the revenue. She & Fin.Min.Velasco held to the rule, saving most of it. Their popularity ratings fell sharply. When the recession hit and the copper price fell, the government increased spending, mitigating the downturn. Bachelet & Velasco’s popularity reached historic highs in 2009. Evolution of approval and disapproval of four Chilean presidents Presidents Patricio Aylwin, Eduardo Frei, Ricardo Lagos and Michelle Bachelet Data: CEP, Encuesta Nacional de Opinion Publica, October 2009, www.cepchile.cl. Source: Engel et al (2011). 5 econometric findings regarding bias toward optimism in official budget forecasts. Official forecasts in a sample of 33 countries on average are overly optimistic, for: (1) budgets & (2) GDP . The bias toward optimism is: (3) stronger the longer the forecast horizon; (4) greater in booms (5) greater for euro governments under SGP budget rules; (4) The optimism in official budget forecasts is stronger at the 3-year horizon, stronger among countries with budget rules, & stronger in booms. Frankel, 2013, “A Solution to Fiscal Procyclicality: The Structural Budget Institutions Pioneered by Chile.” (4) Official budget forecasts are biased more if GDP is currently high & especially at longer horizons Budget balance forecast error as % of GDP, Full dataset (1) (2) (3) 33 countries One year ahead Two years ahead Three years ahead GDP relative to trend 0.093*** 0.258*** 0.289*** (0.040) (0.063) 0.201 0.649*** 1.364*** (0.197) (0.231) (0.348) Constant (0.019) Observations 398 up with the year 300 Variable is lagged so that it lines in which the forecast 179 was made. *** p<0.01 Robust standard errors in parentheses, clustered by country. (5) Official budget forecasts are more optimistically biased in countries subject to a budget deficit rule (SGP) Budget balance forecast error 33 countries SGPdummy as a % of GDP, Full Dataset (1) (2) (3) One year ahead Two years ahead One year ahead Two years ahead 0.658 0.905** 0.407 0.276 (0.398) (0.406) (0.355) (0.438) 0.189** 0.497*** (0.0828) (0.107) SGP dummy * (GDP - trend) Constant Observations (4) 0.033 0.466* 0.033 0.466* (0.228) (0.248) (0.229) (0.249) 399 300 398 300 *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1 Robust standard errors in parentheses, clustered by country. 5 more econometric findings regarding bias toward optimism in official budget forecasts. (6) The key macroeconomic input for budget forecasting in most countries: GDP. In Chile: the copper price. (7) Real copper prices revert to trend in the long run. But this is not always readily perceived: (8) 30 years of data are not enough to reject a random walk statistically; 200 years of data are needed. (9) Uncertainty (option-implied volatility) is higher when copper prices are toward the top of the cycle. (10) Chile’s official forecasts are not overly optimistic. It has apparently avoided the problem of forecasts that unrealistically extrapolate in boom times. In sum, institutions recommended to make fiscal policy less procyclical: Official growth & budget forecasts tend toward wishful thinking: The bias is worse among the European countries supposedly subject to the budget rules of the SGP, unrealistic extrapolation of booms 3 years into the future. presumably because government forecasters feel pressured to announce they are on track to meet budget targets even if not. Chile is not subject to the same bias toward over-optimism in forecasts of the budget, growth, or the key copper price. The key innovation that has allowed Chile to achieve countercyclical fiscal policy: not just a structural budget rule in itself, but rather the regime that entrusts to two panels of experts estimation of the long-run trends of copper prices & GDP. Application to other countries Any country could adopt the Chilean mechanism. Suggestion: give the panels more institutional independence as is familiar from central banking: laws protecting them from being fired. Open questions: Are the budget rules to be interpreted as ex ante or ex post? How much of the structural budget calculations are to be delegated to the independent panels of experts? Minimalist approach: they compute only 10-yr moving averages. Can one guard against subversion of the institutions (CBO)? References by the author Project Syndicate, “Escaping the Oil Curse,” Dec.9, 2011. "Barrels, Bushels & Bonds: How Commodity Exporters Can Hedge Volatility," Oct.17, 2011. “The Natural Resource Curse: A Survey of Diagnoses and Some Prescriptions,” "The Curse: Why Natural Resources Are Not Always a Good Thing,” “The Natural Resource Curse: A Survey,” 2012, “How Can Commodity Exporters Make Fiscal and Monetary Policy Less Procyclical?” “On Graduation from Procyclicality,” 2012, with C.Végh & G.Vuletin; J. Dev. Economics. “Chile’s Solution to Fiscal Procyclicality,” “A Solution to Fiscal Procyclicality: The Structural Budget Institutions Pioneered by Chile,” in Fiscal Policy and Macroeconomic Performance, 2012. Central Bank of Chile WP 604, 2011. 2012, Commodity Price Volatility and Inclusive Growth in Low-Income Countries , R.Arezki & Z.Min, eds.. HKS RWP12-014. High Level Seminar, IMF Annual Meetings, DC, Sept.2011. Milken Institute Review, vol.13, 4th quarter 2011. Chapter 2 in Beyond the Resource Curse, B.Shaffer & T. Ziyadov, eds. (U.Penn. Press); proofs & notes; Summary. CID WP195, 2011. Natural Resources, Finance & Development, R.Arezki, T.Gylfason & A.Sy, eds. (IMF), 2011. HKS RWP 11-015. 2012, Transitions blog, Foreign Policy. "Product Price Targeting -- A New Improved Way of Inflation Targeting," in MAS Monetary Review Vol.XI, issue 1, April 2012 (Monetary Authority of Singapore). “A Comparison of Product Price Targeting and Other Monetary Anchor Options, for Commodity-Exporters in Latin America," Economia, vol.11, 2011 (Brookings), NBER WP 16362.