Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Homework 5 Economics 503 Foundations of Economic Analysis Assigned: Saturday, October 8th, 2005 Due: Saturday, October 15th, 2005 1. The long-term interest rate in 1966 in the USA was 4.61% (i.e. i = .0461). Suppose that Howard Hughes had invested his US$650 million in a T = 38 year bond that paid an interest rate of 4.61% per year. What was the value of his payoff at the end of 38 years? What was the real value of that payoff in 1966 dollars? What was the average real return earned on this investment? Use the GDP deflator data in the notes to answer this question. In 1966, Howard Hughes put $650 million into a 38 year bond with an interest of 4.61%. After 36 years the investment was worth (1+i)T∙Principal = 3603.255318. Convert this into 1966 dollars using the GDP deflator. Divide by the price level in the current year (2004) and remultiply by the price level in 2004. P Payofft ref 3603.255318 22.855 762.8188767 . The real return is Pt 107.958 Payofft T Pt+T Principal t Pt 2. 1 T 762.8188767 650 1 38 1.004220678 In HK, we observe a sudden, unanticipated increase in investor confidence. Use the business cycle model to analyze the effects of this event on output, price level, employment, and interest rates. a. Draw an AS-AD model and show the short-run effects of this event on the goods market. YLR P P** SRAS 2 P*=PE 1 ´ AD AD GDP If business confidence increases, then firms will want to invest more in physical capital. They will purchase more goods at any given price level shifting the price level upwards. Given input prices fixed by long-term contracts, the profit maximizing level of output increases as prices increase. Output increases above potential output. b. Draw graphs of the labor and loanable funds market and the short-run effects of this event. Redraw your graph of the goods market and identify the automatic adjustment impacts of outcomes in the labor and loanable funds market. The economy is in a boom. Therefore firms are increasing their scale of production. The demand for labor shifts up. In equilibrium, real wages and labor increase. This increases the cost of production. To produce any level of output, the firms will charge a higher price. The short run aggregate supply curves shifts up. Firms also need to borrow more to buy more capital equipment. The demand for loanable funds increase. This increases the interest rate which will have a negative impact on the AD curve. Labor Supply W/P 2 Labor Demand 1 ´ Labor Demand Labor LS i 2 LD 1 ´ LD Loanable Funds YLR SRAS SRAS´ P P** 3 2 P*=PE ´ AD AD´´ AD GDP ´ c. Draw one more graph of the goods market showing the long-term effects of the rise in investor confidence showing the self-correction mechanism. In the short run, the price level is higher than the expected price level priced into long-term contracts. Input producing firms made a mistake. When contracts expire, they will correct their mistake by charging higher prices for their inputs. This will increase the cost of production for output firms. They will increase the price that they would demand to produce at any level of output. The SRAS curve will shift up as long as input firms feel they should increase their prices. They will do so, until the prices actually equal the prices they price into their contracts. 1 SRAS´ SRAS´´ ´ 5 SRAS´ P 4 P** 3 P*=PE ´ AD AD´´ AD GDP 3. ´ New Orleans, Louisiana, is an important part of the transportation system in the USA and an important center for the petrochemical industry in that country. Consider the impact of the recent hurricanes that devastated that city as a temporary supply shock for the USA. a. Discuss, in one paragraph or less, the outcomes that we are likely to see in terms of goods markets and the loanable funds market in the USA as a result of this negative business cycle shock. A supply shock increases the cost of production at any scale of production. The firms will charge a higher price and the SRAS curve will shift up. When production levels are reduced. Firms will reduce their production levels and reduce their demand for labor and capital, and thus loanable funds. YLR SRAS P 2 SRAS´ 1 AD GDP W/P Labor Demand ´ Labor Supply 1 2 Labor Demand Labor i LD ´ LS 1 2 LD Loanable Funds b. Analysts are also worried that the natural disaster may have a negative impact on consumer confidence. Discuss briefly the differences in outcomes that we would observe if this demand side effect were stronger from the outcomes that we would observe if the supply side effects were dominant. If consumer confidence declined, then demand would decline. This would lead to lower prices and output. Both the impact of the shock as a supply shock and as a demand shock reduce the level of output. Both would reduce the demand for labor and capital (and thus, for loanable funds). However, a stronger demand shock would reduce price levels. A stronger supply shock would lead to higher price levels. YLR P SRAS P*=PE 1 P** 2 ´ AD AD GDP c. Discuss the impact that these events would have on Hong Kong’s economy. Consider both the impact on Hong Kong’s exports and the effect on Hong Kong’s loanable funds market. From either perspective, these events will lead to lower levels of output and demand in the USA. Since the USA is a market for HK exports, this will reduce the demand for HK’s exports. On the other hand, consider the effect on HK’s loanable funds market. The USA interest rate will decline increasing the amount of loanable funds direct toward HK. The lower interest rate would stimulate demand for capital goods, housing and consumer durables in HK. Thus, there would be counter-veiling effects of this shock on output in HK. i LD ´ LS 1 LD 2 Loanable Funds Homework 5, Pt 2 Economics 503 Foundations of Economic Analysis Assigned: Saturday, October 8th, 2005 Due: Saturday, October 15th, 2005You are studying unemployment trends 4. in Hong Kong. An economic organization identifies the following years as containing business cycle peaks and troughs. Peak 1987 1996 1999 Trough 1984 1989 1997 2001 a. Calculate the average unemployment rate during peak years and trough years. Which is higher? Use unemployment rates obtained from here? The average unemployment rates during trough years is 3.1 years. The average unemployment rates during the peak years. 3.57 is actually higher than trough years. That doesn’t make sense, does it? Peak Peak Unemployment Rate 1987 1.7 1996 2.8 1999 6.2 Trough Unemployment Rate 1984 3.9 1989 1.1 1997 2001 2.2 5.1 b. Calculate the average unemployment rates in Hong Kong in 1997-2004 and compare those in the years 1989-1996. Explain how changes in cyclical and frictional employment might explain these trends. Hong Kong Census and Statistics Department http://www.info.gov.hk/censtatd/eng/hkstat/fas/labour/ghs/labour1_index.html Unemployment Rate 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1.1 1.3 1.8 2.0 2.0 1.9 3.2 2.8 Average 2.0125 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2.2 4.7 6.2 4.9 5.1 7.3 7.9 6.8 5.6375 In the years before 1996, the average unemployment rate was 2.0125. After 1996, the unemployment rate averages 5.6375. This long run rise in the unemployment rate may indicate an increase in the structural rate of unemployment.