Download On the category of topological topologies

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Sheaf cohomology wikipedia , lookup

Geometrization conjecture wikipedia , lookup

Orientability wikipedia , lookup

Manifold wikipedia , lookup

Surface (topology) wikipedia , lookup

Homology (mathematics) wikipedia , lookup

Brouwer fixed-point theorem wikipedia , lookup

3-manifold wikipedia , lookup

Covering space wikipedia , lookup

Sheaf (mathematics) wikipedia , lookup

Continuous function wikipedia , lookup

Fundamental group wikipedia , lookup

General topology wikipedia , lookup

Homological algebra wikipedia , lookup

Grothendieck topology wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
C AHIERS DE
TOPOLOGIE ET GÉOMÉTRIE DIFFÉRENTIELLE
CATÉGORIQUES
M ARIA C RISTINA P EDICCHIO
On the category of topological topologies
Cahiers de topologie et géométrie différentielle catégoriques, tome
25, no 1 (1984), p. 3-13
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=CTGDC_1984__25_1_3_0>
© Andrée C. Ehresmann et les auteurs, 1984, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Cahiers de topologie et géométrie
différentielle catégoriques » implique l’accord avec les conditions
générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/legal.php). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive
d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier
doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme
Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
Vol. XXV - 1 (1984)
CAHIERS DE TOPOLOGIE
ET
GÉOMÉTR1E D1FFÉRENT1ELLE
CATÉGOR1QUES
ON THE CATEGORY OF TOPOLOGICAL TOPOLOGIES
by
Maria Cristina PEDICCHIO
SUMMARY.
study the main properties of the category 9 of all pairs ( Y, Y* )
with Y a topological space and Y4’ a topological topology on the lattice
of open sets of Y . By q, it is possible to classify monoidal closed and
monoidal biclosed structures on Top .
We
INTRO DUCTION.
Isbell in
tors
is
[8]
gave the
of the category
completely
with 2
Top
of
determined
by
a Sierpinski
It is natural then
that
and whose
f-1 : Y* ~
a
pair ( Y, Y*)
to
define
morphisms
X" is continuous
Our aim is
to
of
topological
spaces where
underlying Y * is, up to isoof open sets of Y , and the topology of Y * is a
is, it makes finite intersection and arbitrary un-
space ; furthermore the
morphism, just the lattice
topological topology, that
ion continuous operations.
( Y , Y*) ,
following classification for adjoint endofunctopological spaces. A pair F -1 G : Top ~ TQp
study
a
set
category 9
whose
all continuous
are
objects
maps f :
are
all
pairs
X -
Y,
such
too.
the main
properties
of such
a
category 9 .
completely devoted to recall definitions and properties
about topological functors and initially complete categories drawing mainly
on Herrlich [6, 7 1.
In Section 2, first we prove that ! is a small-fibred, initially complete category on Top , in order to apply the previous results; then we
construct a monoidal closed (also biclosed) structure on 9 .
Section 1 is
3
problem of classification of monoidal
closed structures on the category of topological spaces [2, 3]). As a generalization of our results about structures induced by adjoining systems
of filters [10], we give a complete description both of all monoidal closed
structures and of all monoidal biclosed structures on Top, relating them
to opportune functors from -1 to Top . The author is greatly indebted to
G. M. Kelly for many helpful conversations and advices.
Section 3 is devoted
1. For
A , 11
and
concrete
a
the
over
categor y
where U: A - X is
a
base category X,
forgetful functor,
a
that
is,
we
mean a
faithful,
a
pair
amnestic
functor.
transportable
A X-morphism
or
Top
c : X ~ Y is said
Z in X and for
th at, for each
Set
to
this definition is
D EF INITION 1.1. A
gical category
iff the
( i ) U : A - X is
( ii)
A is
( iii)
phism
be
a constant
all u , v E X ( Z , .Y ) ,
just
concrete
to
the classical
category
=
c . v .
If X is
one.
( A , 11 )
following hold :
a topological functor
morphism provided
c . u
in the
over
X is called
sense
of
a
topolo-
[6;
small-fibred;
every
constant
morphism U ( A ) --&#x3E; U ( B)
underlies
some
A-mor -
A--&#x3E; B .
category X is Set or Top then condition ( iii ) is equivalent to the following
( iv ) For any X with cardinality one, the fibre (J’ ( X ) is a singleton.
If the base
We shall say that
completes
a
concrete
category iff it verifies (i) and
category is
(11)
a
small- fibred, initially
[1, 11] ).
of Definition 1.1 (see
( A , U ) and (B,V) are concrete categories over X , for a funcwith
over X , F ( A, U ) --7 ( B , V ) , we mean any functor F i A - B
If
tor
F
V.F = 11 ,
D EF INITION
an
1.2. A
extension (of (
DEFINITION
functor F
A , U )) if
over
X, F: (A, U) --&#x3E; (B, V), is called
F is full and faithful.
1.3. An extension
E: ( A, U ) --&#x3E; (B, V )
4
is called
a
small-
fibred, initial completion (o f ( A , U ) )
tially complete.
if
(B, V) is small-fibred and ini -
following list exhibits some properties of small-fibred, initially
complete categories over the category Top of topological spaces ; the same
results are well known for topological categories over Set [7].
The
PROPOSITION 1.4.
over
(2) A
a
small- fihred, initially complete category
following hold :
is finally complete ;
is complete and cocomplete
and U : A 4
Top preserves limits
colimits ;
( 3 ) An A-morphism is
tive
is
then the
Top,
(1) A
and
I f ( A, U )
a
monomorphism (epimorpbism) iff
(surjective),’
( 4) A is wellpowered and cowellpowered;
( 5) U: A Top has a full and faithful left adjoint
--+
D
it is
injec-
( = discrete
structure) ;
( 6 ) U : A 4 Top has
structure)
a
full
and
faith ful right adjoint
K
( = indiscrete
,
A-morphism f, f is arz embedding i f f f is an extremal
monomorphism i f f f is a regular monomorphism f is a quotient map iff
f is an extremal epimorphism i f f f is a regular epimorphism;
( 8 ) For any topological space X , the fibre U -1 ( X ) of X is a small
complete lattice ;
( 9 ) Any A-object A , with U A 1:- ø and A D U A, is a separator;
( 10 ) An A-object A is a coseparator iff there exists an embedding
of an indiscrete object with two points into A ;
( 11 ) An A-object A is projective i f f A = D U A ,
K UA.
( 12 ) An A-object A is injective iff U A A O and A
( 7)
For any
,
=
.
=
P ROO F.
( 1 ), ( 2 ) and ( 3 ) follow from [6 ], Sections 5 and 6.
( 4 ) is
true
for
Top
is well- and
cowellpowered.
( 5 ) and ( 6 ) follow by Th eorem 7.1 of [6 ] .
( 7 ) follows easily by the definition of regular and extremal morphism.
( R) For any pair Ax , Ax of objects in U-1 ( X ) , let us put
5
l1x
A x
iff there is
with this order
any
family
a
A-morphism g: A x
U-1 (X)
relation,
( Ai x )iE in
the
forms
fibre,
,7C’
small
a
inf ( A ix )
with
U(g) = IX ;
lattice
complete
is the 11-initial
and, for
lifting
of the
source
( 9 ), ( 10 ), ( 11 ) and 12 ) follow by properties of discrete and indiscrete
0
structures.
2. Let
recall the
definition from
following
topology 7’ on
is a topological topology
Y
space
us
[8].
the lattice 0 Y of the open
A
of
sets
a
topological
iff it makes finite intersection and ar-
bitrary union continuous maps (we use the symbol Y" for the set O Y topologized by T ). Isbell [8, 12] has proved that any pair of adjoint endofunctors F j G of Top is determined (up to functorial isomorphism) by a
pair ( Y, Y*,), where Y = F ( { * }) and Y*=G(2),with 2 aSierpinski
furthermore G(2) has,
space ;
tion) and Y* is
a
We define
underlying
as
topological topology
category 9
on
set,
just
O Y
(up
to
bijec-
this lattice.
t = Isbell
category) as follows :
Objects of 9 are all pairs (X, X*), with X c Top and X * a topological
topology on OX. An g-morphism f : (X, X * )--+ ( Y , Y *) is a continuous
map f : X--+ Y such that f-1 : 0 Y OX is continuous from Y * to X * (we
shall write f * for f-1 ). We call V the forgetful functor V : 9--+ Topo defined by
a
--&#x3E;
and
call U the
we
Then,
if
adjoint
Adj
forgetful
U:9--+ Top defined by
functor
objects are the pairs F U CT of
morphisms are the pairs of nat-
denotes the category whose
endofunctors of
Top , and
whose
ural transformations
(a,B ):
Isbell’s result
( F, G)--&#x3E; ( F’ G ’ ) ,
implies
THEOREM 2.1. T’he
the
with
following
a:
F % F’ and
B:
theorem :
categories Adj and 9
6
are
equivalent.
G’ --&#x3E;G
( 9,
P ROP OSITION 2.2.
egory
over
a
( Xi , X*i) is
sink in
Top ,
with respect
suffices
and
to
to
stitall-libred, initially complete
to
we
a
denote
I-objects
of
X* the
by
following
set
and
OX with the initial
topology
a
topological topology, it
diagram
commutative
topology to the continuous composite
the union map).. Since, for any
of the initial
apply properties
(the
family
To show that X* is
( f*i )i E I .
consider the
r i X f*i )
same
applies
to
f*i . h * is continuous for
q-morphism (for any i ). This
with respect to
(fi)i E I
h *: Y* -&#x3E; X* is continuous iff
an
9-morphism
is the
q-final
iff h.
fi
is
an
X
structure on
Any finally complete
is
a source
in
category is
a
initially complete ;
the
following
topological topology
is
9-initial
structure on
structure
X with respect
i , then h is
shows that (X, X*)
any
.
Top and 4) denotes
is
then the
cat-
Top .
P ROO F. If
is
LI ) is a
on
to
X
set:
on
an
with respect
if
0.B, and
4-morphism
to
all the functions 1 :
( gi )i E I
for any
is the
i}
4-final
(X, X*)--&#x3E; X, X*E O.
0
REMARK 2.3. If S is
are
objects
inuous map
an
open
of X * such that r
topological topology X* and r, s,
( Sand s 2 r , then s c s . Consider the cont; since U-1 ( S ) is open in the topological
set
of
product
a
,
7
then there
ex-
neighborhood U c U-1 ( S)
ists
a
and
7"7 15.;:; h
sets
open
,
of ( rn ) with
of X*
containing
n E N’ with tn = r if n = l1 , l2 , ... , lh
is in
Ur’
generally
As
tn = s otherwise
10, 2
construction of
a
consider
and denote
by
k t: X--+ 3 , it follows,
(2,2*) is
by
the
a
constant
0 , 1, 2}
3 =
is open in the final
ogy, so, if
9-initial
structures
by Top-final
struc-
fails.
example,
an
(X,X*)E g,
set
and
The sequence
so 5 is in S.
Note that
tures
r.
topology
2 *f
Remark 2.3, that
g-initial
structure
U ( X , XI), with
map k : 2 --+
the ordered
O 2 . Since the
3 with re spect
on
2 *f
set
is
not a
to
the map
topological topolto k , 2*
2f* .
with respect
Theorem 2.2,
Proposition 1.4 can be applied, hence completeness and cocompleteness of q follow, where limits and colimits are obtained from limits and colimits in Top by q-initial and g-final structures
respectively, with respect to the maps of the limit (or colimit) cone of Top.
Again by Proposition 1.4, U: g --+ Top has a left adjoint D and a right adjoint K with the following properties :
By
for any X E
structure
X*
D
and
( Y, Y * ) E g. If
D ( X ) and by
and X4,
ology
Top
K
determine,
definable
on
(X, X*)
resp., the
OX . For X =
we
denote
by
the indiscrete
coarsest
1* 1,
( X , X*D )
structure
and the finest
the discrete
K ( X ) , then
topological
top-
the fibre
objects), hence I is not
topological. Since Top is topological over Set with the forgetful functor
U : Top 7 Set , then I is small-fibred, initially complete over Set with the
forgetful functor W U . U . We write D and K for the left and right adjoints to FJ and D and K for the composite functors D . D and K . K .
(where
2
denotes
an
indiscrete space with
=
8
two
For
X , Z E Top and
U(X)XU(Y)
set
symbol [ Y, Z]
respect
to
with the
denotes the
( Y, Y* ) E g ,
symbol X ø Y denotes the
topology O ( XO Y ) = Top ( X , Y*), and the
set Top( Y, Z ) with the initial
topology with
the maps
defined
[8, 10]. Furthermore,
note
from
now
on,
we
by
shall
use
letters A , B , C
to
de-
g-objects
will be the
J
the
THEOREM
category [4 ]
2.4. The
(q,
’wherp [Y, Z *]
with respect
g-object D ({ * }) = ({ *} , 2)
to
o ,
1,
category I
{-, -})
is the sett
the maps
{
admits
a
and I
structure
the
g-object
of
monoidal
closed
with
O [ Y, Z I with the final topological topology
PS: Z*--+ 0[ Y, Z !SfOY*’ defined by
topology on Top( X, Y*) with respect to all the
maps {lS} S E O Y* is a topological topology (see Theorem 2.2), then the
tensor product object is in 9. For g-morphisms f A --+ A’ and g : 9 4 B’
P ROO F. Since the initial
we
as
define
the
product f X g .
If
r :
X’ --&#x3E; Y’4’ is
an
open
set
of X’ O Y’ , then
f X g: X O Y --+ X’ O Y’ is continuous ; to prove the continuity of
( f X g ) *: [ X’, Y’* ]--&#x3E; [X, Y *] , it suffices to apply properties of the initial
topology. I = ( { *} 2 ) , so
hence
The
associativity
of
o
follows from
Proposition 2.3 of []0],
9
for
topological topology [ Y,Z]*as in
Theorem 2.3 and the 4-morphism {f, g}: {B, C}--+ {B’, C’ j} is hom ( f , g ) ,
for any f : B ’ --+ B and g : c » C’ . If B
( Y , Y*) 6 q , it is known by [8] ,
As for the internal hom
we
get the final
=
that
Let
us
denote
by k: X --+ [ Y, Z]
h * is continuous iff the
are
continuous,
for
the
following composite
any S E
0
for
map o ( h ),
maps
any h:X O Y--+ Z.
ts
for the commutative
Y" , but,
and, by properties of the final topological topology, ts
any S ) iff k * is continuous; hence
and - o B - {B, -} for any R f g,
We end this section with
The
tensor
closed
o
is
not
structures over
(g , - o -, I, { -, - })
diagram
is continuous (for
o
two
further
comments
on
Theorem 2.4.
symmetric, for there exist non symmetric monoidal
Top (for example Greve structures [5 ]), induced by
(see Section 3). A o - preserves
coproducts and coequalizers for any .4 f g, then by Freyd’s Special Adjoint Functor Theorem,
it has a right adjoint, hence the g-structure is biclosed.
3. Consider Top
as a concrete
PROPOSITION 3. 1 (see
category
also [10}). A
10
over
Top itself :
monoidal closed
structure
on
Top,
is
equivalent
PROOF.
to
functor
over
Top,
F :
( Top , 1 ) --+
(g,
U ) such that
By [8)] (or [12 ]) ,
Top . From Proposition 2.3 of [10], ( i )
0
monoidality of ( To p , - D -, {*}).
for X, Y, Z
valen t
to a
Then, for
any monoidal closed
small-fibred,
a
structure
is
(g, -
initial
completion
0 - , I) restricted
to
pair (g,
of
( Top ,
the full
F:
Top --+)
7 ). Further the monoidal
subcategory F ( Top) = Top ,
just (ToP, - D-, {*}) .
EXAMPLES. The canonical
(separate continuity
and
symmetric monoidal closed
pointwise convergence)
ultrafilters of open
the
lotson
where
h ( X) &#x3E; denotes the
PROP OSITION
set
of all open
3.2. A monoidal biclosed
the
sets
to
of I’
structure
of all
any Y E Top
over
Top
PROOF. If
a
monoidal biclosed structure , F and G
11
are
prin-
the top-
containing h ( X ) .
such that
over
Top
of Booth and Til-
is
pair of functors
Top, ( F, G ): Top--+ g,
3.
( i ) and ( ii ) of Proposition 1 and V.F -l V °. G °: Top 4 Top ° .
to a
on
by F ( Y ) =
family
a-structures
Similarly
[2] and Greve 5] are obtained associating
ological topology generated by the family
cipal
sets.
structure
is determined
( Y, Y4) where the topology of Y* is generated by
is
are equi-
structure
the associated functor F is strict monoidal and the
is
and ( ii )
f
defined
by
F
equivalent
satisfies
Sin c e,
for X , Y , Z c
Top,
then if Z= 2,
so V . F -l
V ° . G ° .
and G determines
V.
F -l
V ° . G °
an
Conversely,
F determines
adjunction -DY -l
a
monoidal closed
structure
Y, - &#x3E;&#x3E; with
implies
Since
and (2,2) is
X, hence
a
strong cogenerator of
Top ,
Y 0- -t «Y,"», for. any Y.
Observe that
determined by
a
a
symmetric
pair ( F, G )
then
0
monoidal closed
with G = F.
12
YDX = YD X, for any
structure
over
Top
is
REFERENCES.
1.
J. ADAMEK, H. HERRLICH &#x26; G. E. STRECKER, Least
completions, Gen. Top. Appl, 4 ( 1974), 125- 142.
and
largest initial
J. TILLOTSON, Monoidal closed, cartesian closed and convenient
categories of topological spaces, Pacific J. Math. 88 (1980), 35- 53.
2. P. BOOTH &#x26;
3. J. 010CIN010CURA, Tensor product in the category of
Math. Univ. Carol. 20 ( 1979), 431- 446.
4. S. EILENBERG &#x26; G. M. KELLY. Closed
topological
categories,
Proc.
spaces, Comment.
Conf.
Cat.
Algebra
(La Jolla), Springer, 1966, 421-562.
5. G.
GREVE,
How many monoidal closed
structures are
there in
Top? Arch.
Math. 34, Basel (1980), 538-539.
6. H. HERRLICH,
Topological functors,
Gen.
Top. Appl. 4 (1974), 125-142.
HERRLICH, Cartesian closed topological categories, Math. Colloq.,
Cape Town 9 (1974), 1- 16.
7. H.
8.
J. R. ISBELL,
Function spaces and
adjoints, Math.
Scand. 36
Univ.
(1975), 317-339.
9. G. M. KELLY, Basic concepts of enriched category theory, London Math. Soc.,
Lecture Notes 64, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1982.
PEDICCHIO, Closed structures on the category of topological spaces
determined by systems of filters, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 28 (1983), 161-174.
10. M. C.
11.
H. E. PORST, Characterizations
of Mac Neille
completions
and
topological
functors, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 18 (1978), 201- 210.
12. M. C.
VIPERA, Endo funtori aggiunti di Top. Quad, del gruppo di ri cerca Alg.
Geom. Topologia, Dip.
Mat. Univ.
13. O. WYLER, On the
categories
Arch. Math. 22
7- 17.
(1971),
of
P erugia, 1980.
general topology
14. O.
WYLER, Top-categories and categorical topology,
( 1971), 17- 28
Institute of Mathematics
Universita degli Studi
1-34100 TRIESTE. ITALY
13
and
topological algebra,
Gen.
Topology Appl.
1