Download sample letter - Campaign to End AIDS

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Maternal health wikipedia , lookup

Health equity wikipedia , lookup

Reproductive health wikipedia , lookup

Harm reduction wikipedia , lookup

Syndemic wikipedia , lookup

Diseases of poverty wikipedia , lookup

HIV and pregnancy wikipedia , lookup

Epidemiology of HIV/AIDS wikipedia , lookup

India HIV/AIDS Alliance wikipedia , lookup

Index of HIV/AIDS-related articles wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
October 18, 2013
Executive Name
Address
Re: Formulary Exclusion of Single-Tablet Regimens for Individuals Living With HIV
Dear Mr/Ms. X:
We are writing to express our serious concern about the absence of single-tablet regimens
(STRs) for the treatment of HIV on your formularies. Based on a preliminary review, it appears
that your plans exclude STRs in several states, which is inconsistent with the current standard of
care for HIV. A majority of public and private health insurance plans cover STRs, including the
state benchmark plans that set the minimum standard for mandatory Qualified Health Plan
(QHP) pharmaceutical coverage under the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
We urge you to immediately amend your formularies to include all STRs, in tiers that will allow
people with HIV access to these essential medications, and to update your plan profiles in the
Marketplaces to reflect this change. These medications play an important role in the
management of HIV infection for a majority of people with HIV who are on treatment; their
exclusion from QHP formularies creates a second class of health insurance coverage for
individuals purchasing coverage through the Marketplaces.
Advances in HIV care and treatment have transformed HIV/AIDS from a deadly disease to a
manageable chronic health condition. Consequently, the HIV standard of care in the United
States is to offer treatment to all individuals testing positive, as failure to suppress the virus early
in its progression causes irreparable and costly harm to the immune system.i,ii Development of
STRs (that significantly reduce daily pill burden) has further improved management of HIV.
Utilization of STRs has increased adherence and improved health outcomes, as well as reduced
transmission rates and healthcare expenditures.iii,iv,v In fact, STRs have been shown to reduce
hospitalization-related costs by 23% and overall medical costs by 17%.3 Some of the preferred
HIV treatment regimens recommended by the Department of Health and Human Services and
International Antiviral Society-USA in their respective guidelines for antiretroviral treatment are
available as STRs. Most of the co-formulated products are no more expensive than their
component parts and can be of greater value when the benefit to treatment adherence is
considered.
With the enactment of the ACA, tens of thousands of individuals living with HIV will now have
access to the QHPs you offer. By limiting access to STRs, individuals living with HIV enrolled
in your plans will not have access to the simplified drug regimens that promote treatment
adherence. This could place them at greater risk for developing more serious HIV-related
complications jeopardizing their health and leading to the need for more costly medical
interventions, as well as increasing the risk of transmission. In addition, failing to cover STRs
will result in extremely dangerous disruptions in treatment for those who are currently uninsured,
yet receiving access to these medications through state AIDS Drug Assistance Programs or
patient assistance programs (both of which cover STRs), as they transition to QHP coverage.
1
Plans are required to have clear policies and procedures in place that allow enrollees to request
coverage for drugs that are not on formularies (45 CFR § 156.122(c)). However, these processes
can be labor intensive, lengthy, and lead to increases in overall health care costs due to the
harmful consequences of a potential coverage delay or denial, and the increased administrative
burden on an already strained health care system. It also unreasonably deters enrollees (and
potential enrollees) from seeking much needed health insurance, as this deviation from the states’
benchmarks will likely have the effect of actively discouraging individuals living with HIV from
enrolling in these plans. This may even amount to unlawful discrimination under the ACA.
Under 45 CFR § 147.104(e), insurers may not “employ marketing or benefit designs that will
have the effect of discouraging the enrollment of individuals with significant health needs.” A
benefit design that excludes essential medications for the treatment of HIV violates this
regulation.
We strongly urge you to amend your formulary by adding STRs to your drug formularies so that
your QHP coverage supports today’s standard of HIV care. We also urge you to ensure that
these medications are available at reasonable cost sharing levels to ensure access to the treatment
that is critical to keeping people with HIV healthy.
Thank you for your prompt attention to these matters. Should you have any questions or wish to
further discuss these matters, please contact Robert Greenwald at [email protected] or
(617) 390-2584.
Respectfully Submitted by the Steering Committee of the HIV Health Care Access Working
Group,
AIDS Action Baltimore | AIDS Action of MA | AIDS Alliance for Children, Youth & Families |
AIDS Foundation of Chicago | The AIDS Institute | AIDS Project Los Angeles | AIDS Treatment
Data Network | AIDS United | American Academy of HIV Medicine | Broward House |
Community Access National Network | Communities Advocating Emergency AIDS Relief
(CAEAR) Coalition | Gay Men’s Health Crisis | Georgia AIDS Coalition | Harlem United |
Health and Disability Advocates | HealthHIV| HIVictorious, Inc. | HIV Medicine Association |
HIV Prevention Justice Alliance | Housing Works | L.A. Gay & Lesbian Center | Moveable Feast
| National Alliance of State and Territorial AIDS Directors | National Minority AIDS Council |
The National Working Positive Coalition| Project Inform | San Francisco AIDS Foundation |
South Carolina Campaign to End AIDS| Treatment Access Expansion Project | Treatment Action
Group | VillageCare
cc:
Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services
Gary Cohen, Deputy Administrator and Director, Center for Consumer Information and
Insurance Oversight, Department of Health and Human Services
2
i
Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescents. Department of Health and
Human Services Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents (Available at
http://aidsinfo.nih.gov/ContentFiles/AdultandAdolescentGL.pdf).
ii
Thompson, MA, et al, Antiretroviral treatment of adult HIV infection, JAMA 2012.
iii
Cohen CJ, Meyers JL, Davis KL, Association between daily antiretroviral pill burden and treatment adherence,
hospitalization risk, and other healthcare utilization and costs in a US Medicaid population with HIV, BMJ Open
3;2013.
iv
Juday T et al, A retrospective study of HIV antiretroviral treatment persistence in a commercially insured
population in the United States, AIDS Care: Psychological and Socio-medical Aspects of AIDS/HIV, 2011.
v
Sax PE, et al., Adherence to antiretroviral treatment and correlation with risk of hospitalization among
commercially insured HIV patients in the United States, PLoS ONE, 2012.
3