Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Children of the Sun, Mass Observation, and Cinema Going in Bolton. Tom Harrisson was an anthropologist in the 1930s who had made several 'scientific' expeditions to the Artic and St.Kilda, Borneo and the Western Pacific together with two years in the New Hebrides in Melanesia. It was here he encountered the 'Big Nambas of Malekula', who, apparently, were cannibals. Despite this, Harrison found them to be pleasant and no more difficult to live with than the English, Irish or Welsh. So, it slowly dawned on him, that while anthropologists had been generously financed to study the 'so-called primitive peoples of the world', no one was making a study of ordinary people in his native land. Harrison determined, therefore, to return home to study the 'cannibals of Britain', particularly those living in a place that was 'strange' to him in the industrial north of England - Worktown - the fictional name given to the study of Bolton and Blackpool. It was in Bolton that he spent his first few months of anthropological study, working in different jobs, trying to 'pick up the threads of mass life in Britain in much the same way as one does when visiting a little known country'. Harrisson relates that after he had been doing this for about six months he met a newspaper reporter from the Daily Mirror, who was also a published poet, Charles Madge. Both were Cambridge 'drop-outs'. The eminent historian, poet and highly respected literary scholar, Angus Calder, described them as ‘children of the sun’ It was Madge, however, who persuaded Harrisson that the best way to make studies was through a nation-wide system of voluntary informants, reporting on themselves, rather than by specialised study on the spot. Indeed, Gary Cross in his Worktowners in Blackpool claims that Madge announced the formulation of 'Mass Observation' and that 'Harrison soon joined'. Thus it was that Mass Observation was born by 'a heterogeneous group of leftish middle-class intellectuals' in early 1937 and based itself in a rather dilapidated terraced property in Bolton in Davenport Street, in an area that was within easy walking distance of the town centre. The street still exists but is not the row of Victorian houses that it once was being now part of the local authority housing stock having been ‘redeveloped’ in the 1980s. Besides Harrisson and Madge, the 'heterogeneous group' comprised the painters Graham Bell, William Coldstream and Julian Trevelyan, the photographer Humphrey Spender and the writers, John Somerfield and Bill Naughton and poet, and later documentary film director, Humphrey Jennings. Also in the group in its early days were Kathleen Raine, Stuart Legg, David Gascoyne and William Empson. Support for the project came from such luminaries of the time as J.B.S. Haldane, 1 Julian Huxley, J.D. Bernal, Bronislaw Malinowski and H.G. Wells and was partly funded by the publisher Victor Gollancz. It was Gollancz who commissioned four books on Bolton - politics, religion, the pub and leisure (including Blackpool). Only one, however, The Pub and the People, actually appeared in January 1943. 83-87 Davenport Street in August 1960 from Britain Revisited. The aim of Mass Observation was to produce a 'people’s anthropology' in which ordinary people were asked to write about their daily lives and the events in their community. In many ways they succeeded although reports, collected by Harrison and co, were invariably written by middle class people that, undoubtedly, coloured the representation of working class life. A number, however, were written by working class respondents and in that way their own voices can be discerned from the evidence, sometimes directly from autobiographical writing, sometimes from the ‘silences and omissions (that) have to be dramatised in the reader’s imagination’. Mass observation was not without its critics though, from popular newspapers through to academics. For example the leader of the Bolton Evening News on the 27th of June 1937 called it an ‘unequalled opportunity for the pettifogging, the malicious, the cranky, the interfering and the mildly dotty’. The Mass Observation 2 Studies of the 30s do, however, give us some insight into working class behaviour in Bolton at that period, particularly with regard to working class institutions such as the pub, the annual holiday treat and cinema going. Charles Madge and Tom Harrisson More recently the Marriot trust have sponsored mef to give a more contemporary voice to Boltonians fond memories of cinema-going in the town. Thankfully, many of my fellow Boltonians have been only too willing to share them. Many memories surround individual cinemas and so each cinema has been located and described and memories of them shared through oral recordings, interviews, articles and correspondence from contemporary Boltonians. Their voices are used in an attempt to weave a sophisticated narrative of ‘leisure lives’ of the twentieth century in the town and, as such, eye-witness participants have recalled the events of the past for the purpose of historical reconstruction aimed at producing a cultural history of Bolton from those indigenous peoples, or members of cultural minorities, whose voices have seldom been heard. At the same time, it highlights the complexity of the oral history relationship and the extraordinary variety of ways of interpreting the past, and of making histories using these sources. The monograph then contains original material of those oral recordings, etc. juxtaposed alongside historical research from 20th century local newspapers, journals and books together with a unique collection of photographs ranging from fairground stalls exhibiting the newly invented Kinetoscope in the early twentieth century through to images of the shells of long gone picture palaces. 3 The Rialto Cinema on St. Georges Road. Photo courtesy of the Cinema Trust. In all spheres of academic life debates take place that attempt to establish an exact picture of the material or social world. This is probably an unattainable aim but nevertheless scholars and academics continue to strive towards the nearest approximations of that exact picture. The cruel paradox, however, seems to be that increased knowledge brings in its wake yet more questions, so that the goals that once seemed within easy grasp lurch away into infinity. Indeed, this may be the nature of the journey undertaken in this monograph as it attempts to give voice to previously unheard memories of contemporary Boltonians and their leisure lives in the twentieth century. Almost inevitably, from the voices that have been recorded more questions are raised than answered as, necessarily, a limited number of people are included. The excluded majority would certainly have coloured the portrait of leisure life in Bolton with a different hue. Nonetheless, the effort to write this monograph has been undertaken with enthusiasm as it is seen a valid historical exercise underpinned by the idea that there can be an adequate correspondence between people’s oral evidence and the truthful knowledge of the past. Cinema-going is, hopefully, the first is a series of studies of leisure in Bolton across the twentieth century that includes specifically women’s rounders, dancing, dog-racing, football, cricket together with other sports, recreations and hobbies such as bowls, table tennis, tennis, darts, rambling, angling, amateur dramatics, boxing, wrestling, etc. Dr. Peter Swain April, 2011. 4