Download This is the presentation

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Magnetorotational instability wikipedia , lookup

Reynolds number wikipedia , lookup

Magnetohydrodynamics wikipedia , lookup

Euler equations (fluid dynamics) wikipedia , lookup

Turbulence wikipedia , lookup

Lattice Boltzmann methods wikipedia , lookup

Bernoulli's principle wikipedia , lookup

Fluid dynamics wikipedia , lookup

Computational fluid dynamics wikipedia , lookup

Navier–Stokes equations wikipedia , lookup

Derivation of the Navier–Stokes equations wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Stable Fluids
A paper by Jos Stam
Contributions
Real-Time unconditionally stable solver for
Navier-Stokes fluid dynamics equations
Implicit methods allow for large timesteps

Excessive damping – damps out swirling vortices
Easy to implement
Controllable (?)
Some Math(s)
Nabla Operator:
Laplacian Operator:
Gradient:
More Math(s)
Vector Gradient:
Divergence:
Directional Derivative:
Navier-Stokes Fluid Dynamics
Velocity field u, Pressure field p
Viscosity v, density d (constants)
 External force f

Navier-Stokes Equation:
Mass Conservation Condition:
Navier-Stokes Equation
Derived from momentum conservation condition
4 Components:




Advection/Convection
Diffusion (damping)
Pressure
External force (gravity, etc)
Mass Conservation Condition
Velocity field u has zero divergence
Net mass change of any sub-region is 0
 Flow in == flow out
 Incompressible fluid

Comes from continuum assumption
Enforcing Zero Divergence
Pressure and Velocity fields related

Say we have velocity field w with non-zero divergence

Can decompose into


Helmholtz-Hodge Decomposition
u has zero divergence

Define operator P that takes w to u:

Apply P to Navier-Stokes Equation:

(Used facts that
and
)
Operator P
Need to find
Implicit definition:
Poisson equation for scalar field p

Neumann boundary condition
Sparse linear system when discretized
Solving the System
Need to calculate:
Start with initial state
Calculate new velocity fields
New state:
Step 1 – Add Force
Assume change in force is small during timestep
Just do a basic forward-Euler step
Note: f is actually an acceleration?
Step 2 - Advection
Method of Characteristics
p is called the characteristic


Partial streamline of velocity field u
Can show u does not vary along streamline
Determine p by tracing backwards
Unconditionally stable

Maximum value of w2 is never greater
than maximum value of w1
Step 3 – Diffusion
Standard diffusion equation
Use implicit method:
Sparse linear system
Step 4 - Projection
Enforces mass-conservation condition
Poisson Problem:
Discretize q using central differences


Sparse linear system
Maybe banded diagonal…
Relaxation methods too inaccurate

Method of characteristics more precise for divergence-free field
Complexity Analysis
Have to solve 2 sparse linear systems

Theoretically O(N) with multigrid methods
Advection solver is also O(N)

However, have to take lots of steps in particle tracer, or
vortices are damped out very quickly
So solver is theoretically O(N)

I think the constant is going to be pretty high…
Periodic Boundaries
Allows transformation into Fourier domain
In Fourier domain, nabla operator is equivalent to ik
New Algorithm:
1)
2)
3)
Compute force and advection
Transform to Fourier domain
Compute diffusion and projection steps
•
4)
Trivial because nabla is just a multiply
Transform back to time domain
Diffusing Substances
Diffuse scalar quantity a (smoke, dust, texture coordinate)


Advected by velocity field while diffusing
ka is diffusion constant, da is dissipation rate, Sa is source term
Similar to Navier-Stokes

Can use same methods to solve equations, Except dissipation term
The End