* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Results
Phase-locked loop wikipedia , lookup
Josephson voltage standard wikipedia , lookup
Oscilloscope types wikipedia , lookup
Oscilloscope wikipedia , lookup
Immunity-aware programming wikipedia , lookup
Wien bridge oscillator wikipedia , lookup
Radio transmitter design wikipedia , lookup
Index of electronics articles wikipedia , lookup
Power MOSFET wikipedia , lookup
Transistor–transistor logic wikipedia , lookup
Surge protector wikipedia , lookup
Power electronics wikipedia , lookup
Analog-to-digital converter wikipedia , lookup
Zobel network wikipedia , lookup
Valve audio amplifier technical specification wikipedia , lookup
Regenerative circuit wikipedia , lookup
Current source wikipedia , lookup
Voltage regulator wikipedia , lookup
Integrating ADC wikipedia , lookup
Oscilloscope history wikipedia , lookup
Two-port network wikipedia , lookup
Operational amplifier wikipedia , lookup
Current mirror wikipedia , lookup
Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup
Schmitt trigger wikipedia , lookup
Valve RF amplifier wikipedia , lookup
Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
RLC circuit wikipedia , lookup
Network analysis (electrical circuits) wikipedia , lookup
ENME 482L Lab 3: Second Order Systems By Aaron Caprarola, Justin Mitchell, & Anthony Snukis Conducted: October 3, 2006 Instructor: Dr. Uri Tasch T.A: Priya Narayanan INTRODUCTION The objective of this lab was to study the effects of input voltage and frequency on the outputs of second order RLC (Resistor-Inductor-Capacitor) circuits and find the time domain and frequency domain response for the circuits. The first part of the experiment was to use a D.C. power supply and oscilloscope to capture the response of the capacitor voltage from the DC source with various sized resistors. Emphasis was placed on the transient response for different sized resistors. The second part of the experiment utilized the same procedures as the first only the source was replaced with a function generator. The magnitude and phase of the output voltage in relation to the input was the main relevance of this part. METHODS & MATERIALS A National Instruments ELVIS system was used to conduct this experiment. The ELVIS system is an integrated signal generator, oscilloscope, and breadboard. In addition, an HP oscilloscope was used. For the first part of this experiment, the time domain of an RLC circuit was analyzed. The circuit in Figure 1 [I] was constructed. Channel one of the HP oscilloscope was connected to measure the input voltage produced by the DC source. Channel two was connected to measure the capacitor’s voltage. R1, R2, R3 5V / FuncOut INPUT L=58mH CH A+ C=1F Groun d R1 = 10 ACH 0+ OUTPUT ACH 0- CH B+ R2 = 330 R3 = 1000 (RL = 88 ) CH B- Figure 1: RLC Circuit with varying resistors and inputs. In order to determine the capacitor’s response to a step input, a 5V DC input signal was suddenly applied, and the results captured on the oscilloscope. This step was repeated for each of the three different resistors whose values were 10 , 330 , and 1000 respectively. It is important to note that these were the provided values not the actual values of the resistors. The second part to the experiment was to analyze the frequency response of the circuit to an AC input signal. To accomplish this only the source of the input was changed from 5V DC to the FuncOut on the NI ELVIS board, the rest of the circuit remained the same as shown in Figure 1. The input signal was set to a 2 volts peak-topeak sine wave, at a frequency of 5 Hz. The amplitude of the capacitor voltage was measured using the oscilloscope, as well as the phase difference compared to the input signal. To observe the behavior of the RLC circuit at different input frequencies, this procedure was repeated at frequencies of 10 Hz, 100 Hz, 150 Hz, 200, Hz, 500 Hz, 1 kHz, 10 kHz and 100 kHz for each of the three resistors used in the first part of the experiment.. The resulting output signals observed on the oscilloscope were compared to the theoretical values. Results In the first part of this lab, the time response of a second order RLC circuit was captured, using three different resistors. Using three different resistors gave three different damping ratios, ξ. Table 1, given below, tabulates the resistors and their respective damping ratios, calculated from the transfer function, equation 1 [II]. Table 1 R (ohms) ξ 10 330 1000 0.021 0.685 2.076 1 Vout ( s) n2 LC G(S ) 2 R 1 Vin ( s) s 2 n n2 2 s s L LC (eq.1) The 10 ohm and 330 ohm resistor both gave values of ξ less than 1, therefore making the circuit underdamped. The 1000 ohm resistor gave a value of ξ greater than 1, making the system overdamped. Using this theory, the transfer function predicts that the 10 ohm and 330 ohm resistors should oscillate when an input is applied, while the 330 ohm resistor will ease into its steady state value. Although the three different resistors provide three different damping ratios, the natural frequency remains the same for all three. The natural frequency was calculated from the transfer function to be 4,152.3 rad/sec. The first circuit was constructed using the 10 ohm resistor. A 5 volt input voltage was applied. The acquired data was plotted using Matlab, as shown in Figure 2. Voltage vs. time; 10 ohm resistor 9 8 7 Output Voltage (Volts) 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0.005 0.01 0.015 time (seconds) 0.02 0.025 0.03 Figure 2: Voltage vs. time, 10 ohm resistor The plot in figure 2 demonstrates the behavior expected of an underdamped second order circuit to a step response. There is initially a transient response, which is the oscillation present immediately after the input is applied. As time goes on, the transient response disappears, and the only response present is due to the forced response, or the step input. Using the Matlab generated plot in figure 2, values can be found for the rise time, settling time, percentage overshoot, and peak time. Also, using the values of the damping ratio and natural frequency previously found, the same values can be calculated theoretically. Table 2 presents the values found by measurement, as well as the calculated values. Rise time (s) Peak time (s) Settling time (s) % Overshoot Table 2 Measured 2.46E-04 6.14E-04 5.04E-03 65.13% Theoretical ≈2.65E-4 7.568E-04 4.587E-02 93.61% The measured rise time and peak time are both similar to their respective theoretical values. However, the measured settling time is much quicker than the calculated value. One possible source of this error is that only the impedances of the inductor, capacitor, and resistor were taken into account. There are also impedances due to the breadboard and input/output connections. For the same reason, the percentage overshoot is less than the theoretical value. During the next part of the experiment, the ten ohm resistor was replaced with a 330 ohm, and the previous procedure was repeated. Although the circuit is theoretically underdamped, it was found that it behaved more like a critically damped one. The voltage rose to its steady state value very quickly, with no overshoot or oscillation. The time response is shown in Figure 3. Voltage vs. time, 330 ohm resistor 6 5 Output Voltage (Volts) 4 3 2 1 0 0.005 0.01 0.015 time (seconds) 0.02 0.025 0.03 Figure 3: Voltage vs. time, 330 ohm resistor The measured values for the settling time and rise time are presented with the theoretical underdamped values in Table 3. Although the circuit is theoretically underdamped, table two indicates that the percentage overshoot is theoretically only 5.21%, which is much closer to 0 than the circuit with the 10 ohm resistor, whose value was 93.61%. This circuit does not behave ideally for the same reason as before. The impedances not accounted for would further damp this system, possibly to the extent where the damping ratio is greater than one. Rise time (s) Peak time (s) Settling time (s) % Overshoot Table 3 Measured 5.42E-04 N/A 7.89E-04 N/A Theoretical ≈4.82E-4 1.038E-03 1.406E-03 5.21% For the final portion of the first part of the experiment, a 1000 ohm resistor was used in the circuit. This gives a damping ration of 2.076, or an overdamped system. The 5 volt input was applied as before, and the data was acquired. The resulting time response is shown in Figure 4. Output Voltage vs. time, 1000 ohm resistor 6 5 Output Voltage (volts) 4 3 2 1 0 0.005 0.01 0.015 time (seconds) 0.02 Figure 4: Voltage vs. time, 1000 ohm resistor 0.025 0.03 The response in figure 4 indicates that the circuit behaves like an overdamped one, as expected. The input is applied at time t = 0, and the output voltage rises to its steady state value. The measured values of the rise time and settling time are presented in Table 4. The values confirm the analysis. The overdamped system in figure 3 has a larger rise time than the critically damped circuit in figure 2. A critically damped circuit has the fastest possible rise time without oscillation. Although the overdamped system is second order, it behaves in a similar matter as a first order circuit. Table 4 Rise time (s) Settling time (s) Measured 5.42E-04 7.89E-04 Conclusion In the first part of this lab, the objective was to study the response of the voltage across a capacitor in an RLC circuit as a function of input. It was shown that the response consisted of a transient and steady state part. The type of transient response was dependent on the resistor used. It was shown that for resistors with small values, the system was underdamped, and the transient response of the output was a voltage oscillating around its steady state value. As the value of the resistance was increased to its critically damped value and beyond, the transient response involved no oscillation, and the rise time increased. The transfer function was used to derive the damping ratio, which enabled us to predict the behavior of the system. The 10 ohm circuit produced an underdamped response, as expected. The 1000 ohm resistor produced an overdamped response, also as expected. However, the damping ratio of the 330 ohm circuit was found to be 0.685, implying that the circuit should be underdamped, but it behaved as a critically damped one instead. One way to correct this discrepancy, and improve the other results, would be to measure the impedance of the other components in the circuit. Examples of some of these components include the breadboard and connectors. Reference [I] Tasch, Uri Second Order Systems 03 October 2006 [II] Nise, N.S. Control Systems Engineering Fourth Edition, 2004 Contributions Snukis, Anthony Title page, Introduction, Methods Caprarola, Aaron Time Domain Analysis; Results, Conclusion, Editing Mitchell, Justin Frequency Domain Analysis; Results, Conclusion