Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Embodied Metaphors and Emotions in the Moralization of Restrained Eating Practices Sana Sheikh Lucia Botindari Emma White University of St Andrews running head: Embodied Metaphors, Emotions, and Restrained Eating emails: [email protected] mailing address: Sana Sheikh School of Psychology St. Mary’s College University of St. Andrews Fife, United Kingdom KY16 9AP word count: 3,914 keywords: morality, emotion, restrained eating, embodied metaphors ABSTRACT Moralization is the process whereby preferences are converted to values (Rozin, 1999). Two studies used an embodied metaphor approach, in which moral metaphors are grounded in one’s sense of physical cleanliness, to investigate whether restrained eating practices are moralized among women. Specifically, we predicted that the regulation of food intake by women is embodied in their feelings of physical cleanliness. Study 1 found that failures of restrained eating (i.e., overeating) increased accessibility of physical cleanliness-related words for women, but not men. Study 2 found that increased negative moral emotions fully mediated the effect of overeating on a desire for physical cleanliness. Overall, the studies argue for the importance of morality in restrained eating and in the central role of emotions in the embodiment of cognitive metaphors. “As society at large slipped off the constraints of traditional religious morality, the old moral code—diminished in scope, more constricted than ever, but functionally unchanged— tightened on women’s bodies.” –Naomi Wolf, The Beauty Myth (italics added) Moralization “converts preferences into values” (Rozin, 1999, p. 67), imbuing behaviors with certain psychological properties and, according to recent work on embodied metaphors, a feeling of physical cleanliness. Behaviours such as eating practices have been moralized across many historical contexts: for instance, vegetarianism has been moralized among practicing Hindus as part of Ahimsa for centuries while more recently the production and consumption of locally grown and sustainable foods is increasingly viewed through a moral lens in the United States. Another eating practice that has risen sharply during the latter half of the 20th century and increasingly across the world (see Nasser, Katzman, & Gordon, 2001) is the strict monitoring and restriction of food intake among women. And although at first glance restrained eating practices seem to be motivated by adherence to “conventional” cultural standards of beauty and thinness, we believe that it has also taken on moral psychological properties. Moralization and Metaphors Bodily concepts such as physical balance, force, and cleanliness are extended by metaphor to understand and give meaning to more abstract concepts of time, power, and morality, respectively (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980). For instance, Johnson (1987) gives the example of “the force of an argument.” Here, the concept of force is used metaphorically, but Johnson keenly notes that a metaphorical force is actually understood and given meaning by us through our understanding of physical force placed on our bodies. Similarly, Zhong and Liljenquist (2006) showed that our understanding of morality is grounded in our sense of physical cleanliness. In their studies, the authors found that cleaning one’s hands bolstered one’s moral self-image and that a threat to one’s morality increased the desire to physically clean oneself. Specifically, participants recalling an unethical deed showed increased mental accessibility of cleansing-related words and increased desirability of cleanliness-related products such as antiseptic wipes. The authors conclude that moral failures render participants with a desire to literally “wash away their sins.” Moralization of a particular behavior affixes relevant successes and failures of that behavior to our feelings of physical cleanliness. If failure to abide by certain eating practices induces a desire for physical cleanliness, there is good reason to believe that these practices are moralized. Restrained Eating Among Women Restrained eating, the strict regulation of type and amount of food (Herman & Polivy, 1980), has become increasingly prevalent among women. Examples of restrained eating include chronic or continuous dieting and, to a much more pathological extent, eating disorders such as anorexia nervosa. Much of the research on restrained eating has focused on the influence of cultural standards on women’s food intake (e.g., Striegel-Moore, Silberstein, & Rodin, 1986) showing, for instance, that media messages towards women largely emphasize weight consciousness, restricted food and caloric intake, and idealized standards of female thinness and emaciation (e.g., Greenberg & Worrell, 2005; Quart, 2003; Smith, 2004). These cultural standards promote disordered eating (Striegel-Moore et al., 1986), greater efforts in dieting and restricting food intake (Herman & Polivy, 1975; 1980), body dissatisfaction (Davison & McCabe, 2005; Greenwood & Pietromonaco, 2003), and selfobjectification (Huon & Brown, 1984; Fredrickson & Roberts, 1997) among women. Naomi Wolf (1991), in her analysis of these cultural standards, showed that the messages promoting restrained eating “reverberate with reference to religious ideas of temptation and sin” (p. 88). For example, she notes the prevalence of deserts being referred to as “sinful,” “indulgences,” “temptations” and dieting in terms of “following” or “cheating on” it. Detox regiments claim to cleanse the body of food toxins--part of what Wolf called the “Cycle of Purification.” If, according to an embodied perspective, metaphors are not solely cognitive abstractions but are grounded in our bodily experiences, equating certain types of eating with “sin” may serve more than rhetorical purposes: these messages may highlight the moralization of restrained eating whereby failures of restrained eating are perceived by women as moral failures, thereby embodied in their feelings of physical cleanliness. Moral Metaphors and Emotions: A potential mechanism? Subjective feelings are central to any embodied cognition account. For instance, recounting an unethical deed induces feelings of physical impurity (Zhong & Liljenquist, 2006). These feelings of physical impurity likely entail painful recognitions of moral failure, as manifested by negative moral emotions, which may be what drives the desire for subsequent physical cleanliness. Emotions have long been acknowledged as motivators of our desires and actions, especially those concerning morality (Hume, 1777/1960). Although past literature on embodied cognition has yet to identify the mechanisms regulating the desire for physical cleanliness, we suspect emotional responses to threats to our morality play a central role. In fact, the presence of moral emotions has been found among those high in restrained eating practices. Overeating has been found to induce shame, guilt, anger, and disgust towards oneself (e.g., Costanzo, Reichmann, Friedman, & Musante, 2001) and disordered eating is linked with these particular emotions (e.g., Fox & Froom, 2009; Sanftner, Barlow, Marschall, & Tangney, 1995; Troop, Treasure, & Serpell, 2002; von Ranson, Stevenson, Cannon & Shah, 2009; Waller, Babbs, Milligan, Meyer, Ohanian, & Leung, 2003). Moreover, the literature on emotional eating also indicates the importance of emotions in the precursors and consequences of overeating. We would thus expect that failures of restrained eating practices for women would incur negative moral emotional responses, underpinning an embodied desire for cleanliness. Present Studies The following studies used an embodied metaphor account to investigate the moralization of restrained eating practices. We expected failures of restrained eating, such as overeating, to induce a desire for physical cleanliness for women in particular. We also investigated the role of emotions in the embodiment of cognitive metaphors and expected that negative moral emotions felt after overeating drive the subsequent desire for physical cleanliness. Study 1 Study 1 tested whether restrained eating practices are moralized and thus grounded in experiences of physical cleanliness. We expected overeating to incur a desire to physically cleanse, and, given past research showing women as primary targets of cultural messages regarding restrained eating, we expected this effect to occur for women but not for men. Method Participants A total of 100 participants from the University of St Andrews took part in the study, 50 of whom identified themselves as women and 50 as men. There were 56 who identified themselves as White, 25 South Asian, 8 East Asian, 8 as “Other”. Materials Overeating Recall Task: Participants were randomly assigned to either an overeating recall task condition or a no-task control condition. The overeating recall task activated thoughts of one’s failure to restrict eating by asking participants to recount a time when they ate too much. Specifically, participants were asked to think back to a time when they ate too much and describe that experience in as much detail as possible. Word Completion Task: Three word fragments developed by Zhong and Liljenquist (2006) to measure mental accessibility of cleansing-related words were used as an indicator of participants’ subsequent desire for physical cleanliness. These words could be completed with either a cleansing-related or non-cleansing-related word (e.g., SH - - ER; “shower” or “shiver”) and were interspersed with three neutral filler word fragments. The Word Completion Task was given immediately after the Overeating Recall Task. Participants were then given a brief demographics questionnaire, fully debriefed, and thanked for their participation. Results A two-way analysis of variance yielded a main effect for condition, F(1, 96) = 4.64, p = .03, such that the cleansing-related words were generated more in the overeating condition (M = .90, SD = .76) than control condition (M = .58, SD = .73). However, the main effect was qualified by a significant condition X gender interaction, F(1, 96) = 5.42, p = .04 (see Figure 1). Here, women generated more cleansing-related words after recounting a time they ate too much (M = 1.12, SD = .86) compared to women in the control (M = .46, SD = .66), F(1, 96) = 4.85, p = .03. However, men in the overeating condition (M = .66, SD = .57) did not differ from those in the control condition (M= .69, SD = .78), F(1, 90) = .41, p = ns. Moreover, the women in the overeating condition generated more cleansing-related words than the men in the overeating condition, F(1, 96) = 4.23, p = .04. Women in the control condition did not differ significantly from the men in the control condition, F(1, 96) = 1.01, p = ns. Nor was there a significant main effect of gender on accessibility of cleansing-related words, F(1, 96) = .41, p = ns. Our bodily responses to moral violations involve a desire for physical cleanliness; as such, women who recalled a time they “ate too much” displayed an increased accessibility of cleansing-related words. These findings provide the first evidence for the moralization of restrained eating practices among women: overeating is felt as a moral failure requiring absolution, which then results in a desire for physical cleanliness. As a follow-up, Study 2 investigated the role of emotions in the embodiment of moral metaphors and whether negative moral emotions incurred by moral failures, such as overeating (for women), drive the desire for physical cleanliness. Study 2 Moral emotions are often painful recognitions of transgressions and have been found to regulate people’s sense of morality (Sheikh & Janoff-Bulman, 2010). Just as cognitive metaphors are felt by their physical embodiment, these recognitions of transgressions are felt as negative moral emotional experiences—from an embodied and phenomenological perspective, both provide meaning to our cognitive reasoning and judgments. As such, we expect the emotional responses after a moral failure to underpin the desire for physical cleanliness. Given that morality involves a set of complex psychological processes, we do not expect one emotion category in particular to drive the effect of moral failure of desire for physical cleanliness. In fact, research by Zhong and colleagues (Zhong & Liljenquist, 2006; Zhong, Strejcek, & Sivanathan, 2010; Liljenquist, Zhong, & Galinsky, 2010) found that the embodiment of moral metaphors involves a diverse set of moral psychological and behavioral processes, including one’s moral self-image, harsher judgments of others, and increased prosocial behaviour. Thus feeling physically dirty as a result of a moral failure likely entails a host of painful moral emotions, including shame, guilt, disgust, and anger towards oneself. Indeed, all of these emotions have been found to be related to restrained and disordered eating (e.g., Fox & Froom, 2009; Sanftner, Barlow, Marschall, & Tangney, 1995; Troop, Treasure, & Serpell, 2002; von Ranson, Stevenson, Cannon & Shah, 2009; Waller, Babbs, Milligan, Meyer, Ohanian, & Leung, 2003). Study 2 tested whether negative moral emotional responses mediate the effect of overeating for women on a desire for physical cleanliness. As a secondary purpose, Study 2 also made sure the findings from Study 1 were not a function of merely focusing women on their bodies. In other words, we wanted to ensure that any effects found are not because of any semantic priming of body-related words but instead specifically due to the moral impact of overeating on a desire for physical cleanliness. Method Participants A total of 112 women from the University of St Andrews participated as part of an online study. There were 92 women who considered themselves as White, 7 as South Asian, 7 as East Asian, 1 as Latina, and 5 as “Other”. Materials Overeating Recall Task: Similar to Study 1, participants were randomly assigned to either an overeating recall task condition or a control condition. Participants completing the overeating recall task were again asked to recount a time when they ate too much. This time, participants in the control condition were asked to describe an ordinary day. Negative Moral Emotions: To assess state negative moral emotions, participants in both conditions were asked, “When you think about this experience, how do you feel?” Single items assessed how ashamed, guilty, angry, and disgusted they felt on a 5-point scale (from 1 = “not at all” to 5 = “extremely”). Cleansing Products Forced-Choice Task: Following Zhong and Liljenquist (2006), we used a forced-choice measure to assess desire for physical cleanliness. The measure asked participants to pick a product shown on the screen that they found most desirable. These items were two cleansing products, a packet of “wipe-n-go” general cleansing wipes and antibacterial hand-gel, as well as one non-cleansing product, a pen. As a forced-choice measure, participants were only allowed to pick one of the three products as “most desirable.” Two cleansing products were included to rule out the possibility that the effect found in Study 1 was due to a mere focus on the body, which, in this study, would render women in the overeating condition more likely to pick the hand-gel over and above the “wipe-n-go” and the pen. However, a desire for physical cleanliness as a result of overeating would result in no significant differences between the two cleansing products; both would be chosen over and above the neutral pen. After completing the Overeating Recall Task (or neutral task), responding about their state negative moral emotions, and choosing the product they found most desirable, participants filled out a brief demographic questionnaire and then were provided a full written debriefing and thanked for their participation. Results A chi-square found overall differences between conditions and product choice, χ2 = 6.81 (df = 2), p = .05. As a follow-up analysis, we conducted a logistic regression with condition as a predictor and product choice as the nominal outcome variable. We expected a difference between the general cleansing wipes and the pen if the effect was due to a desire for cleanliness, but a difference between the hand-gel and the general cleansing wipes if the effect was due to body-related semantics. A nominal logistic regression found that the difference between the general cleansing wipes and pen chosen was higher after the participants had to recall a time they ate too much, (B = -.89, SD = .46, p = .05) and the difference between the hand-gel and pen chosen was higher after recalling a time they ate too much (B = -1.32, SD = .65, p = .04). However, there was no difference between the proportion of hand-gels versus general cleansing wipes chosen as a function of condition, (B= .44, SD= .72, p = ns). These findings show two things: (1) we replicated findings from Study 1, and (2) the effect found in Study 1 was not due to priming of body-related words; rather, recalling a time one ate too much seems to enact a desire for physical cleanliness. To test whether negative emotions mediated the effect between recalling a time one ate too much and a desire for cleanliness, we ran a mediational analysis by collapsing general cleansing cloths and hand-gel together to form a dichotomous outcome: cleansing product versus neutral. We predicted that negative emotions experienced mediate the impact of overeating on a desire for cleanliness. The mediational analysis used the four steps specified by Baron and Kenny (1986). In Step 1, recalling a time one ate too much led to choosing a cleansing product over a neutral one (B = -.98, SE = .41, p = .02). In Step two, recalling a time one ate too much incurred greater negative emotions compared to a control (B = -.97, SE = .17, p < .001). In Step 3, reported moral emotions predicted choosing a cleansing product over a neutral product, (B = -.50, SE = .24, p = .04) while condition no longer significantly predicted choice of product (B = -.50, SE = .47, p = ns.). A Sobel test indicated that elicited moral emotions significantly mediated the effect of overeating on choosing a cleansing product (Z = 1.94, SD = .25, p = .05).1 In other words, negative moral emotional responses drove the impact of overeating on a desire for physical cleanliness. Discussion Two studies found that restrained eating practices are moralized for women. In particular, Study 1 found that overeating increased accessibility of physical cleanlinessrelated words among women, but not men. Moreover, Study 2 found that negative moral emotions incurred as a result of overeating drove the subsequent desire for physical cleanliness. Using an embodied metaphor perspective, the psychological study of moralization can go beyond our traditional notions of what moral ought entails—and investigate the moral nature of every day injunctions that we place upon ourselves. The two studies are just the first step in understanding the moralization of restrained eating practices and their consequences. We started by focusing on failures at restricting the amount of food intake (i.e., overeating). But there are other failures of restrained eating practices involving not only the amount--but also type--of food that may also be grounded in our feelings of cleanliness. We found an effect of gender in Study 1, which makes sense given the feminist and sociocultural literature on restrained eating and eating disorders shows that messages concerning restrained food intake as well as idealized images of feminine thinness and emaciation target women in particular. Interestingly, however, this isn’t the only case of moralization of restrained eating practices. Religious asceticism almost always equate inhibiting food intake with a sense of moral purity. Fasting in many religions, such as in Islam during the month of Ramadan and Catholicism during Lent, is understood as a sign of devotion and morality. We would expect then for these forms of restrained eating to also be embodied through physical cleanliness. The two studies also provide insight into the role of emotional responses in the embodiment of cognitive metaphors. Given that emotions are evaluations of ourselves and the world around us, the negative moral emotions elicited by overeating entail some recognition of a moral failure. This recognition is necessary for any subsequent desire for physical cleanliness. More interestingly, emotions are felt evaluations entailing both cognitive and bodily experiences, providing meaning to our cognitive appraisals and judgments. It would then make sense that these bodily feelings of moral failure—as manifested in Study 2 by feelings of shame, guilt, disgust, and anger at oneself--are what regulate moral metaphors of cleanliness. The role of emotional experiences in the embodiment of cognition and cognitive metaphors is an exciting and potentially fruitful avenue for future work. ENDNOTES 1. None of the emotions alone mediated the effect of overeating condition on cleansing product choice. References Baron, R.M. & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182. Costanzo, P.R., Reichmann, S.K., Friedman, K.E.& Musante, G.J. (2001). The mediation effect of eating self-efficacy on the relationship between emotional arousal and overeating in the treatment seeking obese. Eating Behaviors, 2, 363 - 368. Davison, T. E., & McCabe, M. P. (2005). Relationship between men’s and women’s body image and their psychological, social, and sexual functioning. Sex Roles, 52, 463–475. Fox, J. E., & Froom, K. (2009). Eating disorders: A basic emotion perspective. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 16, 328-335. Fredrickson, B. L. & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Towards understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173-206. Greenberg, B. S., & Worrell, T. R. (2005). The portrayal of weight in the media and its social impact. In K. D. Brownell, R. M. Puhl, M. B. Schwartz, & L. Rudd (Eds.), Weight bias: Nature consequences, and remedies (pp. 42–53). New York: Guilford. Greenwood, D., & Pietromonaco, P. R. (2003). The interplay among attachment orientation, idealized media images of women, and body dissatisfaction: A social psychological analysis. In L. Shrum (Ed.), Blurring the lines: The psychology of entertainment media. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Herman, C. P., & Polivy, J. (1975). Anxiety, restraint, and eating behavior. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 84, 666-672. Herman, C., & Polivy, J. (1980). Restrained eating. In A.B.Stunkard (Ed.), Obesity, pp. 208225. Philadelphia: Saunders. Hume, D. (1777/1960). An enquiry concerning the principles of morals. La Salle, IL: Open Court. Huon, G. F. & Brown, L. B. (1984). Bulimia: the emergence of a syndrome. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 18, 113-126. Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago, IL US: University of Chicago Press. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Liljenquist, K., Zhong, C. B. & Galinsky, A. D (2010). The Smell of Virtue: Clean Scents Promote Reciprocity and Charity, Psychological Science, 21, 381-383. Nasser, M. ,Katzman, M., & Gordon, R. (Eds.). (2001). Eating disorders and cultures in transition. New York: Brunner-Routledge. Quart, A. (2003). Branded: The buying and selling of teenagers. Perseus, New York. von Ranson, K. M., Stevenson, A. S., Cannon, C. K., & Shah, W. (2009). Changes in eating pathology and associated symptoms among chronically ill adults attending a brief psychoeducational group. Eating Behaviors, 11, 186–189. Rozin, P. (1999). Food is fundamental, fun, frightening, and far-reaching. Social Research, 66, 9-30. Sanftner, J. L., Barlow, D. H., Marschall, D. E., & Tangney, J. P. (1995). The relation of shame and guilt to eating disorder symptomatology. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 14, 315-32. Sheikh, S. & Janoff-Bulman, R. (2010). The “shoulds” and “should nots” of moral emotions: A self-regulatory perspective on shame and guilt. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 213-224. Smith, J. C. (2004). The current epidemic of childhood obesity and its implications for future coronary heart disease. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 51, 1679–1695. Striegel-Moore, R. H., Silberstein, L. R., & Rodin, J. (1986). Toward an understanding of risk factors for bulimia. American Psychologist, 41, 246–263. Troop, N.A., Treasure, J.L. & Serpell, L. (2002). A further exploration of disgust in eating disorders. European Eating Disorders Review, 10, 218-226. Waller, G., Babbs, M., Milligan, R., Meyer, C., Ohanian, V., & Leung, N. (2003). Anger and core beliefs in the eating disorders. International Journal Of Eating Disorders, 34, 118-124. Wolf, N. (1991). The Beauty Myth. New York: Doubleday. Zhong, C., & Liljenquist, K. (2006). Washing Away Your Sins: Threatened Morality and Physical Cleansing. Science, 313, 1451-1452. Zhong, C. B., Strejcek, B., & Sivanathan, N. A. (2010). Clean Self Can Render Harsh Moral Judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 859-862.