Download doc - University of Toronto

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO
FACULTY OF APPLIED SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING
Mid-term examination
BME 205S: Engineering Biology
Examiner: M.V.Sefton
February 14, 2002
Answer all questions
All questions are of equal value
1. It has been experimentally observed that the presence of hemoglobin
augments the transport of oxygen through aqueous solution. Available data
suggests that this is a case of facilitated transport by a mobile carrier
(hemoglobin) wherein oxygen reacts to form the oxyhemoglobin complex.
Diffusion of the oxyhemoglobin results in a greater flux of oxygen than that
attributable to purely physical diffusion of oxygen alone.
Consider a stagnant aqueous hemoglobin solution (0.5 g/mL) that is in the
form of a flat 'film', 0.2 cm thick. Calculate the maximum relative amount by
which the hemoglobin can augment oxygen diffusion if the upstream face is
maintained at 100 mm Hg oxygen partial pressure (97% of maximal
hemoglobin saturation) and the downstream face at 10 mm Hg oxygen partial
pressure (10% of maximal hemoglobin saturation).
Data:
Diffusivity of oxygen in hemoglobin solution = 1 x 10-5 cm2 /sec
Diffusivity of hemoglobin in hemoglobin solution = 5 x 10-7 cm2 /sec
Each gram of hemoglobin can bind with 1.34 ml (STP) of oxygen,
maximum
Solubility coefficient for oxygen in hemoglobin solution (as free oxygen) is
the same as that in water = 3 x 10-5 mL O2 (STP)/cm3mmHg
Assume that the diffusivity of oxyhemogobin is equal to that of
hemoglobin.
2. (a) A cell has a maximum specific growth rate, µmax of 0.3 hr-1 when grown
aerobically on glucose. The Monod constant on glucose, K s is 2 g/L and
the cell yield on glucose (Yx/s) is 0.35 g cell/g glucose. Assume steady
state operation and that all nutrients are in excess except glucose.
Assume 109 cells weigh 1g.
1 of 4
We grow this cell in a 10 L continuous reactor using 1 L/hr. of a feed
stream containing 10 g/L glucose. What is the glucose concentration
exiting from the CSTR?
(b) Consider again the stem cell production problem of PBL 2 and
exercise 4. The probability of self renewal (p) is dependent on the ratio of
differentiated cells to stem cells, as it is the mix of growth and
differentiation factors (and inhibitors) produced by the two cell types that
determine the value of p. A starting point for this kind of analysis would be
an estimate of the ratio of stem cells to differentiated cells (S/X), where S
= # of stem cells/unit volume and X = # of differentiated cells/unit volume,
as a function of p. In addition to stem cell growth (self renewal) and
differentiation, you need to account for differentiated cell growth which
takes place with the same "doubling time" as the stem cells: i.e.,  is the
same for both cell types. The doubling time is 24 hours.
Stream 2
Figure 1
Stem cell recycle
Stream 1
Differentiated
cell effluent
However, the standard continuous well-stirred reactor situation must be
modified in order for the differentiated cells to not outgrow and essentially
displace the stem cells from the reactor (at steady state). In one approach
to this problem a separation device is inserted into the effluent (Figure 1)
to separate stem cells from differentiated cells (based on differences in
protein receptors on the surfaces of the two cells). What is the ratio of
stem cells to differentiated cells in this reactor (at steady state) for a
separator that is 100% efficient for differentiated cells (no differentiated
cells in stream 2), 95% efficient for stem cells (the concentration of stem
cells in stream 1 is 5% of that leaving the reactor) and when stream 2 has
a volumetric flowrate that is 5 x that of stream 1.
As before:
rate of self renewal  pS
rate of differenti ation   (1  p) S
2 of 4
3. In order for birds to fly south for the winter, the birds store fuel for the long
flight by depositing fat - as much as doubling their weight. Unfortunately this
makes them heavier so that they expend more metabolic energy during flight.
Because their wing span does not change, heavier birds have to fly faster to
stay airborne.
(a) According to aerodynamic theories of bird flight, flight speed scales with
mass, M as M1/6. If output power (power associated with flying) scales with
the product of weight and speed, what is the scaling relationship for output
power. [this is a gift]
(b) Kvist et al recently (Nature, 413, 730-732, October 18, 2001) measured
the metabolic power input for a particular type of bird (the red knot) flying
at 15 m/s in a wind tunnel. The data is shown in figure 2. They found that
power input scales with bird mass as M0.35.
Derive a scaling relationship for flight muscle efficiency, :
Pout

 Pin   BMR
 1.1


where Pout = output power, Pin = input power and BMR is the power used in
basal metabolism. BMR can be estimated from the following graph, even
though a bird is not a mammal. Assume 1 mole of ATP/GTP can produce 7.3
kcal of energy. 1 cal = 4.19 J
Figure 2 Total metabolic power input (Pin)
in relation to average body mass (mb) in
red knots flying at 15 m s-1. Different
symbols denote different individuals. An
analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with
individual as factor and log10 mb as
covariate revealed significant effects of
log10 mb (F1,23 = 7.00, P = 0.01) and
individual (F3,23 = 3.11, P = 0.046) on log10
Pin. The interaction term was not
significant (that is, the slope relating log10
Pin to log10 mb did not differ between
individuals) and was excluded from the
model. The common slope relating log10
Pin to log10 mb, correcting for individual
differences in intercept, was 0.35 (95% CI 0.08–0.62). Individual intercepts were 0.41, 0.39, 0.41 and
0.35
3 of 4
Figure 3
4. What do you need to know/understand to solve the following problem. Do
NOT actually solve it. Explain or justify your answer. Restatement of the
problem is not an adequate answer. No additional information is required.
_____________
Professor Yu-Ling Cheng worked for the ALZA Corporation in California before
joining the University of Toronto. In those days, ALZA designed drug delivery
systems especially for controlling the delivery of drugs across the skin
(transdermal delivery). The difficulty was that the skin was a variable barrier
(resistance) to the drugs of interest (eg anti-nausea drugs for motion sickness).
For example the flux of drug A through human skin under maximal concentration
driving force was found to range from 2 g/cm2hr to 10 g/cm2hr, with an
average of 6 g/cm2hr. This was too great a variability to be useful, since the
required therapeutic dose of A was 100 g/hour and the range of variability in
dosage was no more than 20 g/hr. Professor Cheng/ALZA's ingenious solution
was to add a rate controlling membrane in series with the skin to reduce the
impact of the skin variability, as shown below. The drug reservoir contains a
supersaturated solution of the drug and thereby generates a constant and
maximal driving force. Specify the required membrane area and calculate the
maximum and minimum flux of the drug through the rate controlling
membrane/adhesive composite under the maximal concentration difference.
Backing membrane (impermeable)
Drug reservoir
Rate controlling membrane
Adhesive (very permeable)
skin
4 of 4