Download detailed report - The Environmental lens

FOREST ACTION NETWORK
Environmental Lens
Report – UCCCU Uganda
Application of the Environmental Lens Tool to
the UCCCU Dairy
Dominic Walubengo
2011
1|Page
[TYPE
THE COMPANY ADDRESS]
Environmental Lens Report – UCCCU Uganda
Introduction
From 13 to 15 April, 2011, Diakonia along with SCC and other partners, organized an Environment Lens
workshop at Nairobi, Kenya. The main objective of the workshop was to introduce the Environment Lens
Tool to Diakonia and SCC partners working in East and Central Africa. The tool places environment at the
centre of project development and asks two probing questions to project promoters. These are as
follows:
1. The programs impact on the environment
Is the effect the program has on the environment understood, and are the negative effect reduced and
the positive effects strengthened?
2. External environmental factors influencing the program
Is the risk of environmental degradation, natural hazards/disasters, changes in the climate on the
program addressed? Is the interdependence between the environment and the rights-holders addressed?
During the workshop, the consultant made a presentation on the link between environment and climate
change and development projects. Thereafter, the consultant was requested by Diakonia to visit the
Uganda Crane Creameries Cooperative Union (UCCCU) to test the Environment Lens using the new dairy
being constructed by the Union. Accordingly, the consultant traveled to Kampala, Uganda on Monday 13
June 2011; and on 14 June, in the company of Mr. Elijah Kajubi of SCC-Uganda, to Mbarara, SouthWestern Uganda, about 300 km from Kampala, where the UCCCU is constructing the dairy. On 15 and 16
June, the consultant met with the staff of UCCCU as well as with members of two farmers’ dairy
cooperatives. Further, the consultant visited the UCCCU dairy that is currently under construction. The
consultant held a final meeting with UCCCU staff on 16 June and left for Kampala on 17 and to Kenya on
18 June.
The main role of the consultant was to work with the staff of UCCCU to examine if the Union had put
into account the Environment Lens Tool while constructing the dairy. In carrying out this role the
consultant had to educate participants about the Environment Lens Tool and to ask some probing
questions.
The people who participated in the analysis of the UCCCU dairy project are listed in Annex I.
This is the report of the consultant’s intervention.
The analysis took two days (15 and 16 of June) and included visits to two farmers’ cooperatives.
2|Page
Environmental Lens Report – UCCCU Uganda
Description of the Uganda Crane Creameries Cooperative Union
The Uganda Crane Creameries Cooperative Union (UCCCU) is a national cooperative union and acts as
the commercial arm of the Uganda National Dairy Farmers Association (UNDFA). At the moment, the
union is active in south-western Uganda. The union hopes to spread its activities to the other parts of the
country in the near future. The vision of UCCCU is to be a leading farmer owned provider of high quality
dairy products and services in the east African region. The union’s mission is to develop a vibrant dairy
sector that will enhance improved livelihoods of the dairy farmers through increased incomes, modern
farming, technological development and easy access to high quality dairy products on wider markets.
UCCCU was established in 2006 as an apex union of 8 district cooperative unions. These district unions in
turn have a total membership of 108 primary dairy farmers’ cooperative societies.
The objectives of UCCCU are as follows:








To mobilize farmers into cooperatives for collective marketing of dairy products;
To train farmers to run dairy farms commercially;
To carry out research and market development
To mobilize and train farmers on value addition in the milk supply chain;
To build the capacity of farmers in milk handling, collection, processing and marketing;
To diversify the market of the dairy products to the regional and international markets;
To encourage a saving culture among members for increased household incomes;
To help farmers access credit for productive purposes for security their societies and animals.
UCCCU is a partner of the Swedish Cooperative Centre (SCC) which supports the strengthening of the
farmers’ co-operatives.
Description of the UCCCU project:
Uganda Crane Creameries Cooperative Union (UCCCU) is constructing a dairy processing plant at
Mbarara. Construction of the processing plant began in April 2009 and is expected to be ready in early
2012. Construction is being paid for by the farmers. The plant will initially process 50,000 litres of milk
per day. Processing will include pasteurizing , packaging and converting some of the milk into yogurt.
Further, the plant will have a facility to ultra heat the milk (producing the UHT version). The market
includes schools, hotels and households. It is hoped that production will start in January 2012.
From experience in other dairies, it is estimated that the UCCCU plant will need 50,000 litres of water per
day. It will also use a large amount of electricity. In addition, it will attract many trucks for transporting
the milk to the plant and the finished product to the market. Therefore, the plant will need good access
roads and adequate parking space.
The building that will house the plant is large and will have facilities like offices, meetings rooms,
changing rooms, bathrooms and a laboratory.
3|Page
Environmental Lens Report – UCCCU Uganda
UCCCU milk processing plant under construction at Mbarara, Uganda
Scope of the analysis:
The analysis was limited to the proposed UCCCU milk processing plant that is currently under
construction. To get a good picture of the status of the cooperatives that UCCCU intends to serve
through this plant, the consultant visited two primary cooperatives: Kakindo and Esigana Kashari. UCCCU
and SCC hope that this analysis will assist them to ensure that environmental problems are dealt with
upfront. By so doing, the partners hope to save costs and thus go towards achieving sustainability.
Further, UCCCU hopes to improve the design of the dairy processing plant to be in line with the SCC
environmental and climate change policy and the environmental laws of Uganda. In so doing, UCCCU
will be able to process milk in a clean environment and thus guarantee the market. In addition the union
wishes to ensure the sustainability of the entire dairy industry in Uganda, by enabling farmers to adapt
to climate change.
The project’s impact on the environment
Current linkages
During the analysis, the following question was delved into: is the effect the project is likely to have on
the environment understood, and are the negative effects reduced and the positive effects strengthened?
4|Page
Environmental Lens Report – UCCCU Uganda
The analysis came up with the following effects that the project is likely to have on the environment:







The plant will process 50,000 of milk per day; and use 50,000 litres of water per day. This is a lot
of water that will be imported into the area;
There will be a lot of waste water being released into the environment;
The building housing the plant has a large roof and this will provide a large surface for rainwater harvesting, thus releasing a lot of water into the environment around the plant;
If appropriate care is not taken, waste water will be released into the nearby swamp, posing a
danger to the biodiversity in the swamp and to water users downstream;
There will be increased traffic in the area as trucks will be needed to deliver milk and take away
the finished products to markets;
The plant will attract many employees and these will need adequate facilities;
The market provided by UCCCU will encourage farmers to expand their dairy herds, thus needing
more pasture and water and in this way placing more pressure on natural resources found in the
environment.
Are negative effects understood?
In discussions with UCCCU officials, the consultant was informed that the union has
commissioned an environment impact assessment (EIA)of the project to establish what negative
effects that the project may have. The staff have not had access to the EIA report. However,
they agreed with the consultant that the project may have the following negative effects:



The release of waste water into the near by swamp;
The flooding of the area around the plant during the rain season owing to the large roof
area of the building;
Traffic congestion in the area around the plant as many trucks deliver milk or collect the
finished products;
Reducing the negative impacts



The staff of the union agreed that they would reduce the negative impacts of the project in the
following way:
Constructing adequate waste water ponds and a wetland. This will prevent the waste water
from ending up in the nearby swamp and the river;
The waste water system should be constructed in such a way that it is not susceptible to flooding
from storm water;
Proper septic tanks would be constructed to take in waste from the bathrooms, these tanks
should then be linked to the local authority sewerage system;
5|Page
Environmental Lens Report – UCCCU Uganda


The eucalyptus trees in place downstream from the plant will be maintained so that they can
consume excess water from the plant;
Proper access roads as well as adequate parking should be provided for the many trucks that will
frequent the area;
Strengthening positive impacts
In discussions with the consultant, the union staff proposed that the positive impacts of the
project could be strengthened in the following manner:




The rain water harvested from the roof of the building housing the plant would be stored and
used in the plant, thus reducing dependence on outside sources of water;
Since union members will try to rear more cows in order to benefit from the presence of the
plant, UCCCU would continue to educate their members to harvest hay to be used during the
prolonged dry season and during floods;
Using the example of water harvesting at their plant, UCCCU would educate their members to
harvest rain water to be used during the dry season;
The increased traffic as a result of the UCCCU would encourage the union to lobby the local
government authorities to repair the roads that serve livestock farmers and ensure that they
operate throughout the year.
External environmental factors that can influence the project
Current linkages
In discussions with UCCCU staff and cooperatives serviced by UCCCU, it was agreed that there are
external factors that can influence the project.
External factors
The main external factor s being noticed in western Uganda are:

Prolonged dry seasons

. Sudden floods
Effects of external factors
The main effects that the external factors are likely to have on the project are as follows:

During the prolonged dry season, swamps dry up and pastures become scarce. This means that
livestock keepers do not have enough water and pastures for their livestock. Without enough
6|Page
Environmental Lens Report – UCCCU Uganda
water and pastures, there will be reduced milk production. In addition, livestock keepers may
decide to more further and further away from the catchment area of the project, and in the
process being unable to deliver milk to the dairy.

When floods occur, the livestock has to be kept in high places – the hills- where there may not be
enough fodder. This will result in reduced milk production. In addition, floods dame roads and
livestock keepers will not be able to transport their milk to the dairy.
Interventions against external factors
The UCCCU would in its own interest encourage livestock keepers to take up activities that would
maintain a high level of milk production. Such interventions would include the following:
To counter the effect of climate change induced prolonged dry seasons, UCCCU is encouraging members
to construct surface water dams and rain –water harvesting tanks to store water during the rainy season.
To counter the lack of fodder, members are being shown how to make hay and store it for the dry
season. They are also making silage and dairy meal. Farmers are planting fodder trees such as
calliandria;
To counter the high food and water consumption of current livestock, UCCCU is urging members to
switch from Fresian to the Jersey breed of cattle, as the Jerseys eat less and need less water. They can
therefore survive climate change.
To deal with flash floods in the low lands, especially in areas where the wetlands have been interfered
with (e.g. in Kabale), ffforts are being made by the local authorities to rehabilitate the swamps and
wetlands.
Result of the analysis
The Environment Lens analysis was carried out together with UCCCU staff. This is because the
staff are responsible for implementing the project successfully. The other advantage of the staff
participating is that they are now in a good position to see the opportunities for improving the
environment that the project offers. This is different from an environment impact assessment,
which is usually carried out by experts who then produce a report for the government and for
the project managers.
Opportunities for improving current practices
The Environment Lens analysis offers some opportunities for improving current practices. Firstly, the
current practice of constructing dairies like the one UCCCU is undertaking simply involves taking the
minimum care of the environment – as may be pointed out by the EIA report. For example, there was no
plan to use the roof to catch rain water that can then be used by the dairy. The design was to drain the
7|Page
Environmental Lens Report – UCCCU Uganda
rain water into the nearby swamp. The other issue that the Environment Lens brought out is that of the
eucalyptus trees downstream of the dairy. The current practice would be to cut them down and let the
waste water flow past. The Environment Lens analysis brought out the fact that these trees could be
used to reduce the waste water.
What was not included in the EIA
Although the UCCCU staff did not have the EIA report with them, they informed the consultant that rainwater harvesting and the expected heavy traffic at the project site once completed were not included.
The way forward for UCCCU
Following the Environment Lens analysis, and since the UCCCU plant is still under construction, the staff
undertook to re-visit the Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) study that was carried out prior to the
commencement of the project to ensure that the study recommendations are being adhered to. Further,
the staff promised to ensure that the lessons from the Environment Lens analysis will be used. These
include implementing the rain-water harvesting idea and lobbying the local authorities to improve the
condition of the access road.
The way forward for UCCCU partners
In meetings with the primary cooperatives, the members started to understand the link between climate
change and their livelihoods. Further, the farmers realized the harmful impact that draining their
wetlands could have.
The dairy farmers have a good appreciation of cattle rearing as a business that needs a good
environment in order to thrive. This includes adequate pastures and clean water. In turn this means that
they have to take measures to conserve soil and water.
The primary cooperatives therefore undertook not to drain the swamps as they now understand the
implications of doing so.
Assessment of the methodology
The Environment Lens Tool is a fairly new way of looking at proposed projects and the environment. This
tool not only asks questions about the impact that the project is likely to have on the environment, but
also about the impact that the environment can have on the project. Further, the tool forces project
proponents to consider the actions that have to be taken to mitigate the impact that the environment
may have on the project.
8|Page
Environmental Lens Report – UCCCU Uganda
Difference between the Environment Lens tool and EIA
The table below gives a good indication of the difference between the Environment Lens tool and EIA
Environment Lens Tool
Environment Impact Assessment
Considers the impact of the project on the
environment and proposes mitigation measures
Considers the impact of the project on the
environment and proposes mitigation measures
Considers the impact that the environment may
have on the project and proposes mitigation
measures
Does not consider the impact that the
Environment has on the project
Points out the opportunities that are offered by
the negative impact of the project on the
environment and proposes ways of taking
advantage of these.
Does not look at opportunities offered by the
negative impact that the project has on the
environment
Puts into account the negative impact that the
environment may have on the project and turns
these into opportunities
Does not put into account the likely negative
effects of the environment on the project.
Forces project proponents to carry out an analysis
of the impact of the project on the environment;
and of the environment on the project
The project proponent leaves all the analysis to a
consultant and only carries out those interventions
that are necessary for obeying the environment
impact assessment law.
Forces project proponents to look farther than
their primary objective or core functions
Limits project proponents to their core functions or
primary objectives
Carried out with all stakeholders thus enabling
them to follow the process from start to
completion.
Carried out by EIA experts who deliver their report
to the government and to the project
implementers
From the above table, it is clear that the Environment Lens tool focuses on mitigation of negative
impacts as well as taking advantage of opportunities. The EIA process on the other hand focuses on
mitigation of negative impacts.
9|Page
Environmental Lens Report – UCCCU Uganda
Annex I: People involved in the analysis:
Kiconco Penelope-Admin-secretary
Kanyesigye Pison-Project Officer
Antamiire Esther-extension staff
Naturinda Peace-extension staff
Muhangi Jim-Project officer
Elijah Kajubi-SCC-Uganda Office
Participants at first Dairy meeting
10 | P a g e
Environmental Lens Report – UCCCU Uganda
Participants at second meeting
11 | P a g e