* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download presentation
Solar micro-inverter wikipedia , lookup
Variable-frequency drive wikipedia , lookup
Audio power wikipedia , lookup
Portable appliance testing wikipedia , lookup
Electric power system wikipedia , lookup
Electrification wikipedia , lookup
History of electric power transmission wikipedia , lookup
Geophysical MASINT wikipedia , lookup
Power engineering wikipedia , lookup
Power inverter wikipedia , lookup
Voltage regulator wikipedia , lookup
Voltage optimisation wikipedia , lookup
Power over Ethernet wikipedia , lookup
Immunity-aware programming wikipedia , lookup
Power electronics wikipedia , lookup
Alternating current wikipedia , lookup
Buck converter wikipedia , lookup
Mains electricity wikipedia , lookup
Power supply wikipedia , lookup
Group #4: Kevin Cheng, Dan Long, Kathy Qiu EM DEVICE INTRODUCTION Original idea to explore 3-D motion via EM forces Educational tool for classes/labs After review, switched to a 2-D programmable game board Features a game mode and an automation mode OBJECTIVES Explore applications of EM Navigate a magnet via user input without any direct contact Demonstrate autonomous movement via feedback control ORIGINAL DESIGN MODIFIED DESIGN BLOCK DIAGRAM H-BRIDGES REQUIREMENTS •H-Bridge switches polarity when the direction input switches •Devices supply a constant 2.0 A ±5% to solenoids when switched on and 0.0 A when switched off H-BRIDGE PCB AND SETBACKS Used Texas Intruments DRV8833 Dual Motor Driver Dual Rated output of 1.0 A Main Issue: Not breadboard compatible Test Results: • PCB not operational • Output was 0.0A H-BRIDGE SOLUTION •Pre-fabricated DRV8833 •One directional input using inverter *From TI DRV8833 data sheet Test Results: •Fully Operational •Output reversible 2.0 Amp *From Pololu.com POWER SUPPLY REQUIREMENTS/VERIFICATION •Power from a 120 VAC 60Hz Wall Outlet is converted to a 5 VDC ±5%. •Supplies those 5 V at 15W ±5% single channel output. CHALLENGES WITH POWER SUPPLY PART 1 Pros: Parallel Orientation •32 Amps 32A Original Plan: Low Input Voltage 4V •4 Volts Cons: •0.125 Ohm Equivalent (based off 0.862 Ohm per solenoid) Very high current Requires 16 Current Regulators = Current Regulator = H-Bridge/Solenoid CHALLENGES WITH POWER SUPPLY PART 2 Pros: Series Orientation Much lower current •2 Amps 2A Alternative Plan: Only 1 Current Regulator 64V •64 Volts •32 Ohm Equivalent Cons: High Voltage Input = Current Regulator = H-Bridge/Solenoid CHALLENGES WITH POWER SUPPLY PART 3 Pros: Combo Orientation Uses 4 current regulators. •8 Amps 32A Alternative Plan: 12V Relatively low current. •12 Volts •2 Ohm Equivalent Cons: = Current Regulator = H-Bridge/Solenoid Still a higher current than desired. POWER SUPPLY SOLUTION Breakthrough with H-Bridges: DRV8833 uses 5V, 3mA supply input to produce a regulated 2.0 A output Importance: •Significantly less amperage needed to supply solenoids. •3 Amp power supply chosen POWER SUPPLY TESTING Results: •Initially achieved a 5V output. •4.2-5.2V range adjustability. •Achieved 15W output. Before Demo, power supply failed! SOFTWARE PIN-SOLENOID DESIGNATIONS SOFTWARE GAME MODE User controls solenoids with PS/2 keyboard Solenoids in turn direct magnet’s motion SOFTWARE GAME MODE 1st key specifies which solenoid pair to activate along with polarization 2nd key specifies level of strength Example: User presses “1,” followed by “f” • Solenoid pair A-L activates with low polarization (i.e. so that magnet is pushed left) at 50% duty cycle SOFTWARE TESTING FOR GAME MODE Set up grid of 16 LEDs in layout of solenoids Use 8 additional LEDs for polarization Successfully verified that keyboard correctly interfaces with Arduino • User can specify what solenoid LEDs to activate and their brightness level • Polarization LEDs turn on/off appropriately SOFTWARE AUTOMATION MODE Sensor system guides magnet from sensor 1 to sensor 34 SOFTWARE SOFTWARE TESTING FOR AUTOMATION MODE When magnet was placed in area without sensor, LEDs behaved correctly LEDs didn’t respond to sensors Poor choice of testing • Unclear if there’s bug in code, muxes, or sensor system • Alternative verification procedure: hard-code sensors FRAME DESIGN REQUIREMENTS/VERIFICATIONS Non-magnetic Centered solenoid cores Low friction All verified with machine shop Aluminum frame Brass Screws Delrin plate Acrylic Roof FRAME DESIGN Final build FRAME DESIGN CHALLENGE: MAGNET ORIENTATION Solenoids align magnet side-side Sensors only detect along single axis (up-down) SOLENOIDS REQUIREMENTS/VERIFICATION Pull magnet across 5cm distance using 2A Using power supply, can magnet “fly” to core center After testing: Safe up to 3A Dimensions can fit four solenoids across 10cm(~4 inches) Build with Machine Shop and test Final solenoid (1.00”, 5.0cm) SOLENOIDS FUNCTIONAL TEST Zinc core of threaded rod, washers, and nuts. 1.25” length, 1.5” diameter, ~250 turns Distance results Test solenoid setup SENSORS Requirements: Locate specific position of magnet Use triangulating algorithm Allegro A1301 Quiescent at half Voltage (2.5 V) Changes from 0-5V depending on polarity (negative-positive) Sensing only along a single axis (and single side) Triangulating not possible, Had to increase number of sensors Cheapest option that is non-latching SENSORS Distance graphs Critical point – 10mm Critical point – 4mm SENSORS CHALLENGE: MUX IMPLEMENTATION Benefit: Allow for higher sensor resolution 40 Sensors instead of 20 Failed test – Possible reasons Arduino was not outputting correct select bits Power supply could not power all devices Sensors were not properly soldered SENSORS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER WORK Integrate Mux/Sensor board with Arduino Test sensors with solenoids Reduce friction from magnet on board Future work: Integrate entire design into a single, aesthetic unit SPECIAL THANKS TO Steve Hall Iain Brearton Skee Aldrich - Machine Shop Mark Smart - Electronics Shop QUESTIONS