Download document 8939002

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
Transcript
BBR - Brazilian Business Review
E-ISSN: 1807-734X
[email protected]
FUCAPE Business School
Brasil
Alencar de Farias, Salomão
Internal Marketing (IM): a literature review and research propositions for service excellence
BBR - Brazilian Business Review, vol. 7, núm. 2, mayo-agosto, 2010, pp. 99-115
FUCAPE Business School
Vitória, Brasil
Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=123021648006
Cómo citar el artículo
Número completo
Más información del artículo
Página de la revista en redalyc.org
Sistema de Información Científica
Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal
Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto
v. 7, n.2
Vitória-ES, May - Aug . 2010
p. 99 - 115
ISSN 1808-2386
Internal Marketing (IM): a literature review and research propositions for
service excellence
Salomão Alencar de Farias †
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco – UFPE
ABSTRACT: The role of service employees is indeed relevant for the success of any service
organization, especially those that process people and internal marketing can help firms to
deliver service excellence. Even though it is not a new concept, since it was first mentioned in
the literature more than 30 years ago, confusion still exist on what exactly internal marketing
(IM) is. This theoretical paper reviews the IM literature and relates it to the service excellence
at the same time that presents some research propositions to the development of the
knowledge in this marketing area. A desk research methodology was adopted, and data base
on international academic journals was accessed for the construction of this article. As a
conclusion it was possible to speculate that something has to come before IM application in a
company, that is a service orientation. Without that, it is impossible to have a successful IM
program. Also, the variety of interpretations as to what IM constitutes did result to a diverse
range of activities grouped under the umbrella of IM.
Keywords: Internal marketing, human resources management, service excellence.
Received in 04/13/2010 ; revised in 04/27/2010; accept in 05/14/2010.
Corresponding authors*:
†
Doutor em Administração pela Universidade de São Paulo
Vinculação: Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
Endereço: Rua Rodrigues de Mendonça, nº. 45.
Apto. 1103, Prado, Recife/Pernambuco, CEP50720-170
E-mail: [email protected]
Telefone: (81) 2126-7174
Fax: (81) 2126-8880
100
Farias
1. INTRODUCTION
bout 34 years ago internal marketing (IM) was first proposed as a
solution to the problem of delivering consistently high service
quality by Berry et al. (1976). “There is a great deal of confusion in
the literature as to exactly what IM is, what it is supposed to do,
how it is supposed to do it, and who is supposed to do it.
One of the main problems contributing to this is that there does not exist a single
unified concept of what is meant by IM” (MOHAMMED; AHMED, 2000, p. 449). The
variety of interpretations as to what IM constitutes has led to a diverse range of activities
being grouped under the umbrella of IM. The purpose of this paper is to examine the IM
concept and present its scope by tracing the evolution in the concept from its beginning to the
current time. Another objective is to present some research propositions as a way to stimulate
further development of the knowledge in this marketing area. The term IM appears to have
been first used by Berry et al. (1976) and later by George (1977) and Thompson et al. (1978,
p. 243) and Murray (1979). Today, there is still some confusion on what IM is, and this is the
start point for this paper. Kollat et al. (1970) talking about the importance of standardized
definitions, claim that “so many definitions make it difficult and hazardous to compare,
synthesize and accumulate finds” (p. 329). On the other hand, Jacoby (1978, p. 88) says that
“nothing is so practical as a good theory”. Neglecting theory can lead to error in interpreting
data and poor research results. So, reviewing the literature on IM can help researchers
interested in this topic to better comprehend this marketing tool.
A considerable body of research in the marketing literature has focused on the "service
encounter," which is defined as "the period of time during which a consumer directly interacts
with a service" (JOSEPH, 1996, p. 55). Every episode where a customer or key buying
influence interacts with a service company, its products, people, facilities, or communications
represents a moment of truth because each episode can shape a customer's impressions and
judgments about the firm (JOSPEH, 1996). Berry et al (1976, p. 8) affirm that IM is
“concerned with making available internal products (Jobs) that satisfy the needs of a vital
internal market (employees) while satisfying the objectives of the organization”. On the
reality a service organization's capability for satisfying the needs of its external customers
depends in part on that firm's ability to satisfy the needs of its internal customers. According
to Berry (1981) there are several forms of IM. “What they all share in common is that the
Internal Marketing (IM): a literature review and research propositions for service excellence
101
employees as internal customers, jobs as internal products and offering internal products that
satisfy the needs and wants of theses internal customers, considering the objectives of the
organization” (p.34). The people who buy goods and services in the role of consumer, and the
people who buy jobs in the role of employee, are the same people, and the “exchange takes
place between employers and employees is no less real than the exchange that takes place
between consumers and companies” (p. 34).
Bansal et al. (2001, p. 61) indicate that “an increasingly service-oriented economy
asks companies to attract and retain customers to ensure a sustainable competitive advantage”.
To achieve this goal, organizations must focus their efforts on developing and sustaining an
organizational “culture that emphasizes internal customer well-being as a means to attract and
retain external customer patronage. In service-providing organizations, the quality of service
is embedded in the quality and performance of human resources” (p. 61). Such critical
marketing events as ‘‘first encounter’’ and ‘‘moment of truth’’ are the works of frontline
employees (p.64). Most of the initial work on IM focused on employee motivation and
satisfaction. It was believed that a firm must have satisfied employees in order to have
satisfied customers, because so much of what customers of service companies buy is labor.
The basic way of achieving employee satisfaction was to treat employees as customers
(BERRY et al., 1976, p.8). This is what is called the employee satisfaction phase on the
development of IM (Mohammed & Ahmed, 2000). Later it was recognized that the
relationship between buyer and seller not only affects the customer's decision to buy a service
or go back for more, but also provides a marketing opportunity for the company. Employees
should, therefore, “be sales-minded as well as customer-orientated. The object of IM was
therefore to get motivated and customer conscious employees, and to achieve good coordination between employees dealing directly with the customer and the company's support
staff” (Mohammed & Ahmed, 2000, p.9). This phase of IM theory is called the customerorientation.
According to Mohammed and Ahmed (2000) some authors now explicitly began to
recognize that IM could help a company to achieve its strategy. In particular, it was believed
that if strategies are to be implemented more effectively, internal conflicts must be overcome
and internal communications improved. IM today is seen as “a way of reducing departmental
isolation, reducing internal friction and overcoming resistance to change. It is now applied to
any type of organization, not merely service companies”. This characterizes what is called the
strategy implementation and change management phase on the evolution of IM literature
102
Farias
(MOHAMMED; AHMED, 2000). IM lacks a widely accepted definition, but usually it
encompasses three main themes: “service-mindedness and customer-oriented behaviors,
focusing staff attention on the internal activities that need to be changed in order to enhance
marketplace performance and creating motivated and customer-oriented employees”
(MOSLEY, 2007, p. 128).
Ahmed and Rafiq (2003, p. 1177) indicates that employees as customers concept that
was proposed by Berry (1981), leads to the premise that just as external customers, internal
customers desire to have their needs satisfied. “Fulfilling employee needs enhances employee
satisfaction. The higher the employee satisfaction, the higher the possibility of generating
external satisfaction and loyalty” (p.1177). This variety of interpretations as to what IM
constitutes to do have resulted to a diverse range of activities grouped under the umbrella of
internal marketing. In Brazil some terms illustrate this confusion: “endomarketing” and
“Marketing applied to Human Resources”. In addition, the scarcity of implementation models
that was evident in the literature reviewed by Papasolomou (2006) “has resulted in a variety
of implementation formats, which confuse and create ambiguity rather than clarity and
understanding” (p. 197).Such a proliferation of definitions “merely underscores the growing
interest among service providers to get employees to adopt the marketing concept of customer
orientation and to become part of the company's team” (JOSPEH, 1996, p.54).
2. INTERNAL MARKETING DEFINITION
The term internal marketing (IM) is used to describe the application of marketing
internally within the organization. “Every department and every person is both supplier and a
customer, and the organization’s staff works together in a manner supporting the company
strategy and goals”. IM relates to all functions within the organization, but it is vitally
concerned with the management of human resource (COLLINS; PAYNE, 1991, p. 261).
Greene et al. (1994, p. 5) offer a definition of IM as the “promoting of the firm and its
product(s) to the firm’s employees, and for this strategy to be successful top level
management must fully embrace it”. “IM means applying the philosophy and practices of
marketing to the people who serve the external customer so that the best possible people can
be employed and retained and they will do the best work possible” (p. 8). More specifically,
“IM is viewing employees as internal customers, jobs as internal products, and endeavoring to
design these products to meet the needs of these customers better” (p. 8). Joseph’s (1996, p.
55) definition of IM is “the application of marketing, human resources management, and
Internal Marketing (IM): a literature review and research propositions for service excellence
103
employees at all levels of the organization to continuously improve the way they serve
external customers and each other" (p.55). Many definitions of IM view it as either a concept,
a philosophy or a management practice, as either relating to human resources management,
services marketing or change management (LINGS; BROOKS, 1998, p. 327). Figure 1
presents a perspective of the IM definition in terms of its interaction with external marketing.
It is possible to see that “interactive marketing” is what links IM and external marketing
during the service encounter. Front-line employees are responsible for ultimately delivering
the service (product) to external customers. In services, like it is exemplified here, the
production and consumption take place on the service encounter.
Interactive
Marketing
Internal Marketing
External marketing
Internal Organizational
Marketing
Backstage
employees
& deps.
Internal interunit marketing
Front-line
employees
Production
Service
Encounter
External
customers
Consumption
Staff personnel
Figure 1 - The internal Marketing Interaction
Source: Joseph (1996, p. 56).
Initially the impetus behind the development of the IM concept was the “concern that
because contact employees involved in services become involved in what is called interactive
marketing, it is essential that they are responsive to customers’ needs” (RAFIQ; AHMED,
1993, p. 220) Bowers et al. (1990) present the perspective that the “customer-contact position
has been noted for its importance in delivering service quality. Contact employees are service
marketers as well as service providers” (p. 58). How they interact with customers is often
104
Farias
contact employees are the company to the customers.Particularly for the service organization,
“marketing has an additional, internal, role that is to ensure that service employees are
customer conscious and also satisfied with their job” (GOUNARIS, 2008p. 403).
Figure 1 points out that to the correct management of IM, backstage employees are
important resources since they make it possible for front-line employees to deliver the service.
Internal organizational marketing goes from backstage and front-line employees, and also
impact what Joseph (1996) calls staff personnel. The figure pictures a chain that links IM to
external marketing through interactive marketing, a concept related to the service encounter
that needs both IM and external marketing to succeed.
Papasolomou (2006) suggests that “people are critical to the success of organizations.
Companies that select, develop, manage and motivate their workforce to produce outstanding
business results have an extraordinary competitive advantage that others cannot copy” (p.
195). The objective of IM is to get motivated and customer conscious employees in order to
achieve service excellence. The use of marketing in the IM context suggests an emphasis on
the application of marketing techniques, approaches, concepts, and theories aimed at
achieving customer satisfaction in the context of internal customers, in order to achieve
success in the external market (p. 195).
It appears that the results regarding the employee satisfaction – customer satisfaction
relationship are controversial, it should be noted that the empirical findings in favor of this
relationship are derived based on multilevel analysis (GOUNARIS, 2008, p. 403). But this
does not take away the relevance of IM for the “right” employee management, based on
marketing philosophy. George (1990, p. 69) points that “IM can be used in the three following
ways: assistance in developing a service culture, maintaining a service culture, and
introducing new products as well as new marketing activities”.
Cardy (2001) points that customer service holds great potential as a means for
managing the internal work environment. “Focusing on people rather than on jobs can be a
difficult transition, but it may be critical for the survival and success of the organization” (p.
13).
This way, one can define IM as proposed initially by Berry et al (1976, p. 8) since they
point out that it is “concerned with making available internal products (Jobs) that satisfy the
needs of a vital internal market (employees) while satisfying the objectives of the
organization” and it is complemented by Greene et al. (1994, p. 8) when they say that IM is
Internal Marketing (IM): a literature review and research propositions for service excellence
105
“viewing employees as internal customers, jobs as internal products, and endeavoring to
design these products to meet the needs of these customers better”.
3. HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND INTERNAL MARKETING
Collins and Payne (1991) affirm that IM “relates to all function within the
organization, but it is vitally concerned with the management of human resources” (p. 261)
and describes the application of marketing internally in the organization. By now, we
understand that every department and every person inside an organization is both a supplier
and a customer. Also, supplier and customers must work together “in a manner supporting the
company strategy and goals” (p. 261).
IM has been described as a philosophy for managing the organization’s human
resources based on a marketing perspective. “A market-oriented human resources manager is
more likely to make an impact on the success of a company, considering it tends to be more
effective in both demonstrating the relevance of human resources to all the company, helping
other managers to increase their productivity”. Marketing provides an “action framework and
a practical approach by which the human resource manager can offer effective solutions to
key corporate problems” (COLLINS; PAYNE, 1991, p. 269).
Rafiq and Ahmed (1993) identify the main elements of IM as: employee motivation
and satisfaction; customer orientation and customer satisfaction; inter-functional coordination and integration; marketing-like approach; and implementation of specific corporate
or functional strategies. According to George (1990) IM operates as a holistic management
process to integrate the multiple functions of the organization in two ways: “1) to ensure that
the employees at all levels understand and experience the business and its various activities
and campaigns
in the context of an environment that supports customer consciousness, and 2) to
ensure that all employees be prepared and motivated to act in a service oriented manner” (p.
64). The base of this philosophy is that management wants employees to do a great job with
customers, then it must be prepared to do a great job with its employees.
That is, internal exchanges between the organization and its employee groups must be
operating effectively before the organization can be successful in achieving goals regarding
its external markets Thus, “the internal marketing concept states that the internal market of
employees is best motivated for service-mindedness, and a customer-oriented behavior by an
106
Farias
active, marketing approach, where marketing like activities are used maternally” (GEORGE,
1990, p. 64).
Mudie (2003, p. 1263) tells us that the customer has been the focal point of marketing,
the very reason for its existence. “Being a customer is about pleasure, happiness and
satisfaction” (p.1272). The notion of an internal customer suggests that “every employee is
both a supplier and a customer to other employees within the organization. Internal customers
generate goods and services for the end customer and, as such, are crucial to providing
customer satisfaction” (CONDUIT; MAVONDO, 2001, p.12).
Having satisfied and motivated employees will influence positively customer
satisfaction, through more satisfactory encounters with contact personnel. From this
viewpoint, “employment” (job description and employee-related policies) is the internal
“product” and first-line employees the company’s internal “customers” (GOUNARIS, 2008a,
p. 69).
Encouraging the organization’s employees to “buy their own services and products in
both consumption and psychological terms can boost sales and confidence for customer
service delivery”. It requires considerable co-ordination since promotion to external
customers will also largely influence employees (VAREY, 1995, p.50). Paraskevas (2001,
p.285) affirms that in an ideal working environment, internal service encounters would result
in successful interdepartmental relationships. Several important components for implementing
an internal marketing process require attention: “management support, training, internal
communications, personnel administration, and external activities” (GEORGE, 1990, p. 68).
Vasconcelos (2008, p.1255) says that people do not simply “buy” a job description.
“Actually, the process of exchange between employers and workers are much more complex
than that. Although it is believed that assurances of reasonable job security, continual training,
and development aid to establish a social exchange relationship”. Employers should offer
pleasant job experiences and receive, in exchange, employees’ expertise and dedication.
“Such premise – and there is no reason to believe on contrary – can lead to satisfying
organizational performance.
Theoretically, it will fulfill both parties since it is managed in a proficient manner”. It
is a task for the human resource manager to closely work with the marketing manager in an
attempt to make it work as expected. By that we mean, IM and Human Resource are separate
entities, but must work together for the success of the program implementation and results.
Internal Marketing (IM): a literature review and research propositions for service excellence
107
George (1990, p. 68) indicates that one of the marketing like activities necessary to
implement an IM program is “market research activity, that could bring an understanding of
employee capabilities (attitudes, skills) to participate in an internal marketing strategy,
necessary to the success of internal marketing practices”. Services marketing and
management pose special challenges because services deal with "processes rather than things,
with performances more than physical objects". Three management functions— marketing,
operations, and human resources—are intimately joined in what it has dubbed the "service
trinity” to create and deliver services (JOSEPH, 1996, p. 55).
Making everybody a customer in his relations to others inside the organization allows
one to view what happens in a firm from a true process-management perspective (GEORGE,
1990, p. 67). According to Bansal et al. (2001) some relevant aspects of human resources
management practices in achieving internal customer commitment, job satisfaction, and trust
are relevant to the success of IM management. “Internal customer commitment deals with the
employee’s involvement and attachment to their company. Job satisfaction is the evaluation of
the job characteristics and emotional experiences at work. Trust in management can be
described as having trust in the words and actions of those in management” (p. 66).
It was possible to see that IM and human resources management are closely related,
but different concepts. One works in a way to help the other so that the firm is able to deliver
service excellence, the next topic here discussed.
4. ELEMENTS OF INTERNAL MARKETING AND SERVICE EXCELLENCE
The boom of service industry in the 80s has led to the development of a theoretical
corpus specific to this sector, and the work of Gronroos (1982, 1989), Lovelock (1983) and
Parasuraman et al. (1988), for instance, have contribute a lot to the understanding of specific
characteristics of the service business, that includes IM.
One of the elements of IM presented by Bansal et al. (2001, p. 67) is employment
security, that is defined as “providing employees with the reasonable assurance that they will
not be laid off, even during tough economic cycles. Any slowdowns in productivity or
profitability may result in transfers, retraining, or job rotation, thus avoiding the necessity of
layoffs”. Another element is extensive training since almost all “descriptions of IM practices
emphasize the importance of training because frontline employees need the requisite
knowledge and ability to recognize and solve problems and to ensure high-quality products
and services” (p. 68).
108
Farias
If an organization is serious about attracting and retaining the best and brightest
candidates, “providing them with a higher-than-industry-average salary is one way of
accomplishing this objective. What is the message that paying people well sends? Higher pay
is a way of communicating the value of employees to the organization” (p.68). This way,
“higher-than-industry-average salaries and pay partially contingent on performance will be
positively associated with job satisfaction, loyalty to the firm, and trust in management”
(Bansal et al., 2001, p. 69).
In order to build trust, it is important that organizations function in a transparent
manner, with a service focus. To do so, companies must be prepared to openly share with
their members, “information on their strategy, financial performance, and expenditures –
sharing information is a key factor to IM. Employee empowerment is an essential way to
impact employee attitudes and behaviors and, hence, the level of service provided to the
external customer” (BANSAL et al., 2001, p. 69). Finally, consistent with a focus on
information sharing and empowerment, organizations with an emphasis on internal customers
should also work to reduce the status distinctions that make some people feel more or less
valued than their colleagues.
Service excellence means delivering what the customer wants at the first encounter. In
an external marketing perspective this is related to service quality, to exceed customer
expectation, to make it right the first time. For that to happen, internal customers must also
have what they want, since they are customers.
It is believed that internal customer satisfaction will lead to external customer
satisfaction, which represents a way to offer service excellence. “Although the importance of
internal customer satisfaction levels on external customer satisfaction levels has been
increasingly emphasized, there remains a dearth of literature that comments on the exact
nature of the relationship between the two” (BANSAL et al. 2001, p. 71).
By satisfying the needs of its internal customers, an organization upgrades its
capability for satisfying the needs of its external customers. This is true for most
organizations (GREENE et al. 1994, p. 8). Service excellence calls for a marketing plan.
Figure 2 presents a service plan with IM mix and external marketing mix.
The organization must have clear at a strategic level the importance of customers (both
internal and external), for the success of the service production and deliver. Issues like
employee empowerment, customer satisfaction and more important, the marketing mix
Internal Marketing (IM): a literature review and research propositions for service excellence
109
management. IM mix consists of the programme, product, price, communication and
distribution, according to Pierce and Morgan (1991).
The plan should link the mission, objective, strategic audit and marketing tactics to
both IM and External marketing. Services are intangible and people dependent on nature.
Having employees satisfied is a key topic for service excellence. What we are trying to stress
is that, with the application of IM a service organization would be able to deliver service
excellence better than the ones that do not have it a service philosophy or as a strategic tool.
Mission
Objective
Strategic Audit
Marketing
tactics
Internal
marketing
programme
Product
Price
Communications
Distribution
External
marketing
programme
Product
Price
Communications
Distribution
Key target
groups in the Key customer
segments
Figure 2 - Marketing Plan
Source: Pierce and Morgan (1991, p.84)
Gremler et al. (1994) claims that “successful service organizations understand well the
importance of carefully monitoring and managing customer satisfaction” (p. 34), and service
encounter can play an important role whether customer satisfaction will occur or not. The
satisfaction of internal customers can be influenced by service encounters with service
suppliers internally in the organization. Internal service encounters are the interaction between
customers within a firm. “In order to have their needs met, employees often depend upon
internal services provided by others in the organization. Like external customers, internal
customers engage in numerous service encounters to satisfy the many needs they have in the
110
Farias
Service excellence is a subjective concept, like perceived quality; it is in the eyes of
the beholder. Despite of its subjective character, excellence can be achieved by offering a
superior service, with committed employees, willing to serve external customer better than the
competition. IM has an important role in service excellence.
Before presenting the research proposition it is interesting to remind of the key
elements present on the definitions of IM presented before:
 Making available internal products to employees and satisfying organization’s
objectives (BERRY, 1976).
 Application of marketing internally in the organization, a marketing oriented
human resource management (COLLINS; PAYNE, 1991).
 Promoting product and firm to employees; Applying the philosophy and marketing
practices internally the organizations; Employee as customers and jobs as products (GREENE
et al., 1994).
 Applying marketing and human resources management to motivate and manage
employees (JOSEPH, 1996).
 The concept or philosophy or management practice applied to human resources
management, service marketing or change management (LINGS; BROOKS, 1998).
 Jobs as products and employees as customers (GOUNARIS, 2008a).
Taking in account the elements presented, we proposed that IM is applying marketing
management to the relationships between employees and their organization, where in an
internally perspective, jobs are products and employees are customers and suppliers, with the
support of human resource management.
5. RESEARCH PROPOSITIONS FOR IM AND SERVICE EXCELLENCE
Based on the literature review, we now present some research proposition that could
help develop knowledge on this area of marketing and also improve service excellence on the
practical side. This was the second objective of this paper. The propositions are not
exhaustive, they only seek to encourage more research in this subject often relegated to a
secondary position in the marketing academy in Brazil.
The first research proposition deals with IM orientation of a firm and how it relates to
employee job satisfaction. Gounaris (2008) examined the impact of IM orientation on the
Internal Marketing (IM): a literature review and research propositions for service excellence
111
application of IM practices and employee job satisfaction. Even though it is not clear that
satisfied internal customers will lead to external satisfied customer, there is some evidence for
that. This way: P1 – Investigate the relationship between IM orientation and employee
satisfaction and external customer satisfaction.
This topic needs to be clarified and probably positivist methods with the application of
a survey with the right measurement of the constructs will help to verify the power and
validity of this relationship.
The second proposition takes in account the service quality literature, more
specifically the SERVQUAL model (PARASURAMAN et al., 1988), and brings it inside the
organization with the work of Frost and Kumar (2000), that proposes INTSERVQUAL
(Internal service quality model), where they imply that service quality is a key for the success
of IM. Considering this, we propose P2 – Verify the validity of INTSERVQUAL in different
service sectors in search for its dimensions stability and validity.
Lings and Greenley (2005) worry about the operacionalization of IM. They proposed
the development of the IM orientation scale and its measurement as a multidimensional
construct. Jou et al. (2008) presented a scale to asses “employee’s perception of their
company’s internal marketing measures” (p. 66).
Considering this, we state P3 – To apply Lings and Greenley scale in the Brazilian
context to validate it, and also to verify the impact of IM orientation on service quality. IM
seems to make more sense to be applied in private companies where exists flexibility to
empower customers, to make changes in a fast pace and to adapt to the customer’s demands.
Papasolomou (2006) found that the bureaucracy present in banks in UK was a barrier
for the IM implementation. This way, we propose P4 – Very the possibility to apply IM in
governmental owned organizations in Brazil, identifying the obstacles, if they exist, for a
successful IM program in governmental organizations.
Service excellence is a complex construct that needs to be investigated in conjunction
with IM. P5 – Identify what leads an organization to be considered as having excellence in
service and the role, if any, IM has on this.
Finally, we propose that P6 - a research to be conduct using meta analysis to verify
how academics are studying IM in the Brazilian context, and if the term “endomarketing” is a
good one to represent IM in the academic literature.
112
Farias
6. CONCLUSION
IM can be an important allied to service marketing management in a scenario of global
competition. Service excellence is a goal for most service organizations, and it heavily
depends on employees’ performance to deliver high quality products on service encounters.
This paper aimed to review the literature on IM and to attempt to clarify it scope and
theoretically discuss some issues related to IM concept, scope and its relationship with human
resources management. The ultimate objective of IM is to motivate employees in order to
achieve service excellence. The use of marketing in the IM context suggests an emphasis on
the application of marketing techniques, approaches, concepts, and theories. This has the
objective of achieving customer satisfaction in the context of internal customers, which could
lead to the success in the external market context.
The variety of interpretations as to what IM constitutes to do have resulted to a diverse
range of activities grouped under the umbrella of internal marketing. In Brazil some terms
illustrate this confusion: “endomarketing” and “Marketing applied to Human Resources”.
The international literature here reviewed is clear about the use of only one term:
internal marketing. Maybe it is the time to the Brazilian marketing academy to unify the term
and its concept, avoiding confusion and helping the advance of the knowledge in this service
literature field. IM is an important topic that needs more research and proper application on
the real world, considering the benefits presented on the papers here analyzed.
After reviewing more than thirty academic papers, it was possible to clarify the IM
concept, its elements, its relationship with human resource management, and also to present
some research propositions for the development of the knowledge in the scientific field. As a
conclusion it is possible to speculate that IM concept is still applied only partially in most
organizations and its concept plurality to date, is one of the key element for this to happen.
7. REFERENCES
AHMED, Pervaiz K.; RAFIQ, Mohammed. Internal marketing issues and challenges.
European Journal of Marketing. v. 37, n. 9, p. 1177–1186, 2003.
BANSAL, Harvir S.; MENDELSON, Morris B.; SHARMA, Basu. The Impact of internal
marketing activities on external marketing outcomes. Journal of Quality Management, v. 6,
p. 61-76, 2001.
BERRY, L.L. The Employee as customer. Journal of Retail Banking, v. 3, p. 25-8, mar.
1981.
Internal Marketing (IM): a literature review and research propositions for service excellence
113
BERRY, L.L.; HENSEL, J. S.; BURKE, M. C. Improving retailer capability for effective
consumerism response, Journal of Retailing, v. 52, n. 3, p. 3-14, 1976.
BOWERS, Michael R.; MARTIN, Charles L.; LUKER, Alan. Trading places: employees as
customers, customers as employees. The Journal of Services Marketing, v. 4, n. 2, p. 55-69,
1990.
CARDY, Robert L. Employees as customers? Marketing Management, v. 10, n. 3, p. 12-13,
set/out. 2001.
COLLINS, Brett; PAYNE, Adrian. Internal marketing: a new perspective for HRM.
European Management Journal. v. 9, n. 3, p. 261-269, set. 2001.
CONDUIT, Jodie; MAYONDO, Felix T. How critical is internal customer orientation to
market orientation? Journal of Business Research. v. 51, p. 11-24, 2001.
ROST, Frederick A.; KUMAR, Mukesh. INTSERVQUAL: an internal adaptation of the GAP
model in a large service organization. Journal of Service Marketing. v. 14, n. 5, p. 358 –
377, 2000.
GEORGE, William R. The Retailing of services: a challenging future. Journal of Retailing,
Outono, p. 85-98, 1977.
______. Internal marketing and organizational behavior: a partnership in developing
customer-conscious employees in every level. Journal of Business Research. v. 20, p. 63–
70, 1990.
GOUNARIS, Spiros. Antecedents of internal marketing practice: some preliminary empirical
evidence. International Journal of Service Industry Management. v. 19, n. 3, p. 400-434,
2008.
______. The Notion of internal market orientation and employee job satisfaction: some
preliminary evidence. Journal of Service Marketing. v. 22, n. 1, p. 68 -90, 2008a.
GREENE, Walter E.; WALLS, Gary D.; SCHREST, Larry J. Internal marketing: the key to
external marketing success. The Journal of Services Marketing. v. 8, n. 4, p. 5-13, 1994.
GREMLER, Dwayne D.; BITNER, Mary Jo; EVANS, Kenneth R. The Internal service
encounter. International Journal of Service. v. 5, n. 2, p. 34 – 56, 1994.
GRONROOS, Christian. An Applied service marketing theory. European Journal of
Marketing. v. 16, n. 7, p. 30 – 41, 1984.
______. Defining marketing: a market-oriented approach. European Journal of Marketing,
v. 23, n. 1, p. 52 – 60, 1989.
JACOBY, Jacob. Consumer research: how valid and useful are all our consumer behavior
research finds?: a state of the art review. Journal of Marketing, abr., p. 87-96, 1978.
114
Farias
JOSEPH, W. Benoy. Internal marketing builds service quality. Marketing Review. v. 16, n.
1, primavera, p. 54-59, 1996.
JOU, Jacob Y. H.; CHOU, Cathy K.; FU, Fongling, L. Development of an instrument to
measure internal marketing concept. The Journal of Applied Management and
Entrepeneurship. v. 13, n. 3, p. 66, 2008.
KOLLAT, David T.; ENGEL, James F.; BLACKWELL, Roger D. Current problems in
consumer behavior research. Journal of Marketing Research, v. 7, p. 327 – 332, ago. 1970.
LINGS, Ian N.; BROOKS, Roger F. Implementing and measuring the effectiveness of
internal marketing. Journal of Marketing Management. v. 14, p. 325-351, 1998.
LINGS, Ian N.; GREENLEY, Gordon E. Measuring internal market orientation. Journal of
Service Research. v.7, n. 3, p. 290, 2005.
LOVELOCK, Christopher H. Classifying services to gain strategic marketing insights.
Journal of Marketing. v. 47, verão, p. 9 – 20, 1983.
MOSLEY, Richard W. Customer experience, organisational culture, and the employer brand.
Brand Management, v. 15, n. 2, p. 123-134, 2007.
MUDIE, Peter. Internal customer: by design or by default. European Journal of Marketing.
v. 37, n. 9, p. 1261-1277, 2003.
MURRAY, J.G. The Importance of internal marketing. Bankers Magazine, p. 38-40,
jul./ago. 1979.
PAPASOLOMOU, Ioanna. Can Internal marketing be implemented within bureaucratic
organisations? International Journal of Bank Marketing. v. 24, n. 3, p. 194-212, 2006.
PARASKEVAS, Alexandros. Internal service encounters in hotels: an empirical study.
International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. v. 13, n. 6, p. 285-298,
2001.
PARASURAMAN, A.; ZEITHAML, Valerie A.; BERRY, Leonard L. SERVQUAL: a
multiple item scale for measuring consumer perception of service quality. Journal of
Retailing. v. 64, n. 1, p. 12 – 37, 1998.
PIERCE, Nigel; MORGAN, Neil. Internal marketing: the missing half of the marketing
programme. Long Range Planning, v. 24, n. 2, p. 82 – 93, 1991.
RAFIQ, M.; AHMED, P. K. The Scope of internal marketing: defining the boundary between
marketing and human resource management. Journal of Marketing Management, v. 9, p.
219-32, 1993.
______.; ______. Advances in the internal marketing concept: definition, synthesis and
extension. The Journal of Services Marketing. Santa Barbara, v. 14, n. 6, p. 449, 2000.
Internal Marketing (IM): a literature review and research propositions for service excellence
115
THOMPSOM, T. W.; BERRY, L. L.; DAVIDSON, P. H. Banking tomorrow: managing
markets through planning. Nova York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1978.
VAREY, Richard. Internal marketing: a review and some interdiciplinary research challenges.
International Journal of Service Industry Management. v. 6, n.1, p. 40-63, 1995.
VASCONCELOS, Anselmo Ferreira. Broadening even more the internal marketing concept.
European Journal of Marketing. v. 42, n. 11/12, p. 1246 – 1264, 2008.