* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download -. - ” .~, ,1_11 _ _, IX-X,““.
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
-.- ”.~,,1_11 _ _,IX-X,““. ^“-, _ __- ,I,,-,_“, “,_-” ,,x_ ,, ,,-__ ,~,.,-, MCNEIL CONSUMER PRODUCTS COMPANY, CAMP HILL ROAD. FO TJ. S. Department of Health and Human Services Dockets Management Branch (HFA 305), Room 4-62 Food and Drug Administration 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 c-2 5';: ..J -T2 5 g 2 ;.r=: z Re: Docket Number 76~05@ (Cold, Cough, Allergy, Bronchodilator, and Antiasthmatic Drug Products for Over-the-Counter Human Use; Tentative Final Monograph for OTC Nasal Decongestant Drug Products) z Gentlemen: In the Federal Proposed Register Rulemaking of under January 21 CFR Part identifying conditions Decongestant products are generally misbranded. The Proposed Regulation Monograph directions under comments presented 1. Labeling McNeil 21 CFR 341.80 "Exclusivity lists 341, under the FDA published establishing (b) a Tentative Over-the-Counter which recognized a Notice as safe included labeling and (d), which are the Final Nasal H and not and effective indications of and dosage subject of the not prescribe Policy" of Company believes terms Rather than prohibiting should permit from which or misleading. that labeling the use of alternative manufacturers communicate the desired false 1985, below. Consumer Products exclusive 15, label to choose indications, FDA should indications truthful consumer must be drawn. terminology, oriented FDA language so long as such language to is not "' It is noted Policy" that on April FDA proposed 22, certain 1985 and McNeil revisions will submit to the "Exclusivity comments on that proposal separately. 2. Indications for Use [341.80(b)] The Tentative Final containing products indications believes be active phrase "For or are products extraneous, but oral potentially particularly true for combination cold inappropriate for persons suffering allergy McNeil therefore amended to allow requests manufacturers indications noted above, which product is the allergy 341.80(b)(l) or that sinusitus]. be modified the to directed Accordingly, to read: (P rhinitis) or McNeil of the above of the all decongestants to three may not consumers. which common This is may be totally of the TFM be or sinusitis. choose [i.e.: nasal The use of products indications as appropriate three treatment nasal confusing of decongestants, the oral relief all label sinusitis." different. containing for carry (allergic all nasal for entirely to with require whom products and sinusitis all to calls temporary hay fever containing to the associated inappropriate products Decongestants ingredients (cold), allergies audiences for OTC Nasal common cold is all allergy indications only it for The consumer the respiratory that indications cold, to due to the upper for decongestant limited congestion other Monograph for from among any the consumer either it section the is of market the segment common cold requested that three to (cold), 21 CFR "The labeling of indications the product under includes the contains heading a statement the (select hay temporary one of fever relief the of (allergic indications: nasal following) the which "Indications" one or more of the following "For of congestion the rhinitis) due to common cold or (cold), associated with sinusitis." Other Allowable To permit "other Indications meaningful allowable alternative alternate consumer Indications" statements 341.80(b)(l) [341.80(b)(2)] given rather than oriented in in the label indications, TFM should addition to the be available those permitted as under above. 0 McNeil also those already oriented head (b)(2)(i) "(2) that the included terms, stuffed-up 341.80 believes in allowable since the be in Therefore, clogged-up are synonymous they are "temporarily e.g. McNeil requests 341.80(b)(l) As an alternative above, the any of the following relief that nose, nose, (select stopped-up nose, stuffed-up (3) head, to the labeling of statements: of one nasal stuffy of the stuffi- head.' with consumer relieves to read: temporary stuffy permitted, indications. may contain ness, and head). the product following): 341.80(b)(2) (stuffy listed For below also indications (i) terms should be modified Other underlined 21 CFR ‘.. r \ 1 3. Warnings [341.72(c)] The current text FDA mandated warning and also contains statement for required in adults (c)(l)(i)(d) the T F M calls and children other warnings. 341.80(c)(l)(i)(c) and in redundant For example, language. language to read like essentially as warning precautionary duplicates McNeil read a m e d ical inappropriate a drug interaction Therefore, be m o d ified to some cases for which tends requests given below statements that and 21 that 341.80 be eliminated: (c)u Do not heart take this disease, disease, product depression, diabetes, enlargement of or the if you are being high blood have difficulty prostate pressure, in gland treated unless for thyroid urination directed due to by a doctor." f Similarly for that CPR 341.8O(c)(l)(ii)(c) 21 products 341.80(c)(l)(ii)(d) (c) for give heart blood pressure Labeling m a d e in l341.72 for children be under age 12, m o d ified as it is requested outlined below and this product disease, to thyroid or depression unless children who are being disease, diabetes, high directed by a doctor." [341.80(d)] Recommendations for McNeil labeled be eliminated: "DO not treated 4. CFR Changes in Pediatric Consumer Products the (d)] pediatric Company's dosing recommends the schedules of the monograph: (4) Dosage Schedules used in the following "Directions" changes be section A. Addition of a pediatric B. C. an optional dosage dosage equivalent unit additional age dosing concept; unit Addition of optional basis package labeling. Addition of schedule to developed groupings which l/8 to utilizes the the adult better concept of dose and includes utilize the pediatric and a weight-based as schedule part of the a professional that could recommendations dosing dosage be incorporated schedule for children on an in consumer under 2 years of age. Recommendation: divided New targeted primarily schedule Adoption patient of using either schedule through for based more on pediatric patient, dosing schedule in adults, it growing to fin@y is currently is which reasonable that used (1) in for a dosing doses to the Proposed in various of combination provide to the and reported between dosage continue in the Tentative (5) need products years. formulation also a market For of incremental consistency the nonprescription patients. there Drug Products provide the administration similar consistency for in pediatric use, his/her system 3) would targeted or pediatric Analgesic for available adult provide a dosing (2, allow currently for would OTC Internal products the toward that literature would products intended pediatric for dosing age breaks. Most cough-cold are pediatric Final to the Monograph published monographs and products. For recommendations allow the Monograph. option for of The Pediatric Dosing pediatric dosing developed that by incremental using growth unit for in be administered the administered Because it adult is The standard drug one-fifth, adult dosing into have one-eighth unit of already mental Analgesic can unit of been the in age-breaks can be pediatric patient with typical PDU concept fixed be used the allows dosing products increments adult evaluated, incremental adult use with are can long unit but to dose is acetaminophen consistent with is such Drug Products. (6) pediatric of use. a recognized ingredient. be applied independent dosing one-eighth intervals of can of the usual as one-twelfth, one-tenth, meet for a PDU that ranges. consistent the needs be one-eighth of with seven incremental In addition, with Proposed the adult or pediatric is and aspirin the orally or specific as can be developed weight for all rates. do not Using framework usual as doses, essentially and fractions category concept dosing for intended drug elimination pediatric seven consistent ranges intervals, account a dosing and/or schedules growing relatively to any drug as satisfactorily. dose, periods system dosing fractions formulations with can be applied pediatric Other the the weight The most appropriate dose. addition, based on standard to take dosing standardized and effectively. PDU dosing or pediatric ranges weight In a relatively need of preparations half-life adjusted the over-the-counter it dose, and administration safely basis, with age Using concept. (PDU) as the children. oral Importantly, (PDU) are consistent pattern intended Unit the usual age a PDU that pediatric products Monograph and the for is dosing increInternal .. *iv: ’ I 1 Application of For products whose labeling five the age breaks professional desired. pediatric would labeling dosing is unit lim ited be incorporated also could concept to to children into be developed consumer 2 years package for labeling. and older, only Additional labeling. the younger age child if (see below) The following summarizes pediatric dosing units constant, incremental the that dosing recommended age periods would be required throughout at and the a given the pediatric number of age to m a intain age period: RECOMMENDED PEDIATRIC DOSING SCHEDULE Number of Pediatric Dosing Units (PDUs) for that Age Range Age Ranges 6 9-10 5 6-8 4-5 2-3 4 3 2 Note: Eight PDUs would be the children under two recommendations. The following groups relative in equivalent years, compares the age groupings the Tentative doses as fractions F inal of for Monograph the adult ranges. (7) 0 of the usual adult professional see the PDU schedule showing dose for the age For dose. labeling with the age breaks each of the specific and age COMPARATIVE AGE GROUPINGS FOR PROPOSED PDU DOSING SCHEDULE AND TENTATIVE FINAL MONOGRAPHSCHEDULE WITH DOSES DISPLAYED AS FRACTIONS OF THE USUAL ADULT DOSE. Fractional Dose Administered TFM PDU Age Schedule Schedule (years) 1.0 1.0 Adult --------------------___________^________------------------0.75 11 0.625 10 II 9 8 7 6 0.50 5 4 3 2 0.375 this to dextromethorphan, Using the dosing 11 the schedule dose. For mg/ kg. four across approach the drug utility of compounds: pediatric calculated, various this drug approach, (monograph) we have applied acetaminophen, that would range of unit For pseudoe- with a dosing range tains complete dosing dosing dosing 0.6 would chlorpheniramine, to 0.10 for (8) be established. range dosing mg/kg. of For a dosing pediatric dosing these to four 1.5 would aceta- produce range unit using of would a 15 mg/kg per be 0.5 mg, dextromethorphan, mg/kg. agents mg/kg For 10 to unit mg, with 1.0 identified, be 80 mg and would a dosing pediatric the can schedules the approximately schedules units would in be 2.5 phedrine, of unit result chlorpheniramine, dosing dosing and pediatric a dosing pediatric this PDU system, dosing with labeling. and pseudoephedrine. ranges minophen, 11 II II 0.25 To demonstrate concept 0.25* 11 of categories. 11 II II II 11 11 II *Professional Applicability 0.50 0.3 the to 0.5 be 7.5 mg, Appendix A con- the PDU system. . To further illustrate PDU dosing schedule comparison illustrates this, with unity the mg/kg dose/weight demonstrates, greater weights for the for children lowest single single dose exceeding for by using breaks, that of the therapeutic Applicability of yet provide greater the in with which The single decongestants to all no doses we the Tentative Category can be applied included As can be seen, a reasonable the Final of dosing in a+ approach approach a with range. this at figure doses, consistency Appendix C summarizes the dosing to as Category dosing schedule all I nasal oral Category I recommendations I ingredients Nasal for all in the TFM. can be established for each nasal decongestant. summary, we have pediatric dosing consistent with Analgesic As a result doses in Decongestants. Category I oral sets age ranges doses. This In age. narrower decongestants. nasal arbitrarily of produces index This based on ages, doses are between 70 and 75% of the index Monograph on a mg/kg basis, oral schedule. ages 6 and 12, based on 12 years recommend do not exceed the maximum single an effective specific The comparison 6 and incremental for calculated PDU schedule, number of ratios age. ratio 1) compares the proposed approved TFM dosing dose/weight percentile TFM doses B (Figure the already 50th the Appendix provided schedule those data that provided in Drug Products. (9 supporting the utility of incorporates additional the Monograph for Proposed age a new breaks Internal , We also , four have reviewed different monographs decongestants, approach the This dosing unit dosing of 2-3, Recommendation: There is weight children are approach the usual of in weight, can be this 4-5, 6-8, 9-10, a schedule on package is very age breaks pediatric small to have and in from I oral nasal consistent the pediatric a standard pediatric adult with dose available labels. age for an optional Such schedules and is a given patient especially their are some when age and when children dosing and while can be useful schedule. While has been recommended on the area, there standard known, for and body surface of drugs Schedule consumers or rational concept the four of Category medications benefit interrelated, list to and 11 years. Based Dosing large dosing is the one-eighth when weight very the that this nonprescription is dosing children age, entire that Weight related drugs and to the incorporates an additional used with of of approach (PDU) increments application demonstrating to patient. the each specific of these dosing basis of parameters preferences for each approach. While body surface change that occurs growth parameter area in that may reflect the is in is clearly not a parameter of as weight a merit. Weight surface area dosing growing that and thus, by body surface for are dosing is reasonably by weight (10) body the of pediatricians' drugs similar is the surface used by parents. dosing area. accurately child, common use in parameter changes more magnitude area is not offices As a result, has to far the a reasonable more changes of a and the use practical in substitute body for , While the age has the simplest reasonable advantage parameter guide consideration for dosing schedule health professionals wide offers a almost the in in who would Recommended Weight Schedule. like universally and while child that for into a weight-based those consumers Since dose by weight. recommend that takes one occur, benefit to known and is age can be used as a provided growth significant we would always is use, variations known, not it consumer growth to the that or weight is the weight-based schedule be to avoid unnecessary consumer and optional. health professional available, review with that the pediatric weight the age breaks that simplicity of unit deviate order when weight-based standardized increments dosing schedules but ideal. confusion we recommend that indicates In of weight 12 pounds concept. in We recommend that ranges are by a few pounds from the pediatric the following are made be adopted. Our the most There are currently 12 pound increments incorporated schedules and its dosing weight that consispnt in use other proposed consistency unit schedule herein, with concept the make it be utilized: RECOMMENDED WEIGHT-BASED DOSING SCHEDULE Weight Ranges (pounds) (kilograms) 33.0-43.9 72-95 27.0-32.9 60-71 22.0-26.9 48-59 16.0-21.9 36-47 11.0-15.9 24-35 Because weight the United kilograms Number of Pediatric Dosing Units (PDUs) for that Weight 6 5 4 3 2 is still States in included the consistency measured pounds, and remembered by the the proposed as an alternate. of dosing that occurs (11) schedule Appendix is B (Figure when these weight Range average in 2) ranges parent pounds, in with demonstrates are used. . Recommendation: Professional In order guidance to provide about dosing professional additional of nasal dosage schedule based on the PDU system. This decongestants, be adopted for Under Age 2: professionals 1 yr 1.5 4-11 mo 1.0 we would recommend that children readily to any appropriate nasal the Professional Labeling pseudoephedrine, decongestant. section to 6 hours, Adoption children would be 4 months to under 1 year, not to exceed 7.5 mg every 4 not to exceed 30 mg in 24 hours. of such a professional to the health For H one year of age, 11.25 mg every 4 to 6 hours, 45 mg in 24 hours; a under age 2 years amended to read as follows: Children seeking The schedule would be as follows: No. PDUs for Children to assistance 42% can be adapted example, Dosage Schedule for dosage schedule would be of great professional. (12) benefit Summary of Recommendations In McNeil summary, on Directions: Consumer recommendations with dosing decongestants: 1. of nasal We recommend that optional standard incremental 2. age-related 3. schedule dosing age breaks, that in consumer schedule, unit, 2-3, the package 9-10, schedule, consistent with of professional to the dosage for the labeling the three pediatric directions an concept and 11 years; package FDA add for an increased consumer as summarized making labeling on provides 6-8, is directions based that 4-5, Company FDA add to schedule, We recommend changes dosing pediatric weight to FDA add to pediatric We recommend that optional regard Products of a number of and directions newly an proposed herein. oral children / nasal decongestant TFM a below age two. Sincerely, MCNEIL CONSUMERPRODUCTSCOMPANY Regulatory set 57638 (13) Affairs . -’ REFERENCES 1. Proposed Monograph Antirheumatic 2. Done, Products, A.K., Yaffe, and children" 3. Temple, 2. A.R.: 3:321-327, For Federal S.J., Pediatrics "Pediatric OTC Internal Register and Clayton, 95:617-625, dosing of 1983. (14) Analgesic, 42:35346-494, J.M.: "Aspirin Antipyretic and 1977. dosage for infants 1979. acetaminophen" Pediatric Pharmacology APPENDIX PEDIATRIC A. DOSING DOSING UNIT SCHEDULE AS APPLIED TO ACETAMINOPHEN, CHLORPHENIRAMINE, DRXTROMETHORPHAN,AND PSEUDOEPHEDRINE. General PDU Dosing Schedule No. PDUs Age (years) 11 6 9-10 5 6-8 4 4-5 3 2-3 2 ------------------------------------------- 1 1.5 4-11 mo. Pediatric Dosing dextromethorphan 1 Unit schedule for acetaminophen, chlorpheniramine, and pseudoephedrine. "Usual" adult dose: Pediatric dosing unit: Dosing Schedule 11 yrs 9-10 yrs 6-8 yrs 4-5 yrs 2-3 yrs 1 yr 4-11 mo. Dosage: Approximate Approximate dosing mean: range: Acetaminophen 650-1000 mg 80 mg Chlorpheniramine 4.0 mg 0.5 mg 480 400 320 240 mg mg mg mg 160 mg 3.0 2.5 2.0 120 mg 80 mg 0.75 0.5 12.5 mg/kg lo-15 mg/kg mg mg mg 1.5 mg 1.0 mg 0.08 .065-,095 (15) mg mg mg/kg mg/kg Dextromethorphan 20 mg 2.5 mg 15.0 mg mg 10.0 mg 7.5 mg 5.0 mg 12.5 3.75 2.5 0.4 0.3-0.5 mg mg mg/kg mg/kg Pseudoephedrine 60 mg 7.5 mg mg mg mg mg 15.0 mg 45.0 37.5 30.0 22.5 11.25 7.5 mg mg 1.25 mg/kg 1.0-1.5 me/kg