Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Femtosecond pulse generation using ground-state and excited-state transitions in quantum-dot SESAMs C. G. Leburn, N. K. Metzger, A. A. Lagatsky, C. T. A. Brown, W. Sibbett M. Lumb, E. Clarke, R. Murray J. F. Allen Research Laboratories, SUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9SS, UK Experimental Solid State Physics, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK Abstract Stable mode locking is demonstrated in a Cr4+:forsterite laser incorporating quantum-dot SESAMs operating either through ground-state or excited-state transitions to initiate and maintain the generation of pulses as short as 100fs and 122fs respectively. Imperial College London OCIS codes: (140.4050) Mode-locked lasers; (140.7090) Ultrafast lasers; (230.5590) Quantum-dot devices Introduction Results The continuing growth of applications in ultrafast science has meant that there is currently much interest in the design and construction of femtosecond lasers that are more flexible, compact, robust and applicable than those used at present. Our current project is looking at ways of tackling these issues. Here we demonstrate femtosecond-pulse generation from a laser that was mode locked using either ground-state or first-excited-state transitions in quantum-dot-based SESAM devices and this facilitated a comparison between their respective operating regimes. 0.2 0.6 Average output powers of 45mW. Time-bandwidth product of 0.33 implies near–transform–limited pulses 0.4 0.2 1260 1280 1300 1320 Mode locking threshold fluence on the SESAM was estimated to be 9J/cm2 0.0 1340 -200 0 Wavelength (nm) 200 Time (fs) Fig. 4. Measured optical spectrum and corresponding intensity autocorrelation for the mode-locked Cr4+:forsterite using the antiresonant ground-state QD-SESAM Excited-state QD SESAM Average output powers of 40mW Time-bandwidth product of 0.33 implies near–transform–limited pulses Experimental setup We constructed a Cr4+:forsterite laser to asses the GS and X1 devices. The laser comprised of a standard 4-mirror asymmetric, Z-fold cavity. Gain medium was a 11.6mm long Brewster-cut Cr4+:forsterite crystal with a small-signal pump absorption coefficient of 1.3cm-1. Self-starting stable mode locked operation was possible 1.0 =14.8nm centre=1290nm 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Mode locking threshold fluence on the SESAM was estimated to be 25J/cm2 Self-starting stable mode locked operation was possible Pump source was a Nd:YVO4 laser that could deliver up to 10W of continuous wave near-diffraction-limited 1064nm laser radiation. 1.0 = 122fs =0.33 0.8 Normalised intensity Fig. 1a). The refractive index profile of the QD-SESAM structures and the calculated field standing-wave pattern at 1290nm and b), room temperature PL measurements on the single layer and bilayer dots used in the GS and X1 samples. Pulse durations as short as 122fs were measured (sech2 pulses assumed) Normalised intensity The dot absorber layers were positioned in three groups of three, separated by 40nm GaAs spacer layers. The positions of these dots are displayed in figure 1a), which shows the nominal refractive index profile for the SESAM and the calculated field structure. 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 1260 1280 1300 Wavelength (nm) 1320 0.0 -400 -200 0 200 400 Time (fs) Fig. 5. Measured optical spectrum and corresponding intensity autocorrelation for the mode-locked Cr4+:forsterite using the antiresonant excited-state QD-SESAM Conclusions & future work Using these QD-SESAMs, pulses as short as 100fs have been generated. Future work will include more in-depth studies on the effect of state degeneracy and recovery time of the excited-state (X1) devices, although we believe the absorption recovery time of the X1 devices is faster than the GS devices – making X1 devices suitable for high p.r.f. systems A simple telescope system and focussing lens were used to provide a 1/e2 pump beam spot radius of 35m in the gain crystal. The University of St Andrews is a charity registered in Scotland : No SC013532 0.4 0.0 1240 The DBR had a design operating wavelength, 0, of 1290nm, which corresponds to the centre of the high reflectivity stop band in the frequency domain. Nine absorbing InAs quantum dot layers were incorporated into a 80/4 GaAs low-finesse cavity leading to anti-resonance at 0. Two fused silica prisms with a tip-to-tip separation of 325mm were inserted in the long arm of the cavity to provide the appropriate dispersion compensation. 0.6 Pulse durations as short as 100fs were measured (sech2 pulses assumed) = 100fs =0.33 0.8 Normalised intensity Normalised intensity The SESAM structures comprised of a 25-period AlAs/GaAs distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) with QDs embedded in a GaAs cavity deposited as a top layer. The dots in the ground state sample were single layer dots with an areal density of 2.2 x 1010cm-2 per layer. The dot layers in the X1 sample had bilayers consisting of a seed layer of QDs and a second QD layer separated by 10nm. 100 We are also looking at the potential of resonant devices for ultrashort pulse generation. Our expectation is that this will offer more degrees of freedom for the tailoring of fully optimised SESAM elements. 80 Ouput power (mW) Mode-locked operation of the laser was obtained when HR-mirror was replaced by one of the quantum-dot SESAMs such that the spot radius of the incident beam was 200m. =18.4nm centre=1296nm 0.8 Device structure Ground-state QD SESAM 1.0 1.0 Here we report experimental assessments for femtosecond-pulse generation from a Cr4+:forsterite laser system where the exploitation of the intracavity SESAM devices incorporated within the laser cavity to initiate and sustain mode locking has involved either ground-state (GS) or first excited-state (X1) transitions. 60 References 40 20 0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 Incident power (W) Fig. 3. Cw output powers of Cr4+:forsterite laser with 0.5% output coupler & HR in place Fig. 2. Schematic diagram for laser cavity [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] D.E. Spence, et al., "60-fsec Pulse Generation from a Self-mode-locked Ti-Sapphire Laser“, Optics Letters. 16,(1): 42-44, (1991). U. Keller, et al., "Semiconductor saturable absorber mirrors (SESAMs) for femtosecond to nanosecond pulse generation in solid-state lasers“, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 2, (3): 435-453, (1996). C.G. Leburn, et al. "Self-Starting Femtosecond Cr4+:YAG Laser Mode Locked with a GaInNAs Saturable Bragg Reflector", in Conference Proceedings of ASSP, Vancouver, Canada, Paper WA6, (2007). M. Le Du, et al., "Quantum-well saturable absorber at 1.55m on GaAs substrate with a fast recombination rate“, Applied Physics Letters, 88, (20): 201110, (2006). A. McWilliam, et al., "Quantum-dot-based saturable absorber for femtosecond mode-locked operation of a solid-state laser“, Optics Letters, 31, (10): 1444-1446, (2006). M. Lumb et al., “Tailoring Quantum Dot Saturable Absorber Mirrors for Ultra-Short Pulse Generation”, Materials Research Society Symposia Proceedings, 1076, 1076-K09-04 (2008). E.U. Rafailov, et al., "Fast quantum-dot saturable absorber for passive mode-locking of solid-State lasers“, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 16, (11): 2439-2441, (2004). A.A. Lagatsky, et al., "Low-loss quantum-dot-based saturable absorber for efficient femtosecond pulse generation“, Applied Physics Letters, 91, (23): 231111, (2007). Group website at http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~wsquad K. Wundke, et al., "PbS quantum-dot-doped glasses for ultrashort-pulse generation“, Applied Physics Letters, 76, (1): 10-12, (2000). Project website at http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/physics/music E.C. Le Ru, et al., "Strain-engineered InAs/GaAs quantum dots for long-wavelength emission“, Physical Review B, 67, (16): 165303, (2003). O.S. Heavens, Optical Properties of Thin Solid Films, 1955, London: Butterworths. e-mail: - [email protected] Poster MB18 - 2nd February - Advanced Solid-State Photonics 2009 – Denver, Colorado, USA