Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Short Note No. 128/2013 Sepacore impact in anticancer drug development – recent applications in natural product research Sepacore X50, Sepacore X10, Sepacore Purification Systems 1. Introduction On the one hand, the road towards a new effective anticancer drug is long, bumpy, hidden, curvy, potholed and above all the toll is very, very high. On the other hand, the end of the road usually ends in the land of plenty. The market for anti-cancer products is predicted to grow from $54 billion in 2009 to $75 billion in 2015 and is deemed to be the most lucrative therapy sector. [1] using different gradients yielded 141 mg of damnacanthal a compound that could be of interest for human pancreatic cancer treatment. [4] Normally, the compounds are identified and characterized by combined MS, IR and NMR analysis. However, only one of 5000 drug candiates finally masters the road. [2] In addition, identification of drug candidates itself usually involves years of reserach. So far, about 50 % of the anticancer drugs were discoverd in natural products such as medicinal plants or marine organisms. [3] Here, we selectively highlight recent research on finding anticancer drug canditates from natural origin using Sepacore for product isolation. 2. Product isolation In a first step in the hunt for new molecules, the sample is extracted. Such a sample could be coral sponges as shown in Figure 1. This step is crucial since the solvent chosen for the extraction affects the selection of the stationary phase for downstream chromatography processes and of course defines which compounds can be dissolved to the mixture. Aqueous extracts, for example, cannot be separated with normal silica. One needs reverse phase stationary material as C-18 or diol substitiuted silica. Figure 2. Chromatographic isolation pathway (bold line) for damnacanthal, elucidated by Dibwe et al. [4] Another successful isolation of potential drug candidates using Sepacore was recently published by Smitha et al. [5] Smitha and coworkers isolated Prunolide A from ascidian Synoicum found in the Indian Ocean, and which showed activity against breast cancer cells at low concentrations. In further phytochemical studies using the Sepacore system new compounds were identified, however, no or inconclusive cytotoxicity was observed. [6] 3. Sepacore impact To rapidly identify drug candidates the compounds need to be isolated as efficiently as possible. Compared to traditional hydrostatic column chromatography employing Sepacore equipped with a state of the art UV/VIS or/and ELSD sucessfully minimized the separation process time. As shown by the researches cited above, the Sepacore can play a key role to speed-up chromatographic processes of natural extract separation towards new, highly desired anticancer drugs. 4. References Figure 1. A selection of coral sponges collected and then separated employing the Sepacore by the Mauritius Oceanography Institute (MOI). After sampling, extraction, filtration and concentration by evaporation under vaccum, the crude sample mixture is separated into its components. Usually, the first separation by medium pressure liquid chromatography (MPLC) roughly devides the extract into fractions of different polarities. To isolate a single compound out of a mixture further separation steps by MPLC are needed, often followed by preparative high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC). In Figure, 2 a typical isolation pathway, elucidated by Dibwe et al, is shown. [4] In their work a chloroform extract (dry mass of 5.85 g) of G. huillensis, a Congolese medical plant, was split into its components. A three step normal phase separation [1] www.swissinfo.ch/eng/science_technology/Drug_d evelopment_s_road_gets_longer.html?cid=35210626 [2] www.swissinfo.ch/eng/science_technology/The_bu siness_of_cancer_research.html?cid=35210166 [3] J. Mann, Nature Reviews, 2, 143, 2002. [4] D. F. Dibwe et al, Phytother. Res., 26, 12, 1920– 1926, 2012. [5] D. Smitha et al, Nat Prod Res, published online, DOI:10.1080/14786419.2013.827194, 2013. [6] G.-Q. Wang et al, J. Asian Nat Prod Res, published online, DOI:10.1080/10286020.2013.824429, 2013.; Y. Gao et al., Nat Prod Bioprospect 2, 2, 65-69, 2012. ; Y.-L. Li, Phytochemistry, 81, 159–164, 2012.