Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Economic comparison between Conventional and No-Tillage farming systems in Morocco Mohamed Boughlala, O. El Gharras, and R. Dahan Contributed paper prepared for presentation at the 57th AARES Annual Conference, Sydney, New South Wales, 5th-8th February, 2013 Copyright 2013 by [authors]. All rights reserved. Readers may make verbatim copies of this document for non-commercial purposes by any means, provided that this copyright notice appears on all such copies. Economic comparison between Conventional and No-Tillage farming systems in Morocco Mohamed Boughlala1, O. El Gharras1, and R. Dahan2 1Centre 2Institut Régional de la Recherche Agronomique de Settat, BP 589, Settat, Maroc National de la Recherche Agronomique, BP 415, 10000, Avenue la victoire, Rabat, Maroc Background The fragile dryland areas in northern Africa are seriously threatened by soil and water degradation. Morocco is a good example where soils with relatively low organic matter contents (<2%) are directly impacted by the serious erosion processes which can exceed 20 tons ha-1 yr-1. It is estimated that the total annual cost of erosion from agriculture in Morocco is about 0.41% of its GDP. This deterioration is mainly due to poor soil management through conventional tillage practices. Research on no-tillage system (NT) conducted in Morocco during the past tow decade showed that with the adoption of this technology farmers can re-build the harmony between soils and crops. Objective The objective of this study was to compare the economics of conventional tillage (CT) and NT system on bread wheat at the level of three arid zones of Morocco . Methodology A sample of 70 farmers was randomly selected in the three regions concerned by the study. Surveys were conducted in three rural zones, ranging from 240 meters to 350 meters above sea level. Mixed cereal-livestock farming is the dominant form of livelihood in three zones. 10 farmers were interviewed in Abda region, 50 farmers in Chaouia region and 10 farmers in Zair region. The sample includes in the same time users and no-users of no-till system. Results Energy saving The average farm size for small-scale farmers is 4.8ha. This category of farmers represents 60.9% of total farmers but have control over only 31% of total area. The average farm size for medium and large farms is respectively equal to 13.5 and 21.6 ha. Medium farm size category controls 50.5% of the area and represents only 25.6% of farmers. Large farmers represent only 13.5% but have control over 18.5% of land. The calculation of estimated savings in diesel was done only in Chaouia region with a group of seven farmers that have their own machinery. The estimated saving in diesel fuel for the NT relative to CV system is 24.75 liter per hectare. According to soil scientists the suitable area for NT system in Morocco is estimated to 1.5 Million ha, so we can save up to 37126 t. of Diesel annually. Production costs (US$ ha-1) for bread wheat using conventional and notillage system for large and medium size farms. Items Seed cost Fertilizer Tillage Seeding Herbicide Fungicide Custom combining Hired labor Family labor Total Variation Zair-Rabat CV NT 78 62 100 100 82 0 21 24 25 44 46 46 35 35 7 5 10 8 406 324 -20% Abda CV 62 54 87 21 56 61 35 7 12 394 NT 58 59 0 24 56 54 35 6 10 302 -24% Chaouia CV 73 84 59 21 25 46 35 8 7 358 NT 58 89 0 24 35 46 35 7 6 300 -16% Production costs (US$ ha-1) for bread wheat using conventional and notillage system for small farms. Items Seed cost Fertilizer Tillage Seeding Herbicide Fungicide Custom combining Hired labor Family labor Total Variation Zair-Rabat CV NT 82 62 49 100 53 0 0 24 9 44 0 46 35 35 1 5 12 8 243 324 34% Abda CV 70 54 69 0 18 0 35 3 13 262 NT 58 59 0 24 56 54 35 6 10 302 15% Chaouia CV 82 50 76 0 11 18 35 7 14 293 Conventional system No-tillage system Saved energy Diesel consumption l/ha Diesel cost US$/ha 53,27 45,29 28,52 24,24 24,75 21,06 Adoption of No-till system in Morocco In Morocco it is still early to talk about the evaluation of the adoption of NT, despite all the benefits (monitory and no-monitory) of this technology. The raison is that until now we are still working on the evaluation of the technology and no large scale dissemination program was conducted in Morocco. At the national level, farmer adoption of NT technology remains low, covering only about 6,000 ha. Constraint to adoption of NT system According to farmers discussion the first constraint to adoption of NT system is fragmentation of farms and farm holdings. Farmer’s lack of knowledge on how to do it is also a serious problem. We still have a problem of the adequate NT seeding machine to recommend to farmers. The INRA prototype could be recommended for some regions but not for others. Residue management is also a problem especially for small holders. NT 58 89 0 24 35 46 35 7 6 300 2% Bread wheat gross and net benefit in US$ ha-1. Zair-Rabat CV NT Avr. Yield, t/ha large/medium 2,71 3,46 Avr. Yield, t/ha small farms 1,63 3,46 Gross benefit, US$/ha, large/medium 796 1017 Gross benefit, US$/ha, small farms 479 1017 Net benefit, US$/ha, large/medium 390 693 Net benefit, US$/ha, small farms 237 693 Variation in net benefit, large/medium 78% Variation in net benefit, small farms 193% Estimated savings in diesel fuel for NT relative to CV system. General finding of the study Abda CV NT 2,75 3,25 1,56 3,25 809 956 459 956 415 654 197 654 58% 232% Chaouia CV NT 2,85 3,56 1,71 3,56 838 1047 503 1047 480 747 210 747 56% 256% The general finding of this study is that bread wheat production in the no-tillage system is more profitable than in the conventional tillage system. Results for smallholders show an increase in bread wheat production costs in all regions when moving to NT system. The main raison for this is that in order to better manage the risks related to high climate variability and uncertainty, smallholder tend to minimize their production costs by using less input. This behavior is not possible when it comes to NT and if we drop a component of this system, like weed control for example, all the system fall down.