Download Conference Syllabus

Document related concepts

Dental emergency wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
27th Annual SW VA Pediatrics Conference
DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
8/6‐7/2011
DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
William Dalton, PhD
Karen Schetzina, MD
does not anticipate discussing the unapproved /investigative
use of a commercial product/device during this
lecture. He reports that he DOES NOT have a
financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with
one or more organizations that could be perceived
as a real or apparent conflict of interest in the
context of this presentation. does not anticipate discussing the unapproved /investigative
use of a commercial product/device during this
lecture. She reports that she DOES NOT have a
financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with
one or more organizations that could be perceived
as a real or apparent conflict of interest in the
context of this presentation. Child Obesity Treatment in Primary Care: What's the PLAN? • Describe the latest evidence on effective behavioral treatment approaches for child obesity in primary care • Overcome common challenges in treating child obesity • Integrate evidence‐based behavioral approaches and tools for addressing child obesity into primary care practice William Dalton, PhD
Karen Schetzina, MD, MPH
8/6/2011
Learning Objectives
Child Obesity Treatment in
Primaryy Care: What’s the PLAN?
William T. Dalton III, PhD
Karen E. Schetzina, MD, MPH,
CLC, FAAP
• Describe the latest evidence on effective
behavioral treatment approaches for child
obesity in primary care
• Understand how to overcome common
challenges in treating child obesity
• Integrate evidence-based behavioral approaches
and tools for addressing child obesity into
primary care practice
Primary Care Research Study
In Memoriam:
Tiejian Wu, MD, PhD
1962‐2011
Purpose: Evaluate a parent‐mediated approach utilizing brief motivational interviewing and group visits to treat child (ages 5‐11 years) overweight and obesity in the primary care setting.
Questions/Discussion
Resources:
AAP Obesity Initiative http://www.aap.org/obesity/index.html
NIH We Can! http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/public/heart/obesity/wecan/
[email protected]
[email protected]
15-Minute Obesity Prevention Protocol
Steps
Sample Language
STEP 1. ASSESSMENT
Weight and height, convert to BMI. Provide BMI information.
We checked your child’s body mass index (BMI), which is a way of looking at weight
and taking into consideration how tall someone is. Your child’s BMI is in the range
where we start to be concerned about extra weight causing health problems.
Elicit parent’s concern.
—What concerns, if any, do you have about your child’s weight?
— He did jump two sizes this year. Do you think he might get diabetes someday?
Reflect/probe.
So you’ve noticed a big change in his size and you are concerned about diabetes down
the road. What makes you concerned about diabetes in particular? Etc.
Sweetened beverages, fruits and vegetables, TV viewing and
other sedentary behavior, frequency of fast-food or restaurant
eating, consumption of breakfast, and others
(Use verbal questions or brief questionnaires to assess key behaviors.)
Example: About how many times a day does your child drink soda, sports drinks, or
powdered drinks like Kool-Aid?
Provide positive feedback for behavior(s) in optimal range.
Elicit response.
You are doing well with sugared drinks.
I know it’s not healthy. He used to drink a lot of soda, but now I try to give him water whenever possible. I think we are down to just a few soda’s a week.
So you have been able to make a change without too much stress.
Reflect/probe.
Provide neutral feedback for behavior(s) NOT in optimal range.
Elicit response.
Your child watches 4 hours of TV on school days. What do you think about that?
I know it’s a lot, but he gets bored otherwise and starts picking an argument with
his little sister.
So watching TV keeps the household calm.
Reflect/probe
STEP 2. AGENDA SETTING
Query which, if any, of the target behaviors parent/child/adolescent
may be interested in changing or might be easiest to change.
We’ve talked about eating too often at fast-food restaurants, and how TV viewing is more
hours than you’d like. Which of these, if either of them, do you think you and your child
could change?
Well, I think fast food is somewhere we could do better. I don’t know what he would do if
he couldn’t watch TV. Maybe we could cut back on fast food to once a week.
Agree on possible target behavior.
That sounds like a good plan.
STEP 3. ASSESS MOTIVATION AND CONFIDENCE
3a: Willingness/Importance
On a scale of 0 to 10, with 10 being very important, how important is it for you to reduce the amount of fast food he eats?
0
Not at all
1
2
3
4
5
6
Somewhat
7
8
9
10
Very
continued
15-Minute Obesity Prevention Protocol
15-Minute Obesity Prevention Protocol
15-Minute Obesity Prevention Protocol, continued
STEP 3. ASSESS MOTIVATION AND CONFIDENCE, continued
3b: Confidence
On a scale of 0 to 10, with 10 being very confident, assuming you decided to change the amount of fast food he eats, how confident are you that
you could succeed?
0
1
2
3
4
Not at all
5
6
Somewhat
3c: Explore IMPORTANCE and CONFIDENCE ratings with the
following probes:
Benefits
Barriers
Solutions
7
8
9
10
Very
You chose 6. Why did you not choose a lower number?
I know all that grease is bad for him.
You chose 6. Why did you not choose a higher number?
It’s quick, cheap, and he loves it…especially the toys and fries.
REFLECTION: So there are benefits for both you and him.
What would it take you to move to an 8?
Well, I really want him to avoid diabetes. My mother died of diabetes, and it wasn’t
pretty…maybe if he started showing signs of it…maybe if I could get into cooking a bit.
STEP 4. SUMMARIZE AND PROBE POSSIBLE CHANGES
Query possible next steps.
So where does that leave you?
OR
From what you mentioned it sounds like eating less fast food may be a good first step.
OR
How are you feeling about making a change?
Probe plan of attack.
What might be a good first step for you and your child?
Or
What might you do in the next week or even day to help move things along?
Or
What ideas do you have for making this happen?
If patient does not have any ideas…
If it’s OK with you, I’d like to suggest a few things that have worked for some of
my patients.
Summarize change plan, provide positive feedback.
Involving child in cooking or meal preparation
Ordering healthier at fast-food restaurants
Trying some new recipes at home
STEP 5. SCHEDULE FOLLOW-UP
Agree to follow up within X weeks/months.
Let’s schedule a visit in the next few weeks/months to see how things went.
If no plan is made
Sounds like you aren’t quite ready to commit to making any changes now. How about
we follow up with this at your child’s next visit?
OR
Although you don’t sound ready to make any changes, between now and our next visit
you might want to think about your child’s weight gain and lowering his diabetes risk.
We Can! Try Tips To Eat Well
and Move More
Choose to take small steps today! Try these tips to eat well and move
more and see how easy taking small steps toward a healthier life can be.
Eating Well (ENERGY IN)
• Drink water before a meal.
• Eat half your dessert, or choose
fruit as dessert.
• Avoid food portions larger than
your fist.
• Drink diet soda instead of
regular soda.
• Eat off smaller plates.
• Don't eat late at night.
• Skip buffets.
• Grill, steam, or bake instead
of frying.
• Share an entree with a friend.
• Eat before grocery shopping.
• Choose a checkout line without
a candy display.
• Make a grocery list before
you shop.
• Drink water or low-fat milk over
soda and other sugary drinks.
• Flavor foods with herbs, spices,
and other low-fat seasonings.
• Keep to a regular eating schedule.
• Eat before you get too hungry.
• Don't skip breakfast.
• Stop eating when you are full.
• Snack on fruits and vegetables.
• Top your favorite cereal with
apples or bananas.
• Include several servings of
whole-grain foods daily.
• If main dishes are too big, choose
an appetizer or a side dish instead.
• Ask for salad dressing “on
the side.”
• Don't take seconds.
• Try a green salad instead of fries.
• Eat sweet foods in small amounts.
• Cut back on added fats or oils in
cooking or spreads.
• Cut high-calorie foods like cheese
and chocolate into small pieces
and only eat a few pieces.
• Use fat-free or low-fat sour cream,
mayo, sauces, dressings, and
other condiments.
• Replace sugar-sweetened
beverages with water and add a
twist of lemon or lime.
• Every time you eat a meal, sit
down, chew slowly, and pay
attention to flavors and textures.
• Try a new fruit or vegetable (ever
had jicama, plantain, bok choy,
star fruit, or papaya?)
• Instead of eating out, bring a
healthy, low-calorie lunch to work.
• Ask your sweetie to bring you fruit
or flowers instead of chocolate.
Moving More (ENERGY OUT)
• Walk your children to school.
• Take a family walk after dinner.
• Join an exercise group and enroll
your children in community sports
teams or lessons.
• Replace a Sunday drive with
a Sunday walk.
• Do yard work. Get your children
to help rake, weed, plant, etc.
• Get off the bus a stop early
and walk.
• Work around the house. Ask
your children for help doing
active chores.
• Walk the dog to the park.
• Go for a half-hour walk instead
of watching TV.
• Pace the sidelines at kids'
athletic games.
• Choose an activity that fits into
your daily life. Being physically
active with your family is a great
way to spend time together.
• Park farther from the store
and walk.
• Use an exercise video with your
kids if the weather is bad.
• Avoid labor-saving devices, such as
a remote control or electric mixers.
• Play with your kids 30 minutes
a day.
• Dance to music. Play your favorite
dance music for your children and
have them play their favorites
for you.
• Make a Saturday morning walk a
family habit.
• Walk briskly in the mall.
• Choose activities you enjoy—you'll
be more likely to stick with them.
Ask children what activities they
want to do.
• Explore new physical activities.
• Acknowledge your efforts with
non-food related rewards, such as
a family day at the park, lake,
or zoo.
• Take the stairs instead of
the escalator.
• Swim with your kids.
• Turn off the TV and play ball at
the park.
• Take your dog on longer walks.
• When walking, go up the hills
instead of around them.
• Use a family activity planner to
make time each day for activity.
• Buy a set of hand weights and
play a round of Simon Says with
your kids—you do it with the
weights, they do it without.
Source: Adapted from www.smallstep.gov
We Can! Try Tips To Eat Well and
Move More Tracking Sheet
Pick a tip each week from the list of Everyday tips to help you eat well and
move more! Fill in the tips on this tracking chart to encourage you to keep
it up. Put the tracking sheet on your refrigerator or other central location
for your family to see that you are making steps toward maintaining a
healthy weight.
Week
Week 1 (___/___)
Week 2 (___/___)
Week 3 (___/___)
Week 4 (___/___)
Week 5 (___/___)
Week 6 (___/___)
Eating Well Tip
Moving More Tip
Notes
for Healthy Active Living
Name
Date
Ideas for Living a Healthy Active Life
5 Eat at least 5 fruits and vegetables every day.
2 Limit screen time (for example, TV, video games, computer) to 2 hours or less per day.
1 Get 1 hour or more of physical activity every day.
0 Drink fewer sugar-sweetened drinks. Try water and low-fat milk instead.
My Goals (choose one you would like to work on first)
n Eat
fruits and vegetables each day.
n Reduce screen time to
minutes per day.
n Get
minutes of physical activity each day.
n Reduce number of sugared drinks to
per day.
From Your Doctor
Patient or Parent/Guardian signature
Doctor signature
Healthy Active Living
An initiative of the American Academy of Pediatrics
27th Annual SW VA Pediatrics Conference
8/6‐7/2011
DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
Eric Parks, MD
does not anticipate discussing the unapproved /investigative
use of a commercial product/device during this
lecture. He reports that he DOES NOT have a
financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with
one or more organizations that could be perceived
h
ld b
d
as a real or apparent conflict of interest in the
context of this presentation. Sports Injuries in the Pediatric Athlete: Considerations for the Stars of Tomorrow • Recognize the common overuse injuries sustained by the young athlete • Make recommendations to parents of young athletes regarding risks of overuse during sports Eric Parks, MD
8/6/2011
Disclosure Statement of
Unapproved/Investigative Use
Sports Injuries in the Pediatric Athlete:
Considerations for the Stars of Tomorrow
Eric D. Parks, MD
Watauga Orthopaedics
Kingsport, TN
I, Eric D. Parks, MD,
DO NOT anticipate discussing the
unapproved/investigative
d/
use off a
commercial product/device during this
activity or presentation.
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Disclosure Statement of
Financial Interest
Outline
I, Eric D. Parks, MD
DO NOT have a financial
interest/arrangement
or affiliation
i
/
ffili i with
ih
one or more organizations that could be
perceived as a real or apparent conflict of
interest in the context of the subject of this
presentation.
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
• Why Exercise?
• Epidemiology
• Pressures/Risk factors for
injury
• Ove
Overuse
use Injuries
ju es
• Acute Injuries
– Pediatric Fractures
• Summary
– Osteochondroses
•
•
•
•
•
Knee
Pelvis
Elbow
Shoulder
Foot
– Spondylolysis
– Stress Fractures
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Eric Parks, MD
8/6/2011
Why Exercise?
• Regular exercise increases self-esteem, and reduces
stress/anxiety
– Farmer ME. Am J Epidemiol. 1998
• Athletes are less likely to be heavy smokers and use
drugs
– Kino-Quebec, 2000. Physical Activity: a determinant of health in youth
– Escobedo
E b d LG
LG. JAMA
JAMA. 2003
• Athletes are more likely to stay in school
– Zill N. Adolescent Time Use, Risky Behavior and Outcomes. 1995
• Learn teamwork, self-discipline, sportsmanship,
leadership, and socialization
– Cahill BR. Intensive Participation in Children’s Sports. 1993
• Builds self-esteem, confidence, fitness, agility
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Some Active Kids on Our Hands
• ~45 million children/adolescents 6-18 yo participate in
organized sports on a yearly basis
– 1997- 32 million
– 2008- 44 million
• 7 million adolescents participate in organized highschool sports on a yearly basis
– 4.1 million males
– 2.9 million females
• National Federation of State High School Associations. 2005
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Childhood Obesity
Exercise
• Current public health guidelines
60min of exercise/day
– Strong WB. J Pediatr. 2005
recommend
What fits into your busy schedule better,
exercising 1 hour a day or being dead 24
hours a day?
• Physical activity declines significantly during adolescence
– Brodersen NH. Br J Sport Med. 2006
• Overweight children perceive themselves to be just as active as
their non-overweight contemporaries
– Gillis LJ. Clin J Sport Med. 2006
• The energy expended playing active Wii Sports games was not
intense enough to contribute to daily recommendations
– Graves L. Br J Sports Med. 2008
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Sports Injuries
Epidemiology
• 30-40% of all accidents in children occur during sports
• ~2.5 million sports injuries treated annually in ER for
patients ≤18 yrs old
• Sports/over-exertion leading cause for all injury related visits
to PCP
• Rate of sports injuries was 22.44 per 1000 exposures
• 10-14 year olds at greatest risk
• 22% of adolescents experience some sports-related injury
– 62% occurred during organized sports
– 20% during physical education classes
– 18% during non-organized sports
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Eric Parks, MD
8/6/2011
Sports Injuries
Sports Injuries
Epidemiology
Financial Burden
• 25-30% occur during organized sports
• 40% occur during non-organized sports
– Hergenroeder AC. Pediatrics. 1998
• males >> females
• males 10-19 y/o
• $588 million in direct expenses
• $6.6 billion indirect costs
– US Consumers Product Safety Commission. Jan 2006
• Sports are the leading cause of injury and hospital
emergency room visits in adolescents
– football, basketball & bicycle injuries MC
• females 10-19 y/o
– basketball, bicycle & gymnastics injuries MC
– Emery CA. Clin J Sport Med. 2003;13:256-268
• CDC estimates that ½ of all sports injuries in children
are preventable
• Backx FJG. Am J Sports Med. 1991
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Sports Injuries
Epidemiology
• 30-50% of adolescent sports-related injuries are
overuse
– Watkins J. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1996;36(1):43-48.
• 15% off allll adolescent
d l
t injuries
i j i are to
t the
th physes
ph
and apophyses
– Pill SG. J Musculoskeletal Med. 2003;20:434-442
Definitions
• Physis
– Primary ossification center located at the ends of long bones
– Responsible for longitudinal growth
• Apophysis
– Secondary ossification center located where major tendons attach to
bone
– Provide
P id shape
h
andd contour
t
to
t growing
i bone
b
but
b t add
dd no length
l th
• Osteochondroses
– disorders affecting bone and cartilage together
• Osteochondrosis
– disease of the ossification centers in children
• Apophysitis
– irritation of the musculotendinous attachment
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Eric Parks, MD
8/6/2011
The Physis
General Anatomy
• Cartilage is less resistant to tensile forces than bones,
ligaments, and muscle-tendon units
• Bones grow faster than muscle-tendon units
j y leadingg to a muscle strain in an adult mayy
• Same injury
result in growth center injuries in adolescents
• The “Weak Link”
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Physeal Anatomy
• Zone of Growth
– Longitudinal growth
– Area of greatest concern
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Impact of Growth on Injury Risk
• Injuries tend to be most common during peak
growth velocity
• Zone of Maturation
– C
Calcification
l ifi i
– Replaced by osteoblasts
– MC area for fracture
• Zone of Transformation
– Complete remodeling
– Metaphyseal vessel penetration
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
• Peak
P k height
h i h velocity
l i precedes
d peakk flexibility
fl ibili gains
i
• Decreased BMD in the 2-3 yrs preceding peak
height velocity
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Eric Parks, MD
8/6/2011
Pathophysiology
• Repetitive tensile forces
• Stress to the physis
• Microtrauma leads to:
–
–
–
–
–
Pain
Inflammation
Widening
Avulsion
Microfracturing
Overuse
• “When microtrauma occurs to bone, muscle, or
tendonious units as a result of repetitive stress with
insufficient time to heal.”
• Long term complications exist for physeal injuries
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Risk Factors for Overuse
Risk Factors for Injury
• Intrinsic
– ↑ vulnerability to stress in growing skeleton
– Inability to detect injury
– Skeletal variants
ariants
• Pes planus, overpronation, patella alta, external
tibial torsion
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Extrinsic
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Pressure
Training errors
Sports camps
Year round training
Single vs Multi-sport
Early specialization
Improper technique
•
•
•
•
•
•
Weekend tournaments
Motivation sources
Personal coaches
Team vs club sport
10 yr / 10,000 hr rule
Evaluation programs
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Eric Parks, MD
8/6/2011
The Gradual Progression
• Multi-sport athlete
• Recent increase in activity
• Pain with activity, not with rest, still normal
performance
f
• Pain with activity, rest, and decline in
performance
Key Points During Evaluation
• History and physical exam
– Recent change in activity or training
• Insidious onset of pain that worsens with activity and
improves with rest
• Point tenderness with or without swelling
• Pain with passive stretch of attached ligament/ muscletendon unit
• Pain with firing muscle-tendon unit against resistance
• Radiographs?
– Help to rule out other pathology
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Treatment
Patellofemoral Friction Syndrome
General Principles
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Relative rest
Cross training
Flexibility
Ice
Counter-balance bracing
?NSAIDS
ORIF with certain avulsions
Resection of retained, non-fused ossicles
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
•
•
•
•
Most common cause of anterior knee pain
Estimated prevalance of 20%
Mean age 14 years
“The Great Imitator” of symptoms
– Location and quality of pain
• Walking stairs, incline/decline
• “Theatre sign”
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Eric Parks, MD
8/6/2011
PFS
Osgood-Schlatter’s Disease (OSD)
Tibial Tubercle Apophysitis
Risk Factors and Treatment
•
•
•
•
Muscle imbalances
Flexibility issues
Over-pronation, pes planus
Specific sports
• Treat from the hip to the waist
• Orthotics, bracing, taping?
• Occurs in 20% of young athletes
– most common pediatric overuse injury
•
•
•
•
20% of OSD is bilateral
Girls 8–13yo
8 13yo
Boys 10-15yo
Aggravated by running, jumping, or other explosive
activities
• Occasionally aggravated by kneeling or direct trauma
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Osgood-Schlatter’s Disease (OSD)
Osgood-Schlatter’s Disease
Tibial Tubercle Apophysitis
Sequelae
• Point tender +/- swelling at tibial tubercle
• Pain with quadriceps stretch or contraction,
poor quad flexibility
• Widened
Wid d physis
h i or ffragmented
d tibial
ibi l tubercle
b l on
radiographs
• Tight quadriceps or hip flexors
– Postive Thomas test
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Eric Parks, MD
8/6/2011
Osgood-Schlatter’s Disease (OSD)
Osgood-Schlatter’s Disease (OSD)
Radiographs
Pathology
•
•
•
•
•
Chronic traction/stress at apophysis
Cartilage swelling
Cortical bone fragmentation
Patellar tendon thickening
Infrapatellar bursitis
• Long term- prominent tibial tubercle, intratendon ossicles, ? ↑ risk of rupture
•
•
•
•
•
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Osgood-Schlatter’s Disease (OSD)
Osgood-Schlatter’s Disease (OSD)
Risk Factors
Treatment
Repetitive explosive activities
Recent increase in activities
Tight quadriceps and/or hip flexors
External tibial torsion
Patella alta
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
•
•
•
•
•
•
Relative rest
Quadriceps and hip flexor stretching
Ice
NSAIDs
Cho-Pat strap
Knee pads
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Eric Parks, MD
8/6/2011
Sinding-Larsen-Johansson Syndrome
(SLR)
• Apophysitis at the inferior
the patella
• 10-12 years old
• Most common in running
jumping athletes
– Basketball, soccer, gymnastics
pole of
&
El salto del Colacho- “the devil’s jump”
• “Adolescent Jumper’s Knee”
Sinding-Larsen-Johansson Syndrome
(SLR)
• Tenderness at the inferior pole of the patella
• Pain worsened with
explosive
activity
• Tight
Ti h quadriceps
di
• Radiographs may reveal fragmentation of the
inferior pole and/or calcification at the proximal
patella tendon
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Sinding-Larsen-Johansson Syndrome
(SLR)
Patella Sleeve Fracture
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Eric Parks, MD
8/6/2011
Sinding-Larsen-Johansson Syndrome
(SLR)
Treatment
•
•
•
•
•
Relative rest
Quadriceps stretching
Ice
NSAIDs
Cho-Pat strap
Osteochondritis Dessicans
• Avascular necrosis of cartilage bed
• May be result of direct trauma vs iatrogenic
• MC location- lateral portion of medial femoral
condyle
d l
• Age 9-18 years old
• Consider in adolescent presenting with painless
effusion
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Osteochondritis Dessicans
Osteochondritis Dessicans
Radiographs
Treatment
• 4 views- AP, lateral, sunrise, and tunnel
• MRI for stability
• Treatment will depend on the stability of the
lesion
• Protected/NWB for 6 weeks
• Bracing
B i
• Follow up imaging
• Unstable- surgical
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Eric Parks, MD
8/6/2011
Sever’s Disease
Sever’s Disease
Calcaneal Apophysitis
Calcaneal Apophysitis
• Affects boys and girls equally
• Ages 8-13 years
• Most common in soccer, basketball, &
gymnastics
i
– Repetitive heel impact & traction stress from the
achilles tendon
• Bilateral in 60% of cases
Heel pain worsened with activity
No swelling
Point tender at posterior calcaneus
Pain with medial-lateral compression
Pain with calf stretch or contraction against
resistance
• Tight heel cord, weak dorsiflexors, subtalar
overpronation
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Sever’s Disease
Sever’s Disease
Risk Factors
Treatment
• Repetitive explosive activities
• Repetitive trauma
– Jumping, landing, cleats, etc.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Recentt increase
R
i
in
i activities
ti iti
Tight heel cord
Before/during rapid periods of growth
Beginning of new season
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
•
•
•
•
•
Relative rest
Heel cord stretching
Heel cups
Ice
NSAIDs
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Eric Parks, MD
8/6/2011
Sever’s Disease
Calcaneal Apophysitis
Pelvic Apophysitis
• 10-14 years old
• Insidious onset of hip pain or
sharp pain
sudden
– Running, jumping, kicking sports
• Point tender
• Pain with stretch or contraction of involved
muscle
• Widening of physis or avulsion of apophysis
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Pelvic Apophysitis
Pelvic Apophysitis
• Ischial tuberosity 38%
– Hamstrings & Adductor
• ASIS 32%
– Sartorius
• AIIS 18%
– Rectus Femoris
• Lesser trochanter 9%
– Iliopsoas
• Iliac crest 3%
– ITB/Tensor Fascia Latae
– Abdominal muscles
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Eric Parks, MD
8/6/2011
ASIS Avulsion Fracture
ASIS Avulsion Fracture
Sartorius
Sartorius
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
AIIS Avulsion Fracture
Ischial Tuberosity Avulsion Fx
Rectus Femoris
Adductors & Hamstrings
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Eric Parks, MD
8/6/2011
Ischial Tuberosity Avulsion Fx
Pelvic Apophysitis
Adductors & Hamstrings
Treatment
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Relative rest until pain free (~4-6 weeks)
WBAT without limping
NSAIDs
Ice
Stretching & strengthening
Progressive return to activities
Rare need for surgery
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Medial Epicondyle Apophysitis
Medial Epicondyle Apophysitis
Little League Elbow
Little League Elbow
• Most common in 9 to 14 y/o overhead athletes
• ~18-29% incidence of elbow pain in youth and HS
baseball players
• Point tenderness over
v medial epicondyle
p
y
• Classically worsened by repetitive throwing
• Hypertrophy of medial epicondyle
• Flexion contracture
• Pain with valgus stress
& milking
maneuver
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
• X-rays may reveal widening of medial
epicondyle apophysis &/or fragmentation of
medial epiphysis
• 85% of X-rays
X rays are normal
– Hang DW. Am J Sports Med. 2004
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Eric Parks, MD
8/6/2011
Medial Epicondyle Apophysitis
Baseball Overuse Injuries
Little League Elbow
Epidemiology
• The acceleration phase:
• Incidence of baseball overuse injuries is 2-8% annually
• Mechanism:
• Annual incidence of elbow pain in 9-12 y/o baseball players is
20-40%
– Gomez JE. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2002
– Traction injury
– Strongg contraction of the flexor-pronator
p
muscle attachments as the arm
is started forward
– Valgus stress causes tension on the UCL
• Valgus moment with throwing:
–
–
–
–
Lateral compression at radiocapitellar joint
Medial tension at epicondyle and UCL
Posterior shear
Hyperextension valgus overload syndrome
– Walter K. Contem Ped. 2002
• In adolescents, 52% & 86%increased risk of shoulder and elbow
pain respectively if throwing curve ball or slider
– Lyman. USA Baseball. 2002
• 67% of HS UCL reconstructions began throwing curve ball
before age 14
– Petty 2004
• 6 fold increase in elbow surgeries b/t ’94-’99 and ’00-’04
– Fleisig GL. ASMI. 2005
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Medial Epicondyle Apophysitis
Medial Epicondyle Avulsions
• Classic Little League Elbow is an apophysitis of the
medial epicondylar growth plate
• Constellation of Findings:
–
–
–
–
–
–
Apophysitis
p p y
of Medial Epicondyle
p
y
Medial Epicondylitis
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome
UCL Injury rare
Capitellar OCD
Premature closure of proximal radial physis
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Eric Parks, MD
8/6/2011
Little League Shoulder
Little League Elbow
Proximal Humeral Epiphysiolysis
Treatment
• If apophysis not significantly displaced (<5mm)
– (Relative) rest 4 - 6 weeks
– Isometric strengthening, stretching, resistive strengthening
– Throwing mechanics evaluation
– Gradual return to throwing after 6 - 12 weeks
• Interval Throwing Program
– Follow pitch counts & types
• If apophysis significantly displaced (>5mm) surgery is warranted
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Little League Shoulder
Proximal Humeral Epiphysiolysis
• Fatigue fracture of the proximal humeral physis
– Does not fuse until ages 14-20
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Typically high-performance male pitchers
Rotatory torque stresses to the epiphyseal growth plate
99-14
14 years old
Pain
Inability to perform
Decreased ROM
TTP at anterior proximal humerus
Remember– physis is the weak link!
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Little League Shoulder
Proximal Humeral Epiphysiolysis
• Treatment
– Relative rest for 4-6 weeks
– Interval throwing program
– Thrower
Thro er’ss 10 program
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Eric Parks, MD
8/6/2011
USA Baseball Medical & Safety
Advisory Committee
USA Baseball Medical & Safety
Advisory Committee
Pitch Counts 2008
Days Off 2008
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Spondylolysis
• Lesion in the pars interarticularis of the neural
arch
Low Back Pain
Epidemiology
• 30.4% in 11-17 year old athletes
– Olsen TL. Am J Public Health. Apr 1992;82(4):606-8
• No cases of spondylolysis in non-ambulatory
( =143)
(n=143)
– Rosenberg NJ. Spine. Jan-Feb 1981
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Eric Parks, MD
8/6/2011
Spondylolysis
Spondylolysis
Epidemiology
Clinical Presentation
• Incidence of 6-8% in general population
• 6.4% for Caucasian males
• 1.1% for African-American females
– Roche MA, Rowe GG. Anat Rec. 1951
• Overall incidence of 44.4%
4% by age 6,
6 5.2%
5 2% by age 12,
12
and 6% by adulthood
– Frederickson BE. J Bone Joint Surg. 1984
• Males>>>Females
• 85-95% occur at L5 with the remainder typically at L4
– Amato ME. Radiology. 1984.
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Spondylolysis
Imaging
•
•
•
•
•
• Insidious back pain exacerbated by strenuous activity
• Occasional radiation to the buttocks
• Rising to an upright posture against resistance elicits
pain
• Pain exacerbated by hyperextension & rotation bilateral,
unilateral
• Hamstring tightness in 80% of patients
• Tenderness in lumbar spine to palpation
• Hyperlordosis
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Spondylolysis
Imaging
Xrays
Bone scan
SPECT scan
Thin-sliced CT scan
MRI
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Eric Parks, MD
8/6/2011
Spondylolysis
Treatment
•
•
•
•
•
Relative rest & activity modification
Time (>3 months)
Flexion-based core strengthening
NSAIDs
Bracing?
Stress Fractures
• Mechanism
– repeated forceful impact and repetitive loading
on immature trabecular bone
– repeated microtrauma is greater than ability to
repair
– If still painful after the above
• Surgery
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Stress Fractures
History
• Recent change in activity level, equipment, or playing
surface
• Insidious onset of pain
Worse w
with activity
v y
• W
• Improves with rest
• Prior stress fractures
• Menstrual irregularities, weight changes, eating disorder,
nutrition
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Stress Fractures
Clinical Examination
• Focal tenderness may be elicited with
compression or percussion
• Fulcrum test, Hop test, & Tuning fork
• Plain xx-rays
rays often normal early in disease
course
– New bone formation after 2-3 weeks
• Further imaging may be needed
– Bone scan or MRI
– Female Athlete Triad
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Eric Parks, MD
8/6/2011
Stress Fractures
Stress Fracture
Imaging
Treatment
• Relative rest
– Cross-training
– Limit impact activities
•
•
•
•
Immobilization
Gradual return to play
May take 6-8 weeks
Be aware of tenuous stress fractures
– Anterior tibial cortex, tension-sided femoral neck,
Jones, etc.
•
•
•
•
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
Summary
Summary
60 minutes of exercise is recommended daily
Video gaming is not intense enough
Adolescents are not little adults
Overuse injuries occur frequently in adolescents
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
• Be wary of overuse physeal injuries
• Know where the common overuse physeal
injuries occur
• Relative
R l i rest iis a good
d start with
i h most overuse
physeal injuries
• Know common adolescent fractures, including
physeal fractures
27th Annual SW VA
Pediatrics Conference
27th Annual SW VA Pediatrics Conference
8/6‐7/2011
DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
Tracy Glauser, M.D.
does not anticipate discussing the unapproved /investigative
use of a commercial product/device during this
lecture. He reports that he DOES NOT have a
financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with
one or more organizations that could be perceived
h
ld b
d
as a real or apparent conflict of interest in the
context of this presentation. Seizures: Diagnosis and Management in Primary Care • Recognize the signs and symptoms of 3 important i h i
d
f3i
epilepsy syndromes • Classify a patient's seizure as either partial onset or generalized onset py
p
• Select first line therapy for partial onset seizures in children Tracy Glauser, MD
8/6/2011
Seizures:
Diagnosis and Management in
Primary Care
Tracy Glauser, M.D.
Professor of Pediatrics and Neurology
Director, Comprehensive Epilepsy Center
Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio
Disclosure Statement of Financial
Interest
Disclosure Statement of
Unapproved/Investigative Use
I, Tracy Glauser MD, DO anticipate
discussing the unapproved/investigative
use of a commercial product/device during
this activity or presentation.
Epilepsy and its Treatments:
The Modern Era
• I, Tracy Glauser MD, DO have a financial interest/arrangement
or affiliation with one or more organizations that could be
perceived as a real or apparent conflict of interest in the context
of the subject of this presentation, they are:
Affiliation/Financial Interest:
Grant/Research Support:
Consultant:
Speaker's Bureau:
Major Stock/Shareholder :
Advisory Board:
g
( )
Name of Organization
(s):
NIH, Oxley foundation
Supernus, Sunovion, Eisai, ucb Pharm,
Lundbeck, Questcor
Supernus, Sunovion, Eisai, ucb Pharm,
Lundbeck, Questcor
None
None
TA Glauser 2011
Tracy Glauser, MD
8/6/2011
Epilepsy and its Treatments”
The Modern Era
Epilepsy and its Treatments:
The Modern Era
“Who can forget that without putting pen to
paper, Locock…turned the tide of
hopelessness that…had immersed the
epileptic… ”
“For doctors, there is this moral: Never miss
a scientific meeting on epilepsy, and give
close attention to the discussion ”
Sir Charles Locock
TA Glauser 2011
Definitions
Lennox and Lennox, Epilepsy and Related Disorders 1960; p.854
TA Glauser 2011
Magnitude of the Problem
„
“Seizure” - an electrical storm on the surface of
the brain.
„
“Epilepsy” – recurrent unprovoked seizures
„
“Epilepsy Syndrome” – a groups of epilepsy
related signs and symptoms that travel together
10% of people experience at least one seizure
„ Approximately 1% of people develop epilepsy
„
– 40 million people worldwide
– 2.3 million people in the US
„
TA Glauser 2011
„
Estimated annual cost of epilepsy: $12.5 billion
Epilepsy has significant effects on self-image,
family and peer relationships
Epilepsy Foundation: A Report to the Nation.
TA Glauser 2011
Tracy Glauser, MD
8/6/2011
Current Management of Epilepsy
Diagnosis the Seizure
Current Management of Epilepsy
Diagnose seizure and epilepsy
„ Classify seizure type
„ Classify
y epilepsy
p p y - identifyy syndromes
y
„ Set treatment goals, establish bond
„ Start therapy based on seizure type or epilepsy
syndrome
„
„
„
History is the key
Ask about
– Premonitions of the event (aura)
– Repetitive
R
titi motor
t movements
t
– Involuntary head or eye movements
– Alterations in consciousness
– Stereotyped events
– Confusion, tiredness after the event
TA Glauser 2011
TA Glauser 2011
International Classification of
Epileptic Seizure Types
Imitators of Seizures
„
Tics
„ Syncope
g
„ Breathholding
„ Headaches
„ Night terrors
„ Non-epileptics events
„
Partial Seizures
– Simple partial
– Complex partial
– Secondarily generalized
„
Generalized
Seizures
Generali ed Sei
res
–
–
–
–
–
„
Prensky A.L. In: Dodson, Pellock, eds. Pediatric Epilepsy.
TA Glauser 2011
Absence
Myoclonic
Atonic
Clonic
Tonic-clonic
Unclassified epileptic seizures
ILAE. Epilepsia. 1981;22:489-501.
TA Glauser 2011
Tracy Glauser, MD
8/6/2011
Types of Partial Seizures
Simple
Incidence of Seizure Types
Complex
Consciousness
Not Impaired
Simple Partial
14%
Complex Partial
36%
Consciousness Impaired
(With or Without Automatisms)
Generalized Tonic-Clonic
23%
Secondarily Generalized
Partial Unknown
7%
Consciousness Impaired and
Bilateral Cerebral Involvement
ILAE. Epilepsia. 1981;22:489-501.
Unclassified
3%
TA Glauser 2011
Current Management of Epilepsy
Classify Epilepsy, Identify Syndromes
Basic question: What is the underlying cause
of the patient’s seizures?
„ Answer: One of two categories
„
– Idiopathic
– Symptomatic
„
Look for specific epilepsy syndromes
Myoclonic
3%
Absence
6%
Hauser A. Epilepsia. 1992;33 (suppl 4):S6-S14.
Other Generalized
8%
TA Glauser 2011
Classification of Epilepsy
Symptomatic (secondary)
„ Focal or diffuse cerebral
injury
„ Neurologic abnormalities
„ Frequent seizures
„ Difficult to control
Idiopathic (primary)
„ No identifiable pathology
„ Normal development
„ Relatively
R l ti l self-limited
lf li it d
„ Medication-responsive
„ Genetic predisposition
Dreifuss FE. In: Dodson, Pollock, eds. Pediatric Epilepsy.
TA Glauser 2011
TA Glauser 2011
Tracy Glauser, MD
8/6/2011
Epilepsy Syndromes: Features
Etiology of Epilepsy
Degenerative
3.5%
Infection
2.5%
Neoplastic
4.1%
ƒ Specific seizure types
ƒ Typical EEG patterns
Vascular
10.9%
ƒ Associated clinical features
Trauma
5.5%
ƒ Natural history
Congenital
8.0%
Idiopathic
65.5%
Hauser. Epilepsia. 1992;33 (suppl 4):S6-S14.
ƒ Response to therapy
ƒ Precipitating factors / Inheritance patterns
TA Glauser 2011
Common Epilepsy Syndromes
ƒ West Syndrome
ƒ Lennox Gastaut Syndrome (LGS)
ƒ Benign Epilepsy with Centrotemporal Spikes
(Benign Rolandic Epilepsy, BECTS, BRE)
ƒ Childhood Absence Epilepsy (CAE)
ƒ Idiopathic generalized epilepsies with variable phenotypes
– Juvenile Absence Epilepsy (JAE)
– Juvenile Myoclonic (JME)
– Epilepsy with GTCs only
West Syndrome
ƒ Seizure type: Infantile Spasms
ƒ EEG pattern: Hypsarrhythmia
ƒ Clinical: Psychomotor retardation / regression
Tracy Glauser, MD
Infantile Spasms
8/6/2011
Interictal EEG Pattern:
(Hypsarrhythmia)
ƒ Brief contraction of muscles of neck, trunk, extremities
ƒ Bilateral and symmetrical (usually)
ƒ Intensityy varies
ƒ Usually (80%) occur in clusters often after awakening or
when sleepy
ƒ Spasms per cluster vary
ƒ Intensity of spasms waxes, then wanes
West Syndrome
West Syndrome - Treatment
ƒ Natural History:
ƒ Goal
– No spasms (by EEG) and no hypsarrhythmia on EEG
ƒ Options
–ACTH
–Vigabatrin
–Topiramate
–Steroids
ƒ Best response if treated early
–Onset 4-6 months (90% by 1 year)
Untreated - spasms and hypsarrhythmia
–Untreated
resolve by 3 yo but spasms often replaced
by other seizure types
–Development delayed esp in children with
symptomatic causes; those with delayed sz
control
Tracy Glauser, MD
Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome
ƒ Seizure types:
–Tonic; atonic atypical absence; generalized tonic
clonic,
–Myoclonic seizures, CPS less common
ƒ EEG pattern:
–Generalized slow spike-wave (1.5-2.5 Hz)
–Background slowing
ƒ Clinical:
–Psychomotor retardation / regression
Atonic seizure
ƒ Sudden loss of postural tone that involves
either the body or only the head
8/6/2011
Tonic seizure
ƒ Brief (seconds)
ƒ May appear as
–flexion of the head and trunk,
–adduction
dd ti off arms with
ith elevation
l
ti off
shoulders
–sudden falls
ƒ Can be
–asymmetrical or unilateral
–precipitated by stimuli such as noise,
contact, movement, or by falling asleep
Atypical Absence Seizures
ƒ Occur in two-thirds of patients with LGS
ƒ Gradual onset and termination
ƒ Longer than typical absences
ƒ Followed by postictal cognitive impairment
ƒ “Clouding" rather than loss of consciousness
ƒ Associated manifestations include eyelid or perioral
myoclonus, progressive flexion, and localized motor
phenomena, such as neck-stiffening or head-nodding
Tracy Glauser, MD
Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome
ƒ Natural History:
–Onset 2-8 years
8/6/2011
Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome:
Treatments
ƒ Seizures difficult to control
ƒ Medical options
–Poor
Poor response to therapy
–Lamotrigine
Lamotrigine, Felbamate
Felbamate, Topiramate
Topiramate, Rufinamide
–Slow spike-wave / atypical absences remit but
other seizures continue
–Valproate, Zonisamide, Clobazam
ƒ Ketogenic diet
ƒ Surgical
–Corpus callosotomy
–VNS
BECTS/BRE: Terminology
BECTS/BRE
ƒ Seizure type:
ƒ Benign Rolandic Epilepsy (BRE)
ƒ Benign Partial Epilepsy of Childhood with
Centrotemporal
Spikes
C t t
lS
ik (BECTS)
ƒ Benign Focal Epilepsy of Childhood
ƒ Sylvian Epilepsy
–Partial with motor, sensory, and autonomic activity
of face, mouth, and throat, hypersalivation
common.
common Seizures can generalize.
generalize
–Over 50% only have seizures in sleep. Seizures
when awake often occur shortly after awakening.
ƒ EEG pattern: centrotemporal spikes
ƒ Clinical:
–No significant neurological deficits
–Normal neuroimaging
Tracy Glauser, MD
BECTS/BRE – interictal awake
8/6/2011
BECTS/BRE – interictal asleep
BECTS/BRE
BECTS/BRE
BECTS/BRE – treatment
ƒ Natural History:
–Onset 3-13 years (most 5-10 years)
–Remission can be within 3 years of onset
(always by age 16 years)
–Seizures typically infrequent (80% have < 5
seizures but can have daily seizures)
–Associated with behavioral and learning
problems
–Seizure frequency is not predictable by degree
of EEG abnormality
ƒ None
ƒ Carbamazepine
ƒ Gabapentin
ƒ Many others
Tracy Glauser, MD
Childhood Absence Epilepsy
ƒ Seizure types:
– Absence
ƒ EEG pattern:
8/6/2011
Absence Seizures
ƒ Abrupt onset and end
ƒ Duration around 5-20 seconds
ƒ Complete loss of awareness
– Generalized 3 to 3.5 Hz spike-wave
ƒ No post-ictal state
– Normal background
ƒ Automatisms and mild myoclonus may be seen
ƒ Clinical:
– Normal development
Absence - ictal
ƒ Mild myoclonic activity around the eyes may be preset
ƒ Seizures may be subtle
Childhood Absence Epilepsy
ƒ Natural History:
– Onset 4-10 years (peak 5-7 years)
– Females 60%
– Remission in adolescence
Tracy Glauser, MD
8/6/2011
Epilepsy Treatments
in the US (1900 – present)
CAE- Treatment
1912
Phenobarbital (Luminal)
1993
1935
Mephobarbital (Mebaral)
1993
Gabapentin (Neurontin)
1938
Phenytoin (Dilantin)
1994
Lamotrigine (Lamictal)
1947
Mephenytoin (Mesantoin)
1996
Topiramate (Topamax)
1954
Primidone ((Mysoline)
y
)
1997
Tiagabine
g
(Gabitril)
(
)
1957
Methsuximide (Celontin)
2000
Zonisamide (Zonegran)
1957
Ethotoin (Peganone)
2000
Levetiracetam (Keppra)
1960
Ethosuximide (Zarontin)
2000
Oxcarbazepine (Trileptal)
1968
Diazepam (Valium)
2005
Pregabalin (Lyrica)
1974
Carbamazepine (Tegretol)
2008
Rufinamide (Banzel)
1975
Clonazepam (Klonopin)
2008
Lacosamide (Vimpat)
1978
Valproic acid (Depakene)
2009
Vigabatrin (Sabril)
1981
Clorazepate (Tranxene)
2010
ACTH (Acthar)
Summary of Evidence and Recommendations
Partial onset seizures
Seizure
type or
epilepsy
syndrome
Seizure
type or
epilepsy
syndrome
Class
II
Class
III
GTC:
Adults
0
0
23
Level A: None
Level B: None
Level C: CBZ, LTG, OXC, PB, PHT, TPM, VPA
Level A: OXC
Level B: None
Level C: CBZ, PB, PHT, TPM, VPA
GTC:
Children
0
0
14
Level A: GBP, LTG
Level B: None
Level C: CBZ
Level A: None
Level B: None
Level C: CBZ, PB, PHT, TPM, VPA
Absence
seizures
1
0
6
Level A: ESM, VPA
Level B: None
Level C: LTG
Class
II
Class
III
POS:
Adults
3
1
30
Level A: CBZ, LEV, PHT
Level B: VPA
Level C: GBP, LTG, OXC, PB, TPM, VGB
POS:
Children
1
0
17
POS:
Elderly
1
2
Summary of Evidence and Recommendations
Generalized onset seizures
Class I
Class I
1
Felbamate (Felbatol)
Level of efficacy and effectiveness evidence
(in alphabetical order)
Level of efficacy and effectiveness evidence
(in alphabetical order)
Tracy Glauser, MD
8/6/2011
Summary of Evidence and Recommendations
Epilepsy syndromes
Seizure
type or
epilepsy
syndrome
BECTS
JME
Class I
Class
II
Class
III
Level of efficacy and effectiveness evidence
(in alphabetical order)
The Place of Guidelines in
Clinical Decision Making
Evidence
Patient/Physician
Factors
1.Patient data
0
0
0
0
2
0
Level A: None
Level B: None
Level C: CBZ, VPA
Level A: None
Level B: None
Level C: None
1. Cultural beliefs
Knowledge
2.Basic, clinical, and
epidemiologic research
2. Personal values
3 R d i d ttrials
3.Randomized
i l
Clinical
4.Systematic reviews
Decisions
Guidelines
3 Experiences
3.
E
i
4. Education
Ethics
Constraints
1. Formal policies, laws
2. Community standards
3. Time
4. Reimbursement
Figure. Factors that enter into clinical decisions.
Solving the problem
Mulrow CD, et al. Ann Intern Med. 1997.
Solving the problem – Needs for the system
• Human aspects
- Adaptation to the pace of change
- Stronger synchrony of efforts
- Culture of shared responsibility
- New clinical research paradigm
- Notion of clinical data as a public good
- Incentives aligned for practice-based evidence
- Public engagement
- Trusted scientific broker
- Leadership
• Human + Information Technology
- Clinical decision support systems
- Universal electronic health records
- Tools for database linkage, mining, and use
Institute of Medicine (IOM). 2007. page 5
The Learning Healthcare System: Workshop Summary;
Washington, D.C. National Academies Press
Tracy Glauser, MD
Why Clinical decision support systems?
8/6/2011
Future approaches to seizure and epilepsy
diagnosis and management
Collect from humans
to accommodate the reality that although
professional judgment will always be vital to
shaping care, the amount of information required
f any given
for
i
d
decision
i i iis moving
i b
beyond
d
unassisted human capacity
I saw your patient John Johnson in the Neurology Clinic at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center in follow‐up evaluation and management of idiopathic localization‐related vs. generalized epilepsy. The patient's last visit in our clinic was on 01/01/01.
Interval Seizure History : Since the last visit , the patient's seizures have remained unchanged in intensity , frequency or duration. Improve the computer’s understanding
Institute of Medicine (IOM). 2007. page 5
The Learning Healthcare System: Workshop Summary;
Washington, D.C. National Academies Press
Teach the computer
Use the computer’s help
27th Annual SW VA Pediatrics Conference
8/6‐7/2011
DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
Jim Thigpen, PharmD
does not anticipate discussing the unapproved or investigative use of a commercial product/device during this lecture. He p
reports that he DOES NOT have a
financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with
one or more organizations that could be perceived
as a real or apparent conflict of interest in the
context of this presentation. Anti‐epileptics: The Old, the New and Future Directions • Describe
Describe the known mechanisms of antiepileptic drug the known mechanisms of antiepileptic drug
classes • Identify the most common and serious adverse drug reactions for the medications discussed • Determine the appropriate medication choices for a specific sei re t pe
specific seizure type • Discuss the potential implication of pharmacogenetics in epilepsy Jim Thigpen, PharmD
8/6/2011
Describe the known mechanisms of antiepileptic drug classes
ƒ Identify the most common and serious adverse drug reactions for the medications d
d
f h
d
discussed
ƒ Determine the appropriate medication choice(s) for a specific seizure type
ƒ Discuss the potential implication of pharmacogenetics in epilepsy ƒ
Jim Thigpen, PharmD, BCPS
Assistant Professor
East Tennessee State University
Bill Gatton College of Pharmacy
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
K+ Bromide (1857)
Paraldehyde (1882)
Phenobarbital (1912)
Primidone (1952)
Phenytoin (1953)
Ethosuximide (1958)
Diazepam (1963)
Valproic acid (1978)
Carbamazepine (1974)
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Felbamate (1993)
Lamotrigine (1995)
Gabapentin (1993)
Topiramate (1995)
Oxcarbazepine (1990)
Vigabatrin
Levetiracetam (1999)
Zonisamide (2004)
Tiagabine
Ezogabine (2011)
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Brivaracetam
Eslicarbazepine
Perampanel
Clobazam
Ganaxolone
ICA‐105665
BGG492
Carisbamate
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
2DG
NTP‐2014
CPP‐115
Tonabersat
YKP‐3089
IV Topiramate
Sigma‐1 Agonists
Jim Thigpen, PharmD
ƒ
Sodium channel blockers
8/6/2011
ƒ
ƒ Prevent the return of the sodium channel to the Calcium channel blockers
ƒ L, N, and T channels
active state by stabilizing them in the inactive state, preventing the repetitive firing of axons
ti th titi fi i f ƒ “Pacemakers” of normal rhythmic brain activity
ƒ By “locking” these channels, the underlying slow depolarizations needed to generate seizures are inhibited
ƒ Phenytoin, Carbamazepine, Oxcarbazepine, Zonisamide, Lamotrigine
ƒ Ethosuximide
ƒ
GABA enhancers
ƒ An influx of chloride increases the “negativity” of the cell so the cell has greater difficulty reaching the action potential ƒ GABA agonists
▪ Benzodiazepines, barbiturates
ƒ GABA uptake inhibitor
▪ Tiagabine
ƒ GABA transaminase
▪ Vigabatrin
ƒ Glutamic acid decarboxylase modulation
▪ Gabapentin, Valproate
ƒ
Glutamate blockers
ƒ Inhibition of the excitatory neurotransmitter
▪ N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate (NMDA)
▪ Alpha‐amino‐3‐hydroxyl‐5‐methylosoxazole‐4‐
propionic acid (AMPA)
▪ Kainate receptors
ƒ Felbamate, Topiramate
Jim Thigpen, PharmD
ƒ
Carbonic anhydrase inhibitor
ƒ
8/6/2011
↑ Hydrogen ions, ↓ pH, extracellular shift of K+, Synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A) binding agents
increase in seizure threshold
ƒ SV2A appears to be important for the availability ƒ
of calcium‐dependent neurotransmitter vesicles
f
ƒ The lack of SV2A results in ↓ action potential‐
dependent neurotransmission
ƒ Used mainly for refractory seizures with catamenial pattern
ƒ Acetazolamide
ƒ
ƒ
Most common and best characterized AEDs
Prevent sodium channels from returning to their active state
ƒ Prevents repetitive firing of the axons
ƒ Stabilizes the neuronal membranes
ƒ Blocks and prevents posttetanic potentiation
ƒ Limits development of maximal seizure activity
ƒ Reduces the spread of seizures
ƒ Levetiracetam ƒ
Phenytoin (Dilantin®)
ƒ First discovered in 1908, recognized as an anticonvulsant in 1938, FDA approved in 1953
Jim Thigpen, PharmD
ƒ
Phenytoin
8/6/2011
ƒ
ƒ Partial and secondary generalized seizures
ƒ
Phenytoin
ƒ Antiepileptic effect on calmodulin
ƒ Drug interactions
▪ Highly protein bound, CYP450 inducer
ƒ Adverse drug effect profile
▪ GI, rash, blood dyscrasias, headache, vitamin K and folate deficiencies, hormonal dysfunction, bone marrow effects, teratogenic effects
ƒ Serum monitoring
▪ In the presence of low serum albumin or other highly protein bound drugs, “free” (unbound) drug levels should be obtained
Fosphenytoin (Cerebyx®)
ƒ Prodrug for parenteral administration
▪ Far better tolerated than phenytoin through peripheral IV
▪ If central line is used, “regular” phenytion is fine
ƒ Can be infused 3X faster, can be given IM
ƒ May achieve target levels of phenytoin faster
ƒ Far more expensive than phenytoin
ƒ
Carbamazepine (Tegretol®)
ƒ Partial and tonic clonic seizures
ƒ Trigeminal neuralgia and bipolar disorder
ƒ Induces its own metabolism (autoinduction)
▪ Usually seen in the first three weeks
ƒ Active metabolite (10,11‐epoxide)
▪ Must be considered when CNS side effects are seen
Jim Thigpen, PharmD
ƒ
Carbamazepine (Tegretol®)
8/6/2011
ƒ
Oxcarbazepine (Trileptal®)
ƒ CNS side effects are dose‐related
▪ Think 10,11‐epoxide ƒ Partial and secondary generalized seizures
ƒ Aplastic anemia, agranulocytosis, ƒ No epoxide metabolite
ƒ May aggravate myoclonic or absence
thrombocytopenia, rash, and SJS are idiosyncratic
ƒ Hyponatremia
ƒ CNS effects are dose‐related
ƒ Hyponatremia and rash is similar to that seen with ▪ Altered sensitivity to serum osmolality by hypothalamic osmoreceptors or ↑ sensitivity of kidneys to ADH
carbamazepine
ƒ Inducer of CYP3A4
Van Amelsvoort T, et al. Epilepsia 1994 35(1):181‐8.
ƒ
Lamotrigine (Lamictal®)
ƒ Chemically unrelated to any other AED
ƒ Blocks sodium channel conductance and also inhibits release of glutamate
ƒ Partial onset and secondarily generalized tonic‐
clonic seizures and Lennox‐Gastaut
ƒ Can cause worsening of myoclonic seizures
ƒ
Lamotrigine (Lamictal®)
ƒ Few CNS side effects
▪ Headache, ataxia, diplopia, psychosis, somnolence
ƒ Rash is the main concern, SJS in 0.1%
▪ Seen more commonly with taken with valproate
▪ Slow titration ƒ Low incidence of congenital malformations
Jim Thigpen, PharmD
ƒ
8/6/2011
Zonisamide (Zonegran®)
ƒ
Zonisamide (Zonegran®)
ƒ Also affects on T‐type calcium channels and ƒ Avoid with a history of kidney stones
provides neuroprotective effects through free radical scavenging
di l i
ƒ Partial seizures and myoclonus
ƒ Dizziness, anorexia, headache, ataxia, tremor, weight gain
ƒ Confusion, speech abnormalities, mental slowing
ƒ Oligohidrosis due to effect on carbonic anhydrase
ƒ Skin reactions (SJS and TEN) have been reported
▪ Do not use in sulfa‐allergic ƒ Some drug interactions with other AEDs (PHT, CBZ, PB, VPA) leading to reduced ZNS levels
ƒ Good alternative in adherence due to long t1/2
▪ Gradual titration
Drug →
Phenytoin
Fosphenytoin
Carbamazepine
Oxcarbazepine
Lamotrigine
Zonisamide
Partial and secondarily
generalized
Partial and secondarily
generalized
Partial and tonic/clonic
Partial and secondarily
generalized
Partial and secondarily
generalized,
Lennox/Gastaut
Partial and myoclonus
GI, CNS, rash, vitamin K, hormonal dysfunction, etc…
Infusion‐
related
CNS, nausea
CNS, nausea
CNS (few), GI, somnolence
CNS, cognitive effects, weight gain
Not likely
Marrow
toxicity, SJS, ↓ Na+
Marrow
toxicity, SJS, ↓ Na+
+++
++
+
++
+/‐
YES
YES
YES
Details ↓
Seizure type
Common
ADRs
Rare/severe Blood dyscrasias
ADRs
Drug Interactions
Preferred Drug
++++
NO, but effective and economical
++++
Status, peripheral IV
Rash
Oligohidrosis, Rash, kidney stones
Gamma‐aminobutyric acid (GABA) is the most important inhibitory neurotransmitter
ƒ Benzodiazepines
ƒ
ƒ Emergency treatment
ƒ Limited long‐term use
ƒ
Barbiturates
ƒ Affect the duration of chloride channel opening
ƒ ADR profile limits use Jim Thigpen, PharmD
ƒ
Clonazepam (Klonopin®)
ƒ Used for all types of myoclonus and is useful in patients with concomitant anxiety 8/6/2011
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ Higher affinity for the GABA‐A receptor site
ƒ Status epilepticus
ƒ Caution with withdrawal
ƒ IV, IM, Rectal
ƒ Children tolerate sedative effects better than ƒ Intranasal
▪ midazolam
adults
ƒ Some children have hypersalivation
ƒ
Phenobarbital
ƒ
The most commonly prescribed AED of the 20th
century
ƒ Potent and broad spectrum
ƒ CNS effects, especially cognition, behavior
ƒ Drug interactions (enzyme inducer)
ƒ
Diazepam (Valium®, Diastat®)
Lorazepam (Ativan®)
Midazolam (Versed®)
Primidone
ƒ Metabolized to phenobarbital
ƒ Also used for essential tremor at low doses
Reuptake of GABA is facilitated by at least four specific transporting compounds
ƒ Inhibition of these transporters makes increased amounts of GABA available at the d
f
l bl
h
synaptic cleft
ƒ GABA prolongs inhibitory postsynaptic potentials
ƒ
Jim Thigpen, PharmD
ƒ
Tiagabine (Gabitril®)
8/6/2011
ƒ
GABA is metabolized by transamination of GABA‐transaminase (GABA‐T)
ƒ
Inhibition of GABA‐T leads to an increase in hb
f
l d
the extracelluar concentration of GABA
ƒ
Vigabatrin (Sabril®)
ƒ Inhibits GABA transporter‐1 (GAT‐1)
ƒ Used as second‐line or add‐on therapy for partial or secondarily generalized seizures
ƒ No significant idiosyncratic adverse reactions
ƒ CNS effects most common (dizziness, asthenia, nervousness, tremor, depressed mood and emotional lability) but also some GI and rash
ƒ Can worsen absence epilepsy or in partial epilepsy with generalized spike wave
ƒ
Vigabatrin (Sabril®)
ƒ A structural analog of GABA, binding irreversibly ƒ Most common side effect is drowsiness
to GABA‐T
ƒ Used for refractory partial seizures
ƒ Depression (5%), agitation (7%), confusion and ▪ Less effective vs. primarily generalized tonic‐clonic
▪ May worsen myoclonic or generalized absence
▪ Myoclonus or Lennox‐Gastaut do not respond well
ƒ Infantile spasms
▪ Tuberous sclerosis rarely psychosis
ƒ Little effect on cognitive function
ƒ VGB causes visual field changes (nasal constriction followed by concentric constriction, with preservation of central vision) in 50%
▪ Use is restricted
Jim Thigpen, PharmD
ƒ
Gabapentin (Neurontin®)
8/6/2011
ƒ
ƒ Developed to have a structure similar to GABA but Gabapentin (Neurontin®)
ƒ No pharmacokinetic drug interactions
the drug has little or no action on the receptor
ƒ MOA is only speculated
ƒ Only modest reduction in partial seizures and secondarily generalized seizures
ƒ Well tolerated, most side effects are minor and occur mainly at high doses
▪ Increased intracellular concentration of GABA
▪ Inhibits branched chain amino acid transferase, which reduces their conversion to glutamate
▪ Somnolence, dizziness, ataxia, nystagmus
ƒ Binds with the alpha2 subunit of calcium channels in the brain and spinal cord, which may explain its effect on pain
ƒ
Pregabalin (Lyrica®)
ƒ
Valproate (Depakote®)
ƒ Very similar in all aspects to gabapentin
ƒ DOC for many primarily generalized epilepsies and ƒ Approved for adjunct therapy for partial seizures
partial seizures
ƒ Discovered by accident
Disco ered b accident
ƒ Enhances GABA function, may stimulate GAD, also produces selective modulation of sodium channels
ƒ Highly bound to plasma proteins, but decreases at higher levels, kidney or liver disease and during pregnancy
ƒ Used mainly as a pain medication
▪ Increased free fraction of drug (7‐9% to 15%)
Jim Thigpen, PharmD
ƒ
Valproate (Depakote®)
8/6/2011
ƒ
Felbamate (Felbatol®)
ƒ In utero exposure has been linked to lower IQ
▪ VPA should not be used as a first‐line agent for women of childbearing potential
f hildb i t ti l
ƒ Blocks NMDA receptors, calcium and sodium ƒ Effective against multiple seizure types
ƒ Nausea, vomiting, tremor, sedation, confusion, ƒ Occurrence of aplastic anemia and hepatic failure channels
irritability and weight gain are dose‐related
ƒ Hepatoxicity is most serious idiosyncratic effect
ƒ Metabolic effects include hypocarnitinemia, hyperglycemia and hyperammonemia
led to withdrawal from the U.S. market
ƒ Available only for a very limited use
▪ Severe partial epilepsy or Lennox‐Gastaut
Meador, et al. NEJM 2009;360(16);1597‐605
ƒ
Topiramate (Topamax®)
ƒ
Topiramate (Topamax®)
ƒ Derived from D‐fructose, initially developed as an ƒ Adjunct therapy for drug‐resistant generalized antidiabetic drug
ƒ Inhibits sodium conductance, enhances GABA, inhibits the AMPA subtype glutamate receptor, and is a weak carbonic anhydrase inhibitor
ƒ Levels are reduced by 50% when given with phenytion or carbamazepine
ƒ Can reduce ethyl estradiol levels by 30%
epilepsies, including juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, absence and generalized tonic‐clonic seizures, b
d li d t i l i i
and Lennox‐Gastaut syndrome
ƒ FDA approved for partial onset and secondarily generalized tonic‐clonic seizures, primary generalized tonic‐clonic, and Lennox‐Gastaut
Jim Thigpen, PharmD
ƒ
Topiramate (Topamax®)
8/6/2011
ƒ
ƒ Start slow and titrate to minimize/prevent ƒ Approved in June, 2011, for adjunct therapy in adverse effects
ƒ Ataxia, impairment of concentration, confusion, dizziness, fatigue, paresthesia, somnolence, disturbance of memory, depression, agitation and slowness of speech are common
ƒ Cognitive effects occur more commonly at higher doses and with rapid titration rate
ƒ
Levetiracetam (Keppra®)
Ezogabine (Potiga®)
uncontrolled partial‐onset seizures
ƒ CNS side effects include dizziness, fatigue, confusion ,tremor, problems with coordination, double vision, attention, memory and weakness
ƒ Should be available by years end
ƒ
Levetiracetam (Keppra®)
ƒ Thought to inhibit synaptic vesicle protein 2A ƒ No significant drug interactions
(SV2A) , which appears to be important for the availability of calcium‐dependent il bilit f l i
d
d t neurotransmitter vesicles ready to release their content
ƒ The lack of SV2A results in decreased action potential‐dependent neurotransmission
ƒ Used for monotherapy for tonic‐clonic, partial‐
onset, myoclonic seizures in children
ƒ Adverse effects include headache (25%), infection (23%), asthenia (22%), somnolence (22%), dizziness (18%), pain (15%), pharyngitis (11%) and flu‐like syndrome (10%) Jim Thigpen, PharmD
ƒ
Lacosamide (Vimpat®)
8/6/2011
ƒ
ƒ Enhances the slow inactivation of voltage‐gated ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Rufinamide (Banzel®)
ƒ Prolongation of the inactive state of the sodium sodium channels and binding collapsing response mediator protein 2
di t t i Low potential for drug interactions
Dizziness, headache, diplopia, N & V
Small increases in P‐R interval
Refractory partial‐onset seizures saw 37% ↓
Secondarily generalized T‐C sz saw 60‐90% ↓
channel, suppressing neuronal hyperexcitability
and stabilizing cell membranes d t bili i ll b
ƒ FDA approved for Lennox‐Gastaut and may be used to treat partial seizures
ƒ Shown to shorten the QT interval
ƒ Headache, dizziness, fatigue, somnolence and nausea most common
Wisniewski CS. Ann Pharmacother 2010;44:658‐67
ƒ
Eslicarbazepine (Stedesa®, Zebinix)
ƒ
ƒ Investigated for partial‐onset seizures with or ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
without secondary generalization
ƒ Still at the FDA
ƒ Similar side effects to oxcarbazepine
ƒ
ƒ
Brivaracetam
Eslicarbazepine
Perampanel
Clobazam
Ganaxolone
ICA‐105665
BGG492
Carisbamate
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
2DG
NTP‐2014
CPP‐115
Tonabersat
YKP‐3089
IV Topiramate
Sigma‐1 Agonists
Jim Thigpen, PharmD
ƒ
Pharmacogenetics encompasses the principle of testing for how genetic variation among individuals affects variation in response to medicine
d
ƒ Provides the ability to identify potential adverse drug reactions or lack of effectiveness of a drug before administration
8/6/2011
ƒ
The application in epilepsy
ƒ High prevalence
ƒ Wide variety of individual responses to drugs
ƒ Readily qualified outcomes of seizure control
ƒ Validated scales to classify both seizures and adverse effects
Szoeke, CE, et al. neurology.thelancet.com Vol 5 February 2006 ƒ
“Pharmacoresistance” is the inability to achieve complete seizure control despite trials of at least three appropriate AEDs, taken at appropriate doses, excluding k
d
l d
seizures due to drug non‐adherence or extraordinary provoking events
Same Seizure Disorder
Same Seizure Disorder
Same Medication and Dose
Same Medication and Dose
Seizure Free
Continued Seizure Episodes
ƒ Common in patients treated in epilepsy clinics Jim Thigpen, PharmD
ƒ
8/6/2011
Genetic polymorphisms on metabolism
ƒ
ƒ CYP4502D6
▪ Poor vs normal metabolizers
ƒ
ƒ Neural tube defects and VPA
Product
Function
CYP3A4
Cytochrome P450
enzyme
Associated with hydroxylation
MRP
Multidrug resistance‐
associated protein
Transmembrane transport
PRNP
Cellular prion
protein
Associated with neuron protection
ƒ P‐glycoprotein
▪ Phenytoin
▪ Lamotrigine
▪ Valproate
V l
t
ƒ
ƒ Rats bred with resistance to phenytoin
Potential
Candidate
Drug transporters
Drug Metabolism
ƒ CYP450 enzymes
▪ Valproate
▪ Tiagabine
▪ Topiramate
ƒ Glucuronidation
▪ Lamotrigine
Genetic variation and response to AEDs
ƒ
Pharmacokinetics and application of pharmacogenomics
ƒ Drug transport genes
ƒ End‐organ drug targets
ƒ Metabolism
ƒ
End‐organ targets
ƒ Sodium channels
▪ SCN1A
ƒ
Immunogenetic
I
i background
b k
d
ƒ HLA‐B*1502
▪ Carbamazepine
Jim Thigpen, PharmD
ƒ
Future directions
ƒ Clinical trial complexities
ƒ Individual genotypes
ƒ Potential savings
ƒ Application in practice
▪ Felbamate
8/6/2011
27th Annual SW VA Pediatrics Conference
8/6‐7/2011
DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
Sharon Castellino, MD
do not anticipate discussing the unapproved /investigative
use of a commercial product/device during this
lecture. She reports that she DOES NOT have a
financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with
one or more organizations that could be perceived
h
ld b
d
as a real or apparent conflict of interest in the
context of this presentation. Life After Cancer: Cases from the Clinic • Describe the survivor population at risk for chronic health conditions • Describe the leading morbidities in childhood cancer survivors • Review recommendations for health surveillance Review recommendations for health surveillance
following childhood cancer therapy Sharon Castellino, MD
8/6/2011
Objectives
Life after cancer
Cases from the clinic
Sharon M Castellino, MD, MSc, FAAP
Pediatric Hematology/Oncology
S W
S.
W. Virginia Pediatric Conference,
Conference Abingdon VA , Aug 2011
• To describe childhood cancer survivors at
risk for chronic health conditions
• To describe the leading morbidities in
childhood cancer survivors
• To review recommendations for health
surveillance following childhood cancer
therapy
Epidemiology
ƒ 1 in 350 children in U.S.
with cancer by 20 yrs.
age
ƒ ~ 14 new cases for
every
y 100,000
,
children
under age 15 yrs.
ƒ Consistent increase in
the incidence of cancer
in children
Survival: Now a reality
100
Leukemia-85%
CNS Tumors-67%
80
60
Lymphoma-84%
Neuroblastoma-66%
Rhabdo-65%
40
20
Wilms Tumor-91%
Bone Tumors-65%
Retinoblastoma-94%
0
Overall-80%
Sharon Castellino, MD
Case 1: 10 yr old female with weight loss
ƒ Treated for Neuroblastoma 5 years previously
HPI: Recent asthma flare, with persistent cough.
Appetite is fair- picky eater- no consistent calcium
source in diet. She fatigues easily with moderate
activity at school, and has question of shortness of
breath at times.
times
8/6/2011
Case 1: 10 yr old female with weight loss
Chemotherapy
ƒ Doxorubicin 295 mg/m2
ƒ Cyclophosphamide 13150
mg/m2
ƒ Melphalan
M l h l 216 mg/m2
/ 2
ƒ Neck/axillary fields
ROS: pain on bottom of feet; constipation
ƒ Etoposide 2206 mg/m2
PMH: Hearing loss- wears hearing aids
ƒ Cisplatin 383 mg/m2
Current Meds: Singulair; Pulmocort
ƒ Carboplatin 332 mg/m2
ƒ Retinoic Acid
Case 1: 10 yr old female with weight loss
Workup
ƒ Physical: Slight child with well healed scar on abdomen.
Scattered nevi on trunk and back- small/homogeneous in
color and shape; Neck: No thyroid asymmetry/ no
nodules palpable; Lungs: CTA; CV: 2+ pulses; nl S1, S2.
Abdomen: soft; no HSM; Tanner 1; No scoliosis; No
edema
d
ƒ Lab: CBC and CMP wnl (Albumin 3.5)
ƒ Echo: FS 34%; normal function; CXR and Sinus CT clear
Radiation Therapy
ƒ Left abdomen
Case 1
ƒ Parasympathetic
Autologous HSCT
Sharon Castellino, MD
8/6/2011
Case 1: Differential diagnosis
Question: The most likely cause of weight loss and
fatigue is:
Case 1: 10 yr old female with weight loss
ƒ Bone Age: 7 yrs and 10 months (compared to
chronologic age 10y 6m)
ƒ TSH 5.6 uIU/ml; free T4 0.8 mg/dl
A. Pulmonary dysfunction after radiation to chest fields
B. Relapsed neuroblastoma
ƒ PFTs: FVC 85%; FEV1 87%; FEF 25-75 88%;
DLCO 61%
C. Thyroid dysfunction
D. Cardiac dysfunction due to anthracycline and radiation
exposure in childhood
Case 2: 30 yr old male
ƒ Treated for T cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma 22 yrs.
ago
HPI: Overall well. Came to clinic after phone
discussion with oncology nurse talked to him. His
main concern is that his wife and he have been
trying to conceive for 3 yrs. without success.
Case 2:
Chemotherapy
ƒ Doxorubicin 377 mg/m2
ƒ Cyclophosphamide 4231
mg/m2
ROS Tobacco
ROS:
T b
1ppd
1 d
ƒ VM 26 2619 mg/m2
/ 2
PMH: Presented at age 8 yrs. (1988) with mediastinal
mass, hepato-splenomegaly, naso-pharyngeal
mass; No marrow disease; Disease in spinal fluid.
ƒ Prednisone
Varicocele repair in L testes at age 28.
ƒ 6 mercaptopurine
Current Meds: none
ƒ Cytoside arabinoside
ƒ L-asparaginase
Radiation Therapy
ƒ Cranio-spinal 30 Gy
Sharon Castellino, MD
Case 2:
Workup
ƒ Physical: Well app young adult male with male pattern
baldness. Skin: multiple nevi < 6 mm on back- scar at
prior bx site in lumbo sacral spine area; HEENT:
Normocephalic, OP clear; good dentitia; no corrective
lenses ; No cataracts; Neck: no thyroid nodules palp.;
N carotid
No
tid b
bruit;
it L
Lymph:
h N
No adenopathy;
d
th L
Lungs: CTA
bilat; no wheezes; nl resp effort; CV: Nl S1 S2 - no
murmur, rubs or gallop, 2+ pulses throughout; GU:
Tanner V male
Endocrine problems after cancer
Seen after radiation of
hormone-producing glands:
ƒ Pituitary (brain radiation)
ƒ Thyroid
Th
id ((neck
k radiation)
di ti )
ƒ Ovaries (abdomen/pelvis)
ƒ Testes (pelvis or testes))
8/6/2011
Case 1: 10 yr old female with weight loss
Labs: Hepatitis C Ab: non reactive; Total Cholesterol
257 mg/dL; LDL 194 mg/dl; free T4/ TSH wnl;
Testosterone 143 ng/dl ( low); FSH/LH within normal
limits
ƒ ECHO:
C O Mild concentric hypertrophy
ƒ Not screened: GH deficiency
Endocrine problems after cancer
• Most common late effect after cancer
• Affects 20-50% of survivors followed into
adulthood
• Most common in survivors of:
• Stem cell/bone marrow transplant
• Brain tumors
• Hodgkin’s disease
• Head/Neck irradiation
Sharon Castellino, MD
Thyroid Dysfunction
8/6/2011
Thyroid Dysfunction
• Clinically significant dysfunction with
elevated TSH can be seen after thyroid
exposure of >10Gy
• Peak incidence of hypothyroidism: 2-4 years
following irradiation
• Risk of benign and malignant thyroid
neoplasms following therapeutic radiation to
head and neck
• Serial thyroid function tests and annual
thyroid palpation in all survivors who
received radiation in head/neck/ chest field
Endocrine Disorders
• Hyperthyroidism
• Usually with higher doses of radiation >35 Gy
• Survivors 8 times more at risk
• Thyroid nodules
• Wide variation in incidence depending on screening
method ((US vs. p
palpation)
p
)
• Survivors 27 times more at risk
• Higher doses of radiation >25 Gy and females highest
risk
ƒ 20% of females will have thyroid nodule at 20 yrs
• 7.5% of nodules were malignant, 18.3 times general
population
ƒ Thyroid cancer was also reported in pts without nodules
Endocrine and Growth Disorders
• Growth Disorders
• Multi-factorial (eg, hormone deficiency, growth plate radiation,
precocious puberty, nutritional)
• 13% of brain tumor survivors 2 or more standard
deviations below normal
• Most
os a
affected
ec ed c
cranial
a a o
or ccraniospinal
a osp a RT esp
esp. less
ess than
a 10
0
years old
• Other studies showed spinal RT to be associated with shorter
stature
• Survivors of leukemia - similar results
• Dose dependent >20 Gy 8 times risk of shorter stature while 4
times for <20 Gy
• Obesity Risk increases w short stature
Sharon Castellino, MD
Growth Hormone deficiency
• Diminished spontaneous ( physiological) GH
secretion in presence of preserved peak
responses to provocative testing
• GH deficiency: first manifestation of
neuroendocrine injury
j y following
g cranial irradiation
• Severity and time to onset is dose dependent
• Incidence of GH deficiency increases with timeelapsed
• Dx and treatment by endocrinologist
• Current data do not suggest an increased risk of
tumor recurrence with GH replacement initiated 2
yrs after end of therapy
Case 3: 14 yo male- asymptomatic
8/6/2011
Fertility
• Risks for Infertility:
• Higher dose of alkylating agents
• Radiation: head; pelvis
• ? Peripubertal age at treatment
• PMD role due to uncertainty
• Follow Tanner stage and monitor for normal
pubertal milestones
• Sperm /oocyte production can start months
or years after treatment
ƒ Advocate good sexual health in all patients regardless of
treatment risks to fertility ( protection; Gardasil vaccine)
Case 3: 14 yo male- asymptomatic
ƒ Treated for Neuroblastoma 10 years previously
ƒ Treated for Neuroblastoma 10 years previously
ƒ HPI: Patient comes to clinic for regularly scheduled
screening visit. Mother’s main concern is of shuffling
gait due to out toeing.
ƒ Echocardiogram: Compared to prior echo 3 years
previously
ƒ ROS: A lot of loose stools daily; no incontinence;
wears hearing
g aids
ƒ PMH:
ƒ Current Meds:
Sharon Castellino, MD
8/6/2011
Case 3: Screening Echocardiogram
Case 3:
Annual Screening
ƒ Physical: Well appearing teen, who appears smaller
than stated age ( Wt and Ht: 5%ile). OP: enamel
dysplasia; agenesis of posterior roots; Neck: no
thyroid asymmetry; CV: Nl S1, S2; no murmur; Back:
R thoracic rib hump on bend test
ƒ Lab: CBC, thyroid function, UA, Metabolic panel wnl
Hill, Castellino, Williams, Ped Cardiology 2009
Case 3: Work up
CCSS Cumulative Incidence of
Second cancer in Hodgkin’s Cohort
An NCI-funded
Resource
Question: The most likely cause of the intra-cardiac
mass is
B Endocarditis
B.
E d
diti in
i an immunosuppressed
i
d child
hild
C. Second Malignant Neoplasm
Probability of S
SMN
A. Recurrent neuroblastoma
25.3%
(95% CI: 21.2, 29.4)
0.4
Females
0.3
10.9%
(95% CI:8.1, 13.8)
0.2
Females, non-breast
Males
0.1
10.6%
(95% CI: 7.3,13.8)
0.0
5
10
15
20
25
Years Since Diagnosis
30
35
Castellino, Blood 2011
Sharon Castellino, MD
CCSS
An NCI-funded
Resource
8/6/2011
Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CA 55727)
Mortality Patterns in 5 yr survivors
Case 1
18 year old female treated at 12 years of age:
Hodgkin lymphoma
Treatment: modified mantle radiation; anthracycline
chemotherapy
You are ready to transition her to adult care and she is
reluctant
l t t to
t return
t
to
t her
h oncologist,
l i t since
i
she
h is
i 6
years in remission
Mertens, J Natl Cancer Inst 2008
Case 3
Objectives
22 year old female treated at 10 years of age:
Synovial Sarcoma
Treatment:
• To describe the prevalence of late
sequelae in childhood cancer
survivors
• To describe the survivor
population at risk for chronic health
care needs
Sharon Castellino, MD
CCSS
An NCI-funded
Resource
8/6/2011
Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CA 55727)
Study Population
• Retrospective Cohort
• < 21 yrs. at Diagnosis
• Diagnosis
1970-1986
g
• 5-Year Survival
• Leukemia, Lymphomas:
20,720 Eligible
Lost (n=3017)
17 703 Contacted
17,703
Refusal (n=3189)
14,372 Participants
HL, NHL, CNS, Bone,
Wilms, NBL, Soft-tissue
sarcoma
Oeffinger, 2006
Early
treatment
era
(1962-70)
Recent
treatment
era
(1971-83)
Diller, J Clin Oncol 2009
Hudson, JCO 1997
Sharon Castellino, MD
CCSS
An NCI-funded
Resource
8/6/2011
Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CA 55727)
Mortality Risks
Assessing Risk for Late Effects
Disease factors
• Mortality highest in
• Patients diagnosed at 0-4 yrs age (SMR 9.1)
• Those with initial diagnosis: Leukemia (SMR
10 0-14 7) CNS tumor (SMR 12
10.0-14.7),
12.9-17.7),
9-17 7) Ewing
Sarcoma (SMR 13.3)
Treatment factors
Host factors
• Compared to: Hodgkin Lymphoma (SMR 7.8);
Kidney tumor (SMR 4.6)
Treatment factors
Chemotherapy
dose
mechanism of action
metabolism of drug
Radiation
total vs fractional
dose
dose rate
treatment time
treatment volume
machine energy
Surgery
Abdominal
Intracranial
Amputation
Chemotherapy associated
morbidity
• Alkylators/ VP16: secondary leukemia;
MDS; gonadal toxicity
• Platinum: ototoxicity; renal dysfunction
(impaired GFR and tubular function)
• Vinca alkaloids: peripheral neuropathy; ?
CV
• Methotrexate: leukoencephalopathy;
hepatic dysfunction
• Anthracyclines: CV dysfunction
• Ifosfamide: Fanconi syndrome
• Steroids: osteoporosis
Sharon Castellino, MD
8/6/2011
Psychosocial Late Effects
• Academic and occupational achievement
Case 5
ƒ 18 year old female treated at 12 years of age:
ƒ
• Family and interpersonal relationships
Hodgkin lymphoma
ƒ Treatment: modified mantle radiation; anthracycline
chemotherapy
• Adaptation to chronic illness or disability
• Insurance discrimination and access to
healthcare
Case 5:
Question: What are the long term risks/if any ?
A. Recurrent Hodgkin Lymphoma
B. Thyroid disease
C. Breast cancer
D Melanoma
D.
M l
E. Stroke
F. Coronary Artery disease/other CV risks
G. None of the above
H. (A, B, C, E, F)
Mantle Field
Sharon Castellino, MD
8/6/2011
Dental Abnormalities
• Enamel dysplasia
• Incomplete calcification
• Disorders of tooth development
• Foreshortening of roots
• Premature
P
t
close
l
off apices
i
• Tooth agenesis, microdontia
• Arrested tooth development
Anthracycline
Cardio Vascular (CV) toxicity
• Myocyte death
ƒ myofibrillar loss and vacuolar degeneration
ƒ subsequent hypertrophy of surviving myocytes -->
reduced wall thickness
ƒ interstitial
i t
titi l fib
fibrosis
i
• Severity correlates with
ƒ Cum anthracycline dose
ƒ Age at exposure
ƒ Chest radiation fields
Sharon Castellino, MD
Gonadal Dysfunction -female
• Oocytes are very radiation sensitive
• Alkylating agents cause destruction of
resting oocytes and absent primordial
follicles
• prepubertal gonad is more resistant to damage
• Follow-up: Tanner stage progression;
evidence of primary or secondary
amenorrhea
• Risk for perinatal mortality and low
birthweight infant in women treated with
abdominal RT
Neurocognitive Sequelae
• Risks:
• Age at cranial radiation
• Radiation dose
• Female sex
•
•
•
•
MTX - intra-thecal and high systemic dose
Cognitive deficits
Leukoencephalopathy
Seizures and other overt CNS symptoms
8/6/2011
Gonadal dysfunction - male
• Effect of radiation and alkylator therapy on
spermatogenesis is a frequent cause of
infertility
• oligospermia is dose related
• recovery of spermatogenesis can occur later
• Testosterone production is less often
affected
• Workup : semen sample, bone age,
FSH/LH, testosterone
Sharon Castellino, MD
8/6/2011
Objectives
• To describe the prevalence of late
sequelae in childhood cancer
survivors
• To describe the survivor
population at risk for chronic health
care needs
• To review recommendations for
health surveillance following
childhood cancer therapy
Comprehensive follow-up of cancer survivors
Bhatia, S. Hematology 2005;2005:507-515
Copyright ©2005 American Society of Hematology. Copyright restrictions may apply.
COG Long-Term Follow-Up Guidelines
for Childhood Cancer Survivors
• Goal: Increase quality of life and decrease
health care costs
• Promote healthy life-styles
• Provide on-going monitoring of health status
• Identify late effects at an early stage
• Timely Intervention against late effects
Sharon Castellino, MD
Screening and management
Based on treatment exposure
• Summary of cancer treatment
• Diagnosis, age
• Chemotherapy agents used with doses and
cumulative doses
• Radiation doses and fields
• Transplant - HSCT(ie BMT)
ƒ Did patient have GVHD
• Surgery history
• Other treatment/exposure: transfusion
8/6/2011
Screening and Management
All Survivors
• Annual screening:
• Educational and vocational progress
• Mental health: Depression/ Anxiety/PTSD/Social
withdraw
• Healthcare insurance and access
• If patient received chemotherapy:
ƒ Oral and dental exam every 6 months
• Full review of symptoms for subtle issues
• Based on exposures (chemotherapy,
radiation, surgery)
Case: HL survivor
ƒ Annual exam: listen for carotid bruits; teach self
breast exam; skin- attention to RT field; thyroid;
mental health screening; sexual health
ƒ CBC ; Free T4, TSH; Lipids
ƒ Breast MRI and mammography - age 25 or 8 years
after RT
ƒ Echo – and EKG : per guidelines; based on
anthracycline and chest RT ; pregnancy
counseling
- No isometric exercise
-CV health
Childhood cancer survivorship--future directions
Bhatia, S. Hematology 2005;2005:507-515
Copyright ©2005 American Society of Hematology. Copyright restrictions may apply.
Sharon Castellino, MD
8/6/2011
Cure
• Derived from cura = care
• Definitions:
• successful medical treatment; recovery or relief f
from a disease
di
“The pediatric cancer survivor is a vivid and
important illustration of the power of
medicine to conquer cancer”
Patenaude and Kupst (J Pediatric Psychology)
Psychology), 2005
• state where the expectation of life of a group of
patients free of disease is similar to that of the
general population of the same sex and age
• to restore to health, soundness, or normality
Conclusions- PCP
• The general pediatrician’s role in
monitoring growth and other toxicities is
increasingly important
• 75% will develop a chronic disease by 40
years age, and 40% a serious health
problem
• Many effects do not become apparent for
many years following treatment
ƒ Facilitating transition to young adult health
References
• Diller et. al. Chronic Disease in the
Childhood Cancer Survivor Study Cohort:
A Review of Published Findings. 2009. J
Clin Oncol 27: 2339-2355
• http://www.survivorshipguidelines.org
Sharon Castellino, MD
Neuroendocrine Dysfunction
Growth Impairment
• GH deficiency
• common following > 18-20 Gy to
hypothalamic/pituitary region
8/6/2011
Late effects
• Frequency and pathogenesis are difficult
to assess:
• clinically apparent > 2 yrs following radiotherapy
• patient must be a long term survivor to
manifest effect
• 60-80% of irradiated brain tumor patients will have
impaired serum GH response to provocative
stimulation
• numbers of affected and unaffected patients
must be known in order to assign a probability
risk
• dramatic effects are noted, but
subtle/subclinical damage goes unrecognized
27th Annual SW VA Pediatrics Conference
8/6‐7/2011
DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
Rob Clemons, MD
does not anticipate discussing the unapproved /investigative
use of a commercial product/device during this
lecture. He reports that he does not have a
financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with
one or more organizations that could be perceived
h
ld b
d
as a real or apparent conflict of interest in the
context of this presentation. Updates in Dermatology: Let's Get Sun Safe • Identify sunscreen ingredients to make better recommendations for your patients • Assess new FDA guidelines for sunscreen manufacturers Rob Clemons, MD
8/6/2011
Legal Stuff
Updates in Dermatology:
Lets Get Sun Safe
| I have no financial interest in any products discussed in
this presentation but I do work cheap if your interested.
Robert J. Clemons, MD, FAAD
TriCities Skin and Cancer
True or False
| 1. You can not acutely sunburn through the car
windshield
| 2.
2 Sunscreens and blocks cause skin cancer
| 3. You can only maintain Vitamin D levels with sun
exposure
| 4. Indoor tanning can increase Vitamin D synthesis
Ultraviolet Light
Rob Clemons, MD
Ultraviolet Spectrum
8/6/2011
The Basics of Ultraviolet Light
| Ultraviolet spectrum
| UVC (200-290nm)- predominately absorbed by water and
ozone in atmosphere. Highly carcinogenic.
| UVB (291-320nm)- Burning wavelength. Blocked by
i d hi ld
St
l associated
i t d with
ith non-melanoma
l
ki
windshields.
Strongly
skin
cancers in animal models.
| UVA II (321-340nm)- Delayed tanning wavelength of light.
Moderately associated with non-melanoma skin cancers in
animal models.
| UVA I (341-400nm)- Long wavelength deeper penetrating
wavelength of light but less associated with non-melanoma
skin cancers. Associated with several solar dermatosis
Effects of Solar Radiation
| Ultraviolet radiation in the UVC, UVB, and short
wavelength UVA spectrum are associated with
y
dimer formation of DNA
Pyrimidine
| P53 mutations
| Immunosuppressive effects by
| Reducing Langerhans cell populations in the epidermis
| Decreasing peripheral T cell populations in the circulation
Rob Clemons, MD
8/6/2011
Effects of UV Radiation
| Acute effects:
Sunburn
Sunburn
Freckles
Photodermatosis
| Chronic effects: Rhytids
Lentigos
Actinic Keratosis
Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer
Melanoma
Poikiloderma of Civatte
Get The Facts
| It is estimated that a person receives approximately
80% of their accumulative solar radiation before they
reach 18 years of age.
| Skin Cancer Foundation has a different view of lifetime
UV exposure based on a 78 year life span
| Ages 1-18
22.73%
| Ages 19-40
46.53%
| Ages 41-59
73.70%
| Ages 60-78
100.0%
Skincancer.org
Rob Clemons, MD
8/6/2011
Statistics From The American
Academy of Dermatology
Actinic Keratosis
| More than 3.5 million skin cancers in more than 2 million
people are diagnosed each year
| 1 out of 5 Americans will be diagnosed with skin cancer
in their lifetime
| Melanoma incidents have increased for the past 30 years
| 3% per year increase in young white females 15-39 y/o
| 4% per year in white adults > 65 y/o since 1985
| In 2004, the total cost of treating non-melanoma skin
cancer was $1.5 billion
o www.aad.org
Basal Cell Carcinoma
Melanoma
Rob Clemons, MD
8/6/2011
Be Sun Smart
| Wear Broad-spectrum UVA/UVB water resistant sunscreen
| Seek Shade
| Know the high UV hours of the day 10-4
| When your shadow is shorter than you are tall
e t a cautious
ca tio s near
nea water,
ate snow,
sno
| Be extra
and sand
| Sun Protective Clothing
Be Sun Smart
| Tight cotton weave clothing
| Universal Protection Factor clothing (UPF)
| Wide brimmed hat
| Avoid Tanning Beds- Think about self tanner
| Supplement Diet with Vitamin D
Why Do Sunscreens Fail???
| Bad product
| Did not apply frequently
enough
Sunscreens and Sunblock
| Did not apply enough at
each application
Rob Clemons, MD
8/6/2011
Sunscreens and Sunblock
Where Did All the White Noses
Go?
| Sunblock (physical agents)
| Scatter and physically block UV light
| 4 main types
| Zinc oxide
| Titanium dioxide
| Talc
| Red Veterinary petroleum
| Sunscreens (chemical agents)
| Non-opaque and absorb UV radiation of various
wavelengths
Sunblock
Chemical Sunscreens
|
UVB Sunscreens
| PABA and PABA Esters (260-315nm)
| PABA (Para Aminobenzoic Acid)
| Padimate A
| Standard Physical Blocks
| Padimate O
| Micronized Zinc Oxide (290-380nm)
| Micronized Titanium Dioxide (290-320nm)
| Glycerol aminobenzoate
| Cinnamates (270-320nm)
| Octyl methoxycinnamate (280-310nm)
| Cinoxate (270-328nm)
o www.skincancer.org
| Salicylates (290-320nm)
| Homosalicylate
| Octyl salicylate
| Triethanolamine salicylate
| Octocrylene (280-320nm)
o www.skincancer.org
Rob Clemons, MD
8/6/2011
Chemical Sunscreens
UVA Sunscreens: The rest of the
story
| UVA Sunscreens
| Etrocrylene (296-380nm)
| Benzophenones
| UV light
to breakdown many
g appears
pp
y chemical
sunscreens that protect against UVA
| Oxybenzone
y
((270-350nm))
| Dioxybenzone (206-380nm)
| Sulisobenzone (250-380nm)
| Avobenzone/ Parsol 1789 (310-400nm)
| Helioplex (Neutrogena)
| Ecamsule/Mexoryl SX (La Roche-Posay)
| Methylanthranilate (200-380nm)
o www.skincancer.org
Sun Protection Factor
| Sun Protection Factor denotes how long it will take for
UVB rays to redden the skin compared to without the
product
| Historically it was felt that sunburn=radiation damage and if
you didn’t burn then you didn’t damage
| Only relates to UVB and not UVA
Sun Protection Factor
What does it really mean?
| An SPF 15 product protects the person from 93% of the
UVB rays
| An SPF 30 product protects the person from 97% of the
UVB rays
| An SPF 50 product protects the person from 98% of the
UVB rays
Rob Clemons, MD
Do Sunscreens Cause Skin
Cancer???
8/6/2011
FDA New Requirements
|
Proposed to eliminate confusion in the public and mislabeling
| What defines “Broad Spectrum”
| Must be an SPF>15
| Must demonstrate UVA protection proportional to its UVB protection according to
its SPF
| Defines what products can claim they reduce risks of skin cancer and photo
aging
| There may be more to the question
| Eliminate
Eli i
the
h terms sunblock,
bl k waterproof,
f and
d sweat prooff
| Strong UVB protection allows people to stay outside longer
without burning but continue to get UVA damage
| Eliminate the term “instant protection”
| New requirements for water resistance claims
| UVA protection low and does not last
| Must label protective for either 40 or 80 minutes while swimming or sweating
| “waterproof” claims may fall short
| Products that do not meet these standards must include directions to use a water
resistant sunscreen if swimming or sweating
|
SPF labeling can only go to SPF 50+ since there is no evidence that
higher SPF values denote better protection
|
Rules will take effect by Summer of 2012
o www.fda.org
Seek the Shade!!!
Shade Suggestions
| Umbrella or other shade structure
| If your shadow is shorter then you are tall
| Be cautious from 10am to 4pm
| Remember reflective sun off water, snow, and sand
Rob Clemons, MD
8/6/2011
Shade Structure Grants
| Sponsored by the American Academy of Dermatology
| $8,000 grants awarded each year toward the purchase of
permanent shade structures designed to provide UV
protection to outdoor areas
| AAD provides a permanent sign that stresses the
importance of sun safety
| Applicants must
| Be a nonprofit organization or a public school that serves
children under the age of 18 years.
| Demonstrate an ongoing commitment to sun safety by
instituting a sun safety and skin cancer awareness program at
least one year prior to the application
Sun Protective Clothing
| Be sponsored by an AAD member
o www.aad.org
Sun Protective Clothing
| The SPF/UPF of clothing differs with many factors including
tightness of the weave, color, dry or wet, wear and
tear/stretching
| Standard cotton T shirt provides an SPF of 7
| Same T shirt when wet becomes an SPF of 3
| Dark blue denim shirt is an SPF or 1
1,700
700
| Universal Protection Factor (UPF)
| Colorless dyes and sunblock applied during manufacturing that
provide sun protection analogous to SPF rating for UVB
| Ratings start at UPF 15 and go up to 50+. Most advertise at
50+
| Tinosorb- a laundry additive that adds UPF to standard
clothing and lasts for up to 20 washes
Don’t Forget the Wide Brimmed
Hat
Rob Clemons, MD
8/6/2011
Facts About Indoor Tanning
Avoid Indoor Tanning
|
More than 1 million people use tanning beds every day in the United
States
|
70% of patrons are Caucasian females between 16 and 29 years of age
|
28 million people in the United States tan annually and 2.3 million are
teenagers
|
World Health Organization finally has labeled indoor tanning devices as a
carcinogen in the same category as cigarettes
|
The American Academy of Pediatrics joined the AAD, the Skin Cancer
Foundation, and the WHO in demanding a ban on indoor tanning for
young people.
|
Studies have shown a 75% increased risk of melanoma in people who
use indoor tanning
|
Indoor tanning devices use predominately UVA wavelengths with some
UVB
|
UVA wavelengths do not efficiently stimulate Vitamin D synthesis
o www.aad.org
Self Tanners: Tan in a Can
Facts About Indoor Tanning
| Dihydroxyacetone (DHA)
| Derived from sugar beets and sugar cane
| Color change based on the percentage of product
| 1-15%
| OTC usually 3-5%
| Takes effect in 2-4
2 4 hours and continues to darken for up to 24
hours
| Gives minimal SPF protection by itself (SPF 2-3)
| Some products adding sunscreens to the tanner
| Limited effect and need to reapply sunscreen 2 hours after tanner
| Last for 2-4 weeks as the stratum corneum sheds
| Less effect if frequently in water
| Last longer if exfoliate heavily before application
| Only one report of contact dermatitis in hairless Mexican dogs.
| Federal government instituted a 10% tax to indoor
tanning
| Effective lobbying deflected the proposed “botax” in favor of
an indoor tanning tax
| Two bills entered into the House and Senate are aimed at
repealing the tax
Rob Clemons, MD
8/6/2011
Vitamin D: The Great Debate
| Vitamin D can be obtain from 3 sources
| UVB radiation
| 5 minutes of noon day sun in the summer maximizes the extent
of Vitamin D synthesis
| UVB is a carcinogen
Supplement Diet with
Vitamin D
Di t
| Diet
| Oily Fish, Cod Liver
| Fortified orange juice and dairy products and yogurts
| cereals
| Oral supplementation
| 400 IU of Vitamin D for infants up to 12 months
| 600 IU of Vitamin D for children and adults
| 800 IU of Vitamin D for patients over 65 years of age
Sun Protection for Newborns
Sunburns: How To Treat
| Sun Avoidance
| Sunscreens have not
been tested safe under
g
six months of age
| Recognize quickly and
get out of sun
| UPF clothing
| Moisturize
| Shade structures
| Hydration
| If necessary, find a pure
physical block with zinc
oxide and titanium
dioxide
| NSAIDS early
Rob Clemons, MD
8/6/2011
Photodermatosis
Case #1
Case #1
| 12 year old boy from West
Virginia
| Just returned from a spring
break trip to Myrtle Beach
| 1.
Photoallergic contact dermatitis
| Red itchy papules coalescing
into plaques on the ears
2
| 2.
Subacute Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus
| Had the same problem two
years ago during spring break
but last year they went in
August and he was fine
| 3.
Polymorphic Light Eruption
| 4.
Porphyria
| Labs were normal to include
an antinuclear antibody, CBC,
and urine studies
Polymorphic Light Eruption
Polymorphic Light Eruption
|
Most common photosensitivity disorder in children
|
Nonscarring papules and vesicles
|
Pruritic
|
Sun exposed sites usually within hours to days of new exposure to sunlight in
spring and summer
|
Lasts for 1-6 days
|
Di i i h iin mid
Diminishes
id tto llate
t summer
| Topical corticosteroids
|
In adults
| Hydroxychloroquine
|
|
Forearms
|
V of the neck
In children
|
Face
|
Ears
|
Likely a variant of juvenile spring eruption occurring on the ears of boys
|
Appears to be caused by broad band exposure to light to include UVA 1-2,
UVB, and visible wavelengths over sites in the body not acclimated to light
| Treatment
| Antihistamines
| Broad spectrum sunblock with physical barrier protection
| Prophylaxis using gradually increasing doses of UVA to
“harden” the skin early in the spring
27th Annual SW VA Pediatrics Conference
8/6‐7/2011
DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
James Thompson, MD
does not anticipate discussing the unapproved /investigative
use of a commercial product/device during this
lecture. He reports that he DOES NOT have a
financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with
one or more organizations that could be perceived
h
ld b
d
as a real or apparent conflict of interest in the
context of this presentation. Update on Craniosynostosis and Deformational Plagiocephaly
• Differentiate plagiocephaly vs craniosynostosis
• Describe treatment options James Thompson, MD
Update on Plagiocephaly
and Craniosynostosis
8/7/2011
Definitions
Š
Š
Craniosynostosis (craniostenosis) – refers to
the fusion of the cranial sutures
Plagiocephaly – Greek “slanting head” is a
descriptive term regarding head shape.
ƒ
James T. Thompson, M.D. F.A.C.S.
Assistant Professor
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Wake Forest University School of Medicine
Winston-Salem, NC
ƒ
Š
Brachycephaly – a descriptive term referring to
a shortened head shape
ƒ
cranial sutures leads to
the shape abnormality
à Overall incidence ~ 1:2500
à Causes
 Fetal constraint
 Abnormal brain
development
 genetic syndromes
 Maternal smoking
 Amine containing drugs
Synostotic or Deformational
Synostotic Scaphocephaly
Craniosynostosis
à Fusion of one or more
Synostotic – related to fused cranial sutures.
sutures
Deformational – caused by external forces with no
suture fusion.
Š
Sagittal synostosis
ƒ
Most common type ~ 1:1800 births
à about 60% of all nonsyndromic cases
Almost all are nonsyndromic
ƒ 2% hereditary
ƒ Male : Female = 4 : 1
ƒ Classic features:
ƒ
à Frontal bossing
à Elongated skull
à Pointed occiput
James Thompson, MD
8/7/2011
Synostotic Plagiocephaly
Synostotic Trigoncephaly
Š
Metopic synostosis
Š
Incidence ~ 1:5000 births
Male : Female = 3:1
ƒ ~ 90% nonsyndromic
ƒ ~ 6% hereditary
ƒ Classic features
ƒ
Unicoronal
synostosis
Incidence ~ 1:5000
Usually nonsyndromic
ƒ Classic features:
à Ipsilateral frontal
flattening
à Ipsilateral anterior
ear displacement
à Contralateral
frontal bossing
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
à Forehead ridging
à Triangular shaped forehead
à Hypotelorism
Synostotic Plagiocephaly
Synostotic Brachiocephaly
Š
Bicoronal synostosis
Incidence ~ 1:20,000
births
ƒ Almost always
syndromic
y
Š
à Eg. Crouzons, Aperts,
Pfeiffers
ƒ
Classic features:
à Shortened head
à Tall forehead
à Recessed supraorbital
rim
Lambdoid synostosis
ƒ
ƒ
Š
Incidence unkown, less
than 2% of
craniosynostosis
Classic features
Trapezoid shape
Ipsilateral occipital
flattening
ƒ Ipsilateral mastoid
bossing
ƒ Ipsilateral posterior ear
displacement
ƒ Contralateral occipital
bossing
ƒ
ƒ
James Thompson, MD
8/7/2011
Synostotic Plagiocephaly
Š
Frontosphenoidal
synostosis
Synostotic Plagiocephaly
Š
Treatment
ƒ
Unknown incidence
ƒ Classic features:
à Ipsilateral frontal
flattening
à Ipsilateral anterior ear
displacement
à Contralateral frontal
bossing
ƒ
Rationale for treatment:
à Neurodevelopmental outcomes with craniosynostosis
 Gault DT, Renier D, Marchac D, et al Intracranial pressure and
intracranial volume in children with craniosynostosis. Plast
Reconstr Surg 1992: 90:377-381.
KA, Figueroa A,
A Jocher CA,
CA et al.
al Longitudinal
 Kapp-Simon KA
assessment of mental development in infants with nonsyndromic
craniosynostosis with and without cranial release and
reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 92:831-839.
‚ Low grade increased ICP
‚ Cognitive and behavioral dysfunction
‚ Ophthalmologic pathology
‚ Impaired psychosocial function
à Correction of deformity to avoid stigmatization
Synostotic Plagiocephaly
Š
Treatment
Craniosynostosis is usually treated with surgery
ƒ Timing variable but usually between 3-9 months
ƒ Surgery consists of removing the fused suture and
expanding the skull
ƒ
Synostotic Plagiocephaly
Š
Treatment
ƒ
à Bicoronal incision
à Surgically corrected deformity
à Blood loss
à ICU
à Restore cranial volume
à Correct deformity
Traditional surgery
ƒ
Less invasive surgery
à Springs
à Endoscopic + Helmets
James Thompson, MD
ƒ
Deformational plagiocephaly
à Associated factors
 Intrauterine restriction / Multiple gestation
 Torticollis
 Premature birth / ICU stay
 Supine positioning
à Incidence unknown but probably 15-30% of all infants
8/7/2011
Š
Clinical exam
Ipsilateral occipital flattening
Contralateral occipital bossing
ƒ Ipsilateral forehead bossing
ƒ Ipsilateral
p
anterior ear
displacement
ƒ “Parallelogram shape”
ƒ
ƒ
à Male > Female (3:2)
à R>L
Š
Other findings
Anterior displacement of the skull
base
ƒ Anterior displacement of the TMJ
ƒ Crossbite
ƒ
James Thompson, MD
Š
8/7/2011
Cephalic index = head
width/length
Normal = 0.75
>0.80
brachycephaly
>0 80 = b
h
h l
ƒ <0.70 = dolichocephaly
(scaphocephaly)
ƒ
ƒ
Š
Is this purely a cosmetic
deformity?
Neurodevelopment
ƒ Ear problems (infections)
ƒ TMJ problems
ƒ Eye problems
Classification
I (6a)
(6 )
II (6b)
III (6c)
Š
Miller et al. Peds 105(2): 2000.
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Telephone survey of 63 families who had been
previously seen for plagiocephaly
At least 9 years old
Children with plagiocephaly more likely to have
used speech, occupational, or physical therapy
Siblings used as controls
Not statistically significant for females.
James Thompson, MD
8/7/2011
Š
Š
Motor skills delayed
ƒ
Š
ƒ
Fowler et al. J Child Neurol. 23:742, 2008
à Case/Control format with 49 infants
Kordestani et al. PRS.
117(1):207-218, 2006.
à Bayley Scales of Infant
Development-II
à 110 patients (control =
normative data)
à Found more patients fell into
the delayed category than
expected.
à 23 patient who had no
confounding factors tested
normal.
Motor skills delayed
à Hammersmith Infant Neurologic Assessment
Low birthweight
à Motor tone abnormally high and low in infants with plagiocephaly
à Weakness: controls not matched well, only studied infants seeking treatment
ICU admission
Male gender
Family history
Other Congenital
defects
Motor skills delayed
ƒ
Speltz et al. Pediatrics. 125:e537-e542, 2010
à Case/control format 235 infants
à Bayley Scales of Infant Development III (BSID-III)
à Infants with plagiocephaly scored lower
à Controls well matched (socioeconomic, ethnicity) and were screened for plagio
à Weaknesses: Only studied infants seeking treatment, case group scored higher
than expected.
expected
Š
Collett et al. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011;165(7):653-658.
à Bayley Scales of Infant Development III (BSID-III)
à Case/control format 225 with DP 230 without
à Looked at age 18 months
à Scores still lower than control group across the board
à Helmet therapy had no effect on scores
à But both groups scored in the normal range
James Thompson, MD
Š
Motor skills delayed
ƒ
ƒ
8/7/2011
Š
Association
Causation
à Does motor delay cause
ƒ
Š
iincreased
d plagio
l i or vice
i
versa?
à Theory of gyri flattening
Š
Anecdotal observation
ƒ
Š
y
Increased ear infections but not statistically
significant.
ƒ Abnormal tympanograms suggesting abnormal
eustachian tube function.
ƒ
ƒ
Š
About 26% had a posterior crossbite
No attempt to address the significance of this or
discuss symptoms
Denis et al. Child Nerv Syst 12: 1996
ƒ
ƒ
Š
No comment on functional problems or symptoms
One study showing some dental malocclusion
in 5 year olds Lee et al CPCJ 45(3), 2008
ƒ
Increased ear infections
Purzycki et al. J Craniofac Surg. 20(5):1407-11: 2009
One study showing TMJ displacement in
infants St. John et al. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60:873-877, 2002
Strabismus and Astigmatism associated with plagiocephaly
Due to formation of binary vision before 6 months
Miller et al. Peds 105(2): 2000
ƒ
ƒ
Survey of 68 families
No increased incidence of visual disturbances
James Thompson, MD
Š
Positioning
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Š
Š
Physical therapy
Hutchison Pediatrics 2004;114;970-980
ƒ
Avoid car seats (except in the car)
Avoid reclining “bouncy” seats
Tummy time
Bump up one side
Turn the crib around
“Entertainment” on one side of the crib
Rotate head from side to side each night
Torticollis
ƒ
8/7/2011
ƒ
Š
Helmets
ƒ
à Usually resolves
ƒ
200 infants followed from birth to 24 months old
Showed improvement with positioning alone
Active
à Dynamic helmets that have to be custom made and
adjusted weekly to mold the head into shape
Surgery
à $$$$$
à Rarely needed
ƒ
Passive
à Passive helmets rely on rapid infant head growth as the
dynamic factor
à Can be prefabricated and custom fit
à $
James Thompson, MD
Š
Active
ƒ
D.O.C.
8/7/2011
Š
Passive
ƒ
Danmar
à Cranial technologies
à Level 4
Š
Research presented at the ASPS 2006
ƒ
154 patients completed the study protocol
à 91% achieve normal cranial shape and symmetry
à Successful for plagiocephaly and brachycephaly
Success correlated significantly with severity
ƒ Success correlated significantly with compliance
ƒ Success correlated with age at treatment
ƒ
- Patients are
followed with a
laser scanner
that produces 3D
images of the
head
James Thompson, MD
Before
8/7/2011
After
Before
After
Before
After
Before
After
James Thompson, MD
Š
Outcomes
ƒ
ƒ
Lee et al CPCJ 45(3), 2008
à 5 year follow up
à 28 Infants treated with the D.O.C. helmet improvement after
treatment
à Some regression in cranial base asymmetry and cranial vault
asymmetry
à Orbito-tragal asymmetry continued to improve
Xia et al. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. Aug;162(8):719-27. 2008
8/7/2011
Š
Š
Š
Š
à Meta analysis
Must differentiate between synostotic and non
synostotic plagiocephaly
Milder cases of plagiocephaly will resolve with
p
positioning
g
More severe cases will have lasting effects
If helmet therapy is desired it is best to refer
before 6 months of age
à No randomized controlled trials
à 5 of 7 cohort studies show helmets better than positioning
Š
Š
Š
Deformational plagiocephaly is associated with
delayed or abnormal motor development in
infants.
No conclusive evidence that deformational
plagiocephaly causes long term neurological
deficits.
Helmet therapy corrects head shape but other
benefits are yet to be proven.
Š
Š
Randomized trials of helmet therapy
Long term analysis of children with
plagiocephaly
ƒ
ƒ
p
Neurodevelopment
Other facial development problems
27th Annual SW VA Pediatrics Conference
8/6‐7/2011
DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
Jeffrey Carlsen, MD
does not anticipate discussing the unapproved or investigative use of a commercial product/device during this lecture. He p
reports that he DOES NOT have a
financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with
one or more organizations that could be perceived
as a real or apparent conflict of interest in the
context of this presentation. Direct Ophthalmoscopy: How to Use One of the Most Powerful Instruments in Your Office • Improve utilization of direct ophthalmoscope • Recognize common eye conditions with direct ophthalmoscope Jeffrey Carlsen, MD
8/7/2011
„
Jeff Carlsen, MD
I have no financial interest in any products that
may be discussed during the course of this
presentation
110 Medtech Parkwayy
Johnson City, TN 37604
Phone# 423-929-2111
Fax# 423-929-0497
Direct Ophthalmoscopy
How to use one of the most powerful
instruments in your office
Jeffrey Carlsen, MD
8/7/2011
Direct ophthalmoscopy
„
„
ophthalmoscope
Introduced in 1850 ago
by Helmoltz
Examination of the
internal structures of the
eye through the pupil to
diagnose eye pathology
and systemic pathology
via ophthalmic
manifestations
Ophthalmoscope controls
„
„
„
On/off brightness
Focus wheel. Clockwise
increases power .. Focal
point nearer observer
p
and vice versa
Light aperature
Direct ophthalmoscope exam
„
„
„
„
„
Prepare the ophthalmoscope
position the patient- fixation target
RED REFLEX
External eye
fundus
Jeffrey Carlsen, MD
Mydriatics “dilation”
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
Light Reflex to assess eye alignment
Mydriacil…tropicamide
Phenylep
phenylephrine
Cyclogyl
DON’T BE AFRAID
TO USE THESE
STRABISMUS
„
8/7/2011
Latent or manifest misalignment of the visual
axis. i.e. “eyes don’t point the same direction
Strabismus is a significant risk factor for
amblyopia
y p (leading
(
g cause of visual loss in
children)
Strabismus has a profound social and
developmental impact on a child
„
„
Self esteem
Social interaction
Red Reflex
Reflection of the ophthalmoscope light off the
choroidal vessels
Jeffrey Carlsen, MD
8/7/2011
Abnormal red reflex
cornea
Abnormal Red Reflex
„
„
„
„
Abnormal red reflex
lens
„
„
Cataract
Types… with systemic
diseases
Corneal opacity, dystrophy…..
Keratoconus
Dystrophy
scar
Direct ophthalmoscope
Fundus Exam
„
„
„
„
Fixation target
Optic nerve is about 15
degrees nasal
Have
ve patient
p e look
oo at your
yo
ear
Turn lens wheel
clockwise as you get
closer and vice versa
Jeffrey Carlsen, MD
8/7/2011
Fundus exam
„
Optic nerve
Orient yourself. Find a vessel and then follow to the
nerve
Optic nerve
Every Hero has his weakness
„
„
„
Monocular instrument. 2 dimensional therefore
cannot assess depth/height
High magnification 15x/ small field of view 15
degress
Must build a collage and piece together the
whole picture
Jeffrey Carlsen, MD
8/7/2011
Subconjunctival Hemorrhage
„
„
„
„
„
Can be subtle or quite
dramatic
Minor trauma, valsalva,
eye rubbingg
Tx.: r/o bad actors,
reassurance
Spontaneous resolution
If recurrent, then
consider blood dyscrasia
Chalazion/ Hordeolum
„
„
„
Nodule near lid margin
secondary to inspissated
secratory gland. Meibomian,
zeiss, of moll
May or may not have an
infectious component.
Treatment includes:
„ Lid hygiene: heat and lid
scrubs.
„ May consider antiobiotic.
„ Surgery to drain if
necessary.
Trauma
„
„
„
„
High index of suspicion
Usually but not always:
pain and decreased
vision
Think of in unilateral
presentation, exposure to
power tools or
compressed air
If suspicious, refer
Chalazion
Tearing
„
Hypersecretion
„
„
„
„
„
„
Dry eye
Allergies
Misdirected lashes
Conjunctivitis
Blink abnormality
Foreign body/trauma
„
Hypoexcretion
„
„
NLD stenosis
NLD obstruction
Jeffrey Carlsen, MD
8/7/2011
Tearing in infants
„
„
„
„
„
Abnormal or overflow tearing is common in infants;
approximately 1/3 of newborns have excessive
tears/mucus.
Occurs when membrane in nose fails to open before
birth, blocking part of tear duct. Valve of hasner or
ll
rosenmueller.
Tears do not drain properly and collect inside tear
drainage system; spill over eyelid, causing tearing.
Strongly predisposes infant to chronic infection,
conjunctivitis
Blocked tear duct often opens spontaneously 6–12
months after birth.
Managing a NLD obstruction
„
„
„
Most NLD obstructions resolve by 9-12 months
of age; therefore, conservative until then.
If still tearing at 9-12 months, refer.
R f earlier
Refer
li if ffrequent iinfections,
f i
as this
hi may
cause fibrosis of the NLD
NLD obstruction
„
Until tear duct opens,
you may need to:
„
„
„
„
Apply pressure (or
massage) over lacrimal sac
area.
Use antibiotic eye drops
or ointment for infection.
Gently clean eyelids with
warm water.
For persistent tearing,
lacrimal surgery may be
necessary.
Bacterial conjunctivitis secondary to
NLD obstruction
„
„
Standard bacteria. May
also be overgrowth of
normal flora
Occurs as normal tear
flow is obstructed.
(stagnant fluid is like a
petri dish)
„
Tx: topical antibiotics
„
„
„
„
„
Polytrim
Sulfacetamide
Gentamycin
Fluoroquinolones
(reserve these for
recalcitrant cases)
Set up for microbial
resistance. Use sound
prescribing practice
Jeffrey Carlsen, MD
8/7/2011
NLD
„
„
„
If less then 2yrs old, then simple probing has a
very high success rate
If older then 2y/o or previous failed probing,
then NLD stent or dilatation
If failed stent or older then 5-10y/o, then may
need dacrocystorhinostomy
bibliography
„
„
„
„
„
„
Weis AH, Brinser JH, Nazar-Stewart V. Acute conjunctivitis in
childhood. J Pediatr. 1993; 122(1): 10-14.
Martin M, Turco JH, Zegans ME, et al. An outbreak of
conjunctivitis due to atypical Streptococcus pneumoniae. N Engl
J Med. 2003; 348(12): 112-1121
Bl k S,
S Hedrick
H d i k J,
J Tyler
T l R,
R ett al.l Increasing
I
i bacterial
b t i l resistance
it
Block
in pediatric conjunctivitis (1997-1998). Antimicrob Agents
Chemother. 2000; 44(6): 1650-1654
Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. American Academy of
Ophthalmology Basic and Clinical Science Course, section 6.
copyright 2000.
Ophthalmology. Yanoff M, Duker JS. 1998. Mosby publishing
Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. Kenneth Wright, Peter
Spiegel. 2002. Springer Publishing
27th Annual SW VA Pediatrics Conference
8/6‐7/2011
DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
Mark Howell, MD
does not anticipate discussing the unapproved or investigative use of a commercial product/device during this lecture. He reports that he DOES NOT have a
financial interest/arrangement or affiliation ith
financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with
one or more organizations that could be perceived
as a real or apparent conflict of interest in the
context of this presentation. Current Philosophy and Accurate Diagnosis of Pediatric Rhinitis, URTI and Paranasal Sinus Infection • Review anatomy and physiology of URT • Review pathophysiology of nasal and paranasal sinus infections • Apply current guidelines for accurate diagnosis of URTI’s Apply concepts of appropriate pharmocologic
• Apply concepts of appropriate pharmocologic
intervention Mark Howell, MD
8/7/2011
Mark A. Howell M.D., F.A.C.S.
Ear Nose and Throat Associates,
Ear,
Associates P
P.C.
C
Johnson City, Tennessee
Currentt Philosophy
C
Phil
h and
d
Accurate Diagnosis of Pediatric
Rhinitis, URTI and Paranasal
Sinus Infection
Goals
• Review anatomy and physiology of
URT
• Review pathophysiology of nasal
and paranasal sinus infections
• Apply current guidelines for accurate
diagnosis of URTI’s
• Apply concepts of appropriate
pharmocologic intervention
WHY?
• Increasing resistance patterns of
respiratory tract pathogens to
antibiotics
• Lack of objective clinically useful dx
modalities for URTI’s
• Increasing burden to accurately dx
URT symptoms to differentiate
allergic,viral and bacterial etiologies
for appropriate therapy
Mark Howell, MD
8/7/2011
Anatomy
Physiology
• External Bone and Cartilage
• Internal Bone and Cartilage
• Turbinates
T bi
Diagnostic Difficulty
•
•
•
•
•
Respiration
Olfaction
H idifi ti
Humidification
Filtration
Heat Exchange
Sinus Anatomy
• Nose difficult examination
• Unable to visualize sinus as the middle
ear
7
•
•
•
•
•
Four paired sinus groups
Frontal
Ethmoid
Maxillary
Sphenoid
Mark Howell, MD
Sinus Anatomy
• Air filled cavities in facial bones
• Lined pseudostratified ciliated
columnar epithelium with goblet cells
• Continuity with nose via ostia for
ventilation and drainage
Purpose Paranasal Sinuses
• Reservoir air, warming and
humidification
• Voice resonance
• Light weight mechanism to add
volume to cranial-facial structures
8/7/2011
Nasal-sinus transition space
• Ostiomeatal complex(OMC)
• Drains anterior ethmoid,frontal and
maxillary sinuses
• Sphenoid and posterior ethmoid drain
posteriorly
Paranasal Sinus Development
• Maxillary and ethmoid sinuses
present at birth
• Sphenoid development at 2y/o and
pneumatized at 5y/o ;completed
12y/o
• Frontal starts 6-8y/o;completed 20y/o
• 12y/o nasal cavity and sinuses reach
adult proportions
Mark Howell, MD
Sinus Health Maintenance
•
•
•
•
•
•
Anatomy(mechanical obstuction)
Ostial patency
Mucociliary clearance
I
Immune
competence
t
Ciliary function
Biphasic mucus blanket
Local Immune Function
• Secretory IgA
• Lysozymes
• Interferon
8/7/2011
Sinus Physiology
• Pseudostratified columnar epithelium
• Goblet cells
• Biphasic mucus layer(deepsol;superficial gel)
sol;superficial-gel)
• Cilia-1000hz cycle
• Sinuses cleared every 10-15 minutes
Goal of Health Maintenance
• Prevent mucosal adherence of
bacteria and viruses
• Facilitate opsonization and
destruction of bacteria by immune
cells
Mark Howell, MD
8/7/2011
Scope of Problem
• Children at least 3-8 URTI/yr
• 5-13% evolve ARS in children
• .5-2% in adults
Nasal Symptoms
•
•
•
•
•
•
Nasal congestion/obstruction
Nasal discharge
Nasal pressure/pain
It hi
Itching
Post nasal discharge
Cough/Pharyngitis/voice changes
Differential Diagnosis and Associations
• Viral URTI(Daycare exposure- 2-3x
increase)
• Rhinitis(allergic ,nonallergic,cigarette
smoke,environmental)
• Bacterial rhinosinusitis
• Adenoid(adenoiditis,hypertrophy)
• Congenital(choanal atresia/stenosis)
• Foreign body
Mark Howell, MD
Differential Diagnosis and Associations
• Anatomic abnormality(nose/sinuses)
• Odontogenic
Anatomic Associations
• Turbinate hypertrophy(allergic/nonallergic
rhinitis)
• Adenoid hypertrophy(reservoir
bacteria;obstructing airflow/mucociliary
flow)
• Nasal foreign body
• Nasal polyposis(Cystic fibrosis/antral
choanal polyp)
• Tumor
8/7/2011
Other Related Factors
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Cystic fibrosis
Ciliary dyskinesia
Immune deficiency(HIV)
Diabetes
Cranial facial abnormalities
Trauma
GERD
Anatomic Associations
• Concha bullosa(10-24% pt. chronic sinusitis)
• Paradoxical curve middle turbinate(4-10%)
• Hypoplastic maxillary sinus(7-17%)
• Haller cell(10%;50% bilateral)
• Agger nasi cell(frontal sinus)
• Cranialfacial anomaly(Down
syndrome,Crouzon’s ,Aperts syndrome,cleft
palate)
• Deviated nasal septum(10-13%)
Mark Howell, MD
8/7/2011
Nose and Paranasal Sinuses are
anatomically
a
a o ca y p
physiologically
ys o og ca y related
e a ed
as single organ system
Rhinitis
Hyperfunction of nose due to various
stimuli, producing rhinorrhea and
nasal obstruction
Rhinitis and Rhinosinusitis
• Sinusitis is usually preceded by rhinitis
and rarely occurs without concurrent
rhinitis
• Rhinosinusitis therefore is current term
• Acute
• Subacute
• Recurrent acute
• Chronic
Mark Howell, MD
Rhinosinusitis
• Acute (up to 4 weeks and total resolution)
• Subacute(4-12 weeks)
• Recurrent Acute(4 or more episodes year
with resolution between attacks)
• Chronic(12 weeks or more of signs and
symptoms)
• Acute exacerbations of chronic
rhinosinusitis
8/7/2011
Viral vs. Bacterial ?
•
•
•
•
Children 3-8 acute respiratory illness/yr
Adults 3-4 AURTI,s/yr
90% will have CT sinus findings
Only 0
0.5%
5%-2%
2% positive bacterial cultures
adults
• 6-13% in children evolve to bacterial
• 1 billion VURTI expected yearly
• 20 million ABRS expected
Characteristics Viral Infections
• Viral Infection
– Spread person-person contact
– Secretions -nose,mouth,eyes
– Inhalation-viral-laden droplets
– Contact-hands,objects(virus remains
hours,daycare)
Viral agents
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
200 viral species
Rhinovirus(50% common colds)
Echo
Coronavirus
Influenza A and B
Parainfluenza
RSV
Adenovirus
Enterovirus
Mark Howell, MD
8/7/2011
Relationship VURTI,s to ABRS
Signs and Sx of VURTI
• Rhino and Corona virus no epith.damage
• Influenza and Adeno virus damage UR
tract
• Incites histamine,bradykinin,cytokines(ITL)
,
y
, y
( )
• Suppress neutrophil, macrophage and
lymphocyte function
• Animal model RSV enhanced H.influenza
infection in URT in cotton rat
• Activation parasympathic and inflammatory
pathways initiate Sx
• Fever,myalgia,pharyngitis
• Nasal congestion,rhinorhea,sneezing,PND
Cough sore throat
• Cough,sore
• Facial pressure and pain,ear fullness
• Hyposmia/anosmia
• Mucopurulent nasal secretions not specific sign
of bacterial infection(neutriphil influx)
Similarity Sx VURI’s and ABRS
create significant difficulty
distinguishing transition of viral to
bacterial infection
Mark Howell, MD
8/7/2011
Xray Dx ABRS?
• Acute URI 87% evidence CT scan
abnormality(Gwaltney 1994)
• Resolution/improvement after 14 days in 79%
of subjects without antibiotic Tx
y or more sinus aspirates
p
• URI Sx >10 days
demonstrate bacterial growth 60% samples
Guide Dx ABRS
CDC Position Paper
•
•
•
•
• Antibiotic Tx moderate severe sinusitis
not improving after 7 days
• Severe sinusitis of any
duration(purulent nasal discharge with
high fever,erythema, swelling,localized
pain)
• Clinical judgement
•
•
•
•
Viral URI not resolved 10 days or
URI worsens after 5-7 days and exhibiting
Nasal congestion,drainage,PND
Facial pain/pressure(esp.unilateral or
focused;ear pressure/fullness)
Fever,fatigue,cough
Maxillary dental pain
80% preceded VURTI
20% preceded allergic URTI
Mark Howell, MD
Pediatric URI Concensus Team
• Prolonged nonspecific upper
respiratory signs and
symptoms(rhinosinusitis and cough
w/o improvement
p
10-14 days)
y )
• Severe URTI worsening signs
/symptoms(fever >39 degrees C;
facial swelling/facial pain)
8/7/2011
Viral to Bacterial
• Persistent symptoms with no
improvement
• Severe symptoms(clinical judgement)
• Worsening symptoms(biphasic
illness)
Diagnostic Modalities
• Unlike OM the sinus cannot readily be
examined as the TM
• Maxillary sinus aspirates accurate/not practical
• Nasal endoscopy allows visualization of middle
meatus
t and
d cultures
lt
with
ith endoscopic
d
i control
t l
may correlate with aspirate but are not
complete
• Some studies show 60-85%concordance(small
#)
Mark Howell, MD
8/7/2011
Diagnostic Modalities
Imaging
• Anterior rhinoscopy supportive but not
conclusive
• Percussion(tap tenderness)
• Tranillumination(significant
( g
variability
y in
interpretation)
• Nasal
endoscopy(helpful,expertise,equipment
,pt. cooperation often limited in
children)
• Plain Xray can evaluate maxillary and
frontal sinuses
• Concordance with sinus aspirate in
70%
• Poor evaluation ethmoid sinus
• Findings A/F level,opacification more
specific
• Mucosal thickening increases
senstivity but decreases specificity
Imaging
• Gold standard for inflammation CT
• 87% viral URI’s exhibit mucosal
thickening
• 30% asymtomatic
y
pt.
p exhibit abnormal
findings
• Negative plain xray more value than
negative exam
• Findings CT/MRI persist after microbial
resolution up to 8 weeks
Mark Howell, MD
8/7/2011
Imaging Suggestions
Goals Antibiotic Tx
• Not needed in acute uncomplicated
sinusitis
• Diagnostic uncertainty and/or not
responding as expected to appropiate
medical therapy
• Complicated rhinosinusitis with facial
cellulitis,orbital and/or suspected
intracranial complications should have
contrasted CT scans sinuses ,orbits and
head
• Quicker resolution rate
• Return sinuses to health
• Prevent complications(meningitis,brain
abscess)
• Decrease chronic disease
49
49
Selection Antibiotic Therapy
Microbiology ABRS(adult)
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Limited data bacteriologic studies
Pathogen distribution
PK/PD principals
Mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance
Data in vitro studies
Symptom severity
Incidence spontaneous resolution
Probability of resistant organism
S.pneumoniae 20-40%
H.influenzae 22-35%
M,catarrhalis 2-10%
S
Srep
spp.3-9%
3 9%
Anaerobes 0-9%
S.aureus 0-8%
Other 4%
Mark Howell, MD
8/7/2011
Microbiology ABRS (children)
Nasopharyngeal Flora
•
•
•
•
•
•
• Exchange between lateral wall nose
and NP
• Isolates 79% pt. Adenoids and 47%
LW nose
• Molecular typing respiratory pathogens
revealed 89% pt. identical strains both
sites
S.pneumoniae 25-30%
H.influenza 15-20%
M.catarrhalis 15-20%
S
S.pyogenes
2-5%
2 5%
Anaerobes 2-5%
Sterile 20-35%
Nasopharyngeal Flora
Mechanisms Resistance S.pneumoniae
• Antibiotic Tx increases resistant strains of
respiratory pathogens(Dagan;PID,’98)
• Adults also;duration shorter(CID,’97)
• Respiratory
p
yp
pathogens
g
isolated NP of 75%
of adults
• M.catarrhalis resistance with
cephalosporins
• Erythromycin use S.pneumo Finland
• Alteration PBP at 6 know sites
• Macrolide resistance with alterations
ribosomal binding sites;efflux
mechanisms;mutation genes ribosomal
proteins(cross resistance clindamycin)
• Fluroqinolone changes DNA gyrase and
topoisomerase IV;efflux mechanism
• Sulphonamides change binding sites
Mark Howell, MD
Mechanisms of Resistance H.
influenza
• B-lactamase production hydrolyzes
amide bond of B-lactam ring
,inactivating the antibiotic
• Alteration PBP(BLNAR;PBP3a,3b)
• Efflux pumps(macorlides,azalides )
M.catarrhalis isolates 92% Bl t
lactamase
producers
d
8/7/2011
Prevalence Resistance H.influenza
•
•
•
•
30-40% B-lactamase producers
BLNAR strains rare U.S.(Japan)
22% resistant TMP/SMX
PK/PD breakpoints < 3% susceptability
to macrolides;azlides
Mark Howell, MD
8/7/2011
ABRS-mild to moderate (no
daycare or antibiotics for 90 days)
• Amoxicillin(45-90 mg/kg per day two
doses)
• Amoxicillin-clavulanate(45-90 mg/kg
per day two doses)
ABRS-moderate (daycare and/or
antibiotic therapy within 90 days)
• Amoxicillin-clavulanate(80-90mg/kg
day two doses
• Cefdinir(14mg/kg day 1-2 doses)
• Cefuroxime(30mg/kg day)
• Cefpodoxime(10mg/kg day 1x)
• Switch therapy for pt. not responding
to Amoxicillin
ABRS-Beta-lactam sensitivity
•
•
•
•
Non type 1 hypersensitivity
Cefdinir,Cefuroxime,Cefpodoxime
Type 1 hypersensitivity
Clarithromycin(15mg/kg two divided
doses)
• Azithromycin(10mg/kg day1 and 5mg/kg
single dose for four days)
• TMP/SMX
• Clindamycin(30-40mg/kg day 3-4 divided
doses)
Mark Howell, MD
8/7/2011
ABRS-nonresponsive to oral therapy
Possible Referral Indications
• Imaging
• Aspiration of sinus
• Ceftriaxone(100mg/kg per day divided
q 12hr
• Cefotaxime(100-200mg/kg day divided
q6hr)
•
•
•
•
Intracranial or orbital complications
Possible need sinus aspiration
Unusual pathogen
Di
Diagnosed
d or suspected
t d
immunodeficiency
• Recurrent ABRS especially
exacerbation associated pulmonary
conditions
65
65
Adjunctive Therapy Rhinosinusitis
• Decongestants-systemic(improves nasal
breathing;insomnia may diminish with
use)limited use children
• Topical decongestants(,oxymetazolin
children>6y/)
• Antihistamine-2nd generation avoid anticholinergic drying effects(possible
worsening secretion viscosity with limited
or any benefit)
• Steroids systemic or topical
Mark Howell, MD
8/7/2011
Saline Irrigation
Complications of Acute Rhinosinusitis
• Beneficial as natural approach; young
children with discharge and mucostasis
• Wash with bulb syringe/nasal aspirator
• OTC sinus rinse
• Clears secretions
• Reduces mucosal edema
• Orbital-usually acute ethmoid sinusitis
• Preseptal cellulitis-involves
eyelid;globe normal
• Post-septal
p cellulitis with or without
abcess; involves orbital
contents;eyelid
edema;chemosis;proptosis;EOM
impairment;visual changes
• Urgent CT and hospitalization
Intracranial Complications
Management Pearls
• Abscess or meningitis
• Usually from acute frontal and/or
sphenoid sinusitis
• More common in adolescents and
adults since younger children have no
frontal or sphenoid sinuses
• Unilateral or isolated “sinusitis” may be
related maxillary dental infection and/or
abscess;nasal foreign body;neoplasm
• Immune compromised pt. As DM,HIV
beware of mucormycosis
• Recurrent rhinosinsitis in children
consider cystic fibrosis ciliary
dysfunction;adenoids
• CT and MRI may resolve these
dilemmas
Mark Howell, MD
8/7/2011
Absolute Indications for Surgery
Relative Indications Sinus Surgery
• Rhinosinusitis causing brain
abscess,menigitis;subperiosteal orbital
abscess;cavernous sinus
thrombosis;facial cellulitis
• Sinus mucocele or pyocele
• Fungal sinusitis
• Neoplasm or suspected neoplasm
• Recurrent acute rhinosinusitis with
persistent obstruction of sinus or
specific area of recurring disease is
identified
• Chronic rhinosinusitis failing to clear on
appropriate medical Tx
Conclusions
• ABRS may be diagnosed in patients with viral
URI of > 10days or worsens after 5-7 days and
is accompanied by signs and symptoms
• Antimicrobial therapy should cover key
respiratory pathogens
• >30% S.pneumoniae decreased sensitivity to
penicillin
• 30-40% H.flu produce B-lactamase
27th Annual SW VA Pediatrics Conference
8/6‐7/2011
DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
Jennifer Correll, PhD
does not anticipate discussing the unapproved or investigative use of a commercial product/device during this lecture. She reports that she DOES NOT have a
financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with
one or more organizations that could be perceived
h
ld b
d
as a real or apparent conflict of interest in the
context of this presentation. I'm Not Listening! Assessment and Treatment of Oppositional/Disruptive Behavior in Primary Care
in Primary Care • Identify the prevalence of oppositional behavior in primary care • Identify brief assessment tools to use in primary care • Demonstrate brief behavioral interventions that can be recommended to parents Jennifer Correll, PhD
8/7/2011
Prevalence
“I’m Not Listening!”: Assessment &
Treatment of Oppositional/Disruptive
Behavior in Primary Care
A
Jennifer A
A. Correll
Correll, M
M.A.
Department of Psychology
East Tennessee State University
What % of visits to pediatric primary care involve a behavioral
health concern?
3-5%
8 10%
8-10%
12-15%
18-25%
A.
B
B.
C.
D.
Prevalence
Prevalence
y National estimates show up to 25% of children seen by
y The Top 5
pediatricians present with significant psychosocial concerns
(Jellinek et al., 1999)
y Recent pilot data from ETSU Pediatrics suggests higher rates
of behavior disorders in residency training clinic (Gouge,
Polaha, & Powers, in preparation)
y Psychosocial concerns in very early childhood, without
proper guidance or intervention, strongly predict behavior
problems throughout childhood that persists into adolescence
(Frick & Lonely, 1999; Hofstra, Ende, & Verhulst, 2002)
ADHD
Toileting
3. Sleep
4 Oppositional/Defiant Behavior
4.
5. Developmental Delays
1.
2.
Jennifer Correll, PhD
8/7/2011
Prevalence
Prevalence
y Majority of parents feel the most comfortable discussing
How much time extra time does it take when a behavioral
concern is raised in an acute care visit?
behavior problems with their pediatrician.
y About 63%
y When referred to specialty mental health few follow through
with the appointment.
appointment
y Approximately 30%
A.
B
B.
C.
D.
3 minutes
7 minutes
i
10 minutes
15 minutes
Assessment: Informal
Assessment: Informal
y Look for Red Flags.
y Ask about noncompliance
y If you asked him/her to do 10 things during the day how many
would s/he do the first time asked?
y How many could you eventually get him/her to do if you kept
on him/her?
Jennifer Correll, PhD
Assessment: Formal
y Formal screening
y DSM criteria
y Behavior checklist
8/7/2011
Oppositional Defiant Disorder: DSM
Criteria
y Oppositional Defiant Disorder (DSM-IV)
y 6-month pattern of negative, hostile, defiant behavior with 4 of the
following:
¾ Often loses temper
¾ Often argues with adults
¾ Often actively defies or refuses to comply with adults’ requests or rules
¾ Often deliberately annoys people
¾ Often blames others for his/her mistakes or behavior
¾ Often touchy
¾ or easily annoyed by others
¾ Often angry or resentful
¾ Often spiteful or vindictive
y Not psychosis
y Not Conduct Disorder
y Causes Impairment
Assessment
y Behavior Checklist
y Pediatric Symptom Checklist (PSC)
y Eyberg Child Behavior Checklist (ECBI)
Jennifer Correll, PhD
8/7/2011
Treatment
y Behavioral parent training found to be effective intervention for
ODD (Hamilton & Armondo, 2008)
Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (Eyberg, Boggs, & Algina, 1995)
y Over 100 published studies
y Short and long term improvement
y Internalizing and externalizing disorders
y Foster children, abused children
y Depressed/”maltreating” mothers
y Variety of cultural/ethnic samples
y Brief versions
Treatment
Treatment
y Parent-Child Interaction Therapy
Child Directed Interaction
(CDI)
The Child’s Game:
1. Use interactive toys, no
rules
“rules”
2. Observe
3. Describe
4. Praise
5. Use touch
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Pre-treatment assessment/feedback (1)
Teaching behavioral play therapy skills (1)
Coaching behavioral play therapy skills (2-4)
Teaching discipline skills (1)
Coaching discipline skills (4-6)
Post-treatment assessment (1-2)
Boosters (as needed)
Parent-Directed Interaction
(PDI)
1.
2
2.
3.
4.
5.
Arrange toys
I
Instruction
i
Praise or Warning
Praise or Time-out
Instruction
Jennifer Correll, PhD
8/7/2011
Treatment in Primary Care
Treatment in Primary Care
y Conceptualizing the problem for parents
y Balance between reward and discipline
y Skills deficit
y Need to be able to
1. Following instructions
2. Coping with anger
3. Persisting on a task
4. Self-quieting
5. Independent transition to sleep
y Time in vs. Time out
y Creating high contrast
Treatment in Primary Care
Treatment in Primary Care
y Time In
y Time In
y Attending to average behavior
y “Sprinkles of attention”
y Overboard verbal reinforcement for completing a desired task
Jennifer Correll, PhD
8/7/2011
Treatment in Primary Care
Treatment in Primary Care
y Time Out
y Time-Out
y What is it really?
Brief, unpleasant consequence during which there is no access to attention
or anything fun
Treatment in Primary Care
y Time Out
y Common Parent Misconceptions
1. Child must be quiet
2. Child must sit still
3. Child must be sorry
4. Child must understand
y Procedure
y Adult-sized chair
y Area easy to covertly monitor
y 2-3 minutes
y Parent ends the time-out
y Child completes task after time-out
Treatment in Primary Care
y Time out
y Success hinges on
1. Immediacy
2. Saliency
3. Consistency
Jennifer Correll, PhD
8/7/2011
Treatment in Primary Care
Treatment in Primary Care
y Time Out
y Building skills
y What happens when you start to ignore behavior during time
y Compliance Training
out?
y Patience
y Extinction Burst!
y Impulse control and choice for older kids
Treatment in Primary Care
References available upon request
y Points to Remember
[email protected]
1.
2.
3
3.
4.
5.
6.
Conceptualize “problem” as skill deficit and stress twopart/balanced approach
Discuss two components to time-in
Di
Discuss
effective
ff i time-out
i
use
Warn about extinction burst
Set a follow-up meeting to review progress
Refer if no improvement
27th Annual SW VA Pediatrics Conference
8/6‐7/2011
DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
Darshan Shah, MD
does not anticipate discussing the unapproved or investigative use of a commercial product/device during this lecture. He p
DOES NOT have a
reports that hhe
financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with
one or more organizations that could be perceived
as a real or apparent conflict of interest in the
context of this presentation. What’s Up With Spit Up?
• Identify two important causes of spit up in newborns • Discuss Gastroesophageal Reflux and Cow Milk Allergy
Darshan Shah, MD
8/7/2011
What’s up with Spit up in Newborn?
Assistant Professor of Pediatrics
Quillen College of Medicine
Why this topic?
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
What’s up with Spit up in Newborn?
y Crying and spit up
y What’s normal?
One of the most common
Important reason for visit
Misconception regarding formula allergy/intolerance
GER(D) diagnosis
Management controversy
Spit up/Vomiting
y Normal spit up vs. abnormal Everyone agrees ‘some spit up is normal’
Darshan Shah, MD
8/7/2011
Spit up/Vomiting
Spit up/vomiting
y What’s important?
y Quantity?
y How to determine?
y Quantity?
y 10%
y 20%
y Quality? y 30%
y 40%
y Consistency?
y 50%
Spit up/vomiting
Spit up/vomiting
y Depends on feeding interval.
y Consistency? y More than 5 times in 8 feeding for q3 hr feeding
y More than 4 times in 6 feeding for q4 hr feeding
y 20% or more for q 3 hr
% f h
y What’s science behind numbers?
y 30% or more for q 4 hr
Darshan Shah, MD
8/7/2011
Spit up/vomiting
Spit up/vomiting
y Quality
Common causes of spit up in newborn
‰
Physiological(GER)
‰
GERD
‰
Milk allergy
‰
Over feeding
‰
Pyloric stenosis
y Color: Any color other than milk is a red flag
y Projectile nature: Always include in your spit up history; potential red flag
Spit up/vomiting
Spit up/vomiting
Gastro esophageal reflux in newborn
y Most common cause of vomiting in new born is overfeeding, overfeeding, overfeeding and overfeeding
f di f di f di d f di
‰Frequently seen in newborn
‰ Incidence: 1 episode/day in 50% in 0‐3 months increases to 75% at 4 months and decreases to 5% at 10‐12 months.
Darshan Shah, MD
8/7/2011
Spit up/vomiting
Spit up/vomiting
y Role of Lower Esophageal Sphincter (LES) in vomiting/spit up
™ Swallow Related LES; SLESR
¾ Smooth muscle thickening at JN C
l V
C
i b REFLEX l
i
¾ Control : Vagus; Contraction but REFLEX relaxation
¾ External Ring by Diaphragm ligament
Pharyngeal Swallowing initiates LESR and primary peristaltic esophageal contraction
¾ This two mechanism creates LESP:
It could be saliva, milk or even secretion from respitory tract Spit up/vomiting
Spit up/vomiting
™Transient LES Relaxation; TLESR
y TLESR
y Independent of Pharyngeal Swallow
Important for forventing gas from the stomach to prevent GI bloating
GI bl i
y Longer in duration; more than 10 seconds
y Relax more completely as stretch from Cardia affects external Sphincter y Dependent on body position Lt vs. Rt
That’s why there is “Spit up”
Importance of burping lies in feeding
Darshan Shah, MD
8/7/2011
Spit up/vomiting
Spit up/vomiting
y SLESR
y GER could be acid or non acid event depending on time of feeding
y Dependent on Pharyngeal Swallow
y Usually lasts 3‐6 seconds
y No effect on external sphincter
y Independent body position
Spit up/vomiting
Spit up/vomiting
y So, GER /Spit up/Vomiting is very common immediately after feeding (with in one hour)
y Acid reflux is more common before feeding.
y What’s indication to start treatment in GER?
Darshan Shah, MD
8/7/2011
Spit up/vomiting
Spit up/vomiting
y GER is not reason to start infant on medication
y Only Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease; GERD is the l i di i di i
only indication to start on medication
Medications for GERD
y H2 Receptor antagonist
y PPI; not cleared by FDA for less than 1year
y Prokinetics
GERD:
Esophagatis
Apnea
Growth failure
y Always use for short duration of 4‐8 weeks rather than 4‐6 months as GER underlying physiology gets better with time!
Spit up/vomiting
Spit up/vomiting
y Side effects
Common causes of spit up in newborn
‰
Physiological(GER)
‰
GER(D)
‰
Milk allergy
‰
Over feeding
‰
Pyloric stenosis
¾ Increased chances of CAP
¾ Gastroenteritis
¾ Decreased absorption of calcium
Darshan Shah, MD
8/7/2011
Spit up/vomiting
Spit up/vomiting
Milk Allergy
CMA or CMPA or CMI
y Prevalence ƒ Immunologically mediated adverse reaction to cow milk protein ƒ
Proteins implicated; alpha lactalbumin, beta lactoglobulin and casein
Spit up/vomiting
y CMA/CMPA/CMI
y Two types of clinical syndromes
d
9 IgE mediated with in 1‐2 hrs of ingestion
9 Non IgE mediated after 2 hrs
o 2‐8% noted in literature but recent larger cohort 2.2‐
2.8% (Ped Cli Nor Ame 2011)
o Compare to 50‐75% of GER episode in 0‐4 months CMA uncommon
Spit up/vomiting
IgE mediated CMA
y Anaphylaxis
y Angioedema
y Urticaria
y Oral itching and l h
d
abdominal pain
y Nausea/Vomiting/Diarrhe
a
y RhinoConuctivitis
y Wheezing/Exacerbation of RAD
y Laryngeal edema
Darshan Shah, MD
Spit up/vomiting
Non IgE mediated
ƒ Protein losing enteropathy
ƒ GER©
ƒ Proctocolitis/proctitis/ente
rocolitis
ƒ Colic ©
ƒ Constipation©
ƒ Pulmonary hemosiderosis (Heiner syndrome)
8/7/2011
Spit up/vomiting
y Mixed type
‰Atopic dermatitis
‰Eosinophilic Esophagatis
‰Eosinophilic gastroenteritis
Spit up/vomiting
Spit up/vomiting
y History of Atopy is strong predictor for CMA
™20% chance when one parent has history
™32% chance when 1 atopic sibling
™43% chance both parents have
™72% when both parents have identical atopy
y So what to do with newborn presenting with recurrent vomiting/spit up?
y Diagnosis : clinical + history Di
i li i l hi
Or
y Clinical+history+ lab eval for allergy
Darshan Shah, MD
8/7/2011
Spit up/vomiting
Spit up/vomiting
y Lab eval for CMA
y Allergy test are highly sensitive but low specificity
y Also CMA could be manifestation of non IgE type.
ƒ Skin test
ƒ Atopy patch test
ƒ Total IgE
ƒ Specific IgE(RAST)
Spit up/vomiting
Spit up/vomiting
y Treatment/diagnosis for CMA
y Elimination diet is diagnostic and therapeutics for CMA/CMPA/CMI
y Which formula to use?
‰
‰
‰
Soy based(Prosobee)
Extensively Hydrolyzed (Alimentum)
Amino acid based (Neocate)
Darshan Shah, MD
8/7/2011
Spit up/vomiting
Spit up/vomiting
y Soy based formula not ideal for CMA as 10% cross reactivity of IgE and 60% for non IgE reaction.
y Hydrolyzed formula:
S i i l h
ll
i i I y Soy protein is also not hypoallergenic protein. It can worsen enterocolitis
y First choice for non anaphylactic CMA, atopic eczema, gastrointestinal symptoms and food protein induced procto/enterocolitis
procto/enterocolitis.
Spit up/vomiting
Spit up/vomiting
y Amino acid formula:
y Breast milk allergy:
y First choice in anaphylaxis, eosinophilic Esophagatis, CMA i h h f d ll i CMA with other food allergies, growth impairment h i
i
with CMA.
y Rare
y Incidence <1%
y Maternal avoidance of CMP Darshan Shah, MD
Spit up/vomiting
y Duration of elimination diet:
y Minimum of two weeks for improvement in symptoms. If 8/7/2011
Spit up/vomiting
y Reemergence of symptom on introduction after elimination reconfirms CMA. not improved after 4 weeks unlikely CMA.
y Reintroduction of CMP
y Depends on history of previous encounter; if anaphylaxis then do RAST/skin test prior to reintroduction
50‐60% patient can tolerate CM by 1‐2 years and 80‐90% by 2‐3 years.
y Look out for allergy to peanuts and egg in patient with definite CMA.
Spit up/vomiting
Spit up/vomiting
Common causes of spit up in newborn
‰
Physiological(GER)
‰
GER(D)
‰
Milk AllergyMilk Allergy
‰
Over feeding
‰
Pyloric stenosis
y Pyloric stenosis
y
y
y
y
y
Incidence: 0.02‐0.06%
More common in
Most important: Vomiting is PROJECTILE Palpation is positive in epigastric area
BMP/NP will help great if Ped radiologist/ped ultrasound tech unavailable.
y Growth failure is evident by 3rd week
y Ultrasound/UGI will confirm diagnosis