Download 2012-2013 Satisfaction Survey

Administrator Appraisal Program, 2012-13
Results for Dean Williams -- Satisfaction items only
Ordered by the Population mean
1
Population*
(A)
Item
Mean (SD)
Category
Knowledgeables
(B)
Mean (SD)
Category
Effect
size,
B
vs.
A
S11 CU Libraries' access to materials from outside resources, such as
databases, data repositories, and archives
4.0 (0.8) Strength
4.7 (0.5)
Strength
0.9
S10 Faculty involvement in the decision-making process about CU
Libraries' holdings (excludes Law Library)
4.0 (1.1) Strength
4.7 (0.5)
Strength
0.8
S8 Collaborative relationships with colleagues with whom you work on a
routine basis
3.9 (0.8) Strength
4.9 (0.4)
Strength
1.3
S16 Other benefits, including retirement
3.7 (0.8) Asset
4.6 (0.5)
Strength
1.3
S9 Support and encouragement you receive from the University for your
research and creative work
3.6 (0.9) Strength
4.7 (0.5)
Strength
1.3
S15 The current health plan
3.5 (0.9) Asset
4.4 (0.5)
Strength
1.1
S12 Education and training support offered by CU Libraries' staff in new
information technology
3.5 (1.3) Strength
4.5 (0.5)
Strength
0.8
S20 Evaluation of teaching
3.5 (0.9) Asset
4.0 (0.6)
Strength
0.6
S17 Faculty governance in recent years and the progress made in
shared governance
3.3 (1.0) Asset
4.2 (0.4)
Strength
0.9
S2 Classroom facilities
3.3 (1.2) Asset/Issue
3.8 (0.5)
Strength
0.4
S7 Space and facilities (e.g., office, lab, departmental needs)
3.1 (0.9) Issue
3.5 (1.2)
Strength/Issue
0.4
S18 University efforts to recruit/retain a diverse faculty
3.1 (0.9)
3.4 (1.1)
Asset/Issue
0.3
S5 Departmental support services
3.0 (1.1) Improvement
4.6 (0.5)
Strength
1.5
S1 Teaching responsibilities and opportunities (this could include
teaching load, number, kinds, and size of classes, as well as issues
such as scheduling)
3.0 (1.2) Issue
S3 Technological support in teaching
2.9 (1.1) Improvement
4.0 (0.8)
Strength
1.1
S19 University efforts to retain a diverse undergraduate student body
2.8 (0.9) Issue
3.4 (1.1)
Asset/Issue
0.6
S6 The support that you receive for soliciting outside money, such as
extramural contracts and grants
2.8 (1.0) Improvement
. (.)
S14 Equitable distribution of salary, given the current salary structure
and resources at CU-Boulder
2.5 (1.2) Improvement
3.3 (1.5)
Asset/Issue
0.5
S13 Salary relative to those of your peers at comparable research
institutions
2.3 (0.9) Improvement
3.1 (1.3)
Issue
0.8
S4 Number of graduate students assisting in teaching
2.3 (0.8) Improvement
. (.)
. (.)
.
.
.
Scale: 1-Very dissatisfied 2-Dissatisfied 3-Neutral 4-Satisfied 5-Very satisfied
Categories: Strength (60% or > ratings of 4 or 5); Asset (50%-59% ratings of 4 or 5); Issue (25%-39% ratings of 1 or 2); Improvement (> 40% ratings of 1 or 2)
Effect sizes: These express the difference between means in terms of standard deviation units. Example: An effect size of -0.5 indicates that the mean for the
knowledgeablesis 1/2 standard deviation unit smaller than the mean for the population.
Interpretive rules of thumb: Absolute value of 0.20 or less -- small; 0.21-0.49 -- small to medium; 0.50-0.79 -- medium to large; 0.80 or greater -- large.
*Knowledgeables (B) have been excluded from the Population (A) for this analysis. The mean ratings of survey items with 3 or fewer respondents are not reported.
CU-Boulder Office of Planning, Budget, and Analysis; Code ref: L:\mgt\AAP\2012-13\AAP2013_results.sas; Created 02/19/2013