Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Helen Xu, 2015 Gillian Lieberman, MD December 2014 Features of Focal Nodular Hyperplasia on Multiple Imaging Modalities Helen Xu, Harvard Medical School Year III Gillian Lieberman, MD Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Outline • Introduction to focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) – Pathogenesis of FNH – Pathology of FNH – Epidemiology and typical clinical presentation • Patient’s initial presentation • Imaging – – – – US CT MRI +/- Gd-BOPTA DISIDA • Patient’s clinical course • FNH management in general 2 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Outline • Introduction to focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) – Pathogenesis of FNH – Pathology of FNH – Epidemiology and typical clinical presentation • Patient’s initial presentation • Imaging – – – – US CT MRI +/- Gd-BOPTA DISIDA • Patient’s clinical course • FNH management in general 3 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD FNH: What is it? • Non-malignant hepatic tumor Mitros, Frank A. Focal Nodular Hyperplasia Gross. uptodate.com 4 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD FNH: Pathogenesis • Hyperplastic response to hyperperfusion by anomalous arteries 5 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Brief Review: Normal Structure of Hepatic Lobule Digestive System. Droualb.faculty.mjc.edu 6 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD FNH: Pathology • Central stellate scar contains an abnormally large artery in the middle. • Fibrotic tissue surrounds the abnormal artery, along with portal veins and bile ducts. • Hepatocytes are normal. • FNH lesions contain sinusoids and Kupffer cells (specialized macrophages), both of which are absent in hepatocellular adenoma (HA). Mitros, Frank A. FNH Trichrome. uptodate.com 7 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD FNH: Epidemiology and Clinical Presentation • Found predominantly in female between age 2050. • Patient taking OCPs tend to have larger and more vascular masses. • Associated with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (Osler-Weber-Rendu disease) and hepatic hemangiomas. • 90% solitary • Two-thirds to three-fourths of patients are identified incidentally. Can present with abdominal discomfort or palpable mass. 8 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Brief Review: Cross-Sectional Anatomy of the Abdomen med.umich.edu 9 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Outline • Introduction to focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) – Pathogenesis of FNH – Pathology of FNH – Epidemiology and typical clinical presentation • Patient’s initial presentation • Imaging – – – – US CT MRI +/- Gd-BOPTA DISIDA • Patient’s clinical course • FNH management in general 10 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Our Patient: Presentation • 32F presenting w/ 5 days of episodic, crampy RUQ pain associated w/ n/v. – Episodes last a few hours – No fevers/chills • PMH: Obesity, Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia(HHT) epistaxis requiring cauterization • Family hx: HHT • Social hx: 1 beer/wk, denies tobacco and recreational drugs • Physical Exam: – Vitals stable – Abdomen soft, palpable liver edge, slightly tender. No hepatomegaly appreciated. • Labs: AST 45 11 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Outline • Introduction to focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) – Pathogenesis of FNH – Pathology of FNH – Epidemiology and typical clinical presentation • Patient’s initial presentation • Imaging – – – – US CT MRI +/- Gd-BOPTA DISIDA • Patient’s clinical course • FNH management in general 12 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Our Patient: Work-Up (1) #1 differential for crampy RUQ pain = biliary disease RUQ Ultrasound Examples of other ddx: • Hepatitis • Retrocecal appendicitis • PUD • Pancreatitis • Liver abscess • Liver, pancreatic, or biliary tract cancer • RLL pneumonia 13 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Our Patient: RUQ U/S BIDMC PACS Sagittal RUQ U/S •Liver: Homogeneous w/o focal lesion, or intra-hepatic duct dilatation •Gallbladder: thin-walled and unremarkable without stones or pericholecystic fluid. 14 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Our Patient: Work-Up (2) Negative US CT Abd/Pelvis Numerous other ddx: • Retrocecal appendicitis • Hepatitis • PUD • Pancreatitis • Liver abscess • Liver, pancreatic, or biliary tract cancer • RLL pneumonia 15 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Our Patient: CT abd BIDMC PACS C+ axial abd CT: Portal venous phase •At least 10 rounded hyper-enhancing lesions measuring up to 3.2cm • These lesions were isoechoic to liver parenchyma on U/S. 16 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Ddx for liver mass • • • • • • FNH Hepatic adenoma HCC Hemangioma Metastatic cancer Cyst, eg. congenital, echinococcal (hydatid), polycystic kidney disease • Hepatic (Amebic/Pyogenic) abscess 17 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Ddx based on CT and presentation • • • • • FNH Hepatic adenoma Hemangioma HCC Metastatic cancer—no primary CA, low risk • Cyst, eg. congenital, echinococcal (hydatid), associated w/ polycystic kidney disease— Low attenuation on CT C+ • Hepatic abscess (Amebic/pyogenic)—low attenuation on CT C+ 18 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Cyst and hepatic abscess are ruled out because they have low attenuation on CT with contrast. Let’s explore how the other ddx appear on CT. 19 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Ddx based on CT • • • • FNH Hepatic adenoma HCC Hemangioma 20 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Companion Pt 1: HCC on arterial phase CT • Main blood supply is the hepatic artery (normal liver parenchyma has 20/80 arterial/portal blood supply) Baron RL, Brancatelli G. 2004 C+ axial abd CT: arterial phase •Diffuse enhancement of a large mass in the right lobe 21 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Companion Pt 1: HCC on portal venous phase CT • Portal venous phase CT: rapid washes out and become iso/hypo-dense • Heterogenous enhancement due to fibrosis, fat, necrosis and calcifications. Baron RL, Brancatelli G. 2004 C+ axial abd CT: Portal venous phase •Heterogeneous mass, hypo-attenuating compared to adjacent liver parenchyma •Septa hyper-attenuating because of contrast retention in the fibrotic tissue 22 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Ddx based on CT • • • • FNH Hepatic adenoma HCC Hemangioma 23 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Companion Pt 2: Hemangioma on arterial phase CT Morgan, Matt A., and Yuranga Weerakkody. Radiopaedia C+ axial abd CT: arterial phase • discontinuous, nodular, peripheral enhancement 24 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Companion Pt 2: Hemangioma on portal venous phase CT Morgan, Matt A., and Yuranga Weerakkody. Radiopaedia C+ axial abd CT: portal venous phase • progressive enhancement w/ centripetal fill in 25 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Companion Pt 2: Hemangioma on delayed phase CT Morgan, Matt A., and Yuranga Weerakkody. Radiopaedia C+ axial abd CT: delayed phase • Continued centripetal fill in 26 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Ddx based on CT • FNH • Hepatic adenoma • Hemangioma– CT findings not characteristic, also should be seen on US • HCC– Low risk, CT findings not characteristic, also should be seen on US 27 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Our Patient: Work-Up (3) FNH vs Hepatic Adenoma MRI w/ hepatobiliary gadolinium contrast agents It is very important to differentiate FNH and hepatic adenoma! •FNH • no evidence of malignant transformation • Very rarely symptomatic and need resection •Hepatic adenoma • Associated w/ malignant transformation, spontaneous hemorrhage and rupture •Note: 20% of FNH can be associated with other benign tumor 28 and vascular malformation. Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Hepatobiliary Gd Contrast Agent • Dual route of elimination (renal and hepatobiliary excretion) • FNH is hyper/iso-intense on delayed phase because functional hepatocytes and biliary ducts • Hepatic adenoma is hypo-intense on delayed phase because hepatocytes and biliary ducts are not functional • Gd-DTPA • 92% specificity for FNH • Gd-BOPTA • Differentiation of FNH vs HA: • Sensitivity 96.9%, specificity 100%, PPV 100%, NPV 96.4% and overall accuracy 98.3 29 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Our Patient: MRI T2 BIDMC PACS Axial MRI T2 • Slightly hyper-intense lesions 30 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Our Patient: MRI T2 BIDMC PACS Coronal MRI T2 • Slightly hyper-intense lesions 31 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Our Patient: MRI T1 early arterial phase BIDMC PACS Axial MRI T1 early arterial phase w/ Gd-BOPTA (slightly delayed) 32 • Hyper-intense lesions (lack central scarring—atypical) Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Our Patient: MRI T1 late arterial phase BIDMC PACS Axial MRI T1 late arterial phase w/ Gd-BOPTA (slightly delayed) • Slightly hyper-intense lesions 33 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Our Patient: MRI T1 portal venous phase BIDMC PACS Axial MRI T1 portal venous phase w/ Gd-BOPTA (slightly delayed) • Slightly hyper-intense lesions 34 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Our Patient: MRI T1 equilibrium phase BIDMC PACS Axial MRI T1 equilibrium phase w/ Gd-BOPTA (slightly delayed) • Slightly hyper-intense lesions 35 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Our Patient: MRI T1 2hr delay BIDMC PACS Axial MRI T1 2hr delay w/ Gd-BOPTA • Hyper-intense lesions (atypical) 36 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Our Patient: nd 2 Presentation • 1 month later, pt presented again w/ RUQ pain. – Severity: 10/10 – Radiates to R flank, shoulder and R arm – Labs were unremarkable • More workup to rule out cholecystitis – RUQ U/S: unremarkable, no evidence of cholecystitis – DISIDA 37 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Now let’s look at some selected images from our patient’s DISIDA scan 38 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Our Patient: DISIDA (1) BIDMC PACS • Liver 39 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Our Patient: DISIDA (2) BIDMC PACS • CBD 40 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Our Patient: DISIDA (3) • Gallbladder • Duodenum BIDMC PACS 41 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Our Patient: DISIDA (2) inverted • FNH lesion w/ increased uptake BIDMC PACS • FNH has functional hepatocytes and biliary ducts. • may be photon deficient in 60% of cases • Hepatic adenoma takes up the tracer but doesn’t excrete it. • Not specific enough to differentiate FNH vs adenoma • HCC takes up tracer in 50% of the case 42 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Outline • Introduction to focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) – Pathogenesis of FNH – Pathology of FNH – Epidemiology and typical clinical presentation • Patient’s initial presentation • Imaging – – – – US CT MRI +/- Gd-BOPTA DISIDA • Patient’s clinical course • FNH management in general 43 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Our Patient: Clinical Course • Because of patient’s demographics, history, and pain following CCK administration (for DISIDA ), pt underwent cholecystectomy. • Gallstones were present on pathology which were not seen on imaging. • Pain significantly improved • Initial presentation may have been due to atypical FNH or cholecystitis • The sensitivity of ultrasound in the detection of acute cholecystitis is 95% and the specificity is 78-80%. • This case of FNH is atypical: the lack of central scarring in many lesions, the large number of nodules and pain 44 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Outline • Introduction to focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) – Pathogenesis of FNH – Pathology of FNH – Epidemiology and typical clinical presentation • Patient’s initial presentation • Imaging – – – – US CT MRI +/- Gd-BOPTA DISIDA • Patient’s clinical course • FNH management in general 45 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD FNH: management in general • No evidence for malignant transformation for FNH in general. • Follow up with Gd-DTPA at 3-6 months to confirm stability of the lesions • If stable, no long-term routine follow-up is required. 46 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Our Patient: management • Because this patient had atypical lesions, additional follow up was recommended. 47 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Take-home points: FNH • Found predominantly in females between age 2050. • Associated with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia • 90% solitary • 2/3 to 3/4 of lesions are identified incidentally. Can present with abdominal discomfort or palpable mass. • Must be differentiated from hepatic adenoma • 20% of cases are associated with other benign lesions 48 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Take-home points: FNH on Imaging – US: Typically hypoechoic w/ central scar, can be variable – CT: Typically isodense on portal venous phase, atypical in this case. – MRI: use hepatobiliary Gd contrast. Early enhancement. Hyper-/iso-intense on 2hr delay. Can be atypical and lack central scar. • Gd-BOPTA is more specific than Gd-DTPA – DISIDA: normal or increased uptake and excretion (may be photon deficient in as many as 60% of patients). Not used to differentiate FNH from adenoma. 49 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Browse the following slides for the appearance of typical FNH lesions on various imaging modalities 50 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Typical FNH: U/S Focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic adenomas. ultrasoundcases.info Transverse RUQ U/S • Hypoechoic mass • Central scar 51 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Typical FNH: CT Khan et al. 2013 CT C+: Arterial phase • Hyperdense mass • Central scar Khan et al. 2013 CT C+: Portal venous phase • Isodense mass 52 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Typical FNH: MRI Gd-BOPTA Kruskal, Jonathan B. Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver seen on Gd-BOPTA scan. Uptodate.com Axial MRI T1, Gd-BOPTA, 3hr delay • Hyper-enhancing mass • Central scar 53 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD References • • • • • • • • • Mitros, Frank A. Focal Nodular Hyperplasia Gross. N.d. Uptodate. Focal Nodular Hyperplasia. Web. 10 Dec. 2014. Mitros, Frank A. FNH Trichrome. N.d. Uptodate. Focal Nodular Hyperplasia. Web. 10 Dec. 2014. Chopra, Sanjiv, and Anne C. Travis. "Focal Nodular Hyperplasia." Focal Nodular Hyperplasia. Ed. Bruce A. Runyon. UpToDate, 19 Nov. 2014. Web. 10 Dec. 2014. Lobular Organization. N.d. Droualb.faculty.mjc.edu. Digestive System. Web. 10 Dec. 14. Wanless IR, Gryfe A. Nodular transformation of the liver in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1986;110(4):331-5. Goodman ZD. Benign Tumors of the Liver. In: Neoplasms of the Liver, Okuda K, Ishak KD (Eds), Springer, Tokyo 1987. p.105. Morgan, Matt A., and Yuranga Weerakkody. "Hepatic Haemangioma." Radiopaedia. N.p., n.d. Web. 10 Dec. 2014. LaBrecque DR, Cakir-Yedidag A. Management of Liver Neoplasms in Medical Management of Liver Disease, EL Krawitt (Ed), Marcel Dekker, Inc. 1999, p.310. Grazioli L, Morana G, Federle MP, et al. Focal nodular hyperplasia: morphologic and functional information from MR imaging with gadobenate dimeglumine. Radiology. 2001;221(3):731-9. 54 References • • • • • • • • • Grazioli L, Morana G, Kirchin MA, Schneider G. Accurate differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatic adenoma at gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging: prospective study. Radiology. 2005;236(1):166-77. "Cholecystitis." Meddean.luc.edu. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Dec. 2014 Baron RL, Brancatelli G. Computed tomographic imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2004;127(5 Suppl 1):S133-43. Digestive System. Droualb.faculty.mjc.edu. http://droualb.faculty.mjc.edu/Lecture%20Notes/Unit%206/Spring%2006%20Digestive %20system%20with%20figures.htm http://www.med.umich.edu/lrc/coursepages/m1/anatomy2010/html/clinicalcases/cholelit hiasis/gs6.jpg Baron RL, Brancatelli G. Computed tomographic imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2004;127(5 Suppl 1):S133-43. Focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic adenomas. ultrasoundcases.info. http://www.ultrasoundcases.info/Case-List.aspx?cat=129 Khan AN, Boylan C, Sohaib M, Tam C, Sheen AJ. Imaging in Focal Nodular Hyperplasia. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/368377-overview Kruskal, Jonathan B. Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver seen on Gd-BOPTA scan. Uptodate. Focal Nodular Hyperplasia. Web. 10 Dec. 2014. 55 Helen Xu, 2014 Gillian Lieberman, MD Acknowledgements • Dr. Gillian Lieberman • Dr. Jonathan Kim • Mr. Joseph Singer 56