Download Lecture 5 Limit of LEFM_11.pdf

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
CEE 7700 Meeting 5
Objectives of This Meeting
Learn the limit of applicability of LEFM:
• K-dominance
• The process zone, and estimating its size
• Small-scale yielding, SSY
• Dimensional restrictions on process zone size
•The concept of “Brittleness Number”
100
The Concept of K-Dominance:
When is LEFM Applicable?
y
KI
y 
2 x
K-Dominant
Region
 yield
rp
x
D
 y  3a3 r  5a5r 3 / 2  ...
Inelastic
Region,
Simplified
If rp << D, KI still controls fracture process.
How big is rp ????
101
LEFM predicts infinite stress at the crack front.
This cannot be true for a real material.
There must be a region near the crack front where nonlinear material
behavior prevails. This behavior might be governed by elasto-plastic, or
microcracking, or any other dissipative mechanisms.
This region is called the fracture process zone.
Physical Observation
Example of an elasto-plastic process zone
See Computational Simulation
Process zone formation in Al-Cu-Mg alloy, From Broek,
Elementary Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 3d Edit, 1982.
102
Let’s Estimate rp
First approximation, call it r*p:
Ignore triaxiality, assume elastic-perfectly plastic behavior,
fy = uniaxial yield stress, assume no stress redistribution, then
y 
y
KI
y 
2 x
 yield
KI
2 x
KI
 y  fy 
rp
2 rp*
x
rp* 
KI
2
2 f y
2
And an upper bound on r*p
2
Is this an upper or lower
bound to actual value?
K Ic
*
rp 
2
2 f y
(62)
103
Better Estimates for rp
Include 1D stress redistribution:
2
K Ic
**
rp 
 f y2
Include stress redistribution and allow for multiaxiality with the von Mises
yield criterion:
2
rp 
K Ic
2
3 f y
in plane strain
Why difference?
2
K Ic
rp 
 f y2
in plane stress
Next, we want rp to be “small”. Compared to what? How small?
104
Small Compared to What? How Small?
For K, a linear-elastic concept, to dominate the solution, the
process zone must be small compared to all significant dimensions
of the structure containing the crack.
By convention and by reasonableness, “small” is accepted to mean
less than about 1/25th.
For example, we would want rp to be less than 1/25th of the crack
length, a
 K Ic 
25K Ic

a
or a  2.5
2


f
3 f y
y


2
2
(63)
105
Necessary Geometrical Conditions for Validity of LEFM in Materials
in Which Elasto-Plastic Process Zone Behavior Dominates
Necessary Conditions:
 K Ic 

a, B, W - a > 2.5 
 fY 
W-a
2
where
B
2a
KIc= Plane Strain Fracture Toughness
fy= Uniaxial yield strength
W-a = ligament
W
If all these conditions are met, then
SSY conditions are said to prevail
and LEFM applies.
106
Brittleness Numbers
An important concept that emerges from this simple calculation is that of the
“Brittleness Number”.
A material in a state with a high brittleness number has a small process zone, eg.



p 


r
K
f


Ic 

y 
2
for elasto- plasticmaterialstate
so the ratio of yield stress to plane strain fracture toughness, fy/KIc, can be
interpreted as a brittleness number for materials in which the process zone is
predominately dissipating energy in plastic strain energy.
Similarly, inverse brittleness numbers for materials which dissipate fracture
energy through other mechanisms have been defined, e.g. for concrete
lch  GF E / f t 2
107
Brittleness Numbers (BN) for Some “Common”
Engineering Materials (English units, ksi)
Material
Application
Bubble Gum
fy
KIc
BN
~0
??
~0
A36 Steel
Construction Steel
36
150
0.24
Al 2024-T3
Airplane Fuselage
53
33
1.6
Ti-6-4
Engine Compressor Disks
120
75
1.6
Ni Super Alloy
Engine Turbine Blades
138
75
1.8
Al 7075-T651
Airplane Wings
76
28
2.7
D6AC Steel
High Strength Steel
215
70
3.1
10
0.68
15
Soda Lime Glass
BN = fy/KIc