Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Energy efficiency indicators in industry Taller de trabajo del proyecto BIEE / Mesoamérica Base de Indicadores de Eficiencia Energética UPME 24-25 Marzo 2015 Bruno Lapillonne, Enerdata Outline 1. Overall indicators 2. Indicators by branch 3. Data requirements Energy intensity of industry Energy intensity of industry: ratio relating the energy consumption of industry to the value added of industry (koe/€2000) Decrease of the ratio means that industry requires less energy to generate one unit (i.e. one euro) of value added It means that industry use energy more efficiently from an economic viewpoint but not necessarily from a technical viewpoint We will say that industry has improved its energy productivity Energy intensity of industry can be defined at different levels depending on the coverage of the industry sector The definitions are given by the International classification of industrial branches (ISIC or Nace) where industry is broken down into 4 main sectors: Section C: Mining Section D: Manufacturing Section E: Electricity, gas and water Section F: Construction Trends in energy intensity of industry Energy intensities of industry, manufacturing and mining: case of Chile 1.20 1.00 koe/ k$2003 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Intensidad Industria Intensidad Manufactura Source: BIEE, Ministerio de Energía de Chile Intensidad Minería Energy intensity : total industry versus manufacturing Trends can be quite different between industry total and manufacturing industry Variation of the energy intensity in industry (country X) 2,0% 1,5% 1,0% 0,5% 0,0% -0,5% 2000-2005 2005-2010 2000-2010 -1,0% -1,5% Total industry Manufacturing 6 Outline 1. Basic indicators 2. Indicators by branch 3. Data requirements and sources Advanced indicators for industry Intensity by branch (koe/$2000, koe/$2000p) Specific energy consumption (koe/ton) 8 Sectoral energy intensities in industry Energy intensity by industrial branch are calculated as a ratio relating the energy consumption of the branch and its value added of industry (koe/€2000) Requires energy consumption and value added by branch at constant prices with similar classifications Exist an international classification of manufacturing branch that is used in more and more countries Manufacturing industry by branch: international classification(ISIC / Nace) Nace code (2 digits) 15-16 Food (15) and tobacco (16) 17-19 Textile (17), Wearing apparel (18) and Leather (19) 20 Wood 21-22 Paper (21) and printing (22) 24-25 Chemicals (24), Rubber & plastics (25) 26 Non metallic Minerals 27 Primary metals (steel, non ferrous) 28 Fabricated metallic products 29 Machinery and equipment 30-33 Office equipment (30), electrical machinery (31), communication equipment (32), optical (33) 34-35 Motor vehicles (34) and transport equipment (35) 36-37 Others (furniture,...) Refineries and coking plants (Division 23) excluded; Breakdown of the energy consumption by industrial branch: case of Brazil Increasing relative share of food industry: sugar, processed and frozen products; Decreasing share of primary metals and chemicals (less investments and more imports) Energy consumption of manufacturing by sub-sector in Brazil 2000 2012 Food Textile 9% 9% 21% 2% 35% 11% 5% 6% 11% Paper 28% Cement 29% 6% 6% 9% Chemicals 1% 12% Ceramics Primary metals including iron-alloys Other manufacturing Source: BIEE EPE 11 Sectoral energy intensities: case of Uruguay Energy intensity by branch (koe per $2000) (Uruguay) 0,07 0,06 2000 2010 0,05 0,04 0,03 0,02 0,01 0 12 Specific energy consumption of energy intensive products: case of Chile Copper is very intensive in Chile and its specific energy consumption is increasing due to less concentrated ores Using a double scale or showing each product separately enables to better see the trends by product Specific energy consumption (toe/ton) 0.700 0.600 Toe/ ton 0.500 0.400 0.300 0.200 0.100 0.000 2000 2001 2002 Intensidad Papel y celulosa 2003 2004 2005 Intensidad Acero 2006 2007 Intensidad Cemento Source: BIEE, Ministerio de Energía de Chile 2008 2009 2010 Intensidad Cobre Specific energy consumption of steel in Brazil Decreasing specific energy consumption of steel 0,700 0,600 toe/tonne 0,500 0,400 0,300 0,200 0,100 0,000 Steel 1990 Source: EPE 2000 Source: BIEE/EPE 2010 2012 Benchmarking of energy efficiency perfomance among EU countries: case of ODYSSEE Need to compare performance with homogeneous product (e.g. clinker, the energy intensive component of cement, or mechanical pulp or oxygen steel) If heterogeneous product or if there exist different production process, need of benchmarking on a similar mix of product and process (e.g. steel, cement, paper) In ODYSSEE graphical benchmarking with the specific consumption in the vertical axe and the process mix in the horizontal axe Distance to the world benchmark line indicate the potential of improvement In industry, the best world practices are no longer found in the most developed countries Average energy consumption per ton of steel (2004) 0,8 0,7 South Africa 0,6 Ukraine Russia Brazil China India Comparison should be made at similar process mix toe/t 0,5 Australia 0,4 Argentina Japan Canada Taiwan 0,3 EU 0,2 World benchmark 0,1 Distance to benchmark: energy savings potential Mexico Korea USA Thailand Egypt Turkey 0 0% 20% 40% 60% % electric steel Source: Enerdata 80% 100% Outline 1. Basic indicators 2. Advanced indicators 3. Data requirements and sources Data and indicators: industry • Value added at constant price by industrial branch; • Production index by industrial branch; • Physical production for energy intensive products*; • Final energy consumption by industrial branch; Data *steel, cement, aluminium, copper, ferroalloys, sugar, iron mining, potassium, ceramics, gold mining INDICATORS • Energy intensity by branch* • Unit consumption by intensive products; • Energy intensity at constant structure*; 18 Activity data in industry : overview Activity data by branch are usually collected by National Statistical Offices The branch covered follows at national level national classifications that are usually adapted from international classifications: Published by National Statistical Offices often in current prices, sometimes also at constant price If constant price not available, data may be given with price index by branch and/or index of volume by branch can be used to calculate value added values at constant price Energy consumption by branch: main sources Different sources of information are available: The most comprehensive sources are industrial surveys; The other source is administrative , i.e. the administration; requires utilities and/or consumers to provide the information; Modeling may be used to complete the information for intermediate years; Metering relate to audits data that can only be used at national level if the sample is representative. National energy consumption by branch: overview of sources According to an IEA consultation covering mainly OECD countries, industrial surveys represented about half of the sources of national energy consumption statistics by branch in a sample of 22 countries; The other main source is administrative (about one fourth) 30% of countries rely on more than one method 0% 22% Surveys Administratives 52% 26% Source: AIE survey 2011 (march 2012), Modeling Metering Main lessons from indicators in industry Moderate and unequal coverage of indicators by industry sub –sector; The main problems encountered are: 1. Lack of energy consumption by branch in 5 countries ( Argentina Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama, Guatemala). 2. Incomplete coverage of industry sector in official statistic (“zone franca”) 3. Lack of harmonized classification by industry sub sector between value added and energy consumption : many countries only provide energy consumption for selected energy intensive production that do not fit the ISIC classification used for VA (case of Brazil, Chile and Mexico) impossibility to calculate the effect of changes in the structure of industry . 4. Production index defined at a more disaggregated level than required in the template “aggregation” of the index to be done using weight and not arithmetic average (example shown in an excel file “index average.xls) 5. Lack of specific consumption for energy intensive products (i.e. steel, cement, cement, paper) because of confidential data on consumption and/or production (not enough companies) (e.g. Uruguay)