Download Manginelli.Angela

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Comparison of Performance of Laboratory Equipment
1
Manginelli ,
2
Hoyer ,
3
Brestrich
Dr. Angela A.
Dr. Walter
Dr. Gordon
1) R&D Statistics, 2) CMC Statistical Science, 3) Clinical Laboratory Science
Emil-von-Behring-Straße 76 D-35041 Marburg, Germany.
Abstract
The Three Liquid Handlers
• Within the validation of a new highly automated assay, the Clinical
Laboratory Science tested several clinical samples in order to
evaluate precision and linearity of the assay.
• The equipment utilized for the testing includes three liquid handlers
(highly automated pipetting robots).
• The statistical evaluation of the data revealed a significantly poorer
performance of one liquid handler compared to the other two.
• To detect the root cause of the issue, an intensive work including
complete dismantling of the machine with help of a technician of the
vendor was conducted.
• A tiny difference in the programming code of the liquid handlers was
detected.
• JMP 11.0.0 was used for the statistical evaluation before and after
the adjustment of the setting of the liquid handlers.
Maja
Bonnie
Kriemhild
Comparison of Performance of Laboratory Equipment
1
Manginelli ,
2
Hoyer ,
3
Brestrich
Dr. Angela A.
Dr. Walter
Dr. Gordon
1) R&D Statistics, 2) CMC Statistical Science, 3) Clinical Laboratory Science
Emil-von-Behring-Straße 76 D-35041 Marburg, Germany.
How The Assay Works – Serial Dilution Scheme
Automated
pipetting
384 Well –
Micro titer plate
Transfer 14 µL
Bacteria
Step 1
Sample +
Buffer Mix
1:2
28 µL
Predilution
Buffer
14 µL
Buffer
14 µL
Buffer
14 µL
Transfer 14 µL
Step 2
Mix
1:2
Mix
1:4
Buffer
Buffer (diluent)
384 Well – Micro titer plate
Buffer
Transfer 14 µL
Step 3
....
Mix
1:2
....
Mix
1:4
....
Mix
1:8
....
Buffer
....
• After incubation time, the number of surviving bacteria is
determined by means of measurement of fluorescence intensity.
Sample 1
Sample 1  1:2
Sample 1  1:4
Sample 2
Sample 2  1:2
Sample 2  1:4
Normalized values
Human
complement
Serum of
vaccinated
donors
Predilution and Titer Determination
Inflection Point
Log(Dilution)
• Serial dilution is used to determine titer.
• The bactericidal antibody titer is the reciprocal dilution
of the serum at which 50% of bacteria are killed.
Comparison of Performance of Laboratory Equipment
1
Manginelli ,
2
Hoyer ,
3
Brestrich
Dr. Angela A.
Dr. Walter
Dr. Gordon
1) R&D Statistics, 2) CMC Statistical Science, 3) Clinical Laboratory Science
Emil-von-Behring-Straße 76 D-35041 Marburg, Germany.
Dilutional Linearity
• Samples are tested on three liquid handlers which
are expected to deliver identical results.
Results
Error bars:
95% confidence
interval of the mean
• Relative accuracy of the assay is evaluated by
means of dilutional linearity.
Liquid Handler
Bonnie
Kriemhild
Maja
• Dilutional linearity is assessed by computing
Recovery Rate (RR): ratio between the geometric
mean (GM) of the two replicates at one
predilution and the GM at previous predilution.
• 20 samples (serum)  40 RRs on each robot (one
for 1:2 and one for 1:4 predilution).
Mean RR [%]
90
98
97
Std Dev RR
0.28
0.10
0.12
• Lower RR and higher variability on Bonnie.
• Difference in RRs was significant (GLM) when removing the
outlier circled in red (p = 0.0102).
Statistician
The reaction of the team
Lab Manager
Lab Operator
Comparison of Performance of Laboratory Equipment
1
Manginelli ,
2
Hoyer ,
3
Brestrich
Dr. Angela A.
Dr. Walter
Dr. Gordon
1) R&D Statistics, 2) CMC Statistical Science, 3) Clinical Laboratory Science
Emil-von-Behring-Straße 76 D-35041 Marburg, Germany.
Investigation and Solution
Statistical Confirmation
• Lab operator and technician of the vendor were locked for three weeks in the
lab to investigate the issue.
• They compared the setting of the three liquid handlers ...
• ... and found out that the pipet of Bonnie was set to a different mixing speed
compared to the other two:
~16 µl/sec vs ~24 µl/sec
• The setting was adjusted and the experiment was repeated:
24 Samples: undiluted, 1:2 and 1:4 prediluted
2 Replicates (to be averaged) for each predilution on each robot
 18 measurement for each sample, 6 per robot
2 RRs for each sample on each robot (for predilutions 1:2 and 1:4)
Conclusion
• Stay calm, keep trying!
• Never underestimate the importance of small things!
• Luckily with JMP it is possible to write very nice and useful scripts!
Add Image
Comparison of Performance of Laboratory Equipment
1
Manginelli ,
2
Hoyer ,
3
Brestrich
Dr. Angela A.
Dr. Walter
Dr. Gordon
1) R&D Statistics, 2) CMC Statistical Science, 3) Clinical Laboratory Science
Emil-von-Behring-Straße 76 D-35041 Marburg, Germany.
JMP Platform/Script Used
• Graph Builder and ANOVA model
4. Log function
• Script to do the analysis BEFORE and AFTER the issue:
1. Import xlsx file
5. Lag function to create RR
2. Stack and adjust column names
3. Munger function