* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download 9.
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Int Jr. of Mathematics Sciences & Applications
Vol. 2, No. 2, May 2012
Copyright Mind Reader Publications
ISSN No: 2230-9888
www.journalshub.com
A VIEW ON NETS IN TOPOLOGICAL SPACES
VIA b-OPEN SETS
G. Vasuki , E. Roja and M.K. Uma
Department of Mathematics,
Sri Sarada College for Women,
Salem - 636 016
Tamil Nadu.
Abstract
In this paper we define nets, and discuss its convergency in topological space. We prove that
the nets are adequate to describe the closure of a set and the continuity of a function in
topological space via b-open. The properties of b-compact spaces by using nets, filterbases, bcomplete accumulation points are studied.
Keywords : Nets, b-interior, b-closure, b-compact space, b-complete accumulation point.
2010 AMS subject classification primary : 54A05, 54A10, 54A20
1. INTRODUCTION
Topology is Analysis in a general setting. The concept of b-open sets was studied by Andrijevic [1].
Using the concept of b-open sets, the nets and their convergency, closure and continuity are studied. Some
characterizations
of
b-compact spaces in terms of nets and filterbases, b-complete accumulation points are also studied.
2. PRELIMINARIES
Definition 2.1
Let R be a usual metric (i) Let A ⊂ R be a non empty set and x ∈ R. x ∈ cl( A ) iff there is a sequence
in A converging to x. (ii) A function f : R → R is continuous at x0 iff ( xn ) → x0 ⇒ ( f ( xn ) ) → f ( x0 ) for every
sequence ( xn ).
Remark 2.1
The domain of definition D of a net is taken to be a directed set.
Definition 2.2
A set D is a directed set if there is a relation ≤ on D satisfying
(i) ≤ is reflexive (ii) ≤ is transitive and (iii) if λ1, λ2 ∈ D, then there is some λ3 ∈ D with λ1 ≤ λ3 and λ2 ≤ λ3.
Definition 2.3 [8]
A net is a pair ( S, ≤ ) such that S is a function and ≤ directs the domain of S.
Remark 2.2 [8]
A net is sometimes called a directed set.
Definition 2.4
565
G. Vasuki, E. Roja and M.K. Uma
Let ( X, τ ) and ( Y, ν ) be any two topological spaces. Then the following are two well known results :
(i) Let A ⊂ X be nonempty and x ∈ X. Then x ∈ cl ( A ) iff there is a net in A convenging to x. (ii) A function f
: X → Y is ( τ, ν ) continuous at x0 iff whenever the net ( xλ ) → ( x0 ) in X, the net ( f ( xλ ) ) → f ( x0 ) in Y.
Remark 2.3
Throughout the section, the directed set is denoted by D and the poset by P.
Remark 2.4 [4]
Let ( X, µ ) be a topological space and Cµ ( A ) is the µ-closure of A. It is clear that, in a topological
space ( X, µ ) x ∈ Cµ ( A ) iff
G I A ≠ φ for every µ-open set G containing x. Every µ-open set containing x ∈
X is called a neighbourhood of x and the family of neighbourhoods of x is denoted by µ ( x ). If µ ( x ) ≠ φ, then
the following statements hold.
(a)
x ∈ U for every U ∈ µ ( x )
U V∈µ(x)
(b)
If U, V ∈ µ ( x ), then U
(c)
If y ∈ U ∈ µ ( x ), then U ∈ µ ( y ).
Definition 2.5 [4]
Let ( X, µ ) and ( Y, λ ) be any two topological spaces. A function
f : ( X, µ ) → ( Y, λ ) is said to be ( µ, λ )-continuous if the inverse image of every
λ-open subset of Y is a µ-open subset of X.
Definition 2.6 [5]
Let ( X, µ ) be a topological space. Then ( X, µ ) is called a T1-space if for every pair of points atleast
one point has a neighbourhood not containing the other.
Definition 2.7 [5]
A topological space ( X, µ ) is called a T2-space if every pair of distinct points have disjoint
neighbourhoods.
Definition 2.8 [1]
A subset A of X is called a b-open set if A ⊆ cl ( int ( A ) ) U int ( cl ( A ) ). The complement of a bopen set is called a b-closed set. The family of b-open sets in a topological space ( X, T ) will be denoted by B 0
( X ).
Definition 2.9 [10]
Let ( X, τ ) and ( Y, σ ) be any two topological spaces. Let the interior and closure of a set A is
denoted by int ( A ) and cl ( A ). A point x ∈ X is called a
θ-adherent point of A if A
Definition 2.10 [10]
The set of
θ cl ( A ).
I cl ( U ) ≠ φ for every open set U of X containing x.
all
θ-adherent points of
A
is
called
the
θ-closure
of
A
denoted
by
Definition 2.11 [10]
The subset A is called θ-closed if A = θcl( A ). The complement of a
θ-closed set is called θ-open. The collection of all θ-open (respectively, θ-closed) sets is denoted by θO( X, τ ) (
resp. clθ( X, τ ) ).
Definition 2.12 [8]
A filter F in a set X is a family of non-void subsets of X such that
566
A VIEW ON NETS IN TOPOLOGICAL SPACES…
(i)
(ii)
The intersection of two member of F always belongs to F.
If A ∈ F and A ⊂ B ⊂ X, then B ∈ F.
Definition 2.13 [9]
Let A be a directed set. A net ξ = { Xα | α ∈ Λ } θ-accumulates at a point
x ∈ X if the net is frequently in every U ∈ θO ( X, x ). The net ξ θ-converges to a point x of X if it is eventually
in every U ∈ θO( X, x ).
Definition 2.14 [9]
A filterbase
x∈
Θ
=
{
Fα
/
α ∈
Γ
}
θ
-
accumulates
at
a
point
x
∈
X
if
I θcl( Fα ). For a given set S with S ⊂ X, a θ-cover of S is a family of θ-open subsets Uα of X for each α
α ∈Γ
∈ I of X such that S ⊂
U Uα.
α ∈I
Definition 2.15 [9]
A filterbase θ = { Fα / α ∈ Γ } θ-converges to a point x in X for each
U ∈ Θ O ( X, x ), there exists an Fα in Θ such that Fα ⊂ U.
Definition 2.16 [2]
A point x in a space X is said to be a θ-complete accumulation point of a subset S of X if card (S
I U)
= card (S) for each U ∈ θ O (X, x) where card (S) denote the cardinality of S.
Definition 2.17 [8]
Zorn’s Lemma :
If each chain in a partially ordered set has an upper bound, then there is a maximal element of the set.
Definition 2.18 [9]
A space X is said to be θ-compact if every θ-open cover of X has a finite subcover which covers X.
3. NETS AND THEIR CONVERGENCY VIA b-OPEN
Definition 3.1 [1]
The largest b-open set contained in A is called the b-interior of A and is denoted by ib ( A ). The
smallest b-closed set containing A is called the b-closure of A and is denoted by Cb ( A ).
Remark 3.1
Let (
x ∈ Cb ( A ) iff
X,
µ
)
be
a
topological
space.
It
is
clear
that
in
a
topological
space
G I A ≠ φ for every b-open set G containing x. Every b-open set containing x ∈ X is called a
b-neighbourhood
of
x
b-neighbourhoods of x is denoted by µb ( x ).
and
the
family
of
all
Remark 3.2
If µb ( x ) ≠ φ, then the following statements hold:
(a)
x ∈ U, for every U ∈ µb ( x )
(b)
If U, V ∈ µb ( x ) then U
U V ∈ µb ( x )
(c)
If y ∈ U ∈ µb ( x ), then U ∈ µb ( y )
Definition 3.2
Let ( X, µ ) and ( Y, λ ) be any two topological spaces. A function
f : ( X, µ ) → ( Y, λ ) is said to be b continuous if the inverse image of every b-open subset of Y is a b open
subset of X.
Definition 3.3
Let ( X, µ ) be a topological space. Then ( X, µ ) is called a b-T1 space if for every pair of points atleast
one point has a b-neighbourhood not containing the other.
567
G. Vasuki, E. Roja and M.K. Uma
Definition 3.4
Let ( X, µ ) be a topological space. Then ( X, µ ) is called a b-T2 space if for every pair of distinct
points have disjoint b-neighbourhoods.
Definition 3.5
Let ( X, µ ) be a topological space and ( P, ≥ ) be a poset. A net in X is a function f : P → X. We denote
the image of λ ∈ P under f by fλ and the net will be denoted ( fλ ).
Definition 3.6
Let ( X, µ ) be a topological space. A net ( fλ ) is said to be eventually in
b-neighbourhood U if there exists a λ0 ∈ P such that ( fλ ) ∈ U for every λ ≥ λ0.
Definition 3.7
A net ( fλ ) →
/ x ∈ X if there exists a b-neighbourhood U of x such that ( fλ ) is not eventually in U and
( fλ ) → x, if otherwise. If ( fλ ) → x, x is called a limit of ( fλ ).
Definition 3.8
A net ( fλ ) is said to be frequently in b-neighbourhood U if for every λ ∈ P, there exists a λ1 ∈ P such
that λ1 ≥ λ and (
f λ ) ∈ U.
1
Definition 3.9
x is called a b limit point of ( fλ ) if it is frequently in every b-neighbourhood of x.
Proposition 3.1
Let ( X, µ ) be a topological space. Then b-limit of every constant net is unique iff ( X, µ ) is a b-T1
space.
Proof
Let ( X, µ ) be a b-T1 space and x, y ∈ X. such that x ≠ y. The constant
net x, x, … converges to y implies that x is eventually in every b-neighbourhood of y which implies that x ∈ U
for every U ∈ µb( y ) which is a contradiction to hypothesis. Conversely, x, x, x, … does not converge to y for
any y ≠ x implies that there exists a b-neighbourhood of y not containing x. Hence every point of X has a bneighbourhood not containing the other and so ( X, µ ) is a b-T1 space.
Proposition 3.2
Let ( X, µ ) be a topological space and x, y ∈ X such that x ≠ y and ( fλ ) be a
net in X. Then ( fλ ) → x ⇒ ( fλ ) → y iff x ∈
I { U / U ∈ µb ( y ) }.
Proof
Assume that ( fλ ) → x, ( fλ ) → y. This implies that the, constant net x, x, …x which converges to x
converges
to
y
which
implies
that
x
is
eventually
in
every
b-neighbourhood of y. This implies that x ∈ U for every U ∈ µb ( y ), and hence,
x∈
I { U / U ∈ µb ( y ) }. Conversely suppose that x ∈ I { U / U ∈ µb ( y ) } which implies that every U ∈
µb ( y ) is a b-neighbourhood of x. Now, if ( fλ ) is a net such that ( fλ ) → x, which implies that ( fλ ) is
eventually in every b-neighbourhood of x and so ( fλ ) is eventually in every b-neighbourhood of y. Therefore, (
fλ ) → y.
4. NETS DESCRIBE b-CLOSURE AND b-CONTINUITY
Proposition 4.1
568
A VIEW ON NETS IN TOPOLOGICAL SPACES…
Let ( X, µ ) and ( Y, λ ) be any two topological spaces. A function g : X → Y is
b-continuous at x0 ∈ X iff for every net ( fλ ) → x0, the net ( g ( fλ ) ) → g ( x0 ).
Proof
Suppose that g : X → Y is b-continuous at x0 ∈ X. If V is a b-neighbourhood of f( x0 ) there exists a bneighbourhood U of x0 such that g ( U ) ⊂ V. ( fλ ) → x0 implies that ( fλ ) is eventually in U which implies that
( g (fλ ) ) is eventually in g( U ) ⊂ V. Hence ( g ( fλ ) ) → g ( x0 ).
Conversely, suppose that every net ( fλ ) → x0, the net ( g ( fλ ) ) → g ( x0 ). If
g is not b-continuous at x0, then there exists a b-neighbourhood V of g( x0 ) such that
g( U ) ⊆
/ V for any b-neighbourhood U of x0. For each b-neighbourhood U of x0, we can find fU ∈ U and g( fU )
∉ V. Then f : µ( x0 ) → X defined as f( U ) = fU ∈ U is a net in X such that ( fU ) → x0 and ( g ( fU ) ) →
/ g( x0 )
which is a contradiction. Hence g is b-continuous at x0 ∈ X.
5. CHARACTERIZATION OF b-COMPACT SPACES
Definition 5.1
Let ( X, T ) and ( Y, S ) be any two topological spaces. A point x ∈ X is called
b-adherent point of A if A
points
of
A
by bcl ( A ).
I cl ( U ) ≠ φ for every b-open set U of X containing x. The set of all b-adherent
is
called
the
b-closure
of
A
and
denoted
Definition 5.2
A subset A is called b-closed if A = bcl ( A ) The complement of a b-closed set is called b-open. The
collection of all b-open (resp.b-closed) sets denoted by BO( X, T ) (resp. bcl ( X, T ) ).
Definition 5.3
Let ( X, T ) be a topological space. A point x is an b-accumulation point of a subset A iff every bneighbourhood of x contains points of A other than x.
Definition 5.4
Let Λ be a directed set. A net ξ = {Xα / α ∈ Λ } b-accumulates at a point x ∈ X if the net is frequently
in every U ∈ BO ( X, x ). The net ξ is said to be b-converges to a point x of X if it is eventually in every U ∈
BO ( X, x).
Definition 5.5
A filterbase
x∈
B
=
{
Fα
/
α
∈
Γ
}
b-accumulates
at
a
point
x
∈
X
if
I bcl (Fα).
α∈Γ
Definition 5.6
Given a set S with S ⊂ X, a b-open cover of S is a family of b-open subsets Uα of X for each α∈ I of X
such that S ⊂
U Uα.
α∈I
Definition 5.7
A filterbase B = { Fα / α ∈ Γ } b-converges to a point x in X for each
U ∈ BO ( X, x ) there exists an Fα in B such that Fα ⊂ U.
Definition 5.8
A space X is said to be b-compact if every b-open cover of X has a finite sub collection which covers
X.
Definition 5.9
569
G. Vasuki, E. Roja and M.K. Uma
A point x in a space X is said to be a b-complete accumulation point of a subset
S of X if card ( S
I U ) = card ( S ) for each U ∈ BO ( X, x), where card (S) denotes the cardinality of S.
Proposition 5.1
A space X is b-compact iff each infinite subset of X has a b-complete accumulation point.
Proof
are
Let the space X be a b-compact and S an infinite subset of X. Let K be the set of points x in X which
not
b-complete
accumulation
point
of
S.
Hence
for
each
point
x in K, we are able to find U(x) ∈ BO (X, x) such that card ( S
I U ( x ) ) ≠ card ( S ). If K is the whole space
X, then B = { U ( x ) / x∈ X } is a b-open cover of X.
By hypothesis X is b-compact, so there exists a finite subcover ψ = { U ( xi ) }, where i = 1, 2, 3 … n
such
that
S
⊂
U
{
card ( S ) = max { card ( ( U ( xi )
complete accumulation point.
(
U
(
xi
)
I
S
)
/
i
=
1,
2,
…
n
}.
Then
I S ) } i = 1, 2, … n } which is a contradiction. Therefore, S has a b-
Conversely, assume that X is not b-compact and that every infinite subset S ⊂ X has a b-complete
accumulation point in X. Then, there exists a b-open cover B with no finite subcover. Let δ = min { card ( Φ ) /
Φ ⊂ B, where φ is a b-open cover of X }. Fix ψ ⊂ B for which card ( ψ ) = δ and
U { U / U ∈ ψ } = X. Let N
denote the set of natural numbers. Then by hypothesis δ ≥ card ( N ).
By well-ordering ψ be some minimal well-ordering “∼”. Suppose that U is any member of ψ. By
minimal well-ordering “∼” we have card ( { V / V ∈ ψ, V ∼ U } )
< card ( { V/ V ∈ ψ } ). Since ψ cannot have any subcover with cardinality lesser than
δ for each U ∈ ψ, we have X ≠
U { V / V ∈ ψ, V ∼ U }. For each U ∈ ψ, choose a point x ( U ) ∈ X − U { V
U { x ( V ) } \ V∈ ψ, V ∼ U }. This always able to do this. If not, one can choose a cover of smaller quantity
from ψ. If H ( x ) = x (U) / U ∈ ψ }, then proof will be complete if we show that H has no b-complete
accumulation point in X. Suppose that z is a point of the space X. Since ψ is a b-open cover of X then z is a
point of some set W in ψ. Since W∼U, x ( U ) ∈ W. Now, T = { U / U ∈ ψ and
x ( U ) ∈ W } ⊂ { V \ V∈ ψ, V ∼ W }. But card ( T ) < δ. Therefore, card (H
I W) < δ. But card ( H ) = δ ≥
card
(
N
)
since
for
two
distinct
points
u
and
w
in
ψ,
we
have,
x ( u ) ≠ x ( w ). This means that H has no b-complete accumulation point in X, which is a contradiction to our
assumption. Therefore X is b-compact.
Proposition 5.2
For a space X the following statements are equivalent:
a)
X is b-compact
b)
Every net in X with an well-ordered directed set Λ as domain, b-accumulates to some point of X.
Proof
(a) ⇒ (b)
Suppose ( X, T ) is b-compact and ξ = { xα/ α ∈ Λ } be a net with an well-ordered directed set Λ as
domain. Assume that ξ has no b-accumulation point in X. Then for each point x in X, there exists V(x) ∈ BO (
X, x ) and an α ( x ) ∈ Λ such that V ( x ) I { xα / α ≥ α ( x ) } = φ which implies that { xα / α ≥ α ( x ) } is a
subset
of
X – V(x). Then the collection C = { V(x) / x∈X } is a b-open cover of X. By the hypothesis of the theorem, X is
b-compact and so C has a finite subfamily {V(xi)}, where i = 1, 2, … n such that X =
570
U {V(xi)}. Suppose that
A VIEW ON NETS IN TOPOLOGICAL SPACES…
the corresponding elements of Λ be { α (xi) }, i = 1, 2, … n. Since Λ is well ordered and { α ( xi ) } is finite, the
largest element of { α (xi) } exists. Let it be { α (xl) }. Then for γ ≥ { α (xl) }, we have
{ xδ / δ ≥ γ } ⊂
n
n
i=1
i=1
I (X−V (xi) ) = X− I V (xi) = φ, which is not possible. This shows that ξ has atleast one b-
accumulation point in X.
(b) ⇒ (a)
It is enough to prove that each infinite subset has a b-complete accumulation point by utilizing
Proposition 5.1. Suppose that S ⊂ X is an infinite subset of X. According to Zorn’s lemma, the infinite set S can
be well-ordered. This means that we can assume S to be as a net with domain which is a well-ordered index set.
Hence, S has a b-accumulation point z. Therefore, z is a b-complete accumulation point of S. Hence X is bcompact.
Proposition 5.3
A space X is b-compact iff each family of b-closed subsets of X with the finite intersection property
has a non-empty intersection.
Proof
The proof is obvious.
Proposition 5.4
A space X is b-compact iff each filterbase in X has atleast one b-accumulation point.
Proof
Fα′s
Suppose that X is b-compact and B = {Fα / α ∈ Γ } be a filterbase in it. Since all finite intersections of
are
non
empty,
it
follows
that
all
finite
intersections
of
bcl (Fα)’s are also non-empty. From Proposition (5.3) that
I bcl (Fα) is non empty, which means that B has
α∈Γ
atleast one b-accumulation point.
Conversely, suppose B is any family of b-closed sets. Let each finite intersection of each family of bclosed sets be non-empty. The sets Fα with their finite intersection establish a filterbase B. Therefore B, baccumulates to some point z in X. Hence, z ∈
I (Fα). Hence by Proposition 5.2 that X is b-compact.
α∈Γ
Proposition 5.5
A space X is b-compact iff each filterbase on X with atmost one b-accumulation point is b-convergent.
Proof
Suppose that X is b-compact, x be a point of X and B be a filter base on X. The
b-adherence of B is a subset { x }. Then the b-adherene of B is equal to { x } by Proposition 5.4. Assume that
there
exists
V
∈
BO
(X,
x)
such
that
for
all
F
∈
B,
FI ( X – V )
is non-empty. Then ψ = { F − V / F ∈ B } is a filterbase on X. Hence the
b-adherence of ψ is non-empty. However
I bcl ( F – V ) ⊂ I bcl ( F ) ) ⊂ ( X – V )
F∈B
F∈B
= { x } I ( X – V ) = φ, which is a contradiction. Hence for each V ∈ BO ( X, x ), there exists F ∈ B with F ⊂
V. This shows that B b-converges to x.
To prove the converse, it is sufficient to show that each filterbase in X has atleast one b-accumulation
point.
Assume
that
B
is
a
filterbase
on
X
with
no
b-accumulation point. By hypothesis B b-converges to some point z in X. Suppose,
Fα is an arbitrary element of B. Then for each V ∈ BO ( X, z ) there exists Fβ ∈ B, such that Fβ ⊂ V. Since B is a
571
G. Vasuki, E. Roja and M.K. Uma
filterbase, there exists a γ such that Fγ ⊂ Fα
I Fβ ⊂ Fα I V, where Fγ non-empty, which means that Fα I V is
non-empty for every V ∈ BO( X, Z ) and correspondingly for each α, z is a point of bcl(Fα). Hence z ∈ I bcl
α
(Fα). Therefore, z is a b-accumulation point of B which is a contradiction. Hence, X is
b-compact.
REFERENCE
1.
Andrijevic, on b-open sets, Mat. Ventik, 48 (1996), 59-64.
2.
M. Caldas, S. Jafari, G.B. Navalagi and M.M. Shankrikopp, some remarks on
θ-compact spaces, International Journal of Mathematics and Computing Applications, 1 (2009), 123-126.
3.
A. Csaszar, Generalized open sets, Acta Math. Hungar, 75 (1997), 65-87.
4.
A.
Csaszar,
Generalized
topology
generalized
continuity,
Acta
Math.
Hugar,
96 (2002), 351-357.
5.
A. Csaszar, separation axioms for generalized topologies, Acta Math. Hungar., 104 (2004), 63-69.
6.
A. Csaszar, Extremally disconnected generalized ‘topologies, Annales Univ, Sci. Budapest, 47 (2004),
91-96.
7.
S.
Jafari,
Some
properties
of
Quasi
Q-continuous
functions
Far
East
J. Math. Sci., 6 (1998), 689-696.
8.
John.L. Kelley, General topology, 1955 springer - verlag Newyork Berlin Heidlberg.
9.
N.V.Velicko, on extension of mappings of topological spaces, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 292 (1970), 4147.
10. N.V.Velicko H-closed topological spaces, Mat. Sb., 70 (1966), 98-112, English Transl, (2), in Amer
Math. Soc. Transl, 78 (1968), 102-118.
572