Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Int Jr. of Mathematics Sciences & Applications Vol. 2, No. 2, May 2012 Copyright Mind Reader Publications ISSN No: 2230-9888 www.journalshub.com A VIEW ON NETS IN TOPOLOGICAL SPACES VIA b-OPEN SETS G. Vasuki , E. Roja and M.K. Uma Department of Mathematics, Sri Sarada College for Women, Salem - 636 016 Tamil Nadu. Abstract In this paper we define nets, and discuss its convergency in topological space. We prove that the nets are adequate to describe the closure of a set and the continuity of a function in topological space via b-open. The properties of b-compact spaces by using nets, filterbases, bcomplete accumulation points are studied. Keywords : Nets, b-interior, b-closure, b-compact space, b-complete accumulation point. 2010 AMS subject classification primary : 54A05, 54A10, 54A20 1. INTRODUCTION Topology is Analysis in a general setting. The concept of b-open sets was studied by Andrijevic [1]. Using the concept of b-open sets, the nets and their convergency, closure and continuity are studied. Some characterizations of b-compact spaces in terms of nets and filterbases, b-complete accumulation points are also studied. 2. PRELIMINARIES Definition 2.1 Let R be a usual metric (i) Let A ⊂ R be a non empty set and x ∈ R. x ∈ cl( A ) iff there is a sequence in A converging to x. (ii) A function f : R → R is continuous at x0 iff ( xn ) → x0 ⇒ ( f ( xn ) ) → f ( x0 ) for every sequence ( xn ). Remark 2.1 The domain of definition D of a net is taken to be a directed set. Definition 2.2 A set D is a directed set if there is a relation ≤ on D satisfying (i) ≤ is reflexive (ii) ≤ is transitive and (iii) if λ1, λ2 ∈ D, then there is some λ3 ∈ D with λ1 ≤ λ3 and λ2 ≤ λ3. Definition 2.3 [8] A net is a pair ( S, ≤ ) such that S is a function and ≤ directs the domain of S. Remark 2.2 [8] A net is sometimes called a directed set. Definition 2.4 565 G. Vasuki, E. Roja and M.K. Uma Let ( X, τ ) and ( Y, ν ) be any two topological spaces. Then the following are two well known results : (i) Let A ⊂ X be nonempty and x ∈ X. Then x ∈ cl ( A ) iff there is a net in A convenging to x. (ii) A function f : X → Y is ( τ, ν ) continuous at x0 iff whenever the net ( xλ ) → ( x0 ) in X, the net ( f ( xλ ) ) → f ( x0 ) in Y. Remark 2.3 Throughout the section, the directed set is denoted by D and the poset by P. Remark 2.4 [4] Let ( X, µ ) be a topological space and Cµ ( A ) is the µ-closure of A. It is clear that, in a topological space ( X, µ ) x ∈ Cµ ( A ) iff G I A ≠ φ for every µ-open set G containing x. Every µ-open set containing x ∈ X is called a neighbourhood of x and the family of neighbourhoods of x is denoted by µ ( x ). If µ ( x ) ≠ φ, then the following statements hold. (a) x ∈ U for every U ∈ µ ( x ) U V∈µ(x) (b) If U, V ∈ µ ( x ), then U (c) If y ∈ U ∈ µ ( x ), then U ∈ µ ( y ). Definition 2.5 [4] Let ( X, µ ) and ( Y, λ ) be any two topological spaces. A function f : ( X, µ ) → ( Y, λ ) is said to be ( µ, λ )-continuous if the inverse image of every λ-open subset of Y is a µ-open subset of X. Definition 2.6 [5] Let ( X, µ ) be a topological space. Then ( X, µ ) is called a T1-space if for every pair of points atleast one point has a neighbourhood not containing the other. Definition 2.7 [5] A topological space ( X, µ ) is called a T2-space if every pair of distinct points have disjoint neighbourhoods. Definition 2.8 [1] A subset A of X is called a b-open set if A ⊆ cl ( int ( A ) ) U int ( cl ( A ) ). The complement of a bopen set is called a b-closed set. The family of b-open sets in a topological space ( X, T ) will be denoted by B 0 ( X ). Definition 2.9 [10] Let ( X, τ ) and ( Y, σ ) be any two topological spaces. Let the interior and closure of a set A is denoted by int ( A ) and cl ( A ). A point x ∈ X is called a θ-adherent point of A if A Definition 2.10 [10] The set of θ cl ( A ). I cl ( U ) ≠ φ for every open set U of X containing x. all θ-adherent points of A is called the θ-closure of A denoted by Definition 2.11 [10] The subset A is called θ-closed if A = θcl( A ). The complement of a θ-closed set is called θ-open. The collection of all θ-open (respectively, θ-closed) sets is denoted by θO( X, τ ) ( resp. clθ( X, τ ) ). Definition 2.12 [8] A filter F in a set X is a family of non-void subsets of X such that 566 A VIEW ON NETS IN TOPOLOGICAL SPACES… (i) (ii) The intersection of two member of F always belongs to F. If A ∈ F and A ⊂ B ⊂ X, then B ∈ F. Definition 2.13 [9] Let A be a directed set. A net ξ = { Xα | α ∈ Λ } θ-accumulates at a point x ∈ X if the net is frequently in every U ∈ θO ( X, x ). The net ξ θ-converges to a point x of X if it is eventually in every U ∈ θO( X, x ). Definition 2.14 [9] A filterbase x∈ Θ = { Fα / α ∈ Γ } θ - accumulates at a point x ∈ X if I θcl( Fα ). For a given set S with S ⊂ X, a θ-cover of S is a family of θ-open subsets Uα of X for each α α ∈Γ ∈ I of X such that S ⊂ U Uα. α ∈I Definition 2.15 [9] A filterbase θ = { Fα / α ∈ Γ } θ-converges to a point x in X for each U ∈ Θ O ( X, x ), there exists an Fα in Θ such that Fα ⊂ U. Definition 2.16 [2] A point x in a space X is said to be a θ-complete accumulation point of a subset S of X if card (S I U) = card (S) for each U ∈ θ O (X, x) where card (S) denote the cardinality of S. Definition 2.17 [8] Zorn’s Lemma : If each chain in a partially ordered set has an upper bound, then there is a maximal element of the set. Definition 2.18 [9] A space X is said to be θ-compact if every θ-open cover of X has a finite subcover which covers X. 3. NETS AND THEIR CONVERGENCY VIA b-OPEN Definition 3.1 [1] The largest b-open set contained in A is called the b-interior of A and is denoted by ib ( A ). The smallest b-closed set containing A is called the b-closure of A and is denoted by Cb ( A ). Remark 3.1 Let ( x ∈ Cb ( A ) iff X, µ ) be a topological space. It is clear that in a topological space G I A ≠ φ for every b-open set G containing x. Every b-open set containing x ∈ X is called a b-neighbourhood of x b-neighbourhoods of x is denoted by µb ( x ). and the family of all Remark 3.2 If µb ( x ) ≠ φ, then the following statements hold: (a) x ∈ U, for every U ∈ µb ( x ) (b) If U, V ∈ µb ( x ) then U U V ∈ µb ( x ) (c) If y ∈ U ∈ µb ( x ), then U ∈ µb ( y ) Definition 3.2 Let ( X, µ ) and ( Y, λ ) be any two topological spaces. A function f : ( X, µ ) → ( Y, λ ) is said to be b continuous if the inverse image of every b-open subset of Y is a b open subset of X. Definition 3.3 Let ( X, µ ) be a topological space. Then ( X, µ ) is called a b-T1 space if for every pair of points atleast one point has a b-neighbourhood not containing the other. 567 G. Vasuki, E. Roja and M.K. Uma Definition 3.4 Let ( X, µ ) be a topological space. Then ( X, µ ) is called a b-T2 space if for every pair of distinct points have disjoint b-neighbourhoods. Definition 3.5 Let ( X, µ ) be a topological space and ( P, ≥ ) be a poset. A net in X is a function f : P → X. We denote the image of λ ∈ P under f by fλ and the net will be denoted ( fλ ). Definition 3.6 Let ( X, µ ) be a topological space. A net ( fλ ) is said to be eventually in b-neighbourhood U if there exists a λ0 ∈ P such that ( fλ ) ∈ U for every λ ≥ λ0. Definition 3.7 A net ( fλ ) → / x ∈ X if there exists a b-neighbourhood U of x such that ( fλ ) is not eventually in U and ( fλ ) → x, if otherwise. If ( fλ ) → x, x is called a limit of ( fλ ). Definition 3.8 A net ( fλ ) is said to be frequently in b-neighbourhood U if for every λ ∈ P, there exists a λ1 ∈ P such that λ1 ≥ λ and ( f λ ) ∈ U. 1 Definition 3.9 x is called a b limit point of ( fλ ) if it is frequently in every b-neighbourhood of x. Proposition 3.1 Let ( X, µ ) be a topological space. Then b-limit of every constant net is unique iff ( X, µ ) is a b-T1 space. Proof Let ( X, µ ) be a b-T1 space and x, y ∈ X. such that x ≠ y. The constant net x, x, … converges to y implies that x is eventually in every b-neighbourhood of y which implies that x ∈ U for every U ∈ µb( y ) which is a contradiction to hypothesis. Conversely, x, x, x, … does not converge to y for any y ≠ x implies that there exists a b-neighbourhood of y not containing x. Hence every point of X has a bneighbourhood not containing the other and so ( X, µ ) is a b-T1 space. Proposition 3.2 Let ( X, µ ) be a topological space and x, y ∈ X such that x ≠ y and ( fλ ) be a net in X. Then ( fλ ) → x ⇒ ( fλ ) → y iff x ∈ I { U / U ∈ µb ( y ) }. Proof Assume that ( fλ ) → x, ( fλ ) → y. This implies that the, constant net x, x, …x which converges to x converges to y which implies that x is eventually in every b-neighbourhood of y. This implies that x ∈ U for every U ∈ µb ( y ), and hence, x∈ I { U / U ∈ µb ( y ) }. Conversely suppose that x ∈ I { U / U ∈ µb ( y ) } which implies that every U ∈ µb ( y ) is a b-neighbourhood of x. Now, if ( fλ ) is a net such that ( fλ ) → x, which implies that ( fλ ) is eventually in every b-neighbourhood of x and so ( fλ ) is eventually in every b-neighbourhood of y. Therefore, ( fλ ) → y. 4. NETS DESCRIBE b-CLOSURE AND b-CONTINUITY Proposition 4.1 568 A VIEW ON NETS IN TOPOLOGICAL SPACES… Let ( X, µ ) and ( Y, λ ) be any two topological spaces. A function g : X → Y is b-continuous at x0 ∈ X iff for every net ( fλ ) → x0, the net ( g ( fλ ) ) → g ( x0 ). Proof Suppose that g : X → Y is b-continuous at x0 ∈ X. If V is a b-neighbourhood of f( x0 ) there exists a bneighbourhood U of x0 such that g ( U ) ⊂ V. ( fλ ) → x0 implies that ( fλ ) is eventually in U which implies that ( g (fλ ) ) is eventually in g( U ) ⊂ V. Hence ( g ( fλ ) ) → g ( x0 ). Conversely, suppose that every net ( fλ ) → x0, the net ( g ( fλ ) ) → g ( x0 ). If g is not b-continuous at x0, then there exists a b-neighbourhood V of g( x0 ) such that g( U ) ⊆ / V for any b-neighbourhood U of x0. For each b-neighbourhood U of x0, we can find fU ∈ U and g( fU ) ∉ V. Then f : µ( x0 ) → X defined as f( U ) = fU ∈ U is a net in X such that ( fU ) → x0 and ( g ( fU ) ) → / g( x0 ) which is a contradiction. Hence g is b-continuous at x0 ∈ X. 5. CHARACTERIZATION OF b-COMPACT SPACES Definition 5.1 Let ( X, T ) and ( Y, S ) be any two topological spaces. A point x ∈ X is called b-adherent point of A if A points of A by bcl ( A ). I cl ( U ) ≠ φ for every b-open set U of X containing x. The set of all b-adherent is called the b-closure of A and denoted Definition 5.2 A subset A is called b-closed if A = bcl ( A ) The complement of a b-closed set is called b-open. The collection of all b-open (resp.b-closed) sets denoted by BO( X, T ) (resp. bcl ( X, T ) ). Definition 5.3 Let ( X, T ) be a topological space. A point x is an b-accumulation point of a subset A iff every bneighbourhood of x contains points of A other than x. Definition 5.4 Let Λ be a directed set. A net ξ = {Xα / α ∈ Λ } b-accumulates at a point x ∈ X if the net is frequently in every U ∈ BO ( X, x ). The net ξ is said to be b-converges to a point x of X if it is eventually in every U ∈ BO ( X, x). Definition 5.5 A filterbase x∈ B = { Fα / α ∈ Γ } b-accumulates at a point x ∈ X if I bcl (Fα). α∈Γ Definition 5.6 Given a set S with S ⊂ X, a b-open cover of S is a family of b-open subsets Uα of X for each α∈ I of X such that S ⊂ U Uα. α∈I Definition 5.7 A filterbase B = { Fα / α ∈ Γ } b-converges to a point x in X for each U ∈ BO ( X, x ) there exists an Fα in B such that Fα ⊂ U. Definition 5.8 A space X is said to be b-compact if every b-open cover of X has a finite sub collection which covers X. Definition 5.9 569 G. Vasuki, E. Roja and M.K. Uma A point x in a space X is said to be a b-complete accumulation point of a subset S of X if card ( S I U ) = card ( S ) for each U ∈ BO ( X, x), where card (S) denotes the cardinality of S. Proposition 5.1 A space X is b-compact iff each infinite subset of X has a b-complete accumulation point. Proof are Let the space X be a b-compact and S an infinite subset of X. Let K be the set of points x in X which not b-complete accumulation point of S. Hence for each point x in K, we are able to find U(x) ∈ BO (X, x) such that card ( S I U ( x ) ) ≠ card ( S ). If K is the whole space X, then B = { U ( x ) / x∈ X } is a b-open cover of X. By hypothesis X is b-compact, so there exists a finite subcover ψ = { U ( xi ) }, where i = 1, 2, 3 … n such that S ⊂ U { card ( S ) = max { card ( ( U ( xi ) complete accumulation point. ( U ( xi ) I S ) / i = 1, 2, … n }. Then I S ) } i = 1, 2, … n } which is a contradiction. Therefore, S has a b- Conversely, assume that X is not b-compact and that every infinite subset S ⊂ X has a b-complete accumulation point in X. Then, there exists a b-open cover B with no finite subcover. Let δ = min { card ( Φ ) / Φ ⊂ B, where φ is a b-open cover of X }. Fix ψ ⊂ B for which card ( ψ ) = δ and U { U / U ∈ ψ } = X. Let N denote the set of natural numbers. Then by hypothesis δ ≥ card ( N ). By well-ordering ψ be some minimal well-ordering “∼”. Suppose that U is any member of ψ. By minimal well-ordering “∼” we have card ( { V / V ∈ ψ, V ∼ U } ) < card ( { V/ V ∈ ψ } ). Since ψ cannot have any subcover with cardinality lesser than δ for each U ∈ ψ, we have X ≠ U { V / V ∈ ψ, V ∼ U }. For each U ∈ ψ, choose a point x ( U ) ∈ X − U { V U { x ( V ) } \ V∈ ψ, V ∼ U }. This always able to do this. If not, one can choose a cover of smaller quantity from ψ. If H ( x ) = x (U) / U ∈ ψ }, then proof will be complete if we show that H has no b-complete accumulation point in X. Suppose that z is a point of the space X. Since ψ is a b-open cover of X then z is a point of some set W in ψ. Since W∼U, x ( U ) ∈ W. Now, T = { U / U ∈ ψ and x ( U ) ∈ W } ⊂ { V \ V∈ ψ, V ∼ W }. But card ( T ) < δ. Therefore, card (H I W) < δ. But card ( H ) = δ ≥ card ( N ) since for two distinct points u and w in ψ, we have, x ( u ) ≠ x ( w ). This means that H has no b-complete accumulation point in X, which is a contradiction to our assumption. Therefore X is b-compact. Proposition 5.2 For a space X the following statements are equivalent: a) X is b-compact b) Every net in X with an well-ordered directed set Λ as domain, b-accumulates to some point of X. Proof (a) ⇒ (b) Suppose ( X, T ) is b-compact and ξ = { xα/ α ∈ Λ } be a net with an well-ordered directed set Λ as domain. Assume that ξ has no b-accumulation point in X. Then for each point x in X, there exists V(x) ∈ BO ( X, x ) and an α ( x ) ∈ Λ such that V ( x ) I { xα / α ≥ α ( x ) } = φ which implies that { xα / α ≥ α ( x ) } is a subset of X – V(x). Then the collection C = { V(x) / x∈X } is a b-open cover of X. By the hypothesis of the theorem, X is b-compact and so C has a finite subfamily {V(xi)}, where i = 1, 2, … n such that X = 570 U {V(xi)}. Suppose that A VIEW ON NETS IN TOPOLOGICAL SPACES… the corresponding elements of Λ be { α (xi) }, i = 1, 2, … n. Since Λ is well ordered and { α ( xi ) } is finite, the largest element of { α (xi) } exists. Let it be { α (xl) }. Then for γ ≥ { α (xl) }, we have { xδ / δ ≥ γ } ⊂ n n i=1 i=1 I (X−V (xi) ) = X− I V (xi) = φ, which is not possible. This shows that ξ has atleast one b- accumulation point in X. (b) ⇒ (a) It is enough to prove that each infinite subset has a b-complete accumulation point by utilizing Proposition 5.1. Suppose that S ⊂ X is an infinite subset of X. According to Zorn’s lemma, the infinite set S can be well-ordered. This means that we can assume S to be as a net with domain which is a well-ordered index set. Hence, S has a b-accumulation point z. Therefore, z is a b-complete accumulation point of S. Hence X is bcompact. Proposition 5.3 A space X is b-compact iff each family of b-closed subsets of X with the finite intersection property has a non-empty intersection. Proof The proof is obvious. Proposition 5.4 A space X is b-compact iff each filterbase in X has atleast one b-accumulation point. Proof Fα′s Suppose that X is b-compact and B = {Fα / α ∈ Γ } be a filterbase in it. Since all finite intersections of are non empty, it follows that all finite intersections of bcl (Fα)’s are also non-empty. From Proposition (5.3) that I bcl (Fα) is non empty, which means that B has α∈Γ atleast one b-accumulation point. Conversely, suppose B is any family of b-closed sets. Let each finite intersection of each family of bclosed sets be non-empty. The sets Fα with their finite intersection establish a filterbase B. Therefore B, baccumulates to some point z in X. Hence, z ∈ I (Fα). Hence by Proposition 5.2 that X is b-compact. α∈Γ Proposition 5.5 A space X is b-compact iff each filterbase on X with atmost one b-accumulation point is b-convergent. Proof Suppose that X is b-compact, x be a point of X and B be a filter base on X. The b-adherence of B is a subset { x }. Then the b-adherene of B is equal to { x } by Proposition 5.4. Assume that there exists V ∈ BO (X, x) such that for all F ∈ B, FI ( X – V ) is non-empty. Then ψ = { F − V / F ∈ B } is a filterbase on X. Hence the b-adherence of ψ is non-empty. However I bcl ( F – V ) ⊂ I bcl ( F ) ) ⊂ ( X – V ) F∈B F∈B = { x } I ( X – V ) = φ, which is a contradiction. Hence for each V ∈ BO ( X, x ), there exists F ∈ B with F ⊂ V. This shows that B b-converges to x. To prove the converse, it is sufficient to show that each filterbase in X has atleast one b-accumulation point. Assume that B is a filterbase on X with no b-accumulation point. By hypothesis B b-converges to some point z in X. Suppose, Fα is an arbitrary element of B. Then for each V ∈ BO ( X, z ) there exists Fβ ∈ B, such that Fβ ⊂ V. Since B is a 571 G. Vasuki, E. Roja and M.K. Uma filterbase, there exists a γ such that Fγ ⊂ Fα I Fβ ⊂ Fα I V, where Fγ non-empty, which means that Fα I V is non-empty for every V ∈ BO( X, Z ) and correspondingly for each α, z is a point of bcl(Fα). Hence z ∈ I bcl α (Fα). Therefore, z is a b-accumulation point of B which is a contradiction. Hence, X is b-compact. REFERENCE 1. Andrijevic, on b-open sets, Mat. Ventik, 48 (1996), 59-64. 2. M. Caldas, S. Jafari, G.B. Navalagi and M.M. Shankrikopp, some remarks on θ-compact spaces, International Journal of Mathematics and Computing Applications, 1 (2009), 123-126. 3. A. Csaszar, Generalized open sets, Acta Math. Hungar, 75 (1997), 65-87. 4. A. Csaszar, Generalized topology generalized continuity, Acta Math. Hugar, 96 (2002), 351-357. 5. A. Csaszar, separation axioms for generalized topologies, Acta Math. Hungar., 104 (2004), 63-69. 6. A. Csaszar, Extremally disconnected generalized ‘topologies, Annales Univ, Sci. Budapest, 47 (2004), 91-96. 7. S. Jafari, Some properties of Quasi Q-continuous functions Far East J. Math. Sci., 6 (1998), 689-696. 8. John.L. Kelley, General topology, 1955 springer - verlag Newyork Berlin Heidlberg. 9. N.V.Velicko, on extension of mappings of topological spaces, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 292 (1970), 4147. 10. N.V.Velicko H-closed topological spaces, Mat. Sb., 70 (1966), 98-112, English Transl, (2), in Amer Math. Soc. Transl, 78 (1968), 102-118. 572