Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Appendix 20 Introduction • Effective control of FMD: Intra-serotype chimeric FMD vaccine antigen elicit protection in cattle - Physical barriers, including fencing - Immune barrier using vaccination Vaccination F.F. Maree Transboundary Animal Diseases Physical barriers, like fences Introduction A key statement from discussions with DAFF • The control of FMD by vaccination is complicated by: regarding what is needed in the control of FMD: - Multiple genetic lineages (and antigenic variants) in different geographical regions. - Adaptations of field strains are cumbersome. “We need better vaccines and - Stability of the virus and/or antigen. better fences” - Longevity of antibody responses elicited by vaccines. - Developing countries: lack of vaccines tailored to their conditions SAT2 Antigenic variation SAT2 antigenic variation 1.2 Vaccine match based on r-values ZIM/07/83/2 KNP/19/89/2 1 ERI 12/89/2 RWA/02/01/2 0.8 0.6 Ref sera: r-value criteria ZIM/7/83 0.4 KNP/19/89 0.2 RWA/2/01 0 ERI/12/89 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 r-Values of SAT-2 virus isolates from different topotypes compared to antiserum prepared to the reference strains KNP19/89 (I), ZIM7/83 (II), RWA/2/01 (VIII) and ERI/12/89 (X). SAT2 vaccine strains SAT2 reference viruses Open Session of the EuFMD: 2012, Jerez de la Frontera, Spain 1 Appendix 20 A joint approach between conventional, inactivated vaccine technology and genetic engineering Rational design of vaccines • Vaccine containing a inter-serotype chimeric antigen elicited immune responses similar to that of the parental antigen. FMDV capsid • Functional amino acid residues involved in cell culture adaptation of SAT vaccine strains have been identified and introduced in field viruses using reverse genetics. • Genetically engineered SAT2 and SAT3 viruses revealed diverse stabilities to mild acidic conditions - stability of the capsid can be engineered. V • Yield of chimeric vaccine antigen and growth of viruses can potentially be improved by modification and improvement of enzymatic functions. Chimera capsid • Epitope switching may be used to modify antigenicity of an infectious copy virus. Construction of infectious chimeric particles SAT2/ZIM/07/83 vSAT2 Vaccination of cattle with a SAT2/SAT2 vaccine r-values for SAT2 viruses 1.20 ZIM/07/83/2 1.00 KNP/19/89/2 D0 ERI 12/89/2 D7 D14 D21 D32 0.80 SAT2/ZIM/17/91 vZIM17/SAT SAT2/ZIM/14/90 vZIM14/SAT chimera 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 KNP/19/89/2 ZIM/07/83/2 ZIM/17/91/2 ZIM/14/90/2 vZIM17/SAT2 vZIM14/SAT2 Vaccinate 2ml containing 8 μg 146S: Challenge: ZIM/14/90 - ZIM/14/90 - Chimera - Placebo Neutralising antibody titers Vaccination of cattle with a SAT2/SAT2 vaccine Chimeric vaccine Parental vaccine 3.0 Chimeric vaccine Cattle vaccinated with chimera 3.0 2.5 2.5 2.0 2.0 1.5 Parental vaccine Cattle vaccinated with parental 3.00 3.00 2.50 2.50 2.00 2.00 1.5 1.50 1.0 1.50 1.0 1.00 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 Day 0 Day 7 Day 14 Day 21 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.00 Day 0 Day 7 Day 14 Day 21 Day 0 Day 7 Day 14 Days post-vaccination •Cattle vaccinated with 8 ug of antigen •Challenge with 104 ID50 FMDV at 21 dpv •Sera tested with a SAT2 solid-phase competition ELISA (SPCE) Day 21 0.00 Day0 Day7 Day14 Day21 Days post-vaccination •Cattle vaccinated with 8 ug of antigen •Challenge with 104 ID50 FMDV at 21 dpv •Sera tested with a SAT2 solid-phase competition ELISA (SPCE) Open Session of the EuFMD: 2012, Jerez de la Frontera, Spain 2 Appendix 20 Neutralisation titers compared to protection Vaccine Animal number SAT2/ZIM/14/90 vZIM14/SAT Neutralisation titers compared to protection Temperature (ºC) Neutralisation titer Lesions postchallenge P-1 P-2 39.5 39.3 2.06 2.38 None None P-3 P-4 40.1 39.6 2.02 2.47 Mild None 3 P-5 P-6 P-7 40.0 38.6 39.7 2.15 2.38 2.00 Mild None None 2,5 C-1 C-2 39.6 39.7 2.43 2.82 None None 1,5 C-3 C-4 40.3 39.1 2.04 2.26 None None 1 C-5 C-6 C-7 38.7 39.6 39.2 2.59 2.40 2.61 None None None 0,5 1 2 39.6 38.9 <1.3 <1.3 Severe Severe VNT titers 2 0 Control Protected parental Unprotected parental Structurally modified master seed viruses to enhance conventional foot-and-mouth disease virus vaccine production Antigenic relatedness to SAT2 viruses r1= heterologous titer homologous titer 1,20 Protected chimera 1,00 0,80 good vaccine match 0,60 0,40 poor vaccine match 0,20 0,00 SAR/3/04 KNP/19/89 antiserum vZIM14-SAT2 antiserum SAT2/ZIM/7/83 ZIM/14/90 viruses ZIM/7/83 antiserum SAT2/ZIM/14/90 antiserum SAT2/KNP/19/89 antiserum SAT2/SAR/3/04 Wellcome Trust translational award Interpentamer residues aimed at stabilising the capsid Global FMD Research Alliance Consortium consisting of: Institute for Animal Health, Pirbright Structural model of SAT2 pentamer Transboundary Animal Diseases, ARC-OVI Plum Island Animal Disease Centre, USDA University of Oxford Side view of the pentamer, showing the interpentamer interface MSD Animal Health Open Session of the EuFMD: 2012, Jerez de la Frontera, Spain 3 Appendix 20 In vitro measurement of capsid stability Neutralising Ab response in guinea pigs Thermofluor assay A24 vSAT2 Mut B VNT titers of vSAT2 (wild-type) and mutant vaccinated GPs --- A24 (55 °C) --- Mutant B (53 °C) --- Mutant H (52 °C) 3 --- Mutant F (51 °C) 2.5 --- Mutant A (51 °C) --- vSAT2 WT (47 °C) --- Mutant C (45 °C) 3.5 2 1.5 1 Shift of 6 °C 11.3 % increase in dissociation temperature using Thermofluor assay of mutant B. 0.5 0 vSAT2, 1 month Conclusion • Intra-serotype Chimeric Vaccine VZIM/14-SAT2 elicited a protective immune response in cattle comparable to that of the conventional vaccine; SAT2/ZIM/14/90. • Similar antigenic profiles observed for both the chimera and conventional vaccines. • Thermo-stable SAT2 capsids were designed based on structure and infectious viruses based on a capsid stabilised mutation indeed shows an increase >10% in dissociation temperature vSAT2, 6 months Mutant, 1 month Mutant, 6 months Acknowledgements P. Nsamba; K. Scott; B. Blignaut; P. Mutowemba; Makarere University, Uganda TADP, ARC-OVI TADP, ARC-OVI TADP, ARC-OVI A. Kotecha, E. Fry, D. Stuart B. Charleston E. Rieder D. Goovaerts, P .Guntram Oxford Structural biology group IAH, Pirbright PIADC, USDA MSD Animal Health Open Session of the EuFMD: 2012, Jerez de la Frontera, Spain 4