Download Download Slides

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Fiscal multiplier wikipedia , lookup

Economic democracy wikipedia , lookup

Uneven and combined development wikipedia , lookup

Transformation in economics wikipedia , lookup

Rostow's stages of growth wikipedia , lookup

Economic growth wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
LSE Growth Commission
Presentation to OECD by
John Van Reenen & Nicholas Stern
OECD – 16 April 2013
SET UP (IN JAN 2012)
IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE INSTITUTE FOR GOVERNMENT
• Co-Chairs Tim Besley & John Van Reenen
• Financed by HEIF 5 and ESRC
• Commissioners:
o Philippe Aghion
o Lord John Browne
o Francesco Caselli
o Sir Richard Lambert
o Rachel Lomax
o Lord Nick Stern
o Nobel Laureate Chris Pissarides
WHY AN LSE GROWTH COMMISSION?
• Long-term structural issues - beyond debates about
austerity
• Political economy: why things have not been fixed
before? What institutions could be built to last?
The Economic Story of the UK
Human Capital
Innovation & investment
Infrastructure
Measuring Progress
Conclusions
DECLINE AND REBOUND: RELATIVE GDP PER
CAPITA FROM 1870
160
USA
USA
140
USA
Ger
120
Per cent
80
60
Ger
UK
100
Fr
Fr
USA
Fr
Ger
Fr
Ger
40
20
0
1870
1950
1979
2007
Source: LSE Growth Commission
PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH (GDP PER HOUR ) :
IT WASN’T ALL FINANCE
Annual average growth rates in percentage points
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
0.2
0.3
0.5
Financial intermediation
Business services and
renting of m&eq
0.4
0.8
Distribution services
0.1
1.5
0.6
1.0
Personal and social
services
0.7
Other goods producing
industries
0.1
0.6
Manufacturing
excluding electrical
0.5
0.4
Electrical machinery,
post and communication
0.5
0.5
0.0
1979-1997
Reallocation
1997-2007
-0.5
Source: LSE Growth Commission
THE INEQUALITY CHALLENGE: GROWING
WAGE DIFFERENCES
1.35
90-10 Log FT Weekly Wage Differentials
Men
1.25
Women
1.15
1.05
0.95
Men
Women
0.85
1979
1984
1989
1994
1999
2004
2009
Source: LSE Growth Commission
WHAT WORKED
• Policy Changes
– Competition/privatisation policy; flexible labour
markets; increases in university education; Openness
to FDI & immigration
• Institutional innovation
– Competition Commission & OFT; NICE; Bank of
England MPC; OBR; MAC, LPC, NPRB
WHAT DIDN’T WORK
• Policy failures
– short-term political horizons; adversarial politics; lack
of independent expert advice & evaluations
• Outcome is structural weaknesses in skills, infrastructure
and investment in innovation
The Economic Story of the UK
Human Capital
Innovation & investment
Infrastructure
Measuring Progress
Conclusions
WHY HUMAN CAPITAL MATTERS
• Strong relationship between skills & growth
– “Double Dividend”: boosts growth & reduces
inequality
• Some UK problems
– Mediocre test scores (e.g. OECD PISA)
– “Long tail” of underachievement
– Steep socio-economic gradient
10
1. `FLEXIBLE ECOLOGY’ FOR SCHOOLS
Spread better teaching practices:
• School autonomy
• Strengthened accountability
• Wider parental choice
• Flexibility in entry and exit
11
2. TACKLING DISADVANTAGE
Current focus on average, not on “long tail” of disadvantage
• Information on performance across the distribution
(e.g. League Tables)
• Ofsted Inspection
• Revise floor targets
• Expansion of sponsored academies in
disadvantaged areas
12
The Economic Story of the UK
Human Capital
Innovation & investment
Infrastructure
Measuring Progress
Conclusions
INVESTMENT AND INNOVATION
• Low investment as a share of GDP
- heavily weighted towards property and buildings
• Weak intangible investment
–Low R&D & patent intensity
–Poor management quality
• Financing gaps affecting start-ups and SMEs
• Aggravated by lack of skills & infrastructure
• Short-termism in Finane: competition weak in
retail banking
PROPOSALS
• Increase competition in retail/SME banking
– Account switching; banking license
– Referral to Competition & Markets Authority
• Business Bank to focus on innovative start-ups
– Independent board
– Focus on innovation investments
– SME securitisation
The Economic Story of the UK
Human Capital
Innovation & investment
Infrastructure
Measuring Progress
Conclusions
INFRASTRUCTURE
• Problem areas
– Transport (roads, aviation, rail)
– Energy
• Government induced policy risk
– Lack of clear sense of strategy – uncertainty
– Vacillation in and politicisation of policies and projects
• Rigid planning framework
– Rationale with little economic content
– Limited scope to share benefits
• Rigid and misleading public accounting conventions
NEW INSTITUTIONAL ARCHITECTURE
• Infrastructure Strategy Board
– Independent expert advice
– Accountable to Parliament
– Foundation for cross-party consensus
• Infrastructure Planning Commission
– Delivery – planning implications
– Share benefits of development
– No ministerial veto
• Infrastructure Bank
– Reduce policy risk to encourage private sector
investment
– Develop sector-specific skills in new areas
– Catalytic/multiplier effects on private investment
PROMOTING CONFIDENCE AND TRANSPARENCY
The Economic Story of the UK
Human Capital
Innovation & investment
Infrastructure
Measuring Progress
Conclusions
MEASURING PERFORMANCE
• Exclusive focus on GDP not helpful
– Increases even if most people are left behind
– Measures production not income
• Greater focus on Median Household Income
– Captures what happens in the core of the population
– Focuses on income
– Focuses on families
• And yet, no single indicator captures all aspects of
wellbeing.
MEDIAN INCOME AND GDP PER CAPITA
Source: ONS
The Economic Story of the UK
Human Capital
Innovation & investment
Infrastructure
Measuring Progress
Conclusions
Conclusions
Build institutions that put politics in the right place
– Making strategic choices
– Setting high level objectives
– Holding executive bodies to account
supported by
– More capability at the centre of government
– A bipartisan commitment to evidence based policy
Effective action requires sustained cross party
commitment:
– to tackle the key problems holding back long term
growth
– to develop the institutions needed to create a stable
long term policy framework
Thank You