Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Immunity-aware programming wikipedia , lookup
Electricity wikipedia , lookup
Electromotive force wikipedia , lookup
Magnetochemistry wikipedia , lookup
History of electric power transmission wikipedia , lookup
Scanning SQUID microscope wikipedia , lookup
Hall effect wikipedia , lookup
Arc welding wikipedia , lookup
High voltage wikipedia , lookup
Multiferroics wikipedia , lookup
Auroral Arc Electrodynamics from Satellite Data Abstract The ALADYN (AuroraL Arc electroDYNamics) method enables a realistic description of an auroral arc (Marghitu, 2003; Marghitu et al., 2004). The method is based on a parametric arc model, that allows the derivation of the parameters by numerical fit to the experimental data. In order to obtain consistent results one has to take into account, as a minimum, the ionospheric polarization, the contribution of the Hall current to the meridional closure of the field-aligned current (FAC), and the coupling between the FAC and the electrojet (EJ) flowing along the arc. ALADYN is illustrated with a wide, stable, winter evening arc, as seen in the ‘Data’ panels. The ionospheric electric field (IEF), potential, and current obtained by ALADYN are presented in the ‘Results’ panels. The IEF and potential are given for two arc models: YPYH, where only the polarization and Hall terms are considered, and YPYHX, where the FAC–EJ coupling is added. Outside of the ion beams the potential drops at FAST and ionospheric level match each other (as expected, because the magnetic field line is equipotential) for model YPYHX (panel d), which is not the case for model YPYH (panel c). This is a key feature, pointing to the importance of the variations along the arc. The negative excursions of Ex at the arc boundaries indicate polarization charge double layers, as sketched in panel f. Once the IEF is derived, one can also find the ionospheric current. In our case the Pedersen and Hall components of Jx compensate each other, and the ionospheric connection between the downward and upward FACs is vanishingly small (panel e). This quite atypical configuration is caused by the close vicinity of the FAC and convection reversal. Data Results (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) Left (a) Ground optical data. (b–e) FAST data: electron and ion energy spectrograms, high altitude electric potential, perturbation magnetic field. FR and CR indicate the FAC and convection reversal, respectively. Right: Results obtained by ALADYN: (a, b) IEF for polarization length scales of 4km (red), 8km (green), and 20km (blue); (c, d) potential drop at FAST (black) and ionospheric level (red); (e) field-aligned (black) and ionospheric current (Jx red, Jy green, together with their respective Pedersen and Hall components); (f) schematic view of the arc. References: • Marghitu, O., Ph.D. Thesis, TU Braunschweig, MPE Report 284, 2003. • Marghitu, O., et al., J. Geophys. Res., in press, 2004. O. Marghitu, B. Klecker, G. Haerendel, J.P. McFadden