* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Label Switched Path (LSP) Dynamical Provisioning Performance
Recursive InterNetwork Architecture (RINA) wikipedia , lookup
Distributed firewall wikipedia , lookup
Piggybacking (Internet access) wikipedia , lookup
Computer network wikipedia , lookup
Cracking of wireless networks wikipedia , lookup
Zero-configuration networking wikipedia , lookup
Multiprotocol Label Switching wikipedia , lookup
Label Switched Path (LSP) Dynamical Provisioning Performance Metrics in Generalized MPLS Networks draft-xie-ccamp-lsp-dppm-00.txt Guowu Xie,SJTU Guoying Zhang, CATR MII Jianghui Han, IXIA Xueqing Wei, Fiberhome Jianhua Gao, Huawei Motivations • Why need for measuring and characterizing LSP provisioning performance in GMPLS networks. – Requirements of dynamical provisioning capability in GMPLS Networks: interactive broadband multimedia services. – Let the requirement of applications and the provisioning capability of the network be mapped to each other – Essential to the GMPLS network maintenance and optimization. • Standardized metrics and the way to measure them precisely should be defined. • The objective is to maximize common understanding of LSP provisioning performance between the service providers and network users. Methodology • GMPLS LSP performance measurement is similar to IP network: – GMPLS control plane is a packet switched network – the LSP setup/release delay is similar to the round-trip Delay in IP networks. • We use the structures and notions introduced and discussed in the IPPM framework document, [RFC2330] [RFC2679] [RFC2681], and we define the metrics according to GMPLS specific message exchange scenarios. Outlines • Singleton definition of performance metrics – Unidirectional LSP Setup Delay – Bidirectional LSP Setup Delay – LSP Graceful Release Delay • Samples definition of performance metrics – pseudo-random Poisson process is used – Other models may be choosed • Statistics Performance – Min/Max/Median/Percentile – Variance Outlines • Measuring these metrics is important for applications scheduling. – Longer LSP setup delay will incur higher overhead for the requesting application. • Also reflects the status of control plane. – For LSPs traversing the same route, longer setup delays may imply congestion in the control channel or high control element load. Real Network Demonstration • China High Performance Broadband Information Network (3TNET) ----863 project Sponsored by the Ministry of Science and Technology. – Circuit-switched and packet-switched hybrid network to support large-scale interactive broadband streaming media. – Network Infrastructure: IP +ASON/GMPLS+DWDM – Services: VOD, DVB-IP, high speed Internet access • ASON/GMPLS network has some enhanced features of burst scheduling and multicasting, to provide dynamic and automated provisioning of end-to-end Ethernet connections to media server and IPTV head-ends. – Dynamic point-to-multipoint connections for IP head-ends – Periodic connection provisioning for media server, every 10 secs Measured Performance in the Field Trial 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 99.999 1000 500ms/100ms 800 Setup Delay (ms) Cumulative Counts 99.9 600 400 99 95 80 60 40 20 5 1 0.1 0.01 16000 200 0 0 100 200 14000 300 12000 Counts Request Sequence • Delay Variance observed at any load. Higher load will lead to higher variance and longer setup/release delay. 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 Setup Delay (ms) Average setup delay 668 ms 99.9% setup delay less than 1000ms Open Issues • time synchronization between the testing nodes • other circumstances, such as point-tomultipoint multicast LSP, LSP rerouting • Enhancement of MIBs: support monitoring of LSP provisioning metrics on GMPLS nodes, for maintenance/optimization. • Expect to receive feedbacks and suggestions!