Download Ad hoc routing protocols

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Ad Hoc 라우팅 표준(RFC3561)과
IPv6 적용기법
정재훈 (Jaehoon Paul Jeong)
한국전자통신연구원 표준연구센터
[email protected]
http://www.adhoc.6ants.net/
2003. 10. 23
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
1
Contents


Introduction
Ad Hoc Unicast Routing Protocols


AODV (RFC 3561)





Demand-driven Routing Protocols
AODV Message Formats
IPv6 AODV
Autoconfiguration Technologies for IPv6 MANET
Summary
References
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
2
Introduction (1/2)

Categories of Wireless Networks

Infrastructured Network


Infrastructureless Network


Cellular Network, Wireless LAN (WLAN)
Ad Hoc Network
Ad Hoc Network



Temporary network composed of mobile nodes without
preexisting communication infrastructure, such as Access
Point (AP) and Base Station (BS).
Each node plays the role of router for multi-hop routing.
Application

War-field communication, Emergency recovery, Homenetworking, Video-conferencing etc.
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
3
Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
Internet
WLAN
Cellular
Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
4
Introduction (2/2)

Issues in MANET






Ad Hoc Unicast Routing
Ad Hoc Multicast/Broadcast Routing
Power Saving
Global Connectivity for MANET
Addressing & DNS
Automatic Support of Networking Facility in
MANET

Autoconfiguration Technology
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
5
Ad Hoc Unicast Routing Protocols
Ad Hoc routing protocols
Table-driven
(Proactive)
DSDV OLSR TBRPF AODV
CGSR
Demand-driven
(Reactive)
DSR
Hybrid
LMR
ABR
TORA
SSR
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
ZRP
6
Demand-driven Routing Protocols

Characteristics

Creation of routes only when desired by the source node


Route Discovery Process is completed




Until the destination becomes inaccessible along every path
from the source
Until the route is no longer desired
Criterion of Classification of Routing Protocols


Once a route is found
When all possible route permutations have been examined
Maintenance of a Route


By Route Discovery Process
Method by which route finding is performed
Examples

AODV, DSR, LMR, TORA, ABR, SSR
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
7
AODV (RFC 3561)
Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector
C. Perkins, E. Belding-Royer and S. Das,
July 2003.
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
8
Contents





Overview of AODV
Route Discovery
Route Maintenance
Optimizations
AODV Message Formats
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
9
Overview of AODV (1/2)

AODV is improved DSDV algorithm



Reactive or On-demand
Provides unicast and multicast communication
(MAODV)
AODV doesn’t maintain a complete list of routes
as in DSDV algorithm.


Nodes that are not on a selected path don’t maintain
routing information or participate in routing table
exchanges.
Loop-free

AODV utilizes destination sequence numbers to ensure
all routes are loop-free.
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
10
Overview of AODV (2/2)

Route Discovery process

When does it happen?


When source node doesn’t already have
a valid route to a destination
Route Discovery


It broadcasts a route request (RREQ) packet to its
neighbors.
Neighbors forward the request to their neighbors, and so
on until either the destination or
an intermediate node with a “fresh enough” route
to the destination is located.
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
11
Route Discovery (1/10)
B
S
A
C
D
1. Node S needs a route to D in order to send data
packets to D
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
12
Route Discovery (2/10)
B
S
A
C
D
1. Node S needs a route to D in order to send data
packet to D
2. Creates a Route Request (RREQ)
Enters D’s IP addr, seq#,
S’s IP addr, seq#
hopcount (=0)
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
13
Route Discovery (3/10)
B
RREQ
S
A
C
D
2. Creates a Route Request (RREQ)
Enters D’s IP addr, seq#,
S’s IP addr, seq#
hopcount (=0)
3. Node S broadcasts RREQ to neighbors
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
14
Route Discovery (4/10)
B
RREQ
S
A
C
D
4. Node A receives RREQ

Makes reverse route entry for S
dest = S, nexthop = S, hopcnt = 1
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
15
Route Discovery (5/10)
B
RREQ
S
A
C
D
4. Node A receives RREQ


Makes reverse route entry for S
dest = S, nexthop = S, hopcnt = 1
It has no route to D, so it rebroadcasts RREQ
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
16
Route Discovery (6/10)
B
RREQ
S
A
C
D
5. Node C receives RREQ


Makes reverse route entry for S
dest = S, nexthop = A, hopcnt = 2
It has a route to D, and
the seq# for route for D is >=D’s seq# in RREQ
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
17
Route Discovery (7/10)
B
S
A
RREP
C
D
6. Node C sends RREP


C creates a Route Reply (RREP)
Enters D’s IP addr, seq #
S’s IP addr, hopcount to D (=1)
Lifetime
Unicasts RREP towards A
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
18
Route Discovery (8/10)
B
RREP
S
A
RREP
C
D
7. Node A receives RREP


Makes forward route entry to D
dest = D, nexthop = C, hopcount = 2, Lifetime
Unicasts RREP to S
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
19
Route Discovery (9/10)
B
RREP
S
A
C
D
8. Node S receives RREP

Makes forward route entry to D
dest = D, nexthop = C, hopcount = 3, Lifetime
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
20
Route Discovery (10/10)
B
S
A
C
D
9. Node S sends data packets on route to D
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
21
Route Maintenance (1/5)
B
S
A
RERR
C
D
1. Link between C and D breaks down

C can perform local repair for the route to D
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
22
Route Maintenance (2/5)
B
S
A
RERR
C
D
1. Link between C and D breaks down

C can perform local repair for the route to D
2. Node C invalidates route to D in route table
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
23
Route Maintenance (3/5)
B
S
A
RERR
C
D
3. Node C creates Route Error (RERR) message


C creates a Route Error (RERR)
Enters DestCount (=1), D’s IP addr, seq #
Lists all destinations which are now unreachable


“DestCount” field indicates the number of unreachable
destinations included in the RERR message.
Sends to upstream neighbors in precursor list
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
24
Route Maintenance (4/5)
B
RERR
S
A
RERR
C
D
4. Node A receives RERR


Checks whether C is its next hop on route to D
Deletes route to D
or invalidates the route to D according to N flag
(No delete flag)


When N flag is set, A does not send RERR to S and may reinitiate
route discovery for D.
Forwards RERR to S
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
25
Route Maintenance (5/5)
B
RERR
S
A
C
D
5. Node S receives RERR



Checks whether A is its next hop on route to D
Deletes route to D
Rediscovers route if still needed
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
26
Optimizations (1/2)

Expanding Ring Search



It prevents flooding of network during route
discovery
Control Time To Live (TTL) of RREQ to search
incrementally larger areas of network
Advantage


Less overhead when successful
Disadvantage

Longer delay if route not found immediately
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
27
Optimizations (2/2)

Local Repair

It repairs breaks in active routes locally instead of
notifying source.


Advantage


If the first repair attempt is unsuccessful, it sends RERR to
source.
Link repair with less overhead, delay and packet loss.
Disadvantage

Longer delay and greater packet loss when unsuccessful
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
28
AODV Message Formats
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
29
Route Request (RREQ)
Message Format
0
1
2
3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
Type
|J|R|G|D|U|
Reserved
|
Hop Count
|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
RREQ ID
|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
Destination IP Address
|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
Destination Sequence Number
|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
Originator IP Address
|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
Originator Sequence Number
|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
30
Route Reply (RREP)
Message Format
0
1
2
3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
Type
|R|A|
Reserved
| Prefix Sz |
Hop Count
|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
Destination IP address
|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
Destination Sequence Number
|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
Originator IP Address
|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
Lifetime
|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
31
Route Error (RERR)
Message Format
0
1
2
3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
Type
|N|
Reserved
|
DestCount
|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
Unreachable Destination IP Address (1)
|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
Unreachable Destination Sequence Number (1)
|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-|
|
Additional Unreachable Destination IP Addresses (if needed)
|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
Additional Unreachable Destination Sequence Numbers (if needed)
|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
32
Route Reply Acknowledgement
(RREP-ACK) Message Format
0
1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
Type
|
Reserved
|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

RREP-ACK message MUST be sent in response to
a RREP message with the ‘A’ bit set.

This is typically done when there is danger of unidirectional
links preventing the completion of
a Route Discovery cycle.
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
33
IPv6 AODV
C. Perkins, E. Belding-Royer and S. Das,
draft-perkins-manet-aodv6-01,
November 2001.
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
34
AODV for IPv6 Operation

Message Handling

The handling of IPv6 AODV for IPv6 AODV messages is
analogous to IPv4 AODV.


ICMP Processing


AODV messages have the formats appropriate for use with 128bit IPv6 addresses.
Whenever IPv4 AODV specifies use of ICMP, the operation
for IPv6 uses ICMPv6.
Configuration Parameters

IPv4 and IPv6 AODVs use the same parameters.
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
35
Autoconfiguration Technologies
for IPv6 MANET
Reference Paper:
http://www.adhoc.6ants.net/publications/
international-conference/icoin2004-jaehoon.pdf
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
36
Autoconfiguration?

What is Autoconfiguration?


Issues of IETF Zeroconf Working Group





The technology that allows IP-enabled devices be able to
communicate one another in infrastructureless environment.
Unicast Address Autoconfiguration
Multicast Address Allocation
Name Resolution (DNS)
Service Discovery
Why is Autoconfiguration needed in MANET?

To provide the quick and easy configuration related to the
networking in MANET with dynamic topology.
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
37
Autoconfiguration Technology for
IPv6 MANET

Unicast Address Autoconfiguration


Automatic configuration of a unique IPv6 address within
MANET
Multicast Address Allocation

Allocation of a unique multicast address for the application
which needs a new multicast address
Multicast DNS


Translation between name and
IPv6 address
Service Discovery

Discovery of the necessary service
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
Autoconfiguration
Technology
for IPv6 MANET
Multicast DNS

Service Discovery
Unicast Address Autoconfiguration
Multicast Address Allocation
38
Summary

AODV




It is a Reactive/On-demand Ad Hoc routing protocol.
 Route Discovery cycle
Sequence numbers are used for route freshness and loop
prevention.
It maintains only active routes.
Optimizations can be used to reduce overhead and
increase scalability.

IPv6 AODV

Autoconfiguration Technologies for IPv6 MANET
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
39
References
[1] C. Perkins, E. Belding-Royer and S. Das,
“Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing”,
RFC 3561, July 2003.
[2] C. Perkins, E. Belding-Royer and S. Das,
“Ad Hoc On Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing for IP
version 6”, draft-perkins-manet-aodv6-01, November 2001.
[3] Auto-Networking Technologies for IPv6 MANET,
http://www.adhoc.6ants.net/publications/internationalconference/icoin2004-jaehoon.pdf
[4] ETRI Ad Hoc Project,
http://www.adhoc.6ants.net/
제1회 IPv6 표준화워크샵 및 표준설명회
40