Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
EARNEST and the e-IRG Lajos BÁLINT <[email protected]> EARNEST WS, 23-24.05.2006 1 About this presentation Basic goal: input to the EARNEST study wrt. e-IRG • • • • from RN viewpoint basic issues rather than history somewhat subjective (provoking?) advise EARNEST directly (+ e-IRG indirectly) Why e-IRG? • influential advisory role assumed ! ( + coordination ? ) EARNEST WS, 23-24.05.2006 2 Outline • • • • • EARNEST background what is e-IRG e-IRG coverage e-IRG and EARNEST corollaries / suggestions EARNEST WS, 23-24.05.2006 3 EARNEST – considerable background • • • • • • SERENATE (NRENs / TERENA) GN2 JRA1...5 (NRENs / Consortium + DANTE) ENPG (delegated govt. + NREN representatives) e-IRG (delegated govt. + NREN + project reps.) others (EC invites NREN + project reps./individuals) (ESFRI – the wider embedding [served by e-IRG]) Common goal: e-Infrastructures e-Science ERA Briefly outlined here: EARNEST WS, 23-24.05.2006 4 Parallel efforts – different roles EARNEST: a project within GN2 for investigating research networking and preparing the next RN generation ( NRENs, ...) - bottom-up, more technical-organisational - looking mainly for what is possible e-IRG: an advisory body in the area of building the future e-Infrastructure ( EC, ...) - top-down, more political-strategic - looking mainly for what is desirable EARNEST + e-IRG: possibilities vs. desires realities (?) Practice: work is/will be done by the NRENs + DANTE (NGIs + ...)! Role of the EC (priorities): catalysis + orchestration + balancing EARNEST WS, 23-24.05.2006 5 What is e-IRG? • Definition (web, 2005): High level coordination of e-Infrastructure development for eScience • Mission (10 December 2003, Rome): Monitoring & advising (political/administrative) in shared use of e-resources • Objectives: – – – – – – identification of resources recommendation of policies focusing on applications (users / domains) increasing awareness of opportunities addressing governance issues in resource deployment drawing on NREN community experiences EARNEST WS, 23-24.05.2006 6 What is e-IRG? (cont’d) ”... support on the political, advisory, and monitoring level, the creation of a policy and administrative framework for the easy and cost-effective shared use of electronic resources” ”... develop a roadmap for the e-Infrastructures for FP7 and beyond and support the ESFRI in the process of the development of a priority list and a roadmap for new Research Infrastructures” Structure / operation: – Delegated members – troika – Closed meetings and open workshops – White papers – Opportunities lists – Roadmaps + Sustainability ... EARNEST WS, 23-24.05.2006 7 The e-IRG coverage – Past: emphasis on grids (coordination ...) – Present: widening scope (network – Grid – archives) – Future: balanced coverage of e-Infrastructure issues (?) EARNEST WS, 23-24.05.2006 8 (cont’d) The e-IRG coverage Covered topics (revisit?): – The network: national/European/global (connectivity – QoS IP & BoD) – The e-Infrastructure resources (availability, accessibility + coord/mgmt) [sense – process/compute (incl.HPC) – store – actuate ( + data)] – Applications and users (technical / admin / usage support / ease of use) [grids (Grid framework) – coord/mgmt – helping/advising/training] – Federated AAAI (security for dependability + accountability for fairness) – AUP (acceptability of use – key of integrated/shared usage) – Virtual repositories – digital archives (collections of curated resources) – An organisation (?) (oriented to the application framework?) (consortium + coord/QoS operational unit?) [NGIs vs. NRENs ...?] – Involvement of the industry (integrated user & partner) + Sustainability (political – legal – technical – financial – operational ...) EARNEST WS, 23-24.05.2006 9 The e-IRG Roadmap • EC request (2004): Strategic Roadmap for e-Infrastructure (10-20 years) • Goal: e-Infrastructure to well support the ERA (in parallel: ESFRI Roadmaps) • Method: Opportunities List Roadmap 2005 (2006/07) e-IRG Roadmap v0.9: main points (RN + MW + resources + co-op): • global end to end hybrid networking ----------------------------------------------------• AAI • middleware repositories • SW life cycle management • open standards • training and support • grid resource provision ----------------------------------------------------- • supercomputers • storage facilities • data for the grid • sensors • grid-enabled instruments • new technologies -------------------------------------------------• collaboration tools • co-operation with industry EARNEST WS, 23-24.05.2006 10 e-IRG as related to EARNEST • Different role / framework • Overlapping coverage • Possibility of separating the coverage + co-operating: – EARNEST: • • • • • • • • – e-IRG: network technology network architecture geographic coverage org.structure (network) network user communities application demand analysis involvement of telcos sustainability (network level) • e-resources • • • • • • • repositories/archives disciplinary coverage org.structure (applications) appl.user communities network supply analysis involvement of industry sustainability (appl.level) EARNEST WS, 23-24.05.2006 11 The dilemmas for both EARNEST and e-IRG • Several failed earlier foresights (X.25, ATM, early 100 Gbps ...) • Timeframe of foresight / roadmapping (vs. FP7 calendar) • Widening spectrum of options (technology, architecture...) • Revolution (new gen.) vs. evolution (consolidation) periods • Sustainability (multiple conditions – digital divide) • EC (FP7) budget (late decisions – how to adapt) • Necessity of EC support (motivating co-operation and national funding) • Different views on EC financing (arguments for both minor and major increase) • FP6 RN budget: 0,5 % of total FP6 budget goes to GN2 – what in FP7? (cf. 50% rule + rule of only international connectivity) EARNEST WS, 23-24.05.2006 12 The timeframe Timings of the RNs 6,7,8. generations (GEANT-1,2,3): • • • • • Preparing GN-i starts: Proposal submitted: Tendering starts: Project officially starts: New network completed: GEANT-1 GEANT-2 GEANT-3 early 99 late 99 early 00 fall 00 fall 01 late 02 fall 03 early 04 fall 04 mid-06 fall 06 (?) fall 07 (?) early 07 (?) fall 08 (?) late 10 (??) Full time from start to finish: 2,5 years 3,5 years 4,5 years (?) – Final e-IRG Roadmap is due in 2007 (?) – EARNEST final report is due in 2007 (late Summer) EARNEST WS, 23-24.05.2006 13 EARNEST and e-IRG: a summary • Lessons learnt: – overlapping requires co-operation (coverage to be agreed) – lack of integrating the efforts lower efficiency (efforts to be joined) – lack of matching approaches mess of messages (approaches to be harmonised) – lack of balanced emphasis distorted view of needs (balanced view to be attained) – lack of elevated EC funding (FP7 wrt. FP6) losing impetus (annual FP7 funds to be considerably elevated) Sustainability is a common key goal! EARNEST WS, 23-24.05.2006 14 EARNEST and e-IRG: a summary (cont’d) • EC funding (FP6 FP7): some important aspects: • • • • • • • • • • new topics in e-Infrastructure (RN, Grid, testbeds, libraries, research...) general political importance of the field increases seamless pan-European end-to-end connectivity needed geographical coverage of the pan-European network widening digital divide to be narrowed testing, piloting and introducing new technologies/services needed access and campus networks to be developed development of global connectivity to be intensified increase of national funding to be motivated by the level of EC support cohesive role of EU funding to be kept/strengthened EARNEST WS, 23-24.05.2006 15 EARNEST and e-IRG: a summary (cont’d) • Summary – suggestions to EARNEST: (also a message to e-IRG + a model for other EARNEST ”backgrounds”) – Complementarity and collaboration (+ Competition?) (keep contact, exchange ideas, share coverage + keep key role) – Different roles: deliver differently: - EARNEST NRENs (+ EC) - e-IRG EC (+ NRENs) – Don’t waste time – deliver asap! – Put emphasis on: - role of NRENs / TERENA / DANTE (NIGs / ...) - importance of demand-supply balance - necessity of bidirectional flow of information - significance of handling complex sustainability – Increase of annual EC (FP7) support (>50%) to be well reasoned! EARNEST WS, 23-24.05.2006 16