Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Report on the Improved RMTN project Doc. 3.3 (2) Presentation version RA II/ICM-GTS 2003 (Moscow, 8 to 10 September 2003) Contents 1. Background 2. Status of progress of the improved RMTN 2.1 Implementation of circuits 2.2 Migration to TCP/IP 2.3 Seeking cost-effective connections 2.3.1 Frame Relay services 2.3.2 IP-VPN services 2.3.3 Internet links 2.4 Complementary systems 2.4.1 Satellite broadcasting 2.4.2 Internet server systems 3. Prospect on foundations of the Improved RMTN 3.1 IMTN Network II (a core of the Improved RMTN) 3.2 Understanding of network service providers 3.3 Asian market of network services 4. Suggestions in further improving Submitted By Hiroyuki Ichijo (Japan) Rapporteur on the improved RMTN 1. Background Use of managed data network services Strengthen the overall GTS capabilities with cost-effectiveness and technical trends Improved MTN project 1999 ideas Collaborative implementation by a small number of managed networks 2002 2003 2004 Improved RMTN project Feasibility study • Implementation of several networks with appropriate groups • Step by step approach towards ultimate goal of collaborative implementation endorsed by RA II 12th session 2000 2001 Migration to TCP/IP Practical discussion and coordination by ET-IMTN • Administrative issues • Implementation plan by Networks I and II Practical discussion and coordination by each group Training Seminar Step by step implementation on bilateral basis Collaborative implementation of Networks I and II a core A possible configuration of the improved RMTN Improved RMTN Northern part (Group IID) Network Moscow Tashkent Zone of responsibility of RTH Tashkent Novosibirsk Zone of responsibility of RTH Novosibirsk Khabarovsk Zone of responsibility of RTH Khabarovsk Offenbach Tehran Zone of responsibility of RTH Tehran Zone of responsibility of RTH Jeddah Zone of responsibility of RTH Tokyo Improved MTN Network II Tokyo Beijing Jeddah Improved RMTN Western part (Group IIC) Network New Delhi Zone of responsibility of RTH New Delhi Improved RMTN Southern part (Group IIB) Network Zone of responsibility of RTH Beijing Bangkok Zone of responsibility of RTH Bangkok Improved RMTN Eastern part (Group IIA) Network 2. Status of progress of the improved RMTN Objectives of the first stage: 1) Migration to TCP/IP for saving the both of costs and human resources allowing latitude in selecting a network service 2) Extrication from expensive leased circuits for saving recurrent costs obtaining flexible connectivity Seeking cost-effective alternatives to leased circuits, Frame Relay, IP-VPN … Use of the Internet is now being discussed by many centres. 2.1 Implementation of circuits Regional plan : 78 circuits Implemented : 67 circuits Implementation rate : 86 % (as of Aug. 2003) NMCs Baghdad, Kabul and Phnom Penh are isolated from the GTS. Low speed circuits are still more than half. 100% 3 10 More than 9600bps 11 18 75% 25 22 18 33 18 2400 to 9600 (inclusive) less than 2400bps 15 9 50% 5 38 33 25% 32 28 28 21 0% Feb 1997 Aug 1999 Sep 2000 Jan 2002 Aug 2003 2005 (plan) Progress of improvement in circuit speed in RA II The number of circuits 2.2 Migration to TCP/IP Achievement rate : about 35% ( as of August 2003) Estimation rate : over 50% by the end of 2005 number of circuits 50 Additional circuits Interregional circuits 40 Regional circuits MTN circuits 30 20 10 0 Feb 1997 Aug 1999 Sep 2000 Jan 2002 Progress in migration to TCP/IP in RA II Aug 2003 2005 (plan) 2.3 Seeking cost-effective connections 2.3.1 Frame Relay services Bilateral basis FR : 6 circuits Collaborative FR : 3 circuits (as of August 2003) number of circuits 14 Additional circuits 12 10 Interregional circuits Regional circuits MTN circuits 8 6 4 2 0 Feb 1997 Aug 1999 Sep 2000 Jan 2002 Aug 2003 Growth in introducing of Frame Relay circuits in RA II 2005 (plan) Two approaches to establish Frame Relay links Bilateral basis approach (improved RMTN Group IIA strategy) Collaborative approach (IMTN project) Administrative view Multi-end-contract # the traditional peer-to-peer method for GTS circuits # Easy to coordinate One-stop-contract # a new collaborative framework among centres # Not easy to coordinate Technical view Network-to-Network Interconnection (NNI) # Inter-connection of two providers / telecom carriers # Committed Information Rate (CIR) : Symmetric only Seamless connection # connection through a network managed by a single provider # Committed Information Rate : Symmetric or Asymmetric Bilateral basis approach (Strategy of the improved RMTN Group IIA) Traditional method : bilateral contract/billing Frame Relay Network X Frame Relay NNI Network Y Collaborative approach (IMTN project) New method : one-stop concept (a) one-stop contract/billing (b) one-stop contract & multi-end billing 2.3.2 IP-VPN services There is no VPN circuit in RA II. One of VPN services is IP-VPN which is different in backbone management from Internet VPN. IP IP Label VPN group IP Label IP Core Router CE PE Closed IP network by a provider VPN group CE PE Core Router PE CE CE Core Router Provider’s PEs and Core Routers based on MPLS have Label Tables and switch IP packets forward according to the Tables. CE : Customer Edge Router PE : Provider Edge Router VPN : Virtual Private Network MPLS : Multi Protocol Label Switching IP-VPN with MPLS IP ESP AH IP IPsec Product IP ESP AH IP Internet IPsec Product VPN group VPN group IPsec Product IPsec VPN products add/remove the ESP for encryption and encapsulation and the AH for authentication to/from an IP packet. ESP : Encapsulation Secure Payload AH : Authentication Header Internet VPN with IPsec 2.3.3 Internet links Current : 5 circuits (as of August 2003) Estimation : 9 circuits by the end of 2005 number of circuits 10 Additional circuits 8 Interregional circuits Regional circuits 6 MTN circuits 4 2 0 Feb 1997 Aug 1999 Sep 2000 Jan 2002 Aug 2003 Growth in GTS circuits through the Internet in RA II 2005 (plan) 2.4 Complementary systems 2.4.1 Satellite broadcasting systems • Being used for a complement of GTS point-to-point links and a backup source. • PCVSAT (2-way) by China, TV-inform-Meteo by Russia, Data broadcast through World Space Satellite Digital Audio Broadcast by India, MDD by EUMETSAT, WAFS (ISCS, SADIS) and UKSF/WWW Broadcast type DAB: Digital Audio Broadcasting DVB: Digital Video Broadcasting 2 way VSAT type SADIS/UKSF (WAFS broadcast / WWW data by UK satellite Facility) 2.4.2 Internet server systems • With improving Internet connectivity of Members, Internet data serving method is becoming one of convenient and promising complement systems. • A number of RTHs/NMCs operate their own servers and provide WWW data. We must keep track of both of positive and negative aspects of the Internet ! Hidden cost Heavy load Positive aspect : Good opportunities for innovation The Internet always leads IT innovation INTERNET anytime, anywhere, anyone any medium, any contents EC site, Video on Demand, Network Game Music & Movie streaming, On-line shopping Home security Negative aspect : Security risks Victims Target hosts Step mail servers with security holes Step hosts with security holes Simultaneous attacks INTERNET Spam Attack trigger There are bad guys in the world Internet diffusion INTERNET Feb. 1991 Internet full connectivity Not Internet but Bitnet E-mail only (UUCP etc) No connectivity June 1997 3 Prospect on foundations of the Improved RMTN 3.1 IMTN Network II (a core of the Improved RMTN) • The IMTN project is now in the implementation stage and will be completed in 2004. • The IMTN Network II is established as extension of RA VI RMDCN which is a well managed Frame Relay network under the contract between ECMWF and Equant. • Beijing already has joined the RMDCN. New Delhi, Jeddah and Tokyo will join soon. Network I Beijing Tokyo Melbourne Washington Buenos Aires Brasilia Moscow New Delhi Sofia Prague Bracknell Jeddah Network II Offenbach Nairobi Dakar Cairo Toulouse Algiers 3.2 Understanding of network service providers • Find the right price Cut-price with an excessive discount often means a trade-off in service quality. We must keep a balance between price and quality in our minds. • Assess the quality We should try to understand each provider’s specific characteristics in backbone network, reliability and availability, performance such as burst limits and round-trip delay, and support capabilities such as help desk services, monitoring and report procedures and local language support. • Understand difficulties * PTT monopoly often makes a network service less reliable and more expensive. * In case of a bilateral connection, nothing goes well without technical compatibility and a contractual agreement between PTTs. * In case of a seamless connection by a single provider, it is very hard to coordinate administrative issues on one-stop basis among individual NMHSs and the provider. 3.3 Asian market of network service providers • Generally the Asian telecom market is inactive except for the Internet business since the recent recession. New investments by global network service providers have inclined to concentrate on potential markets such as China and India. • Although each country’s PTT is trying to gradually phase out legacy facilities, its progress is slow in some countries of PTT monopoly. Such poor domestic infrastructure affects reliability and cost-effectiveness of international connections. • Increasing the number of available providers in eastern Asia has ceased and then unbelievable discounting in late 1990s is coming to an end. • In business use, the network trend is gradually moving from Frame Relay to VPN services. IP-VPN services are currently available domestically in developed countries and being available internationally among big cities in the world. The coverage of TCP/IP based services will expand on the worldwide level absorbing traditional telephone networks. 4. Suggestions in further improving 1) Acceleration of TCP/IP migration All of RMTN circuits in RA II should migrate to pure TCP/IP links with a first priority in the first step. Delay of implementation in one centre may extinguish the whole benefit. Some NMCs have difficulties in TCP/IP migration. Their telecom systems are already obsolete and have no capability to handle the TCP/IP protocol suite. Lack of expertise and funds definitely obstructs replacement of their systems. Technical and financial support in the early stage of the transition will be effective for promotion of the migration. Related RTHs and WMO Secretariat should consider possible support. 2) Selecting an appropriate network service with a possible framework There are options in cost-effective network services (i.e. FR, IP-VPN). Regarding the contract aspect, in addition to a bilateral framework which is the current strategy, a one-stop collaboration is becoming an option (e.g. further extension of the IMTN Network II). Since there are various differences in technical developments and administrative conditions from part to part in RA II, an appropriate network service and its contractual framework are not to be always the same. Each group and/or part (an RTH and NMCs concerned) should examine and discuss their best solution. In other words, an appropriate network service with a possible contractual framework should be selected by each group/part. 3) Use of the Internet for a GTS circuit as the very end solution The use of the Internet is one of convenient solutions to upgrade the current GTS circuits, especially asynchronous low speed ones. But there are serious risks in security and performance guarantee, as well-known. At present, all centre should first challenge the ordinary approach to the best solution. If the ordinary approach would be very difficult, the Internet use should be considered. In case of GTS circuits through the Internet, introduce of VPN techniques is recommended according to “Guide on Virtual Private Networks (VPN) via the Internet between GTS centres” developed by OPAG-ISS. 4) Practical use of consulting and marketing companies It is desirable to use detailed survey reports provided by telecom consulting and marketing companies in identifying available and adequate data communication services and network providers for RMTN and also national networks. 5) Building up technical information to help NMCs facing difficulty The on-line information resources on the GTS are available on the WMO Web server. Although this site is very useful for all the GTS centres, there seems be still room for improvement and enhancement. WMO Secretariat should strengthen the on-line information resources on the GTS from the view to help small NMCs having no expertise in cooperation with voluntary experts. In this regard, here are some ideas from GTS colleagues: • to add easier contents aiming at a newcomer to telecom section, beginner’s dictionary and necessary extractions from textbooks; • to increase trivial but necessary tips in the implementation collected from centres; • to add the latest information on telecom marketing and network providers; • to update contents timely; • to build a virtual help desk to answer questions from NMCs and to prepare FAQ. Current status of RMTN in RA II (as of August 25, 2003) RTH in Region II Washington NMC in Region II Moscow Centre in other region 64K MTN circuit Regional circuit Interregional circuit Additional circuit No implementation Non-IP link IP link NI 9.6K 100 Ashgabad 100 NI NI Tehran NI 2.4K 1200 Internet 64K Internet 50 100 Algiers Cairo 50 100 75 75 Doha 200 1200 NI 64K 128K Kathmandu 100 Cairo 75 Male NI Hanoi Macao Dhaka 50 200 Hong Kong 100 Internet Colombo Melbourne Yangon 200 64K 2.4K Singapore Frame Relay CIR<16/16K> 1200 Bangkok 75 Frame Relay CIR<16/16K> 200 9.6K Vientiane 50 Frame Relay CIR<16/16K> 75 Moscow 2.4K 50 Seoul 64K 50 Internet Muscat Frame Relay CIR<16/16K> 9.6K New Delhi 75 Frame Relay CIR<32/32K> Frame Relay CIR<32/32K> 64K Internet Emirates Sanaa Offenbach Kabul Karachi Tokyo Beijing Frame Relay CIR<48/48K> NI Bahrain Jeddah 1200 PyongYang NI Kuwait 100 4.8K Dushanbe NI 14.4K Ulaanbaatar Tashkent 75 Baghdad 7.2-28.8K (V.34) 9.6-28.8K (V.34) Bishkek Khabarovsk Frame Relay CIR<32/768K> 7.2-28.8K (V.34) 9.6K via Moscow -32.5K (V.34) via Moscow Almaty 19.2-24K (V.34) NI 7.2-28.8K (V.34) Novosibirsk 9.6-19.2K (V.34) Offenbach 7.2K 64K Frame Relay CIR<16/32K> Manila NI Phnom Penh Kuala Lumpur Melbourne Plans of RMTN in RA II for 2003-2005 RTH in Region II Washington NMC in Region II Centre in other region NI 9.6-19.2K (V.34) NI 19.2-24K (V.34) 9.6K NI 64K 64K Tehran Internet 100 NI NI 50 64K Doha Jeddah 64K NI 64K 50 Internet 64K Emirates CIR<16/16K> New Delhi 128K 50 75 Kathmandu Internet Dhaka Internet Muscat 75 Male Internet Colombo Algiers Melbourne Internet Yangon Internet NI Hanoi 64K Frame Relay CIR<16/16K> Singapore Macao 9.6K Vientiane 1200 Bangkok 75 Cairo Hong Kong 100 50 200 Frame Relay CIR<16/16K> 75 Moscow 2.4K 100 Seoul 64K Frame Relay Cairo 200 Frame Relay CIR<16/16K> 9.6K Internet Sanaa Frame Relay CIR<32/32K> Offenbach 1200 Internet Frame Relay CIR<48/48K> Beijing Frame Relay CIR<48/48K> NI Karachi 200 CIR<8/8K> Kabul 100 Bahrain 75 75 Frame Relay Dushanbe Tokyo PyongYang Ulaanbaatar Tashkent 14.4-28.8K(V.34) 9.6K 7.2-28.8K(V.34) NI Kuwait 64K 9.6-28.8K (V.34) Khabarovsk 7.2-28.8K(V.34) via Moscow -32.5K(V.34) via Moscow Bishkek 75 NI 7.2-28.8K(V.34) Novosibirsk Almaty Ashgabad 100 Offenbach Baghdad Frame Relay CIR<32/768K> 64K MTN circuit Regional circuit Interregional circuit Additional circuit No implementation Non-IP link IP link Plan Frame Relay 64K Moscow Frame Relay CIR<16/16K> 200 Frame Relay CIR<16/16K> Frame Relay CIR<16/32K> Manila NI Phnom Penh Kuala Lumpur Melbourne