Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
AIR TRAFFIC ORGANIZATION FCS Technology Assessment Team: Technology Assessment Phase II – P34 Overview Presented at ICAO ACP WGC Meeting, Brussels, Belgium September 21, 2006 Prepared by: ITT/Glen Dyer NASA/James Budinger Public Safety Radio Systems • Standardized systems with open interfaces – APCO Standards • Developed by TR-8 Private Radio Technical Standards Committee, under sponsorship of the TIA in accord with a memorandum of understanding between TIA and APCO/NASTD/FED (Association of Public Safely Communications Officials/National Association of State Telecommunications Directors/Federal Government). – TETRA Standards • Produced by the Project Terrestrial Trunked Radio (TETRA) Technical Body of the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) – TETRAPOL • Development of the publicly available specifications for TETRAPOL has been carried out by the manufacturers of the TETRAPOL Forum and the TETRAPOL Users’ Club – IDRA • Standardized by the Association of Radio Industries and Businesses (ARIB). The first version of Japan's digital dispatch standard, called RCR STD-32, was completed in March 1993. An updated version of this standard which did not alter the basic RF characteristics of the standard, but which did add substantial networking capability to the system, was approved in November 1995, and is referred to as RCR STD-32A. • Commercial spectrally efficient land mobile radio systems – Integrated Digital Enhanced Network (iDEN™) (referred to internationally as DIMRS) – Proprietary Motorola narrow-band TDMA voice and data system – EDACS (Enhanced Digital Access Communications System) – Proprietary Ericsson trunked narrow-band fail-soft system for critical communications 2 Public Safety Radio Standards Segmentation Project Mesa Bit Rate APCO 34 Tetra Release 2 (TAPS, TEDS) 1000’s kbps Broadband 100’s kbps 10’s kbps Wideband Narrow band Channel Widths APCO P25 Phase 1, 2 Tetra Release 1 TETRAPOL IDRA iDEN EDACS 6.25 kHz 25 kHz 50 kHz 200 kHz 25 MHz Chart courtesy of EADS Defense and Communications Systems, as provided in correspondence between ITT and EADS 3 Evolution of Public Safety Radio Standards US Standards Evolution APCO Project 16 Study Narrowband Pre-standard Analog, 25 kHz FM APCO Project 25 Phase I 12.5 kHz Digital VHF and UHF Bands APCO Project 25 Phase II 12.5 kHz TDMA VHF and UHF Bands European Standards Evolution Pre-standard Analog FM Systems Narrowband Tetra Release I 25 kHz 4-slot TDMA UHF Band *Solution space - The set of technologies for constructing a public safety network. Wideband APCO Project 34 OFDM 150 kHz Channels 700 MHz Band Solution Space* Broadband Project Mesa 50 MHz channel at 4.9 GHz (Joint ETSI and EIA/TIA Standard) Wideband Tetra Release II TAPS – E-GPRS Overlay Network Solution Space* Wideband Tetra Release II TEDS – MCM, TDMA, Adaptive Modulation, 150 kHz UHF Band 4 P34 Overview • APCO Project 34 is a EIA/TIA standardized system for provision of packet data services in an interoperable dispatch oriented topology for public safety service providers – Standards available here: http://global.ihs.com – Example standard description • TIA-902.BAAB - Complete Document Revision: A Chg: Date: 09/23/03 WIDEBAND AIR INTERFACE SCALABLE ADAPTIVE MODULATION (SAM) PHYSICALLAYER SPECIFICATION - PUBLIC SAFETY WIDEBAND DATA STANDARDS PROJECT DIGITAL RADIO TECHNICAL STANDARDS • Project 34 concept is a government/commercial partnership – Provides universal access to all subscribers – Carefully controlled and managed network • Was developed to address “issues that restrict the use of commercial services for mission critical public safety wireless applications” – – – – Priority access and system restoration Reliability Ubiquitous coverage Security 5 P34 Overview (2) • • A P34 network (called a “Wideband System”) can interoperate with other P34 networks (the ISSI standardized interface) with end-systems (Ew interface) and with mobile users over the air interface (Uw) The air interface has defined modes between mobiles (MR to MR); between mobiles and fixed infrastructure (MR to FNE) and repeated modes for extending range to distant stations – Mobile Radios can serve as repeaters to extend range from FNE to distant Mobile Radios • The protocol stack is layered, and assumes a point of attachment to an IP network 6 P34 Overview (3) Source: “Spectrum Considerations for Public Safety in the United States”, Tewfik L. Doumi, IEEE Communications Magazine, January 2006 • P34 systems (shown as TIA-902 in the figure) are slated to be deployed using Frequency Division Duplexing with – Forward Link (Fixed Network Equipment, FNE, to Mobile Radios, MRC) between 767 and 773 MHz as shown in the figure – Reverse Link (MRC to FNE) between 797 and 803 MHz • The band could be cleared in some areas by December 31, 2006 – Provided at least 85% of households have digital capable TV sets • Most likely date is (hard requirement) January 2009 7 Wideband (P34) Data Standards Status Relevant P34 Standards are mature TMS Not Started TIA-902.AAAB Drafting PDS MM Balloting TIA-902. BAEB TIA-902. BAAF Published Transceiver Methods of Measurement (MOM) Transceiver Performance Recommendation (TPR) Text Messaging Specification (TMS) Packet Data Specification (PDS) Mobility Management (MM) Logical Link Control (LLC) Media Access Control / Radio Link Adaptation (MAC/RLA) Radio Channel Coding (CHC) Physical (PHY) LLC Legend TIA-902.BAAE MAC/RLA Required for Interoperability TIA-902.BAAC MOM CHC CHC MOM TIA-902.CBAA TIA-902.BBAD TIA-902.BAAD TIA-902.CAAA TPR PHY PHY TPR TIA-902.CBAB TIA-902.BBAB TIA-902.BAAB TIA-902.CAAB IOTA IOTA SAM Performance Modulation Modulation Provides Additional Capacity 700 MHz General Use Mode SAM Performance 700 MHz Interoperability Mode 700 MHz General Use Mode Chart courtesy of EADS Defense and Communications Systems, as provided in correspondence between ITT and EADS 8 P34 Air Interface (PHY) Description • There are two air interfaces (PHY) defined – SAM for interoperability • Has random access burst structure that incorporates 625 s propagation guard time (187.5 km) and 208.33 s ramp-down (not included in guard) – VDL 3 guard time includes the ramp-down time and is 1.14 ms (334 km) • Random access burst structure rules could be modified to significantly increase system range – IOTA to provide additional data capacity • Has random access burst structure that incorporates 500 s propagation guard time (150.0 km) and 500 s ramp-down • MAC uses timing advance to offset mobile propagation delays – From the standard: “A timing advance feature managed by the MAC layer assumes that propagation delays are not seen at the radio receiver level except for initial random access slot” • Random access burst structure rules could be modified to significantly increase system range 9 Air Interface Specifics • Both Air Interfaces use a form of Multi-Carrier Modulation (Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing, OFDM) • Frequency Domain Extensibility – Base channel is 50 kHz, with extensions defined to 100 kHz and 150 kHz – Each 50 kHz segment is comprised of 8 subcarriers (that map to defined subchannels) • Concatenate subchannel sync/pilot/data structure of the 50 kHz slot two, three times • Simplifies receiver design • Completely scalable to much larger bandwidths (if needed) – Each 50 kHz provides 96 to 288 kbps (modulation adapts with Eb/No) 10 Scaleable Adaptive Modulation Parameters Parameter 50 kHz Channel Configuration 100 kHz Channel Configuration 150 kHz Channel Configuration RF Subchannels 8 16 24 Subchannel Spacing 5.4 kHz 5.4 kHz 5.4 kHz Symbol Rate 4.8 k 4.8 k 4.8 k Symbol Filter Root Raised Cosine ( = 0.2) Root Raised Cosine ( = 0.2) Root Raised Cosine ( = 0.2) Modulation Type 1 QPSK (2 bits/symbol) QPSK (2 bits/symbol) QPSK (2 bits/symbol) Modulation Type 2 16QAM (4 bits/symbol) 16QAM (4 bits/symbol) 16QAM (4 bits/symbol) Modulation Type 3 64QAM (6 bits/symbol) 64QAM (6 bits/symbol) 64QAM (6 bits/symbol) Modulation Rate 1 76.8 kbps 153.6 kbps 230.4 kbps Modulation Rate 2 153.6 kbps 307.2 kbps 460.8 kbps Modulation Rate 3 230.4 kbps 460.8 kbps 691.2 kbps Demodulation Coherent (Pilot Symbol Assisted) Coherent (Pilot Symbol Assisted) Coherent (Pilot Symbol Assisted) TDM Slot Time 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms Slot Interleave Variable Variable Variable 11 Inbound Random Access Frame Structure 12 P34 Air Interface Interactions IP Bearer Service Access Point IP Bearer Service Access Point IPv4 IPv6 IPv4 IPv6 Layer 3 Layer 3 PDP context activation, LLC UP setup, data transfer Subnetwork Dependent Convergence Protocol (SNDCP) PDS MM Logical Link Control (LLC) Layer 2 Radio Link Adaptation (RLA) Media Access Control (MAC) Layer 1 PHY Subnetwork Dependent Convergence Protocol (SNDCP) PDS MM CP functions: acknowledgement, retransmission, optional enhanced error detection UP functions: Segmentation/Reassembly, acknowledgments, selective retransmission, enhanced error detection, flow control, windowing, buffering Dynamic selection of modulation, channel coding, logical channel multiplexing configuration Synchronization, scrambling, link management, random access procedure, MAC address allocation, radio resource allocation, power control Logical Link Control (LLC) Radio Link Adaptation (RLA) Layer 2 Media Access Control (MAC) PHY Layer 1 13 SNDCP Context Activation Sequence Diagram FNE MRC service user SNDCP LLC CP MAC MAC LLC CP SNDCP IP Datagram KEY SN_Activate_Req Activate_Wait timer service user LLC_Connect_Req RSC_Req on RACH RSC_RES(Grant) Link Management Ack Timer MABK on RACH slots MAC_Connect_Ind LLC_Connect_Res(Accept) T1Retry MAD_RES(SAC) MSBK on SSCH MAC_Connect_CON (Accept) MABK - MAC Address Access Block MAD_RES - MAC Address Response MSBK - MAC Signaling Block RSC_REQ – Resource Request RSC_RES - Resource Response OB_MHBK – Out Bound Message Header Block MAC_Signal_Ind – MAC / RLA Service Primitive TNP_SIG – Transport Signal LLC_Signal_Req MSBK_RSC_REQ Resource Management MRC RSC_RES (grant) T1Retry OB_MHBK MAC_Signal_Confirm MSBK_TNP_SIG (SN_Activate_Req) MAC_Signal_Ind (llc control pdu) LLC_Signal_Ind SN_Activate_Acpt_Res LLC_Signal_Req MAC_Signal_Ind (CP_RES pdu) MSBK_TNP_SIG (llc control pdu) MAC_Signal_Con LLC_Signal_Con service user SNDCP LLC CP MAC MAC LLC CP SNDCP service user 14 UP Acknowledged Data Transmission Sequence Diagram FNE MRC service user SNDCP LLC UP MAC MAC LLC UP SNDCP service user KEY SN_Data_Req – IP Datagram LLC_Data_Req – Interlayer primitive MSBK - MAC Signaling Block RSC_REQ – Resource Request RSC_RES - Resource Response OB_MHBK – Out Bound Message Header Block MDBKS – MAC Data Blocks MAC_Data_Confirm – Interlayer primitive MAC_Data_Ind – Interlayer primitive LLC_Data_Ind – Interlayer primitive SN_Data_PDU – Payload Data LLC Ack – Acknowledgement Frames MSBK – MAC Signaling Block Standby/Ready IP Datagram SN_Data_Req Ready Timer Segment Data LLC_ Data_Req MSBK_RSC_REQ Ack Timer Resource Management Schedule PDCH Tx MRC RSC_RES (grant) OB_MHBK T1Retry Open MAC_Data_Confirm MDBKs (UP data) MAC_Data_Ind Assemble Data LLC_Data_Ind SN_Data PDU UP_Response (LLC Ack PDU) MSBK MAC_Signal_Ind (LLC Ack PDU) LLC_Data_Confirm service user SNDCP LLC CP MAC MAC LLC CP SNDCP service user 15 Overview of P34 Modeling • P34 Analysis conducted – OPNET Modeling – the P34 protocol stack was modeled using OPNET Modeler • High fidelity simulation of protocol stack provided insight into technology performance • Offered load and scenario as specified in COCR for NAS “Super Sector” – Physical Layer Modeling – P34 physical layer was modeled with high fidelity by developing a custom C code application • Provided insight into technology performance in aviation environment • For performance assessment, C was chosen over SPW and MATLAB Simulink® due to complexity of P34 pilot structure – Interference Modeling – a model of the P34 transmitter was developed using SPW to assess P34 interference to UAT and Mode-S Receivers • DME receiver modeling was undertaken, but was eventually terminated due to lack of “as built” algorithm information and insufficient fidelity with predictions to known results 16