Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Agenda • Market Forces Driving Providers to Evaluate Clinical Integration & Bundled Payments • Overview of Clinical Integration • Key Elements of a Clinical Integration Strategy • Bundled Payments Overview • Customized Bundled Payment Report Review TRANSFORMATIONAL Change Readiness Curve – Strategic Readiness STRATEGIC Major Change is Essential TACTICAL Focused Change is Necessary Been Here Before LOW Urgency (Opportunity or Burning Platform) HIGH 3 Leading Change – Right of Passage TRANSFORMATIONAL Multi-Hospital System With Very Large Employed Physician Base Major Change is Essential TACTICAL STRATEGIC Multi-State, Multi-Hospital Investor Owned Focused Change is Necessary Hospital Launching IPA+HEP Hospital With Multiple CoManagement Relationships Been Here Before LOW Urgency (Opportunity or Burning Platform) 4 HIGH 4 Payment Models Supported by CIN Strategy Source: HFMA 2010 The Advisory Board 2010 Reshape the Value Curve Optimizing value by focusing on quality, service and costs Value (V) = Quality (Q) * Service (S) Cost (C) NEW PARADIGM PAST THINKING QUALITY & SERVICE B Effectiveness: Improved quality/ service at the same or lower cost High X A Cutting costs at the expense of quality/service C Low Innovation: Improvement in all dimensions Y QUALITY & SERVICE High Adding costs to improve quality/service A Z Efficiency: Cutting costs without impacting quality/ service Low High COST Low High COST Source: *Lean Hospitals, Graban, CRS Press, p10 Low 6 Clinically Integrated Network PAYORS & EMPLOYERS Clinically Integrated Network Community Hospital(s) PHYSICIANS Community Physicians AMBULATORY Community Facilities Community Facilities 7 Clinical Integration Network Objectives 1. Develop a network that includes independent physicians in the market 2. Provide a mechanism to align the clinical practices of physicians across service lines 3. Identify areas of opportunity within the system for quality and efficiency improvements 4. Provide compensation for achieved results 5. Improve the value equation (cost and quality) for healthcare delivered within the network 8 Clinically Integrated Network Defined A Clinically Integrated Network (CIN) is a selective partnership of physicians collaborating with hospitals to deliver evidence-based care, improve quality, efficiency, and coordination of care, and demonstrate value to the market. Clinically Integrated Network Payors and Employers Contracts Participation Agreement $ Participation Agreement CI Entity BENEFIT TO STAKEHOLDERS Physicians • Preserving private practice model through alignment • Enhanced reimbursement through contracting for demonstrated network quality Markets and Hospitals • Align independent, employed, and specialist physicians in one organization • Enhanced reimbursement under FTC guidelines for demonstrated quality WHAT IT’S NOT Private Practice Physicians $ Distribution of Funds $ Health System and Employed Physicians • Physician employment • Hospital-led initiative • Mechanism to gain negotiating leverage over payors 9 Network Considerations – Local Market Pace Financial Performance Risk-based Payment FFS Declining FFS market will require network model to meet Reform Era Imperatives Time Local Market Conditions will Impact Timing of Network Development 10 Critical Market Pacers to Consider HOSPITAL PROFILE Location, access, inpatient volume and market share, EBITDA, profit margin, quality scores, asset distribution, IT infrastructure, etc. MARKET CHARACTERISTICS Supply and demand of beds & access, demographics, population growth, CON requirements, uninsured, HIX COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE Competitive intensity, history of irrationality, pursuit of new strategies and/or payment models PHYSICIAN PROFILE Mix of independent, employed, multispecialty or super groups, historical hospital-physician and physician-physician relationships PAYOR PROFILE Payor mix, rate parity and willingness to offer P4P or risk-based contracts EMPLOYER PROFILE Large employers (>1,000 employees) pursuing contracts with providers; small employers likely to abandon plans for Exchanges 11 Components of a Clinically Integrated Network Structure & Governance Infrastructure & Funding Contracting Distribution of Funds Information Technology Clinically Integrated Network Participation Criteria Performance Objectives Physician Leadership 12 Structure & Governance Overview: Other than an employment-only model, a CIN usually is structured as a joint venture or subsidiary Physician Hospital Organization, or an Independent Practice Association (IPA). Joint Venture PHO IPA Participating Physicians Health System Participating Agreement IPA 100% Payors / Employers Participating Physicians Health System XX% PHO Health System Subsidiary PHO Health System Participating Physicians Subsidiary XX% Payors / Employers 100% Participating Agreement Payors / Employers 13 Infrastructure & Funding Overview: The CIN is a separate business entity with a distinct identity, mission, and vision, dedicated leadership and staff, sustainable sources of revenue, and participating provider agreements with physicians that create potential value for both physicians and payors. Sources of Revenue The CIN will need to offset costs of building the network (Infrastructure) and eventually provide returns through various revenue sources depending on the maturity of the network. Reporting Incentives and Membership Fees Self Funded Health Plan Payor Contracts MATURITY OF CIN LOW HIGH Hospital Efficiency Program Pay-for-Performance Employer Contracts 14 Participation Criteria Overview: Member physicians or groups that satisfy certain guidelines and criteria must sign an agreement outlining the expectations and requirements for participation in the CI program. Sample Participation Criteria Participating Physicians Clinical Integration Legal Agreement (Independent & Employed) Information Technology Adoption Physician Leadership • • • • Active member of “Hospital” Medical Staff Participate in educational programs Complete orientation program Provide leadership and oversight over defined operations • • • • Utilize professional and office email Access to high-speed internet Implement the preferred health information technology Share clinical information / data Contracting Requirements Quality Improvement • • • Develop, implement, and monitor clinical protocols Review member physician performance Develop / implement corrective action plans and process improvement initiatives • Participate in jointly negotiated contracts 15 Performance Objectives Overview: CINs identify metrics and targets designed to meaningfully impact the clinical practice of all network physicians, and to align their conduct with hospital initiatives, so as to improve quality and demonstrate value across the entire continuum of care. Examples of Performance Improvement Element Description Examples Variance & Cost Reduction Minimize variable physician performance not related to patient characteristics Unnecessary Care Reduction Reduce avoidable, unproductive and duplicative services Clinical Restructuring Ensure treatment in most optimal setting with most appropriate level of provider • • Early step down from an IP to SNF bed Partnerships with a local retail clinic to offer non-urgent care System Optimization Shift focus to upstream, preventative care with emphasis on CI and population health • • Disease-based medical homes Patient engagement strategies using telehealth • • Minimize orthopedics supply chain cost Staffing and productivity opportunities • Prostate cancer screenings for elderly patients Reduce Readmissions • Source: Sg2 Analysis 16 Physician Leadership Overview: Health systems must empower physicians to have an influence on the future direction of the network. This will help integrate physicians’ clinical expertise into hospital operations and increase cooperation and credibility of the CI network. CIN IT QUALITY CARE REDESIGN Share In Network Governance MEMBERSHIP FINANCE Medicine Primary Care Neurosciences Heart and Vascular Lead and participate on sub-committees supported by CIN or Health System personnel Surgery Women & Children 17 Information Technology Overview: CINs use an IT-dependent performance improvement architecture with data-based mechanisms and processes to monitor and track utilization, quality, and efficiency of resource use to demonstrate value. View health-related data via a customizable user interface within an enterprise Digitize critical information on an individual within each care site Exchange health-related data within and between enterprises Derive value and intelligence to improve care quality and outcomes and to curb costs Deliver clinical and patient information to enhance patient care experiences and practitioner effectiveness CLINICAL CARE VALUE Advanced Clinical Decision Support Process/ behavioral change Health Analytics Health Information Exchange (Private) Healthcare Portals or Registries (Clinicians and Patients) Intermediate Electronic Medical Records IT Optimization MATURITY OVER TIME Source: IBM Center for Applied Insights 18 Distribution of Funds Overview: The CIN establishes an organized plan to link performance on defined gradients to eligibility for incentive payments. HOSPITAL / SYSTEM $ CLINICAL INTEGRATION NETWORK $ PAYORS & EMPLOYERS • Cost Savings • Efficiency Gains LOCAL NETWORK PERFORMANCE % • Hospital • Specialty • Location • P4P Contracts • Shared Savings • Increased Rates GLOBAL NETWORK PERFORMANCE % • Equal distribution INDIVIDUAL ACTIVITY/ OUTCOMES % • • • • Performance targets Educational event attendance Submission of Data Adoption of IT platform 19 Keys to Developing a High-Performing CIN Determining the right structure for your organization that supports your vision and aligns all stakeholders Generating sufficient funding to support network development and incent physician members through initial contracting efforts Developing a distribution methodology that appropriately incents physician members Crafting a communication plan that effectively communicates the business case for CI for physicians and the health system Bundled Payments Represent Key Opportunity for CINs Source: HFMA 2010 The Advisory Board 2010 BUNDLED PAYMENTS What are Bundled Payments? • One all-inclusive price, focusing on a patient’s total episode of care • Includes payment for all of a patient’s services for a certain procedure or diagnosis over a set number of days (usually from 30-120) • Mega-DRGs 23 How do Bundled Payments Relate to Population Health? • Creates incentives for providers to work together to coordinate care • Focus on the whole patient, not the visit • A targeted version of population health 24 Provider Services - Today Part B Service Part B Service Part B Service Part B Service Dr. Office Visit Dr. Office Visit Initial Inpatient Stay Dr. Office Visit Dr. Office Visit Readmission Dr. Office Visit Dr. Office Visit Dr. Office Visit Inpatient Post-Acute Stay (Rehab, Psych, LTC, SNF, HH) Other Part B Services (Hospital Outpatient, Labs, Durable Medical Equipment, Part B Drugs) 25 Bundled Services Part B Service Part B Service Part B Service Part B Service Dr. Office Visit Dr. Office Visit Initial Inpatient Stay Dr. Office Visit Dr. Office Visit Readmission Dr. Office Visit Dr. Office Visit Dr. Office Visit Inpatient Post-Acute Stay (Rehab, Psych, LTC, SNF, HH) Other Part B Services (Hospital Outpatient, Labs, Durable Medical Equipment, Part B Drugs) 26 Shared Savings • Creates incentives for providers to work together to coordinate efficient, cost-effective care • Bundled payment is set based on review of past performance and future expectations • Savings “delta” between the set payment and actual is shared 27 Data Analytics • Identify components of the bundle • Discern patterns, variances and opportunities for efficiency • Compare performance to benchmarks • Determine potential for shared savings • Monitor performance progress 28 REPORT REVIEW ANALYTICS AVAILABLE Bundled Payment Bundled Payment Preview Analysis Preview Analysis -Tier 1- -Tier 2- (major joints/heart failure) • All 175 BPCI Demo-eligible DRGs •90-day episode review with benchmark comparisons • 90-day episode review with benchmark comparisons •10-page .pdf report • Interactive Excel workbook •Member service • Set fee with discount for multi-hospital systems •2 high-volume DRGs •Available through Association/System Affiliation focus of today’s session • Available through DataGen Custom Analytics • BPCI Awardees - data analytic and monthly monitoring services • Other Risk-Sharing Arrangements •Commercial or public payer •Varying episode definitions and/or lengths •Custom benchmark comparisons Episode Cost Variation Anchor Admission Acute Transfer Readmission Inpatient Rehabilitation Home Health SNF LTCH Inpatient Psychiatric Physician Office Outpatient Regional Average Regional 95th Percentile 31 Episode Components Benchmark Comparisons $0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000$12,000$14,000$16,000 Anchor Admission Acute Transfer Readmission Inpatient Rehabilitation Home Health SNF Long-Term Care Hospital Inpatient Psychiatric Physician Office Outpatient Hospital Region U.S. 32 Episode Components Benchmark Comparisons Percent of Total Episode Dollars by Category Hospital 53% Region 50% U.S. 52% 0% 10% 20% Anchor Admission Inpatient Rehabilitation Long-Term Care Hospital Outpatient 3% 1%5% 3% 8% 30% 4% 6% 40% 50% 60% Acute Transfer Home Health Inpatient Psychiatric 30% 6% 2% 7% 23% 6% 2% 8% 21% 6% 3% 70% 80% 90% 100% Readmission SNF Physician Office 33 Episode Components Benchmark Comparisons Hospital Region U.S. 206 1,129 206,185 $24,950 $26,068 $25,510 # of Episodes MS - DRG Description Average Total Payment Episode Component/Service Type 470 - Major Joint Replacement Or Reattachment Of Lower Extremity W/O Mcc Average Number Average of Claims per Payment Per Episode Claim Average % of Average Payment per Episode Episode Payment Average Number of Claims per Episode Average Payment Per Claim Average Payment per Episode % of Average Episode Payment Average Number of Claims per Episode Average Average % of Average Payment Per Payment per Episode Claim Episode Payment Anchor Admission 1.0 $13,225 $13,225 53% 1.0 $13,024 $13,024 50% 1.0 $13,375 $13,375 52% Acute Transfer 0.0 $0 $0 0% 0.0 $11,686 $10 0% 0.0 $8,501 $6 0% Readmission 0.1 $7,671 $745 3% 0.1 $7,273 $902 3% 0.1 $7,375 $913 4% Inpatient Rehabilitation 0.0 $11,978 $233 1% 0.2 $12,988 $2,174 8% 0.1 $12,347 $1,501 6% Home Health 0.5 $2,690 $1,215 5% 0.7 $2,713 $1,862 7% 0.7 $2,979 $2,049 8% SNF 1.3 $5,886 $7,515 30% 1.0 $5,881 $6,021 23% 0.8 $6,844 $5,357 21% Long-Term Care Hospital 0.0 $0 $0 0% 0.0 $0 $0 0% 0.0 $30,751 $86 0% Inpatient Psychiatric 0.0 $0 $0 0% 0.0 $8,124 $7 0% 0.0 $8,553 $20 0% Physician Office 1.8 $791 $1,463 6% 2.2 $663 $1,476 6% 2.3 $645 $1,480 6% Outpatient 3.3 $167 $556 2% 3.3 $178 $591 2% 2.6 $274 $722 3% 34 Average Episode Payment Benchmark Comparisons Average Payments per Episode $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $0 Region Hospital With Less Than 10 Episodes Region Hospital With 10 To 50 Episodes Region Hospital With 50 Or More Episodes Hospital Regional Average Regional 95th Percentile 35 Timing of Readmissions Benchmark Comparisons 100% 90% 80% 40.0% 47.1% 45.9% 70% 30-90 Days 60% 15-29 Days 50% 40% 30.0% 24.3% 30% 20% 10% 21.1% 8-14 Days 13.6% 1-7 Days 15.0% 12.1% 15.0% 16.4% 19.4% Hospital Region U.S. 0% 36 Cost of Readmissions Benchmark Comparisons Readmissions to Average Dollars Total Claims for Average Episode Total Episodes Episode for Episodes Readmissions Price Provider w/Readmission Average Dollars for Episodes Percent w/out Difference Readmission Hospital 206 20 12 $24,950 $44,039 $23,343 88.7% Region 1,129 140 104 $26,068 $42,538 $24,200 75.8% 206,185 25,536 17,683 $25,510 $41,722 $23,700 76.0% U.S. 37 Analysis of Readmissions Days from Anchor Discharge (1) Regional 95th Percentile Readmission Readmission Dollars % of Dollars Total Episode Price $51,030 Total Episode Price (2) Episode ID Readmission DRG Description 1 394 Other Digestive System Diagnoses W Cc Hospital A 9 $5,133 20.0% $25,667 2 872 Septicemia Or Severe Sepsis W/O Mv 96+ Hours W/O Mcc Hospital A 43 $5,962 19.7% $30,193 3 638 Diabetes W Cc Hospital A 24 $4,289 10.3% $41,648 4 311 Angina Pectoris Hospital B 32 $2,618 3.9% $66,764 4 234 Coronary Bypass W Cardiac Cath W/O Mcc Hospital B 33 $24,933 37.3% $66,764 5 903 Wound Debridements For Injuries W/O Cc/Mcc Hospital A 29 $5,486 19.0% $28,904 6 467 Revision Of Hip Or Knee Replacement W Cc Hospital A 45 $16,691 20.3% $82,210 7 885 Psychoses Hospital A 8 $4,669 7.6% $61,184 7 65 Intracranial Hemorrhage Or Cerebral Infarction W Cc Hospital B 38 $6,025 9.8% $61,184 8 253 Other Vascular Procedures W Cc Hospital A 37 $12,401 16.5% $75,061 9 908 Other O.R. Procedures For Injuries W Cc Hospital A 26 $9,941 16.6% $59,844 10 683 Renal Failure W Cc Hospital A 18 $5,290 17.7% $29,825 Readmission Provider 38 First Post-Acute Setting Benchmark Comparisons Average Inpatient LOS Average Post-Acute Payment 39 First Post-Acute Setting Benchmark Comparisons U.S. Region Hospital Total Episodes 206 1,129 206,185 First Post-Anchor Setting Episode Count Acute Transfer Readmission Inpatient Rehabilitation Home Health Long-Term Care Hospital SNF Inpatient Psychiatric No Institutional Care Acute Transfer Readmission Inpatient Rehabilitation Home Health Long-Term Care Hospital SNF Inpatient Psychiatric No Institutional Care Acute Transfer Readmission Inpatient Rehabilitation Home Health Long-Term Care Hospital SNF Inpatient Psychiatric No Institutional Care 0 0 2 14 0 179 0 11 1 6 177 269 0 637 0 39 155 2,499 23,074 69,707 108 81,641 39 28,962 % Distribution Anchor Admission ALOS Anchor Admission Average Payment Post Anchor Average Payment Total Average Payment Post Anchor % of Payments 1% 7% 4.0 3.7 $13,281 $12,821 $18,756 $4,231 $32,037 $17,052 58.5% 24.8% 87% 3.7 $13,252 $12,856 $26,108 49.2% 5% 0% 1% 16% 24% 2.9 1.0 4.0 3.4 3.1 $13,281 $8,814 $13,519 $12,577 $12,630 $1,592 $13,180 $9,240 $20,920 $5,232 $14,873 $21,995 $22,760 $33,497 $17,861 10.7% 59.9% 40.6% 62.5% 29.3% 56% 3.7 $13,303 $14,860 $28,163 52.8% 3% 0% 1% 11% 34% 0% 40% 0% 14% 3.3 3.2 3.3 3.8 3.1 7.1 3.9 5.6 2.8 $13,253 $12,459 $13,494 $13,330 $13,180 $14,194 $13,527 $13,459 $13,439 $2,091 $28,323 $16,071 $21,380 $5,985 $51,423 $18,034 $22,783 $2,357 $15,345 $40,782 $29,565 $34,710 $19,165 $65,617 $31,561 $36,242 $15,796 13.6% 69.5% 54.4% 61.6% 31.2% 78.4% 57.1% 62.9% 14.9% 40 First Post-Acute Setting Benchmark Comparisons 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Hospital Acute Transfer Inpatient Rehabilitation SNF Inpatient Psychiatric Region U.S. Readmission Home Health Long-Term Care Hospital No Institutional Care 41 ANALYTICS AVAILABLE Bundled Payment Bundled Payment Preview Analysis Preview Analysis -Tier 1- -Tier 2- (major joints/heart failure) • All 175 BPCI Demo-eligible DRGs •90-day episode review with benchmark comparisons • 90-day episode review with benchmark comparisons •10-page .pdf report • Interactive Excel workbook •Member service • Set fee with discount for multi-hospital systems •2 high-volume DRGs •Available through Association/System Affiliation • Available through DataGen Custom Analytics • BPCI Awardees - data analytic and monthly monitoring services • Other Risk-Sharing Arrangements •Commercial or public payer •Varying episode definitions and/or lengths •Custom benchmark comparisons Questions? Gloria Kupferman Vice President, National Information Products DataGen, a HANYS Solutions Company [email protected] 518-431-7968 www.datagen.info Brian Esser Manager, Healthcare Consulting Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP [email protected] 330-650-1752 www.dhgllp.com 43