Download The Clinical Question

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Patient safety wikipedia , lookup

Epidemiology of metabolic syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Epidemiology wikipedia , lookup

Seven Countries Study wikipedia , lookup

Adherence (medicine) wikipedia , lookup

Alzheimer's disease research wikipedia , lookup

Multiple sclerosis research wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Clinical Appraisal of an Article on
Prognosis
The Clinical Question
What is the risk of mortality among patients with
hyperuricemia who received allupurinol?
• PUBMED Search/Mesh Terms:
– Allopurinol
– Mortality
• Advanced Search:
– Humans
– Males
– English
– Aged 65+
Pubmed Search
Limit by topics, language and Journal
groups
• Human, Male, English, Aged 65 +
Results:
CAT MAKER
The Article
• Andrew J. Luk et al.
• Allopurinol and mortality in hyperuricaemic
patients
• Rheumatology 2009;48:804–806
Critical Appraisal
Allopurinol and mortality
in hyperuricaemic patients
Andrew J. Luk1, Gregory P. Levin2, Elya E. Moore3,
Xiao-Hua Zhou1, Bryan R. Kestenbaum4 and
Hyon K. Choi
RELEVANCE
Is the objective of the article on prognosis
similar to your clinical dilemma?
Yes, the study aims to investigate the role of
urate-lowering therapy on the risk of
premature death associated with gout and
hyperuricemia. They examined the impact of
allopurinol, the most commonly used uratelowering drug, on the risk of mortality in
hyperuricaemic patients.
Validity Guidelines
Was there a representative sample of patients without the outcome
at the start of observation?
Yes, they specified how they defined patients included in the study.
The VA Consumer Health Information and Performance Sets (CHIPS)
database was used, where the source population consists of
veterans ≥40 years of age within the Northwest Veterans Integrated
Service Network. They selected a hyperuricaemic population,
defined as having at least one outpatient serum urate level >416
μmol/l (7.0 mg/dl) between the years 2000 and 2007. Subjects
were excluded if they had an estimated glomerular filtration rate
(GFR) of <30 ml/min prior dialysis or renal/organ transplantation, or
history of malignancy.
They also defined a cohort of hyperuricaemic subjects treated with
allopurinol (allopurinol group) on the basis of (i) incident allopurinol
use between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2007 and (ii) an
outpatient serum urate level >416 µmol/l (7.0 mg/dl) within 1 year
prior to allopurinol initiation. Three non-allopurinol treated control
subjects were identified for each allopurinol user, on the basis of (i)
being alive and at-risk at the time the allopurinol-treated subject
initiated allopurinol (index time) and (ii) having hyperuricaemia (as
defined above) during the previous year.
Was follow-up siufficiently long and complete?
• Yes, both allopurinol and control subjects
began accruing risk time beginning with the
time of incident allopurinol use in the
allopurinol group and index time in the
control group, and were followed until death,
study closure, or no further contact with the
VA for 18 consecutive months
Where the criteria for determining the
prognostic factor and outcome explicit and
credible?
Yes. In the study, the role of Allopurinol on the
risk of premature death associated with gout
and hyperuricemia was determined. They
used Cox proportional hazards models, with
robust standard errors, to estimate the
independent association between allopurinol
exposure and the risk of death
Was there adjustment for other prognostic factors?
Yes. They used multivariate models to adjust demographics
(age, race and gender), BMI, comorbidities (as defined by
ICD-9 CM codes for hypertension, diabetes and CVD),
healthcare utilization (as defined by number of previous
primary care or internal medicine visits at baseline), use of
cardiovascular and other medications [statins, fibrates,
angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors,
angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), B-blockers, calcium
channel blockers, low-dose aspirin, NSAIDs, loop diuretics,
hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) and losartan], baseline serum
levels of urate, cholesterol, albumin and baseline GFR.
The multivariate models also adjusted for the Charlson index
[8], which is a composite index of diagnoses that includes
myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure (CHF),
peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease,
dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peptic
ulcer disease, liver disease, diabetes with complications,
renal disease, cancer and AIDS/HIV.
Overall, is the study valid?
Since all the validity questions were fulfilled, the
study can be considered to be valid.
Results
How large is the likelihood of outcome to occur in
those with the prognostic factor in a specified
period of time? Was it statistically significant?
In the study, hazard ratio was used for survival
analysis. After adjusting for baseline urate levels,
allopurinol treatment was associated with a
lower risk of all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR)
0.78; 95% CI 0.67, 0.91)] (Table 2). Further
stepwise adjustment for potential confounders
such as demographics, comorbidities, healthcare
utilization, cardiovascular and other medications
and baseline cholesterol, albumin and GFR did
not appreciably alter the HR (0.77; 95% CI 0.65,
0.91) (Table 2). Results from an as-treated model
were slightly stronger (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.62,
0.86). All these factors are statistical significant at
p <0.05
Will the Results Help Me in Caring for
my patients?
Were the study patients similar to my own ?
Yes, our patient’s characteristics assume baseline
characteristics of the subjects included in this study.
Our patient in the case is a 50 year old obese male,
diagnosed with gout and azotemia. The patients in the
study were mostly male (98%) mean age of 62.7 years,
and selected hyperuriceamic patients. Although they
excluded patients with a GFR of <30ml/min, this does
not necessarily mean that our patient should be
excluded, this very low GFR indicates that they
excluded those who already have stage 3 Chronic
kidney disease or higher, not patients with azotemia.
Will the Results Help in Caring for my
Patient?
Are results useful for reassuring or counseling
patients?
• YES. The use of allopurinol will definitely
benefit our patient. It is useful not only with
lowering the serum uric acid level, but also it
shows survival benefit with its use.
RESOLUTION OF THE PROBLEM IN
THE SCENARIO
• Based on the results in the study, I would
encourage my patients to undergo allopurinol
treatment because it may prolong the life of
the patients with gout and hyperuricemia.