Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
N Engl J Med. 2012 Dec 20;367(25):2375-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211585. Epub 2012 Nov 4 Journal Club Presentation: Nick Bosch Revascularization and Diabetes Patients with DM and multivessel CAD, what is optimal method of revascularization? Atherosclerosis and diabetes 700,000 patients undergo multivessel coronary revascularization yearly 25% of these patients are diabetic N Engl J Med. 2012 Dec 20;367(25):2375-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211585. Epub 2012 Nov 4 History Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation trial (BARI) in 1997 Patients w/ multivessel disease assigned randomly to CABG or PTCA; average follow-up 5.4 yrs No difference in mortality overall Diabetic subgroup undergoing CABG lived longer Led to ACCF/AHA Guideline recommendations: CABG preferred for revascularization of multivessel disease in diabetics N Engl J Med. 2012 Dec 20;367(25):2375-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211585. Epub 2012 Nov 4 Circulation.2011; 124: e652-e735Published online before print November 7, 2011,doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31823c074e History Continued Outcomes from both PCI and CABG have improved with stents, antithrombotic therapy, arterial conduits Coronary Artery Revascularization in Diabetes (CARDia) Study in 2005 Diabetics (~500) with Multivessel or complex single vessel disease randomized to PCI w/ stent or CABG (used both BMS and DES; became available during study) 1 yr results: no difference in mortality, lower rates of revascularization in CABG group Underpowered J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Feb 2;55(5):432-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.014. History Continued Synergy between PCI with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) Study in 2009 Randomized 1800 patients w/ 3-vessel or left main disease to CABG or PCI w/ DES Significantly more major cardiac or cerebrovascular events at 12 months in PCI group; driven by increase in rate of revascularization No difference in all-cause mortality for patients after 1 year N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 5;360(10):961-72. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804626. Epub 2009 Feb 18 Purpose of FREEDOM To determine if contemporary PCI with DES or CABG techniques, both with currently recommended ancillary medical therapies, is the superior approach to revascularization in patients with diabetes and multivessel CAD. Methods continued 2 arm superiority trial Unblinded, no placebo Trial Duration 7 years w/ recruitment period of 5 years (minimum follow-up of 2 years) Stats Log-rank test to compare distributions of the time to first event Cox proportional-hazards regression for hazard ratios for outcomes and subgroup analysis Sites: 140 worldwide Methods Patient Selection Multivessel CAD Stenosis >70% in 2 or more epicardial vessels involving at least two separate coronary artery territories confirmed with angiography Indication for revascularization based on symptoms of angina or objective evidence of myocardial ischemia Diabetics Type 1 or 2 diabetics meeting ADA criteria: fasting BS >126, random BS > 200, or pharmacological or nonpharmacological treatments for diabetes Methods continued Exclusion criteria Prior CABG or valve surgery Left main disease ST-elevation MI in last 72 hours Prior PCI in 6 months Methods continued DES: majority sirolimus or paclitaxel eluting. Newer generations could be used if approved for use. ASA and clopidogrel for at least 12 months. CABG: encouraged arterial revascularization when able Medical therapy goals for both groups: LDL <70 BP <130/80 HgbA1c <7% Methods continued Outcomes Primary Composite of death from any cause, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke Secondary Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events 30 days and 12 months after procedure (includes components of primary end point + revascularization) Annual all-cause and cardiovascular mortality Characteristic n Mean age at screening, y Male Female Male Did not meet angiographic inclusion ⁎ criteria Clinical exclusion present Prior cardiac surgery or † planned cardiac surgery Ineligible 29657 65.2 ± 10.8 Eligible Not enrolled 1409 64.4 ± 9.6 Enrolled 1900 63.1 ± 9.1 <.0001 64.7 ± 10.5 66.2 ± 11.2 67.7% 85.6% 63.7 ± 9.4 66.4 ± 9.7 72.8% NA 62.6 ± 9.0 64.4 ± 9.2 71.4% NA .005 .002 .38 NA 57.7% NA NA NA 32% NA NA NA Race/ethnicity White, non-Hispanic Black or African American, non-Hispanic Asian, non-Hispanic Other, non-Hispanic Hispanic Planned management strategy PCI CABG Medical therapy alone Unknown P value ‡ <.0001 69.6% 4.7% 51.3% 2.7% 13.3% 4.3% 8.2% 9.7% 1.8% 34.5% 51.8% 33.6% 5.8% 8.8% 50% 50% NA Table I. Baseline characteristics for N = 32966 patients screened for FREEDOM trial eligibility ⁎ Participants needed to have multivessel CAD defined as critical (≥70%) lesions in at least 2 major epicardial vessels. Angiographic characteristics needed to be amenable to both PCI/DES and CABG. Left main disease, in-stent restenosis, and >1 CTO were excluded. † Prior bypass surgery or valvular surgery or valve surgery planned. ‡ Test of significance for difference between enrolled patients and eligible but not enrolled patients Table II. History of presenting illness Overall (n = 1900) History of presenting illness (indication for coronary angiography) Stable coronary heart disease (1317 participants) 69.3% ACS (584 participants) 30.7% ST-elevation MI (>72 h before admission) 20.2% Non–ST-elevation ACS (466 participants) 79.8% No recurrent/provocable ischemia 33.3% Provocable ischemia only 23.4% Spontaneous recurrent ischemia 41.3% Refractory ischemia 1.9% Overall Medical history Diabetes mellitus Type 1 Type 2 ⁎ Complications associated with diabetes Diabetic foot ulcer Extremity amputation Diabetic retinopathy/blindness Diabetic nephropathy Diabetic neuropathy History of high BP History of hyperlipidemia Prior MI Prior stroke Peripheral arterial disease History of valvular heart disease History of arrhythmia If yes: permanent pacemaker implanted 4.5% 95.5% 18.0% 9.3% 3.8% 39.4% 32.7% 54.5% 84.8% 83.7% 25.6% 3.2% 11.2% 1.3% 4.8% 20.9% AICD History of chronic renal insufficiency History of dialysis History of COPD or asthma Ever smoked If yes (n = 91): current smoker Ex-smoker (quit >12 m ago) History of gastrointestinal ulcer/bleed Aspirin daily for last 7 d or longer History of renal artery stenosis 0.0% 6.8% 0.4% 10.2% 54.5% 28.8% 65.8% 4.7% 71.7% 0.5% Surgical history Prior PTCA (balloon angioplasty or atherectomy) within 12 m prior 0.6% Prior PCI w/stent within the last 12 m 0.6% Table IV. Cardiovascular risk factor profile of the FREEDOM cohort Variable LDL (mg/dL) LDL <100 LDL <70 HbA1c (%) HbA1c (%) <7.0 7.0-8.0 ≥8.0 SBP (mm Hg) SBP (mm Hg) <120 120-140 ≥140 DBP (mm Hg) DBP (mm Hg) <80 80-90 ≥ 90 Triglycerides (mg/dL) Triglycerides ≥150 HDL (mg/dL) HDL ≤40 (men), ≤50 (women) Mean ± SD or % 92.7 ± 36.6 62.4% 29.1% 7.8 ± 1.7 Waist (cm) Waist ≥102 (men), ≥88 (women) 102.6 ± 14.2 59.4% Current smoker (%) Hemoglobin (g/dL) Creatinine (mg/dL) Presence of microalbuminuria (>30 mg/g) 15.7% 13.6 ± 1.6 1.1 ± 0.5 40.3% 36.0% 25.4% 38.7% 133.8 ± 19.8 18.9% 43.0% 38.2% 76.0 ± 11.1 53.2% 33.1% 13.7% 177.9 ±132.1 (148.0) 48.0% 39.2 ± 11.2 75.4% Overall Medication Antiplatelet agent Aspirin Clopidogrel Ticlopidine Cilostazol Antianginal agent β-Blocker Calcium-channel antagonist Nitrate Lipid-lowering agent Statin Fibrate Other cardiovascular medications ACE inhibitor Angiotensin II antagonist ACE inhibitor or ARB Aldosterone antagonist Loop diuretics Thiazide diuretic Diabetes medication Insulin Sulfonylurea Biguanides α-Glucosidase inhibitor Thiazolidinedione Rosiglitazone Pioglitazone NSAID ⁎ PPI 90.7% 23.9% 1.1% 0.1% 75.3% 31.9% 39.4% 82.3% 4.8% 64.3% 16.3% 78.2% 2.8% 10.3% 13.0% 32.3% 43.7% 55.8% 1.3% 8.2% 4.7% 3.5% 5.3% 14.4% Variable No. of diseased vessels Location of disease Mean ± SD or% 1 0.1% 2 16.6% 3 83.3% LAD 98.9% LCX 92.6% RCA 91.7% Proximal LAD involvement (target lesion = LAD located in proximal) 13.8% No. of lesions per patient 5.7 ± 2.2 (1888) Extent of disease per patient (total length of lesions, mm) 77.6 ± 33.8 (1888) Duke jeopardy score 9.3 ± 3.1 (1874) LVEF (%) 66.2 ± 11.3 (1291) LVEF >50% 90.9% 35%-50% 8.0% <35% 1.1% SYNTAX SCORE Tool to score complexity of CAD based on anatomy There were 395 participants (20.9%) with a high SYNTAX score (>32), 839 (44.0%) with an intermediate score (22-32), and 662 (35.1%) with a low score (<22). Results Results Results Results Results Results Primary composite outcome - subgroups Results Primary outcome analysis for DES type compared to CABG (898 pts) Sirolimus-eluting (469 pts) at 5 yrs: 6.7% more events than CABG Paclitaxel-eluting (394 pts) at 5 yrs: 6.5% more events than CABG No difference in 30 day major bleeding event: P=0.13 ARF requiring dialysis at 30 days significantly higher in CABG group (P=0.02): 8 pts compared to 1 patient Discussion Patients undergoing CABG had significantly lower rates of the primary endpoint including death from any cause Results consistent with reports from smaller, retrospective, cohort, underpowered and subgroup analyses in the past Previous results had shown major adverse events were driven by rates of revascularization. This study shows CABG benefit driven by decreased MI and death from any cause. Increased rate of stroke consistent in almost all previous studies and meta-analyses Discussion Similar rates of medical therapy in each group 90% use of dual antiplatelet therapy at 12 months for PCI groups Showed benefit of CABG over PCI with DES using current technology/medical advances Reinforce vs. change clinical practice Already recommended Increase level of evidence: IIa, level of evidence B -> I? Discussion - limitations Low-prevalence subgroups Low statistical power to detect interactions between subgroups Unblinded Investigators argue that this is less important given objective outcomes and similar medical therapy between groups Generalizability: only 10% of screening population eligible, only half of those randomized Late Breaking Clinic Trial 2012: PI stated that of the eligible patients who declined randomization, most requested PCI as reason for not wanting randomization Equipoise candidates for each procedure often not the case. Likely explains significant number of patients screened but not eligible for randomization “Main Results of the Future REvascularization Evaluation in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: Optimal management of Multivessel disease (FREEDOM) Trial”; Scientific Sessions 2012, late breaking trials AHA Discussion - limitations Variable No. of diseased vessels Location of disease Mean ± SD or% 1 0.1% 2 16.6% 3 83.3% LAD 98.9% LCX 92.6% RCA 91.7% Proximal LAD involvement (target lesion = LAD located in proximal) 13.8% No. of lesions per patient 5.7 ± 2.2 (1888) Extent of disease per patient (total length of lesions, mm) 77.6 ± 33.8 (1888) Duke jeopardy score 9.3 ± 3.1 (1874) LVEF (%) 66.2 ± 11.3 (1291) LVEF >50% 90.9% 35%-50% 8.0% <35% 1.1% Discussion - limitations Type 1 Diabetics: only 4.5% of patients Longer term follow-up: saphenous vein grafts failure? Cost-effectiveness Cost-Effectiveness of PCI with Drug Eluting Stents vs. Bypass Surgery for Patients with Diabetes and Multivessel CAD: Results from the FREEDOM Trial. Elizabeth A. Magnuson et al. Presentation from Late Breaking Clinical Trials Scientific Sessions 2012, 11/4/2012. Total cost for index hospitalization of CABG was $8622 higher per patient compared to PCI Over next 5 years, follow-up costs were higher for PCI mostly due to repeat revascularization but cumulative 5 year costs remained $3641 higher per patient with CABG Model expanding results over lifetime: CABG more economically attractive compared to DES-PCI driven mostly by increase in survival. CABG had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $8,132 per qualityadjusted life-year gained vs PCI. Traditionally, therapies are considered cost-effective if the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is less than $50,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained.