Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Beyond ROI: Making the Business Case for Worksite Health Promotion George J. Pfeiffer President The WorkCare Group, Inc. P.O. Box 2053 Charlottesville, VA 22902 (434) 977-7525 georgeworkcare@ earthlink.net IAWHP Executive Summit, April 7, 2010 Critters What Are We Going to Cover? • Review the evolution of worksite health promotion • Does it make a difference? • Refocusing health promotion • Addressing your entire population • Common strategies • Promising practices First… In the beginning… The Ongoing Proposition…. “A healthy employee saves the organization money and is more productive.” In the Beginning…. • A variety of employee support services: – – – – – Occupational health and safety Recreation Travel Employee Assistance Programs Executive Fitness Programs Executive Fitness Programs 1968… • • • • • Exclusive Medical department Clinical— “The Executive Heart Attack” Cardiovascular risk reduction focus “Exercise prescription” Employee Fitness Programs1976… • • • • Inclusive-major locations Cardiovascular focus Running boom: “Jim Fix Effect” Expansion of recreation services or facility management Employee Health Management Programs-1980…Phase I • • • • • • • Hey! Our costs are rising! Inclusive-all employees, and some households Introduction of the Health Risk Appraisal (HRA) Risk reduction focus Health fairs/onsite programming Medical self-care Communication programs Employee Health Management Programs-1986…Phase II • Hospitals and MCOs become vendors to employers • Onsite screenings • “Health management centers” versus “fitness centers” • Computer learning • Telephonic nurse-line, EAP • Greater focus on high-utilizers Employee Health Management Programs-1996…Phase III • • • • • Rise of the Internet (virtual programming) Greater integration of services Greater use of third-party vendors Concept of presenteeism Concept of risk migration and cost Employee Health Management Programs-Today…Phase IV • • • • • • Population management Integrated data management/HPM Predictive modeling Disease management Health coaching Targeted and tailored messaging (social marketing) • Value-based benefit design • Incentives • Culture of Health So…Where’s the Beef? R.O.I./Where’s the Beef? From a review of 73 published studies of WHP programs1 – Average $3.50-to-$1 savings-to-cost ratio in reduced absenteeism and health care costs. From a review of 56 published studies of WHP programs2 – – – – Average 27% reduction in sick leave absenteeism Average 26% reduction in health costs Average 32% reduction in workers’ comp. & disability mgmt. claims costs Average $5.81-to-$1 savings-to-cost ratio A comprehensive health management program at Citibank3 – $4.56-$4.73-to-$1 savings-to-cost ratio in reduced total health care costs 1. Aldana SG. 2.. Chapman LS. 3. . Ozminkowski RJ, Dunn RL, Goetzel RZ, Cantor RI, Murnane J, Harrison M. So…what does this all mean? “There’s a body of work that demonstrates the efficacy of worksite health management programs.” So…what does this all mean? Let’s move beyond the debate regarding health promotion’s role in reducing direct healthcare costs. Let’s move to productivity management. It’s all about WORK! What’s Wrong With... WORK? Max Weber “One does not work to live; one lives to work.” Our Work Can Provide: Well-being Opportunity Reward Know-how What Drives Competitive Advantage? • Innovative products/services • Market share • Shareholder value • Positive R.O.I. • Revenue/Profitability • Value of human capital What’s a Productive Employee? • • • • • • Competence (“know-how”) Results-oriented Quality focus Team-oriented Fully-engaged (“present”) Physically and mentally well Key Observations ONE: Employee health directly affects an organization’s bottom-line. Runaway Health Care Costs Year 2003 2004 2009 2018 Annual Cost $6,020 $6,880 $8,160 $13,310 GDP 14.9% 14.3% 17.6% 20.3% Employer Health Care Strategy Survey 2003, Delotte & Touche The Problem: Rising Medical Costs/Eroding Profit $600 Billions of Dollars $500 $488 $454 $478 $400 $300 $486 After-tax profits $359 $263 $284 $494 $402 $315 Health benefit cost (does not include related productivity costs) $200 $100 $0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 • Source: The National Data Book: 2001 IRS Data Reports Key Observations TWO: Direct health care costs are the “tip of the iceberg.” Direct Costs Related to Indirect Estimated $12,000 per Employee Medically Related Productivity Costs Medical & Pharmacy *$6,000 Per Employee Direct Medical Costs Absenteeism Presenteeism STD LTD Sources: Loeppke, et.al., JOEM, 2003; 45:349-359 and Brady, et.al., JOEM, 1997; 39:224-231 Estimated Total Costs $18,000 PEPY Being “There” or “Here”? Presenteeism • Chronic disease (e.g, depression, diabetes) • Acute conditions (e.g., allergies, U.R.T.I.) • Work issues (e.g., management style, change) • Personal issues (e.g., caregiving, financial) We Can’t Ignore Direct Costs, Yet, We Need to Focus More on… • Absenteeism • Presenteeism The costs of absenteeism and presenteeism may be three times your direct healthrelated costs. Key Observations THREE: A “perfect storm” is brewing that will further impact the affect of employee health and health care delivery on organizational performance and competitiveness. “A Perfect Storm?” • High health care costs with questionable quality • Aging workforce • Rise of chronic health conditions • Low consumer accountability • Global economy/competition High Costs/Questionable Quality • • • • U.S. is near bottom of Western countries regarding healthcare measures, but pays the most. Participants received only 54.9% of recommended care. Majority of chronic conditions were underused regarding care. Deficits pose serious threats to the health and well-being of Americans. Sourse: McGlynn, E.A., Asch, S.M., Adams. J. et.al. The quality of health care deleivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med 348;26, 2003 Aging Workforce/Chronic Conditions • • • • The median age of workers in 1988 was 35.9, and in 2008 was 40.7 In many “mature” industries the average age is 48 years and above. 125 million Americans had chronic ailments in 2000 ($510 B) 78% of costs attributed to chronic conditions 1. Bureau of Labor Statistics:http//bls.gov/opub/ted/2001/june/wk4/art02.htm 2. Partnership for Solutions. Projection of chronic illness prevalence and cost inflation. Johns Hopkins University and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, 2001; http://www.partnershipforsolutions.org/statistics/direct_costs.htm Low Consumer Accountability • • • • • Entitlement mentality Traditionally distanced from true cost of health care (CDHP) Low commitment to self-care Lacks appropriate decisionmaking skills Low compliance to treatment regimen Economic Uncertainty • • • • Global competition High unemployment High overhead costs Eroding profit margins Key Observations FOUR: Health management needs to not only focus on disease management, but on primary prevention and risk reduction. Why? In order to stay competitive, we cannot ignore the impact that employee health has on organizational effectiveness. To begin, we need to understand that our population’s health risks can be a predictor of business performance. Understand Your Population! Understanding Your Risks • Within a population, the distribution of medical costs is always the same • Approximately 60 percent of a working population is categorized as low risk (e.g., market share) • At any given time, there is a migration (“churn”) of employees between risk categories Source: University of Michigan Health Management Research Center.. The Ultimate 20th Century Cost Benefit Analysis and Report. March 2000; 1-12 Understanding Your Risks • Health risks and medical care costs increase and decrease independent of interventions (e.g., natural flow of a population) • Identify the “natural flow” of a defined population–benchmark against this cohort • Move population to low cost or low risk Source: University of Michigan Health Management Research Center.. The Ultimate 20th Century Cost Benefit Analysis and Report. March 2000; 1-12 Understanding Your Risks Health risks follows costs: – Direct medical costs • • • • Tests/procedures Out-patient In-patient Pharmaceuticals – Indirect costs • Absenteeism (STD/LTD, sick days) • Presenteeism Group Your Risks, Move Your Population Risks: Categories 0-2 3-4 5+ Low Medium High HPM research shows a direct relationship between health risks and direct and indirect costs. Source: University of Michigan Health Management Research Center.. The Ultimate 20th Century Cost Benefit Analysis and Report. March 2000; 1-12 Don’t Ignore Your Healthy! Improve Your “Market Share” • Keep healthy people healthy – $350 is saved when a lowrisk employee remains low-risk • Target high risk populations – $153 is saved when a highrisk employee’s health risks are reduced Source: University of Michigan Health Management Research Center.. The Ultimate 20th Century Cost Benefit Analysis and Report. March 2000; 1-12 No Engagement, No Effectiveness • 80%-85% low risk • 90% total participation within three years – Health Risk Appraisal – Health Coaching – Two other programs So…What’s Health Management to Your Organization? • Cost-driver? • Performance driver? St. Paul’s American Workers Under Pressure , 1992 “Successfully managing human risks requires organizations to pay attention to the whole employee, both on and off the job.” The M.E. Factors Meaningful Employment is a product of: Meaningful Engagement + Meaningful Environment Shifting the Discussion We need to question the value of our health promotion initiatives: Cost Effectiveness? versus Life Effectiveness? It’s Alive! I See Dead People The Bottom Line… • Though we need to focus on the “hard factors” (e.g., products, markets, margins) of the business… • We cannot ignore the “soft factors” that truly sustain a business… The Organization is People! Healthy Employees… A healthy workforce improves an organization’s ability to survive and thrive within a competitive economic environment. Health Promotion is… Work Promotion “Organizational policies and practices that protect, support, and enhance your human capital.” Employee health and safety are primary agents ProfitAbility The ability of an organization to optimize value by maximizing growth (revenues) and managing costs (expenses) “Work promotion addresses the productivity of your human capital with health as a critical success factor.” EmployAbility The ability of an individual to increase his or her value through the acquisition and practice of transferable work-related competencies. “Health management is a transferable job competency” Integrating Self-Care and Work-Care • Self-Care: “Accepting responsibility for ones health.” • Work-Care: “Accepting responsibility for ones work.” Each have their own skills and competencies. Common Strategies Cross-Functional Integration • Human Capital Teams • Alignment/Accountability to Business Goals • Cross-marketing: wellness, benefits, work/life, safety, communications • Dashboard metrics Common Strategies Culture of Health • • • • • Culture is elastic Culture is nodal Culture begins at the top, but needs to be systematic Leading by Example: Partnership for Prevention Management accountability, alignment with business goals • Team leaders: grass roots • Environmental supports • Reducing barriers to participation Common Strategies Value-Based Benefit Design • • • • Uses integrated data to guide benefit design decisions Identifies opportunities for targeted interventions Identifies and reduces/removes cost and access barriers Tiered incentive plans (e.g., HSAs contributions) – Pitney Bowes: reduced coinsurance to select medications – Improved medication adherence to asthma and diabetes drugs – Reduced hospitalizations, E.R. visits, and disability Common Strategies Integrative Databases • Establishment of data warehouses that integrates data into person-centric files • Evaluates the total cost per life • Helps focus on the best R.O.I. • Establishes benchmarking and “performance dashboards” Common Strategies Health Risk Appraisal • Emerging as a “risk engine” for predicting total costs and establishing benchmarks for program outcomes. • Stratifies population—intervention • Often linked to incentives for participation. • Accumulative participation drives market share to lower risk/cost status. • “Health Score” serves as a dashboard metric. Common Strategies Incentives • Carrot or Stick Approach? • Used to motivate and engage • Different plans: premium decrease, HSA contribution, cash, merchandise • Questionable impact on sustained behavior change except for tobacco cessation • “Dutch Auction” model Common Strategies Risk Intervention • Based on HRA data and other screening tools, organizations are able to identify, invite, and intervene at pre-clinical stages. • Linked to health coaching and other intervention tools—online and telephonic coaching. • Incentive and disincentive plans Common Strategies Medical Consumerism • Important component for Consumer Directed Health Plans • Medical self-care education and informed decision-making designed to reduce inappropriate medical utilization. • Decision-tools to improve patient-provider interaction • On average 3:1 R.O.I. Common Strategies Disease Management • Targets high cost/high utilizers in selective disease conditions. • Targets individuals who have predisposing factors. • Integrates lifestyle management and evidencedbased practices. • May include incentives for both patient and provider (e.g., Bridges to Excellence) • Adherence management. Every 20% improvement = $1,074 average in net savings for diabetes. Common Strategies Programming is Communicating! • Leveraging formal and informal communication channels • Promoting your brand! • Your program is not a screen! • Getting into the home! • Using user-generated content-efficacy • Affinity social networks Get Your Bearings! Benchmark Your Population “Promising Practices” Benchmarking Study 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Align features and incentives with the organization’s core mission, goals, operations, and administrative structures; Operate at multiple levels. Target the most important health care issues. Tailor components to needs of individuals. Achieve high rates of engagement and participation, — short and long term. Achieve successful health outcomes, cost savings, and additional organizational objectives. Evaluate based upon clear definitions of success— scorecards and metrics. Adapted from: Goetzel RZ, Shechter D, Ozminkowski RJ, et al. Promising practices in employer health and productivity management efforts: findings from a benchmarking study. J Occup Environ Med. 2007;49:111–130.