Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
NAVIGATING the NEW ERA in IPF: Comorbidities and Complications FACULTY Title Affiliation Learning Objectives • Identify approaches to IPF management that are covered in current guidelines, taking into account the strength of relevant recommendations • Formulate a plan, based on available data and expert consensus, for addressing acute exacerbations of IPF • Explain the impact and treatment of common comorbidities of IPF Common Complications and Comorbidities of IPF • • • • • • • GERD Pulmonary hypertension Emphysema Acute exacerbation OSA CVD and Thromboembolism Depression IPF and GERD Lee JS, et al. Am J Med. 2010;123(4):304-311. Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) • Definition: Symptoms or complications resulting • • • • • from the reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus or beyond, into the oral cavity (including larynx) or lung Risk factor for IPF Common in patients with IPF – Clinically silent in the majority of cases May have nonacid components (alkaline GERD) Etiology unknown Contribution to IPF pathology unknown Katz PO, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(3):308-328. Raghu G, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183(6):788-824. GERD • Diagnosis – Barium swallow – Esophageal manometry – 24 hour pH probe • Treatment – PPI’s – Nissen fundoplication • WRAP-IPF trial • ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01982968 Raghu G, et al. Eur Respir J. 2006;27:136-142. GERD Prevalence • • • • 1. 2. 3. 4. Normal: 10-20%1 IPF: 90%2 COPD: 60%3 Cystic Fibrosis: 35 to 81%4 Katz PO, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(3):308-328 Raghu G, et al. Eur Respir J. 2006;27,136-142. Kempainen RR, et al. Chest. 2007; 131:1666-1671. Robinson NB, et al. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014;11(6):964-968. GERD Distal % Reflux Time ln • Acid GERD prevalent in IPF (87%) • 47% experience classic GERD symptoms • GERD and IPF severities not correlated: DLCO FVC % Predicted % Predicted Raghu G, et al. Eur Respir J. 2006;27:136-142. GERD Treatment and Survival Survival Taking GERD medications Not taking GERD medications Time to Event (days) Lee JS, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184(12):1390-1394. ATS/ERS Recommendation • The recommendation for the treatment of asymptomatic GER in patients with IPF is weak • Asymptomatic GER should be treated in the majority of patients with IPF, but not treating asymptomatic GER may be a reasonable choice in a minority ()*. * () = GRADE quality of evidence very low Raghu G, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183(6):788-824. IPF With Severe PH mPAP = 61 mmHg Prevalence of PH in IPF Hamada (2007) Raghu (2010) Patel (2007) Song (2009) Nathan (2007) Zisman (2007) Shorr (2007) Minai (2009) Nadrous (2005) Nathan (2008) RHC Echo at evaluation at transplantation Estimate of PH Prevalence, % Nathan SD, Cottin V. Eur Respir Monogr. 2012;57:148–160. Distribution of mPAPs in IPF Patients 25 Frequency 20 15 10 5 0 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 mPAP Lettieri et al. Chest 2006. 129:746-752 PAH: mPAP > 25 mm Hg Mean Pulmonary Artery Pressure: Prognostic Value in IPF Cumulative Probability to Survival 1.0 n = 54 No (mPap ≤ 25 mm Hg) 0.8 n = 25 0.6 Yes (mPap > 25 mm Hg) 0.4 0.2 0.0 P < 0.001 0 1 Lettieri CJ, et al. Chest. 2006;129:746-752. 2 3 4 Years to Event 5 6 7 PH in IPF: Impact on 6MWT mPAP < 25 mm Hg (N=24) mPAP > 25 mm Hg (N=10) P value 366 ± 82 144 ± 66 < 0.001 88 ± 4 80 ± 4 < 0.001 mPAP ≤ 25 mm Hg (N=27) mPAP > 25 mm Hg with normal PCWP (N=7) P value 402 ± 25 210 ± 50 0.002 6MWD (m) SpO2 nadir (%) Lettieri CJ, et al. Chest. 2006;129:746-752. 6MWD (m, adjusted for FVC%)* Patel NM, et al. Chest. 2007;132(3):998-1006. When to Suspect PH in IPF • PFTs – DLCO <40% • 6MWT – SpO2 ≤ 88% – Heart rate recovery at 1 minute < 13 bpm • BNP • Echocardiography Echocardiography Does Not Accurately Predict PH in Patients With IPF 50 48% 40% Patients (%) 40 30 20 12% 10 0 Under Estimation Over Estimation Accurate N=110, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients with both echo and RHC Comparison of RVSP by echo to PASP by RHC Nathan SD, et al. Respir Med. 2008;102:1305–1310. Treatment With an Endothelin-1 Antagonist • ARTEMIS study • Patients – IPF aged 40 to 80 years – Minimal or no honeycombing on HRCT – Not selected for PH • Treatment – Ambrisentan, 10 mg/d or – Placebo • Terminated for lack of efficacy at interim analysis Raghu G, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(9):641-649. P = 0.010 Treat IPF Patients for PH? • Ambrisentan, bosentan, and macitentan have been • • found non-efficacious or harmful IPF patients should NOT be routinely treated for PH ABIM's Choosing Wisely: – "Don’t routinely offer pharmacologic treatment with advanced vasoactive agents approved only for the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension to patients with pulmonary hypertension resulting from left-sided heart disease or hypoxemic lung diseases (groups II or III pulmonary hypertension)." http://www.choosingwisely.org. Accessed August 2014. STEP-IPF • • • • Sildenafil (PDE-5 inhibitor) acts as pulmonary vasodilator 20 mg three times daily vs placebo 12 weeks + 12 week extension N = 180 patients with IPF Sildenafil (N = 89) Placebo (N = 91) P-value 9/89 (10%) 6/91 (7%) 0.39 ΔDLCO (%) −0.33 −1.87 0.04 ΔPPO2 (mm Hg) −0.63 −3.64 0.02 ΔSOB Questionairre 0.22 6.81 0.006 ΔSGRQ (QOL) −1.64 2.45 0.01 Endpoint 6MWD improvement ≥ 20% (Primary) Zisman DA, et al. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(7):620-628. STEP-IPF Subgroup Analysis • 19% of subjects had RVSD • Subjects with RVSD treated with sildenafil (vs placebo) – Less decrement in 6MWD (P = 0.01) – Greater improvement in SGRQ (P = 0.005) and – Greater improvement in EuroQol visual analog scores (P = 0.04) Han MK, et al. Chest. 2013;143(6):1699-1708. ATS/ERS Recommendation • PH should not be treated in the majority of patients with IPF, but treatment may be a reasonable choice in a minority (weak recommendation, very low-quality evidence). ()* • In patients with moderate to severe PH (mPAP > 35 mm Hg) documented by right heart catheterization, a trial of vasomodulatory therapy may be indicated • It is not clear if IPF with PH represents a distinct clinical phenotype (IPF–PH) * () = GRADE quality of evidence very low Raghu G, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183(6):788-824. Combined Pulmonary Fibrosis and Emphysema Syndrome (CPFE) CPFE • Upper lobe emphysema and lower lobe fibrosis • Most often observed in males – Mean age 65 years – Tobacco smokers or ex-smokers of > 40 pack-years • May comprise up to 35% of patients with IPF • Symptoms and morbidity largely attributable to severe precapillary PH – Risk of PH ~50% Cottin V. Eur Respir Rev. 2013;22(128):153-157. Features of CPFE • • • • • Severe dyspnea Unexpected subnormal spirometry findings Severely impaired DLCO Hypoxemia with exercise Characteristic imaging features – High HRCT fibrotic score • Basal crackles Cottin V. Eur Respir Rev. 2013;22(128):153-157. CPFE Outcomes in 2 IPF Cohorts • 365 patients with IPF – 29 (8%) had CPFE • Patients with CPFE had – Less fibrosis on HRCT scans – Higher FVC – Greater oxygen requirements • No difference in mortality with IPF +/- emphysema (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.61-2.13; P = 0.69) Ryerson CJ, et al. Chest. 2013;144(1):234-240. Management of Patients With Combined Pulmonary Fibrosis and Emphysema (CPFE) • No specific treatment for CPFE – Absence of specific trials or prospective data – IPF trials not adequate • Smoking cessation; bronchodilators; supportive care; oxygen supplementation; lung transplant • Discuss corticosteroids +/- azathioprine if NSIP considered Adapted from ERS/ESC guidelines, Galiè N et al. Eur Respir J. 2009;34:1219. Acute Exacerbations Punctuate Slow Decline (5-10% of patients per year) King TE Jr, et al. Lancet. 2011;378(9807):1949-1961. Acute Exacerbations of IPF • Incidence 5-10% per year • Diagnostic criteria 1. 2. Diagnosis of IPF Unexplained worsening or development of dyspnea within 30 days 3. HRCT with new bilateral ground-glass abnormality and/or consolidation superimposed on a background reticular or honeycomb pattern consistent with UIP 4. No evidence of pulmonary infection by endotracheal aspirate or bronchoalveolar lavage 5. Exclusion of alternative causes, including • Left heart failure • Pulmonary embolism • Identifiable cause of acute lung injury Raghu G, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183(6):788-824. Collard HR, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007;176:636–643. Management of Patients With Acute Exacerbations • Exclude other causes – – – – Infection CHF Pulmonary embolism Ischemic heart disease • HRCT • Bronchoscopy (if permitted by medical status) • Patients usually treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics and corticosteroids (unproven efficacy) Walter N, et al. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2006;3:330-338. ATS/ERS Recommendation • The majority of patients with acute exacerbation of IPF should be treated with corticosteroids, but corticosteroids may not be reasonable in a minority (weak recommendation, very low-quality evidence). Raghu G, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183(6):788-824. Sleep Disruption is Common in IPF • Impaired physical and social functioning1 • Sleep quality should be a primary therapeutic goal • Nocturnal hypoxemia is common – Associated with • significant sleep disruption,1 • decreased energy levels • impaired physical functioning2 – Daytime SpO2 is a strong predictor of nocturnal SpO23,4 – Daytime spirometric measures are poor predictors of nocturnal hypoxia – Clinical trial of supplemental oxygen is recruiting (clinicaltrials.gov NCT01961362) 1. Mermigkis C, et al. Med Princ Pract. 2009;18:10-15. 2. Clark M, et al. Thorax. 2001;56:482-486. 3. Douglas NJ, et al. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990;141:1055-1070. 4. Cormick W, et al. Thorax. 1986;41:846-854. Is OSA Common in IPF? • 55 subjects with IPF • Sleep apnea evaluation – Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) – Sleep Apnea Scale of Sleep Disorders (SA-SDQ) – Nocturnal polysomnography (NPSG) • Other measures – Spirometry (FEV1, FVC) – Total lung capacity – DLCO – BMI Lancaster LH, et al. Chest. 2009;136:772-778. OSA Is Common in IPF • Findings that did not correlate with OSA – Spirometry – Lung volume – DLCO – ESS • Findings that did correlate with OSA – SA-SDQ: r = 0.45, P = 0.01 – BMI: r = 0.30, P = 0.05 No OSA AHI 5/h 12% 20% 68% Mild AHI 5–15/h Moderate/Severe AHI > 15 events/h AHI: apnea-hypopnea index Lancaster LH, et al. Chest. 2009;136:772-778. Sleep in IPF Patients OSA-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) 34 newly diagnosed IPF patients, therapy naive Overnight polysomnography An abnormal total AHI (> 5) in 59% of the included subjects TLC might predispose IPF patients in sleep disordered breathing TLC, % Predicted • • • • Mermigkis C, et al. Sleep Breath. 2010;14(4):387-390. P = 0.03, r = -0.38 REM AHI Managing Sleep • Caregiver should observe patient • Oxygen desaturation common with ILD, independent • • • • • of OSA Frequent awakening Arrhythmia MI more common during sleep GERD: don’t eat just before sleep ATS/ERS – There are no data on which to make recommendations for treatment of OSA in the setting of IPF. Cardiovascular Disease in IPF • Prevalence: 20% of IPF patients have comorbid CVD • CVD diagnosed during follow-up significantly • • increased mortality (HR 4.7) Increased incidence of • ACS • Angina • DVT • CAD CHF and CAD account for 1/3 deaths in IPF Hyldgaard C, et al. Respir Med. 2014;108(4):647-653. Hubbard RB, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008; 178:1257-1261. Izbicki G, et al. Respir Med. 2009; 103(9):1346-1349 Odds Ratios for Risk Factors of CVD for Incident Cases of IPF • UK database: The Health Improvement Network (THIN) Risk factor Cases Controls (n=3211) (n=12,307) (%) (%) Odds Ratio (95% CI) Pvalue* Hypertension 25.6 21.3 1.31 (1.19-1.44) <0.001 Diabetes 14.0 12.0 1.20 (1.07-1.34) 0.003 Ex-smoker 38.7 26.3 2.20 (1.99-2.43) Current smoker 13.54 13.45 1.44 (1.27-1.65) <0.001 BMI > 31 15.1 13.3 1.16 (1.02-1.32) <0.001 * Likelihood ratio test http://journal.publications.chestnet.org/. Accessed August 2014. Rate Ratios for Ischemic Heart Disease and Stroke IPF vs Control Subjects # events in cases Crude rate in cases (per 1000 pyrs) # events in controls Crude rate in controls (per 1000 pyrs) Rate Ratio Pvalue* IHD 135 17.6 474 9.9 2.32 < 0.001 Stroke 87 11.3 523 10.3 1.25 0.09 Outcome * Likelihood ratio test http://journal.publications.chestnet.org/. Accessed August 2014. Cumulative Incidence of IHD is Higher With IPF http://journal.publications.chestnet.org/. Accessed August 2014. Percent survival 100 Significant CAD Mild or no CAD N=52 75 P=0.003 50 N=21 25 0 0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 Days Nathan SN, et al. Respir Med. 2010:104:1035-1041. VTE is Elevated in Patients With IPF • National Center for Health patients with IPF • Data suggest a link between a pro-fibrotic and a procoagulant state Sprunger DB, et al. Eur Respir J. 2012;39(1):125-132. Background population 1.31% COPD 1.22% Lung Cancer 1.14% 2.0% • Increased risk of IPF • VTE decreased life span of 1.74% 1.0% with VTE IPF 0.0% Statistics, 1988–2007 • 46,450,489 total records – 218,991 patients with IPF – 3815 (1.74%) also diagnosed Prevalence of VTE VTE is Associated with ILD • Danish registry study, ILD Hazard Ratios 1980-2007 records • 7.4 million individuals VTE • Conclusion: In the general population, everdiagnosed VTE was associated with ILD, particularly among those never treated with anticoagulants 1.8 Pulmonary Embolism 2.4 DVT Only 1.3 Control Subjects Sode BF, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;181(10):1085-1092. 1 0 1 2 3 Depression in IPF • Observed in ~25% of patients with IPF – 9.8% in a general population of elderly subjects – 26% in patients with COPD • Correlated strongly and independently with – dyspnea – pain – sleep quality – FVC • Baseline depression score was the strongest predictor of depression score at 6 months (r = 0.59, P < 0.00005) Ryerson CJ, et al. Respirology. 2012 ;17(3):525-32. Correlation of Dyspnea with Depression UCSD SOBQ Score (increasing dyspnea) All patients Patients with IPF ● Non-IPF o IPF Depression Score Ryerson CJ, et al. Chest. 2011;139(3):609-616. (N = 52, r = 0.50; P = 0.0002) (n = 20, r = 0.57; P = 0.009) Proposed Study: CaNoPy • UK mixed-methods cross-sectional study of care • Interviews – Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis • Validated patient questionnaires – Quality of life (EQ-5D) – Depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) – Breathlessness (Borg dyspnea scale) – Cough (Leicester Cough Questionnaire, Cough Symptom Score) Byrne A, et al.BMJ Open. 2013 Aug 7;3(8). pii: e003537. Conclusions • Comorbidities associated with IPF such as GERD, CPFE, CVD, sleep apnea, and depression should be treated • Clinical trials testing drugs approved for pulmonary hypertension in patients with IPF and PH have been negative on IPF endpoints – Other endpoints have been positive – Guidelines recommend against treating IPF patients for PH • Acute exacerbation is a serious complication of IPF