Download Independent Interactive Inquiry

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Pattern recognition wikipedia , lookup

Machine learning wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Independent Interactive InquiryBased (I3) Learning Modules
Lisa Green, Ph.D.
Scott McDaniel, Ed.D.
Ginger Rowell, Ph.D.
Marisella Castro, Graduate Assistant
Kai Guo, Graduate Assistant
Middle Tennessee State University
Outline
•
•
•
•
•
Hypothesis
Project Goals
Implementation
Results
Further Work
Hypothesis
By using audio-visual technology, interactive learning
modules for teaching statistics can be developed that
will provide opportunities for students to complete
inquiry-based learning independent of a teacher.
Project Goals
• Develop discovery-based interactive audio-visual
instructional modules to improve student learning
of post-calculus probability and statistics concepts.
• Evaluate the effectiveness of this learning approach
and these learning objects.
Implementation
Statistical Significance
http://mcdaniel.mtsu.edu/
I_cubed/I_cubed/
Learning Goals: Use simulation to help develop the
understanding of the concept of statistical significance.
Evaluation of Module
• The Statistical Significance module was assigned to
110 students in both Calculus-based and nonCalculus based classes.
• Students took a pre-test, then did the module.
Answers from the wrap-up portion of the module
were compared to answers from the pre-test.
Questions
• Pretest Question:
Define “p-value” in the context of a difference
between groups.
• Wrap-up Question:
If the p-value is around 5% or less, would you
say that the difference in the two groups is likely
to have occurred by some treatment other than
chance? Explain.
Rubric
• 4 points: Exemplary Response, All of the following
characteristics must be present.
• The answer is correct.
• The explanation is clear and complete.
• 3 points: Good Response, Exactly one of the
following characteristics is present.
• The answer is correct but there is a minor flaw
in wording
• The explanation lacks clarity
• The explanation is incomplete
Rubric (Continued)
• 2 points: Inadequate Response, Exactly two of the characteristics in the 3point section are present OR One or more of the following characteristics
are present.
• The answer is incorrect due to a major flaw the wording but
implies some understanding of the concept.
• Explanation lacks clarity or is incomplete but does indicate some
correct and relevant reasoning.
• There is a partial explanation but the thought is not carried out
• 1 point: Poor Response, two of the following characteristics must be
present.
• The answer is incorrect.
• The explanation, if any, uses irrelevant arguments.
• The explanation just restates the problem in other words
• 0 points: No Response
• The student’s paper is blank or contains only wording that
appears to have no relevance to the problem.
Rubric (Continued)
Examples for Statistical Significance:
• 4: The p-value is the probability of obtaining a result at least
as extreme as the given data point. The p-value of an
observed value is the probability that, given that the null
hypothesis is true, it will have a value as or more unfavorable
to the null hypothesis.
• 3: The p value provides evidence that the results do not occur
by random sampling variations alone.
• 2: P-values can indicate if there is a significant difference in
values or treatments.
• 1: The probability that an event will occur.
• 0: I don't know what it means.
Graders
There were 3 independent graders:
• A Graduate Assistant reviewed and graded each
response first.
• Each response was then graded separately by Dr.
Green and Dr. McDaniel.
• Lastly, Dr. Green and Dr. McDaniel met to discuss any
grading issues that may have come up during the
initial grading.
Results
Score
Pre-Test: Define “p-value” in the context of a
difference between groups.
four
4
three
4
two
Post
Test
Test
Wrong
0 to 2
Right
3 to 4
Wrong
0 to 2
66
36
Right
3 to 4
1
7
17
21
one
64
zero
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
Percentage
Post-Test: If the p-value is around 5% or less, would
you say that the difference in the two groups is likely
to have occurred by some treatment other than
chance?
four
4
three
Score
Pre
39
two
20
29
one
18
zero
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Percentage
0.5
0.6
0.7
Future Work
• Construct questions so that they can be
graded more easily.
• Change the wording of some questions
students may have found to be confusing.
• Prepare Learning Modules for release.
• Create addition modules.
I3 Learning Modules
This project has been made possible from funding by
the National Science Foundation (NSF) Division of
Undergraduate Education Materials Development
Proof-of-Concept grant.
NSF #0443088