Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Group Dynamics in Virtual Communities Fay Sudweeks Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition University of Sydney [email protected] www.arch.usyd.edu.au/~fay Overview • • • • • Aims of the research Research questions Groups Methodology Discourse analysis – Dimensions – Communication categories • Findings Aims of the Research • to explore a research perspective that gives equal attention to both computer mediation and human processes • to analyse the content of communication and participants’ perspectives within an computer-mediated group to understand more about communication management and developmental patterns in virtual communities • to evaluate the usefulness of the developed methodology for acquiring a deeper knowledge of communities generally and collaborative groups specifically in a networked environment • to suggest research questions for further studies Research Questions Organisational Issues • What are the developmental processes of a computermediated group (CMG)? • What factors contribute to the effective development of a CMG? • As a group develops, does it become more cooperative and cohesive, and is there a sense of group consciousness? Research Questions Communication Issues • What are the key communication processes in a CMG? • What are the factors that contribute to effective communication? • Do changes in communication patterns and communication management occur during the development of a CMG? If yes, how do these changes occur? Are the changes facilitated by management strategies? Research Questions Cultural Issues • In an environment where dramaturgical cues that signal power and sociocultural distance are weak, do communication patterns vary amongst people from different cultural backgrounds? • Does the group as a system become more homogeneous, i.e. less culturally diverse and more consistent in linguistic registers? • Does a networked environment facilitate the development of “cybersocialism”? Significance of the Research • A methodology that combines qualitative and quantitative analyses in an integrated approach. • A case study of a collaborating group which emerged from a broader environment and created its own shared aims and purposes in a networked environment. Groups Definition “A collection of individuals who perceive themselves to be members of the same social category, share some emotional involvement in this common definition of themselves, and achieve some degree of social consensus about the evaluation of their group and of their membership in it.” (Tajfel and Turner, 1986) Groups Definition “A collection of individuals who are conscious of belonging to a group, and are conscious that there are individuals who do not belong to the group.” • Response to concerns about the reality of a group. • Group norms - mutually acceptable definitions of behaviours - do not develop unless a concept of groupness or group consciousness is perceived. Methodology The quantitative/qualitative choice Quantitative Purpose of the enquiry Explain observed phenomena Qualitative Understand the meaning of observed phenomena Role of the researcher Objective role Participatory role Acquisition of Construct knowledge knowledge Presentation of Figures, graphs, tables research Discover knowledge Data fragments, quotes Methodology CEDA Framework Domain identification Scope of the research Data collection and selection of the data sets Combined explorative data analysis Linking qualitative and quantitative results Interpretation and presentation Methodology CEDA Framework Domain identification Scope of the research • Domain Examine sources (e.g. literature, transcripts) to define research question • Scope Select case(s) by theoretical, not random sampling Methodology CEDA Framework Data collection and selection of the data sets • Data collection • Specify rigorous data collection protocol • Select flexible and opportunistic data collection methods • Array events chronologically Methodology CEDA Framework Combined explorative data analysis Code to define: • Concepts: labels placed on discrete events • Categories: Classification of concepts • Properties: Attributes or characteristics pertaining to a category Methodology CEDA Framework Linking qualitative and quantitative results Domain identification • Link results • Compare emergent theory with sources • Compare with similar and conflicting frameworks • This improves internal validity and generalisability and establishes the domain Methodology CEDA Framework Interpretation and presentation • Interpret • • • No interpretation – present focused excerpts of data so that informants “speak for themselves” – reduces researcher’s biases and intrusion Descriptive interpretation – reduce and order data – selection and interpretation Theoretical interpretation (grounded theory) – conceptualise data – present framework for further research – integrate knowledge Methodology Quantitative analyses Phenomenon Formalisation v2 v1 v3 v4 v7 v8 v6 v5 vk v9 v1 v8 v3 v5 v6 v9 v2 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 xm X1,…,N vk v4 v7 y1 y2 yp Y1,…,N Analysis X Y R Methodology Qualitative analyses Phenomenon s1 Formalisation s2 s3 s4 s7 s8 s6 s5 sk s9 s1 s8 s3 s5 c1 s6 s9 s2 c2 sk s4 s7 cn Analysis c1 c2 ... cn C Participant observation 1 Discourse analysis 2 Content analysis 3 Online survey 4 Semi-structured interviews Integration of data sets 5 6 Regularities in interaction and models of communication in virtual communities Mass computer-mediated communication Methodology Case Study Participants NUMBER COUNTRIES INSTITUTIONS AGES BACKGROUND ~100 19—Australia, Brazil, Canada, Germany, GB, Greece, Hong Kong, Ireland, Israel, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, NZ, Poland, Singapore, Sweden, Switzerland, USA 86—universities and commercial firms early 20s to late 60s 40% social sciences, 35% humanities, 25% applied sciences Case study Frequency distribution of collaborative activity (N=1016), publicly archived on a CIOS (Communication Institute for Online Scholarship) hotline 250 215 184 150 101 100 93 74 6 8 2 5 7 Mar-94 16 Feb-94 8 25 15 Jan-94 5 37 Dec-93 18 Dec-92 11 10 47 42 40 Nov-93 47 Nov-92 50 Time (b y mon th) Oct-93 Sep-93 Aug-93 Jul-93 Jun-93 May-93 Apr-93 Mar-93 Feb-93 Jan-93 Oct-92 Sep-92 Aug-92 Jul-92 Jun-92 0 May-92 Number (of messages) Mes sages (by #) 200 Discourse Analysis • Dimensions – Preliminary review of the corpora identified five salient dimensions. • Turning points – Turning points are defined as a point in the discussions at which changes occur in the presence of a combination of dimensions, and thus delineates the beginning and end of a phase in group development. • Phases – Six major phases identified. • Communication categories – Management styles and communication content in each stage identified. Discourse Analysis Dimensions • Issues: topics to be discussed and resolved • Leadership: inclination to conform or reject leadership and authority • Debate: argumentativeness, criticism, aggression • Relationships: expressions or avoidance of friendship or intimacy • Action: goal-directed or task-directed activity Discourse Analysis ISSUES LEADERSHIP DEBATE RELATIONSHIPS ACTION PHASE 6 PHASE 5 PHASE 4 PHASE 3 PHASE 2 DIMENSIONS IDENTIFIED PHASE 1 Dimensions Discourse Analysis Communication categories Communication Management Formal Informal Communication Content Conceptual Action Socioemotional Discourse Analysis Communication Categories Management: Formal connected with the enforcement of rules and managing the process and production of knowledge and information generation. Example “We submit the following copyright policy, worded by the Copyright Committee, for consideration and ratification by the entire group...” Discourse Analysis Communication Categories Management: Informal collective informal creation, management, and enforcement of communication norms Example “We seem to be getting semi-serious about this. Maybe one tentative and fairly easy way to proceed is to appoint Barry and Ruby the “leaders” (not because they talk the most, but because this is already their research interest and they have some experience in it).” Discourse Analysis Communication Categories Content: Socioemotional deals with the interpersonal relationships among communicators Example “First ... I waded in here over the weekend, got into a barroom fight or two (there IS a certain amount of Dodge Citydom in the current situation), left, and was persuaded by Frank that I was not dealing with a crew of ogres, unemployed CIA operatives, and voyeurs...” Discourse Analysis Communication Categories Content: Conceptual involves the shared creation of mutual understandings and meanings among communicators Example “I think this study sounds like lots of fun, and would like very much to participate. Will you let me in? ... I propose trying to look at nature of threads in the discussions (protracted, multi-contributors, cyclical, substantive or meta-communication, etc.). I think we can come up with a fairly reliable set of measures and codebook for some of these.” Discourse Analysis Communication Categories Content: Action deals with the explicit work to be accomplished by participants in a communication process Example “In the following message, I humbly submit a codebook proposal... we should look the codebook over, react to it if necessary, and commence pretesting the codebook in a week or so...Next up for discussion, once the codebook is ratified, is sampling procedure for the project.” Discourse Analysis COMMUNICATION MANAGEMENT INFORMAL FORMAL SOCIO-EMOTIONAL COMMUNICATION CONTENT CONCEPTUAL ACTION PHASE 6 PHASE 5 PHASE 4 PHASE 3 PHASE 2 TYPES OF COMMUNICATION FEATURING IN GROUP DEVELOPMENTAL PHASES PHASE 1 Communication Patterns phase 1 forming norming phase 2 low performing phase 3 storming ROBBINS phase 4 phase 5 high performing phase 6 adjourning Summary Virtual Groups ... • take longer to develop norms and social relationships, and plan and assign tasks • after these initial phases, networked groups resemble faceto-face groups in development • in later phases, the effectiveness of networked groups increases hierarchical flattening can enhance networked groups providing the process is managed carefully • both task and socio-emotional needs can be satisfied