* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Status of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening in the United States
Telecommunications relay service wikipedia , lookup
Lip reading wikipedia , lookup
Hearing loss wikipedia , lookup
Noise-induced hearing loss wikipedia , lookup
Sensorineural hearing loss wikipedia , lookup
Audiology and hearing health professionals in developed and developing countries wikipedia , lookup
Status of EHDI Programs in the United States • Universal Newborn Hearing Screening • Effective Tracking and Follow-up as a part of the Public Health System • Appropriate and Timely Diagnosis of the Hearing Loss • Prompt Enrollment in Appropriate Early Intervention • A Medical Home for all Newborns • Culturally Competent Family Support 2384 1816 712 934 20 01 20 00 19 99 19 98 462 19 97 19 96 19 95 26 243 120 60 19 94 11 19 93 3 19 92 3 or ea rli er 19 91 2800 2600 2400 2200 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 19 90 Number of Programs Number of Hospitals Doing Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Jul-02 65 Jan-02 Jul-01 Jan-01 Jul-00 Jan-00 Jul-99 Jan-99 Jul-98 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 3 0 Jan-98 Jul-97 Jan-97 Jul-96 Jan-96 Jul-95 Jan-95 Jul-94 Jan-94 Jul-93 Jan-93 Number of Programs Percentage of Births Screened for Hearing Before Discharge 67 25 15 States with Legislative Mandates Related to Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Status of UNHS Legislative Mandates States with mandates No mandate, but statewide programs No mandate Status of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening in the United States (Dec 2001) . . Percentage of Births Screened 90%+ 51 - 90% 21 - 50% 1 - 20% 3 Status of EHDI Programs in the US: Universal Newborn Hearing Screening • With 2/3 all babies screened prior to discharge, newborn hearing screening is becoming the standard of care • There are hundreds of excellent programs - - - regardless of the type of equipment or protocol used • Many programs are still struggling with high refer rates and poor followup Typical UNHS Screening Protocols (example for 1,000 newborns) Inpatient Screening 1 Stage OAE / AABR Inpatient Screening Inpatient Screening Fail=80 Pass=920 Fail=40 Outpatient Screening n=80 Fail=10 Pass=90 Diagnosis n=10 Diagnosis n=40 Pass=960 Fail=20 Pass=980 Diagnosis n=20 Hearing Loss=3 Normal Hearing=7 Hearing Loss=3 Normal Hearing=37 Hearing Loss=3 Normal Hearing=17 Protocols Used in Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programs Screening Procedures Before Hospital Discharge After Hospital Discharge Percent of newborns screened OAE ABR OAE/ABR ------------------- 11.6% 23.3% 6.7% OAE OAE ABR ABR OAE/ABR OAE ABR OAE ABR OAE/ABR 21.4% 4.2% 2.8% 23.2% 6.4% Other protocol ---------- 0.3% Efficiency of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention 1999 (n=43,547) 2000 (n=46,771) 2001(6 mos) (n=23,307) Inpatient Refer Rates (state average) 10 most effective hospitals 10 least effective hospitals 85.2% 92.8% 70.7% 85.5% 93.4% 63.4% 87.5% 93.7% 74.4% Outpatient completion (state average) 10 most effective hospitals 10 least effective hospitals 70.1% 94.5% 45.3% 67.1% 95.9% 52.9% 68.3% 94.7% 58.08% Reported Completion of Diagnostic Evaluations (state average) 133 of 357 37.3% 165 of 380 43.4% 41 of 110* 40% % of babies who complete Diagnostic Eval & have permanent hearing loss 33 of 133 24.8% 65 of 165 39.4% 12 of 41* 29.3% Number of babies still “in process” 224 215 69 *only 3 months worth of data Status of EHDI Programs in the United States • Universal Newborn Hearing Screening • Effective Tracking and Follow-up as a part of the Public Health System Rate Per 1000 of Permanent Childhood Hearing Loss in UNHS Programs Site Sample Size Prevalence Per 1000 % of Refers with Diagnosis Rhode Island (3/93 - 6/94) 16,395 1.71 42% Colorado (1/92 - 12/96) 41,976 2.56 48% New York (1/96 - 12/96) 27,938 1.65 67% Utah (7/93 - 12/94) 4,012 2.99 73% Hawaii (1/96 - 12/96) 9,605 4.15 98% Tracking and Data Management • 75% of states report at least some hospitals submit data to state about results of their screening program • For those getting data, information was submitted for 62% of the births in last quarter • 33% if submissions do not include identifying information --- making follow-up by state impossible • Only 17% of states currently have any kind of linkage with other data systems (eg, Vital Statistics, metabolic, EI, Immunizations) Status of EHDI Programs in the United States • Universal Newborn Hearing Screening • Effective Tracking and Follow-up as a part of the Public Health System • Appropriate and Timely Diagnosis of the Hearing Loss Audiological Diagnosis • Equipment and techniques for diagnosis of hearing loss in infants continues to improve • Severe shortages in experienced pediatric audiologists delays confirmation of hearing loss • State coordinators estimate 56.1% “receive diagnostic evaluations by 3 months of age Availability of Pediatric Audiolgists 20 15 13 9 10 6 5 6 5 2 0 1 .0 14 m or e or 0 .0 0 .0 14 10 00 6. 00 4. to to to to 1 .0 10 01 6. 01 4. 01 2. 00 2. 0- Pediatric Audiolgists per 10,000 Births per year EHDI Materials Available from “State” Programs (n=54) General Screening Brochure 39 states What To Do If Your Baby Refers 35 states What To Do If Your Baby has a Hearing Loss 41 states Guidelines for Audiologic Diagnostic Evaluations 30 states List of Qualified Pediatric Audiologists 39 states Brochure about Genetics of Hearing Loss 7 states Fair or Excellent Availability of Materials in other Languages 34 states Confirmation of Permanent Hearing Loss 35 Coplan (1987) 19 Eissman et al. (1987) 30 Gustason (1987) 30 Meadow-Orlans (1987) 24 Yoshinago-Itano (1995) 25 Stein et al. (1990) 31 Mace et al. (1991) 56 O'Neil (1996) 3 Johnson et al. (1997)* 3 Vohr et al. (1998)* 0 10 20 30 40 50 Average Age in Months 60 70 Status of EHDI Programs in the United States • Universal Newborn Hearing Screening • Effective Tracking and Follow-up as a part of the Public Health System • Appropriate and Timely Diagnosis of the Hearing Loss • Prompt Enrollment in Appropriate Early Intervention Early Intervention • Part C of IDEA is an under used resource • 96% of state coordinators know who the Part C coordinator is • 74% of states have someone on the IDEA Interagency Coordinating Council with experience / expertise in hearing loss with infants • State Coordinators estimate: – 53% of infants with hearing loss are enrolled in EI programs before 6 months of age – 31% of states have adequate range of choices for type of EI programs Percentage of State Coordinators Who Rate Early Intervention Programs in His/Her State as Good or Excellent For children with: bilateral severe/profound losses 63% bilateral mild/moderate losses 56% unilateral losses 46% Status of EHDI Programs in the United States • Universal Newborn Hearing Screening • Effective Tracking and Follow-up as a part of the Public Health System • Appropriate and Timely Diagnosis of the Hearing Loss • Prompt Enrollment in Appropriate Early Intervention • A Medical Home for all Newborns EHDI and the Medical Home Birthing Hospital Parent Groups Audiology Mental Health Primary Provider 3rd Party Payers ENT Child/Family Deaf Community Services for Hearing Loss Early Intervention Programs Genetics State Coordinator’s Ratings of Obstacles to Effective EHDI Programs Serious or Extremely Serious Obstacle Unwillingness of third-party payers to reimburse for hearing screening 28% Physicians don’t know enough about Hearing screening, diagnosis, and intervention 41% Shortage of qualified pediatric audiologists 49% Status of EHDI Programs in the United States • Universal Newborn Hearing Screening • Effective Tracking and Follow-up as a part of the Public Health System • Appropriate and Timely Diagnosis of the Hearing Loss • Prompt Enrollment in Appropriate Early Intervention • A Medical Home for all Newborns • Culturally Competent Family Support Parent’s Attitudes About Newborn Hearing Screening After all hearing tests were completed, how did you feel? Strongly Agree or Agree Worried about my baby’s hearing 11% Confused about the results of screening tests 10% Glad hearing screening is done at this hospital 91% Confident the hearing tests were correct 91% Frustrated by how long it took to get results 13% Happy with the professional way screening was done 86% Confident about what I needed to do next 88% If the analysis is limited to those whose babies did not pass the inpatient or outpatient screen After all hearing tests were completed, how did you feel? Worried about my baby’s hearing Strongly Agree or Agree total group subgroup 11% 24% Confused about the results of screening tests 10% 24% Glad hearing screening is done at this hospital 91% 70% Confident the hearing tests were correct 91% 70% Frustrated by how long it took to get results 13% 28% Happy with the professional way screening was done 86% 76% Confident about what I needed to do next 88% 56% Information Information Wanted Wanted vs. vs. Received Received by by Parents Parents at Hearing Loss Confirmation Degree of loss Auditory system Amplification Educational options Speech/Lang dev Wanted Received Etiology Home activities *Written Information *Financial Support *Emotional Support *Parent Contacts *Referral Sources 0 20 40 60 80 Martin, George, O'Neal, & Daly (1987); *Sweetow & Barrager (1980) 100 “I am a great believer in luck, and I find that the harder I work, the more I have of it.” ---Thomas Jefferson