Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Cytomegalovirus promotes expansion of preexisting T-cell immunity following allogeneic transplantation significantly modulating chimerism status Rob S. Sellar, Frederick Arce Vargas, Jake Y. Henry, Stephanie Verfuerth, Sarah Charrot, Sergio A. Quezada, Stephen Mackinnon, Kirsty J. Thomson, and Karl S. Peggs* University College London Cancer Institute The Dogma • CMV reactivations are increased if you T-deplete • Highest risk population R+/D• New therapeutic strategies are needed What if it is wrong? What if it is wrong? CMV reactivations What if it is wrong? CMV reactivations Days of treatment Problematic CMV reactivations are associated with low levels of recipient chimerism CMV reactivations Problematic CMV reactivations are associated with low levels of recipient chimerism CMV reactivations Days of treatment Problematic CMV reactivations are restricted to patients with significant GvHD CMV reactivations p < 0.0001 Number of CMV reactivations 15 10 5 0 Significant GvHD Nonsignificant/No GvHD Problematic CMV reactivations are restricted to patients with significant GvHD Days of treatment CMV reactivations p < 0.0001 Number of days of treatment for CMV Number of CMV reactivations 15 p = 0.0003 10 5 0 Significant GvHD Nonsignificant/No GvHD 500 400 300 200 100 0 Significant GvHD Nonsignificant/No GvHD Patients with significant GvHD had lower absolute lymphocyte counts CMV appears to influence levels of recipient chimerism CMV appears to influence levels of recipient chimerism CMV appears to influence levels of recipient chimerism CMV influences chimerism even in the absence of GvHD Streptamer positive cells are exclusively of recipient origin Streptamer positive cells are exclusively of recipient origin Donor Recipient CD4+ CD8+ Strep- CD8+ Strep+ Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 3 DLI can be followed by a primary immune response to CMV Donor Recipient CD8+ Strep- Pre-DLI 4 weeks 8 weeks 12 weeks 18 weeks CD8+ Strep+ CD4+ Conclusions • recipient-derived virus-specific T cells that have escaped deletion during non-myeloablative conditioning can protect against recurrent CMV infection • expansion of these cells post transplant has a significant influence on levels of recipient chimerism • “Campath Paradox” - T cell-depletion in the R+D- setting may paradoxically foster more rapid reconstitution of protective antiviral immunity by reducing graft-versus-host directed alloreactivity and the associated elimination of the recipient T cell compartment Acknowledgements • UCL Cancer Institute • Tumour Immunogy Group – Dr Karl S Peggs – Dr Sergio A Quesada – Dr Frederick Arce Vargas – Jake Y Henry • Royal Free Hospital – Professor Stephen Mackinnon – Stephanie Verfuerth • UCLH – Dr Kirsty Thomson – Dr Sarah Charrot