Survey							
                            
		                
		                * Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
The Union in Peril 1848-1860 Four Main Causes of the Civil War  Slavery  Constitutional Disputes: States’ Rights vs. Federal Rights  Economic Differences: Industrialized North vs. the Agricultural South  Political Blunders and Extremism Conflict over Territorial Status  Northern Democrats and the Whigs supported the Wilmot Proviso  Were they abolitionists?  They supported the exclusion of ALL blacks from the Mexican Cession. The Free-Soilers  They did not demand the end of slavery, just the extension of it.  They wanted to keep the West for whites only so there would be no competition with slaves OR free blacks.  Party slogan: “free soil, free labor, and free men”  Advocated free homesteads and internal improvements Southern Position  Disliked abolitionists and FreeSoilers.  Moderates: wanted an extension of the Missouri Compromise line westward Popular Sovereignty  Proposed by Lewis Cass (MO-D)  Slavery should be determined by popular vote. The Election of 1848  Lewis Cass (Democrat): platform was popular sovereignty  Zachary Taylor (Whig): took no position on slavery in the new territories  Martin Van Buren (Free-Soil): Consisted of “conscience” Whigs and anti-slavery Democrats  Taylor defeated Cass because the Free-Soil party took away many Democrats’ votes The Compromise of 1850  1849: CA Constitution banned slavery  President Taylor supported the free admission of CA and NM  Taylor’s actions sparked talk of secession  Henry Clay proposed the following:  Admit CA as a free state  Divide rest of Mexican Cession in UT and NM: allow popular sovereignty to decide the issue  Disputed land in TX and NM to be given to the new territories in exchange for the assumption of TX $10 million debt  Ban slave trade in DC but still allow whites to hold slaves  Adopt and enforce a new Fugitive Slave Law Compromise Debate  Henry Clay (KY): for compromise  Daniel Webster (MA): argued for compromise to save the Union and alienated his abolitionist supporters  John C. Calhoun (SC): argued against compromise and for states’ rights  William H. Seward (NY): against the compromise and argued that there was a higher law than the Constitution  Stephen A. Douglas (IL): prepared the components of the compromise for separate passage  President Fillmore, succeeding Taylor, signed the compromises into law. Fugitive Slave Law  Northerners were obligated to return escaped slaves to the South  Fugitive slave cases were placed under the jurisdiction of the federal government  They were denied the right of trial by jury Underground Railroad  Not dominated by white abolitionists  Northern free blacks and ex-slaves were the main “conductors”  Harriet Tubman: 19 trips and helped 300 slaves escape  Frederick Douglass and Sojourner Truth also took an active role Literature  Uncle Tom’s Cabin (1852) by Harriet Beecher Stowe; promoted abolitionism in both the North and in Europe  Lincoln: “So you’re the little woman who wrote the book that made this great war.”  Impending Crisis of the South (1857) by Hinton Helper showed that slavery hurt the Southern economy  Southerners argued that slavery was sanctioned by the Bible.  George Fitzhugh argued that the northern capitalist wage system was worse than slavery. Election of 1852  General Winfield Scott (Whig): ignored the issue of slavery and concentrated on internal improvements.  Franklin Pierce (Democrat-NH): acceptable to the South because he supported the Fugitive Slave Law  The Democrats won all but 4 states. Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854)  Democrat Stephen Douglas wanted to win support to build a transcontinental railroad.  He obtained southern approval by introducing this bill.  Two states would be formed and popular sovereignty would decide the issue.  Both territories were located North of the Missouri Compromise line.  Renewed the sectional controversy.  A new antislavery party was born: the Republicans. New Parties  Know-Nothing Party: opposition to Catholics and immigrants  Republican Party  Founded in 1854 in Racine, WI  Direct reaction to the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act  Coalition of free-soilers, antislavery Whigs and Democrats made up the party  Asked for a repeal of the KansasNebraska Act and the Fugitive Slave Law  Abolitionists would join later Election of 1856  Republican: John C. Fremont (CA)  Know-Nothings: former President Millard Fillmore  Democrats: James Buchanan  Democrats won, but Fremont carried 11/16 free states Bleeding Kansas  Settled by antislavery farmers from the Midwest  Slaveholders from MO set up homesteads  New England Emigrant Aid Society: paid for the transportation of antislavery settlers  Proslavery Missourians created a proslavery legislature in Lecompton, KS  Antislavery settlers created own The Caning  Senator Charles Sumner attacked the administration about its handling of “Bleeding Kansas”  Included personal attacks on SC Senator Andrew Butler  Butler’s nephew, Congressman Preston Brooks beat Sumner over the head with a cane  Northerners were angry and voted for censure, but Southerners sent Brooks numerous canes to replace his broken one