Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Understanding the eating disorder and mental health needs of people with PWS Behaviour and mental health in PWS Bewleys Hotel, Dublin Tuesday 19th April 2013 Tony Holland Cambridge Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Group Department of Psychiatry www.ciddrg.org.uk Outline • Introduction to PWS – Characteristics over the lifespan (phenotype) – Genetics (genotype) • Eating behaviour and risk of obesity • Physical ill-health – Obesity related co-morbidities – Other physical illnesses • Mental ill-health and problem behaviours • Implications for services and support – Importance of the environment PWS over the lifespan Intra-uterine (placental) • Poor growth • Limited foetal movement • High rates atypical births Gender specific genomic imprinting C/D box snoRNA SNORD 116 (HBII-85) Infancy • Extreme hypotonia • Failure to thrive Childhood • • • • • Developmental delay – intellectual disabilities Short statute – relative growth hormone deficiency Sexual immaturity – sex hormone deficiencies Over-eating - risk of severe obesity and its complications Scoliosis, respiratory disorders, maladaptive behaviours Adulthood • Increased risk of obesity (with greater independence) • Age-related physical and psychiatric morbidity McAllister et al, International Journal of Obesity 2011 Display of normal human chromosome complement Pairs 1 to 23 Chr 15 pair Y chromosome X chromosome Schematic of chromosome abnormalities resulting in PWS Chromosome 15 70% 25% <5% Cambridge PWS Study Assuming no age-specific ascertainment bias Estimated birth incidence 1:29,000 Estimated population prevalence 1:52,000 Estimated mortality rate: 3% across the age-range or 7% per year over age 30 Whittington et al, 2001 Eating disorder in PWS • Initial presentation – Failure to thrive – Development of over-eating • Mechanisms – Abnormality of satiety – Increased reward value of food • Implications – Childhood – Adult life Intra-uterine and peri-natal problems • Abnormal foetal growth (small for dates at gestation) (imprinted genes and placental function) • Reduced foetal movement • Increased rates of caesarean section • Polyhydramnios (excess intra-uterine fluid) Dudley et al 2007 Early Human Development 83: 471 Whittington et al (2008). Early Human Development, 84: 331-336. Characteristics that predicts +genetics •Hypotonia at birth and failure to thrive •Developmental delay and learning disabilities •Undescended testes at birth •Over-eating behaviour Whittington et al 2003 J Med Genet, 39, 926 Weight and height in infancy Deletions only Mean difference between wt & ht centiles By age- Deletions (wt-ht) Mean no centiles +- 2 SE 6 3 0 -3 N= 9 19 birth 20 16 6m 3m 14 1yr 9m 14 13 11 18m 15m 21m 11 2y 9 10 9 30m 27m 33m 9 3y 9 8 6 42m 39m 6 4 4y w t 45m 4 2 54m 51m 57m Weight and height in infancy Non-deletions only (UPD) Mean difference between wt & ht centiles By age - non deletions Mean no centiles +- 2 SE 6 3 0 -3 N= 10 20 birth 23 22 6m 3m 21 1y 9m 17 14 14 18m 15m 21m 9 2y 8 8 8 30m 27m 33m 7 3y 7 7 8 42m 39m 45m 6 4y 6 5 4 54m 51m 57m Weight chart of young adult with PWS Holland et al. (1993). Measurement of excessive appetite and metabolic changes in Prader-Willi Syndrome. International Journal of Obesity: 17:527-532. PWS PET functional brain imaging study Hunger condition Post meal condition Controls PWS The high calorie meal (in comparison to fasting) did not result in the same pattern of brain activation that was found following food intake in those without PWS No activations survived the analysis once the correction for multiple comparisons was applied Hinton et al (2006). Neural Representations of hunger and satiety in Prader-Willi syndrome. International Journal of Obesity 30:313-321 Satiety Cascade Blundell, 1991 Brain control of food intake Regulation of food intake is controlled by a combination of signals to and from the brain. People with PWS have delayed and impaired satiety and may be lacking or insensitive to peripheral signals to the brain. Farooqi, Oxford Textbook of Medicine Signals from fat cells Signals from the gut Why the eating disorder? • The Paradox of PWS: a genetic model of starvation – Holland et al, Lancet, 2003, 362, 989-991 • Disruption of the hypothalamic feeding pathways or high threshold set for satiety (Barker hypothesis) – McAllister et al, International Journal of Obesity, 2011 Eating disorder • Feeding support after birth and in infancy • At transition biological abnormality of satiety and/or reward mechanisms associated with food becomes apparent; • No specific treatment as yet for the eating disorder; • Supervised access to food prevents obesity (and associated morbidity) and may help wellbeing; • Strategies to help manage the tension between choice and the need to control access to food Morbidity in PWS Rates of reported illness <18years Diabetes (type II) 0 Respiratory 18/34 (53%) Scoliosis 9/34 (26%) Fractures 7/34 (21%) Butler et al 2002 >17years 8/32 (25%) 12/32 (38%) 10/31 (32%) 12/32 (38%) Morbidity in PWS Sleep disorders: • • • • Noisy or disturbed sleep Exc. daytime sleepiness Diagnosis of sleep apnoea Diagnosis of narcolepsy 40/63 (64%) 47/64 (73%) 13/64 (20%) 1/64 Mean BMI of those with diagnosis of sleep disorder 36kg/m2 vs 29.6kg/m2 (p>0.05) MENTAL HEALTH Behaviour in PWS Population-based study Prevalence (%) of specific behaviours (n=65) Definite sometime none Excessive eating 78 21 1 Obsessional 70 23 7 Tempers 67 27 6 Skin picking 59 22 19 Mood swings 38 19 43 Holland et al 2003, Psychological Medicine The detection of mental ill-health • The prevention and management of problem behaviours depended on your understanding of those behaviours; • The development of a psychiatric illness may present with a change in behaviour • The key to intervention is a good history and mental state examination and formulation • Long standing or of recent onset • Change in nature and severity of existing behavioural difficulties • Evidence of disturbed mood or abnormal mental experiences Mental illness • • • • Characteristics Prevalence Mechanisms Implications Psychiatric illness in PWS • Kollrack and Wolff 1966 • Since then, over 20 studies describing the association of PWS with psychiatric illness • Most describe an affective psychosis with characteristic features • However, some methodological problems: – Small sample size – Not genetically confirmed Population-based Study of PWS Psychotic Illness (Boer et al, Lancet, 2002) Number with psychotic illness (7/25 28%) Age 18-27 Del (15q11-13) 0/4 UPD 0/3 Other 0/3 Total 0/10 *Imprinting centre defect age 28+ 1/9 (11%) 5/5 (100%) 1/1* 7/15 (49%) Method Soni et al 2008 • 46 of 119 (38.7%) adults screened positive for psychopathology – 24 Deletion, 22 mUPD • Further assessment included: – Psychiatric Assessment Schedule for Adults with Developmental Disability (PAS-ADD) – Operational criteria checklist for psychotic and affective illness (OPCRIT) – Family History Questionnaire – modified Life Events Questionnaire – Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) Soni et al 2008, Psychological Medicine, 38, 1505 Prevalence of psychiatric illness Genetic subtype Psychotic illness more common in mUPD than deletion p<0.001, effect size 0.45 Deletion (n=85) 71.8 11.8 16.5 No psychopathology History of non-psychotic illness History of psychotic symptoms UPD (n=34) 35.3 0% 20% 2.9 40% 61.8 60% 80% Percentage of participants 100% Psychiatric Diagnosis Non-psychotic depressive illness more common in deletion than mUPD p=0.005, effect size 0.43 Genetic subtype Deletion (n=24) 10 9 0 Non-psychotic depression 5 Depressive psychosis UPD (n=22) 1 6 Comparison 0 3 (n=15) 2 0 11 4 Bipolar illness w ith psychotic symptoms Psychotic illness 10 5 10 15 Count 20 25 30 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Deletion (n=12) Hypersomnia Disturbed sleep Decreased appetite Increase in food seeking behaviour Agitation* Poor concentration Loss of confidence Disomy (n=19) Loss of energy Percentage of people Graph to show symptoms in participants with psychotic symptoms (n=31) Symptoms *Difference between genetic subtypes on scores of “agitation”: Fishers Exact test 2 sided; p<0.05 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Symptoms Exaggerated self esteem Overactivity Distractibility Overtalkativeness Pressing, racing thoughts Expansive mood Number of people Symptoms of hypomania in people with psychotic symptoms (n=31) Deletion (n=12) Disomy (n=19) Au di to ry Vi h a su ll a l ucin Ta ha at ct l l u c io n i l e s O lfa ha inat io ll to ns ry uci ha na t Th llu c ions ou ina gh tio t d ns Ca An iso ta r to y de der ni lu c sy sio In mp n sig to ht ms pr es en t Number of people Frequency of psychotic symptoms 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Deletion (n=12) Disomy (n=19) Symptom Summary of phenomenology • Evidence of mood related psychiatric illness; • Hypomanic symptoms and agitation more pronounced in those with mUPD; • Delusions predominately persecutory in both people with deletion and mUPD; • Auditory and visual hallucinations present in both groups; Hypothetical model for the development of psychiatric illness in PWS • “Two-hit” model • Hit 1: having PWS (?5HT2cR related) • Hit 2: mUPD paternally imprinted gene on 15 • Act in synergy to lead to development of psychotic illness • What is the normal function of the presumed paternally imprinted gene that predisposes to affective disorder when there is excess expression and how has it become imprinted during evolution? • Might a variant of that gene predispose to affective disorder in the general population? Prevention, understanding and intervention • The importance of structure, rules, and supportive and informed staff – prevention • The importance of longitudinal knowledge – understanding • Interventions based on a sound understanding - treatment Finally…. • Understand the specific needs of people with PWS • Understand the individual with PWS • Do not place people with PWS in situations that are intolerable • Manage the environment • Strategies to compensate for social and cognitive impairments