Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
#16 – Flexible D-R Model for MOA Including Multiple Pathways - Acrylamide • Goal: How to model low-dose cancer risk if two MOAs are operating in different dose ranges • Method: Evaluate MOAs using modified Hill criteria; choose models based on MOAs – Focus is thyroid tumors, considered relevant to humans – Genotoxicity (mainly low-dose region) and growth stimulation from thyroid hormone (higher dose) – Fit d-r model that captures the MOAs • Demonstration: not a Gold Standard • Team: Hertzberg, Dourson, Allen, Vincent, Haber Method for D-R Modeling of Multiple MOAs • Evaluate MOAs using modified Hill criteria – Increase in key processes -> increase in tumors – Focus is thyroid tumors, considered relevant to humans – Genotoxicity (mainly low-dose region) and growth stimulation from thyroid hormone (higher dose) • Choose models based on MOAs – Low dose genotoxicity • Low dose data: shallow slope, linear, no threshold – Higher dose growth stimulation • Threshold, higher slope Input Acrylamide/Glycidamide PBPK/PD PBPK-1 Acrylamide (AA) PBPK-2 Glycidamide (GA) metabolism urine 1st order metabolism Input urine Hemoglobin Adducts DNA Adducts 1st order metabolism repair turn over PD PBPK-3 Acrylamide metabolite (AA-GS) PBPK-4 Glycidamide metabolites (GA-GS2 + GA-GS3) urine urine 3 Modeling Options • Multiple models – Best if have MOA-specific, independent data sets • Single model with MOA threshold – Statistically similar to multiple models, but simultaneous model fitting with joined models – Estimation of break point requires more data • Single model with desired slope properties – Flat and no threshold at lowest dose – Higher slope at upper doses Example Models 19 Dose groups but only 7 distinct doses to suggest curvature Results • Low dose region – health-protective, linear cancer slope factor (SF) of 0.030 (mg/kg-day)-1 – also applies to higher doses • Higher dose region – Reference Dose (RfD) in the range of 0.05 to 0.02 mg/kg-day Remaining Issues • Risk Communication? – What does dose>RfD (e.g., =0.06) imply re cancer risk? • What experimental design is the minimum for direct estimation of the transition dose? – Need change in curvature, not just in response • Can nonlinear mutagenicity be biologically modeled? Multistage model fitted to pooled-all thyroid tumor data, showing little change in slope between the low and high dose regions. Probit model fitted to pooled-all thyroid tumor data, showing differing slopes between the low and high dose regions.